Corrigendum to “Oscillatory entrainment of the motor cortical network during motor imagery is modulated by the feedback modality” [Neuroimage 111 (2015): 1-11, (S1053811915000853), (10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.058)];Oscillatory entrainment of the motor cortical network during motor imagery is modulated by the feedback modality

NeuroImage

Volumn 111, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-11

  Vukelić, Mathias ^a   Gharabaghi, Alireza ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beta rhythms; Brain self regulation; Brain computer interface; Brain machine interface; Brain robot interface; Functional connectivity; Haptic feedback; Neurorehabilitation; Proprioceptive feedback; Theta rhythms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOREGULATION; BETA RHYTHM; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; MALE; MOTOR IMAGERY; MOTOR SYSTEM; NEUROFEEDBACK; NORMAL HUMAN; PROPRIOCEPTIVE FEEDBACK; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THETA RHYTHM; VISUAL FEEDBACK; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; IMAGINATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BETA RHYTHM; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE NET; PROPRIOCEPTION; THETA RHYTHM; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923017810     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120698     Document Type: Erratum

References (79)

1. Andersen R.A., Snyder L.H., Bradley D.C., Xing J. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1997, 20:303-330. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303.
2. Andrew C., Pfurtscheller G. Event-related coherence as a tool for studying dynamic interaction of brain regions. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996, 98:144-148.
3. Ang K.K., Guan C., Chua K.S.G., Ang B.T., Kuah C.W.K., Wang C., Phua K.S., Chin Z.Y., Zhang H. A large clinical study on the ability of stroke patients to use an EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2011, 42:253-258.
4. Ang K.K., Guan C., Phua K.S., Wang C., Zhou L., Tang K.Y., Ephraim Joseph G.J., Kuah C.W.K., Chua K.S.G. Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke. Front. Neuroeng. 2014, 7:30. 10.3389/fneng.2014.00030.
5. Bai O., Huang D., Fei D.-Y., Kunz R. Effect of real-time cortical feedback in motor imagery-based mental practice training. NeuroRehabilitation 2014, 34:355-363. 10.3233/NRE-131039.
6. Bauer R., Gharabaghi A. Estimating cognitive load during self-regulation of brain activity and neurofeedback with therapeutic brain-computer interfaces. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 9:21. 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00021.
7. Bauer R., Gharabaghi A. Reinforcement learning for adaptive threshold control of restorative brain-computer interfaces: a Bayesian simulation. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9:69. 10.3389/fnins.2015.00036.
8. Bauer R., Fels M., Vukelić M., Ziemann U., Gharabaghi A. Bridging the gap between motor imagery and motor execution with a brain-robot interface. NeuroImage 2015, 108:319-327.
9. Beuter A., Modolo J. Delayed and lasting effects of deep brain stimulation on locomotion in Parkinson's disease. Chaos 2009, 19:026114. 10.1063/1.3127585.
10. Birbaumer N., Cohen L.G. Brain-computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J. Physiol. Lond. 2007, 579:621-636. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125633.
11. Boe S., Gionfriddo A., Kraeutner S., Tremblay A., Little G., Bardouille T. Laterality of brain activity during motor imagery is modulated by the provision of source level neurofeedback. NeuroImage 2014, 101C:159-167. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.066.
12. Brittain J.-S., Sharott A., Brown P. The highs and lows of beta activity in cortico-basal ganglia loops. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2014, 39:1951-1959. 10.1111/ejn.12574.
13. Brookes M.J., Wood J.R., Stevenson C.M., Zumer J.M., White T.P., Liddle P.F., Morris P.G. Changes in brain network activity during working memory tasks: a magnetoencephalography study. NeuroImage 2011, 55:1804-1815. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.074.
14. Buch E., Weber C., Cohen L.G., Braun C., Dimyan M.A., Ard T., Mellinger J., Caria A., Soekadar S., Fourkas A., Birbaumer N. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke 2008, 39:910-917. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505313.
15. Buch E.R., Modir Shanechi A., Fourkas A.D., Weber C., Birbaumer N., Cohen L.G. Parietofrontal integrity determines neural modulation associated with grasping imagery after stroke. Brain 2012, 135:596-614. 10.1093/brain/awr331.
16. Caplan J.B., Madsen J.R., Schulze-Bonhage A., Aschenbrenner-Scheibe R., Newman E.L., Kahana M.J. Human theta oscillations related to sensorimotor integration and spatial learning. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:4726-4736.
17. Cruikshank L.C., Singhal A., Hueppelsheuser M., Caplan J.B. Theta oscillations reflect a putative neural mechanism for human sensorimotor integration. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 107:65-77. 10.1152/jn.00893.2010.
18. Daly J.J., Wolpaw J.R. Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7:1032-1043. 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70223-0.
19. Davis N.J., Tomlinson S.P., Morgan H.M. The role of β-frequency neural oscillations in motor control. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:403-404. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 5106-11.2012.
20. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134:9-21. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009.
21. Desmurget M., Sirigu A. A parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 2009, 13:411-419. 10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.001.
22. Dobkin B.H. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2004, 3:528-536. 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00851-8.
23. Doyon J., Benali H. Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2005, 15:161-167. 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.004.
24. Ewald A., Marzetti L., Zappasodi F., Meinecke F.C., Nolte G. Estimating true brain connectivity from EEG/MEG data invariant to linear and static transformations in sensor space. NeuroImage 2012, 60:476-488. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.084.
25. Fetz E.E. Volitional control of neural activity: implications for brain-computer interfaces. J. Physiol. Lond. 2007, 579:571-579. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.127142.
26. Feurra M., Pasqualetti P., Bianco G., Santarnecchi E., Rossi A., Rossi S. State-dependent effects of transcranial oscillatory currents on the motor system: what you think matters. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:17483-17489. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 1414-13.2013.
27. Gandolla M., Ferrante S., Molteni F., Guanziroli E., Frattini T., Martegani A., Ferrigno G., Friston K., Pedrocchi A., Ward N.S. Re-thinking the role of motor cortex: context-sensitive motor outputs?. NeuroImage 2014, 91C:366-374. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.011.
28. Gao Q., Duan X., Chen H. Evaluation of effective connectivity of motor areas during motor imagery and execution using conditional Granger causality. NeuroImage 2011, 54:1280-1288. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.071.
29. Gharabaghi A., Kraus D., Leão M.T., Spüler M., Walter A., Bogdan M., Rosenstiel W., Naros G., Ziemann U. Coupling brain-machine interfaces with cortical stimulation for brain-state dependent stimulation: enhancing motor cortex excitability for neurorehabilitation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:122. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00122.
30. Gharabaghi A., Naros G., Walter A., Grimm F., Schuermeyer M., Roth A., Bogdan M., Rosenstiel W., Birbaumer N. From assistance towards restoration with epidural brain-computer interfacing. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2014, 32:517-525. 10.3233/RNN-140387.
31. Gharabaghi A., Naros G., Khademi F., Jesser J., Spüler M., Walter A., Bogdan M., Rosenstiel W., Birbaumer N. Learned self-regulation of the lesioned brain with epidural electrocorticography. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2014, 8:429. 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00429.
32. Gomez-Rodriguez M., Peters J., Hill J., Schölkopf B., Gharabaghi A., Grosse-Wentrup M. Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery. J. Neural Eng. 2011, 8:036005. 10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/036005.
33. Halsband U., Lange R.K. Motor learning in man: a review of functional and clinical studies. J. Physiol. Paris 2006, 99:414-424. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.007.
34. Hardwick R.M., Rottschy C., Miall R.C., Eickhoff S.B. A quantitative meta-analysis and review of motor learning in the human brain. NeuroImage 2013, 67:283-297. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.020.
35. Herrojo Ruiz M., Brücke C., Nikulin V.V., Schneider G.-H., Kühn A.A. Beta-band amplitude oscillations in the human internal globus pallidus support the encoding of sequence boundaries during initial sensorimotor sequence learning. NeuroImage 2014, 85:779-793. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.085.
36. Hipp J.F., Engel A.K., Siegel M. Oscillatory synchronization in large-scale cortical networks predicts perception. Neuron 2011, 69:387-396. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.027.
37. Kaplan R., Doeller C.F., Barnes G.R., Litvak V., Düzel E., Bandettini P.A., Burgess N. Movement-related theta rhythm in humans: coordinating self-directed hippocampal learning. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10:e1001267. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001267.
38. Kelly A.M.C., Garavan H. Human functional neuroimaging of brain changes associated with practice. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1089-1102. 10.1093/cercor/bhi005.
39. Kilavik B.E., Zaepffel M., Brovelli A., MacKay W.A., Riehle A. The ups and downs of β oscillations in sensorimotor cortex. Exp. Neurol. 2013, 245:15-26. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.09.014.
40. Lemm S., Müller K.-R., Curio G. A generalized framework for quantifying the dynamics of EEG event-related desynchronization. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000453. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000453.
41. Lloyd D., Morrison I., Roberts N. Role for human posterior parietal cortex in visual processing of aversive objects in peripersonal space. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 95:205-214. 10.1152/jn.00614.2005.
42. Maris E., Schoffelen J.-M., Fries P. Nonparametric statistical testing of coherence differences. J. Neurosci. Methods 2007, 163:161-175. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.02.011.
43. McFarland D.J., Wolpaw J.R. Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface (BCI): model order selection for autoregressive spectral analysis. J. Neural Eng. 2008, 5:155-162. 10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/006.
44. McFarland D.J., Miner L.A., Vaughan T.M., Wolpaw J.R. Mu and beta rhythm topographies during motor imagery and actual movements. Brain Topogr. 2000, 12:177-186.
45. Miller K.J., Schalk G., Fetz E.E., den Nijs M., Ojemann J.G., Rao R.P.N. Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:4430-4435. 10.1073/pnas.0913697107.
46. Miller K.J., Hermes D., Honey C.J., Hebb A.O., Ramsey N.F., Knight R.T., Ojemann J.G., Fetz E.E. Human motor cortical activity is selectively phase-entrained on underlying rhythms. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8:e1002655. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002655.
47. Neuper C., Scherer R., Reiner M., Pfurtscheller G. Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 25:668-677. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.014.
48. Nolte G., Bai O., Wheaton L., Mari Z., Vorbach S., Hallett M. Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:2292-2307. 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.029.
49. Notturno F., Marzetti L., Pizzella V., Uncini A., Zappasodi F. Local and remote effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the electrical activity of the motor cortical network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014, 35:2220-2232. 10.1002/hbm.22322.
50. Nunez P.L. Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford,[U+202F] New York. 2nd ed.
51. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
52. Oostenveld R., Fries P., Maris E., Schoffelen J.-M. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 2011:1-9. 10.1155/2011/156869.
53. Osipova D., Takashima A., Oostenveld R., Fernández G., Maris E., Jensen O. Theta and gamma oscillations predict encoding and retrieval of declarative memory. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:7523-7531. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 1948-06.2006.
54. Perfetti B., Moisello C., Landsness E.C., Kvint S., Lanzafame S., Onofrj M., Di Rocco A., Tononi G., Ghilardi M.F. Modulation of gamma and theta spectral amplitude and phase synchronization is associated with the development of visuo-motor learning. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:14810-14819. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 1319-11.2011.
55. Pfurtscheller G., Lopes da Silva F.H. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110:1842-1857.
56. Pfurtscheller G., Solis-Escalante T. Could the beta rebound in the EEG be suitable to realize a "brain switch"?. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009, 120:24-29. 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.09.027.
57. Polanía R., Nitsche M.A., Korman C., Batsikadze G., Paulus W. The importance of timing in segregated theta phase-coupling for cognitive performance. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:1314-1318. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.021.
58. Pollok B., Latz D., Krause V., Butz M., Schnitzler A. Changes of motor-cortical oscillations associated with motor learning. Neuroscience 2014, 275:47-53. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.008.
59. Prasad G., Herman P., Coyle D., McDonough S., Crosbie J. Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2010, 7:60. 10.1186/1743-0003-7-60.
60. Ramos-Murguialday A., Broetz D., Rea M., Läer L., Yilmaz O., Brasil F.L., Liberati G., Curado M.R., Garcia-Cossio E., Vyziotis A., Cho W., Agostini M., Soares E., Soekadar S., Caria A., Cohen L.G., Birbaumer N. Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 74:100-108. 10.1002/ana.23879.
61. Rawle C.J., Miall R.C., Praamstra P. Frontoparietal theta activity supports behavioral decisions in movement-target selection. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:138. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00138.
62. Riddle C.N., Baker S.N. Manipulation of peripheral neural feedback loops alters human corticomuscular coherence. J. Physiol. Lond. 2005, 566:625-639. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.089607.
63. Rosenberg J.R., Amjad A.M., Breeze P., Brillinger D.R., Halliday D.M. The Fourier approach to the identification of functional coupling between neuronal spike trains. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 1989, 53:1-31.
64. Rossiter H.E., Boudrias M.-H., Ward N.S. Do movement-related beta oscillations change after stroke?. J. Neurophysiol. 2014, 112:2053-2058. 10.1152/jn.00345.2014.
65. Sanei S. EEG signal processing 2007, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester England; Hoboken NJ.
66. Sauseng P., Griesmayr B., Freunberger R., Klimesch W. Control mechanisms in working memory: a possible function of EEG theta oscillations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34:1015-1022. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.006.
67. Schalk G., McFarland D.J., Hinterberger T., Birbaumer N., Wolpaw J.R. BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 51:1034-1043. 10.1109/TBME.2004.827072.
68. Schulz H., Ubelacker T., Keil J., Müller N., Weisz N. Now I am ready-now i am not: the influence of pre-TMS oscillations and corticomuscular coherence on motor-evoked potentials. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 10.1093/cercor/bht024.
69. Shindo K., Kawashima K., Ushiba J., Ota N., Ito M., Ota T., Kimura A., Liu M. Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary case series study. J. Rehabil. Med. 2011, 43:951-957. 10.2340/16501977-0859.
70. Solis-Escalante T., Müller-Putz G.R., Pfurtscheller G., Neuper C. Cue-induced beta rebound during withholding of overt and covert foot movement. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 123:1182-1190. 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.013.
71. Suminski A.J., Tkach D.C., Fagg A.H., Hatsopoulos N.G. Incorporating feedback from multiple sensory modalities enhances brain-machine interface control. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:16777-16787. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 3967-10.2010.
72. Szameitat A.J., Shen S., Conforto A., Sterr A. Cortical activation during executed, imagined, observed, and passive wrist movements in healthy volunteers and stroke patients. NeuroImage 2012, 62:266-280. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.009.
73. Takemi M., Masakado Y., Liu M., Ushiba J. Is event-related desynchronization a biomarker representing corticospinal excitability?. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2013, 2013:281-284. 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609492.
74. Takemi M., Masakado Y., Liu M., Ushiba J. Event-related desynchronization reflects downregulation of intracortical inhibition in human primary motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2013, 110:1158-1166. 10.1152/jn.01092.2012.
75. Vukelić M., Bauer R., Naros G., Naros I., Braun C., Gharabaghi A. Lateralized alpha-band cortical networks regulate volitional modulation of beta-band sensorimotor oscillations. NeuroImage 2014, 87:147-153. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.003.
76. Wander J.D., Blakely T., Miller K.J., Weaver K.E., Johnson L.A., Olson J.D., Fetz E.E., Rao R.P.N., Ojemann J.G. Distributed cortical adaptation during learning of a brain-computer interface task. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 110:10818-10823. 10.1073/pnas.1221127110.
77. Witham C.L., Riddle C.N., Baker M.R., Baker S.N. Contributions of descending and ascending pathways to corticomuscular coherence in humans. J. Physiol. Lond. 2011, 589:3789-3800. 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.211045.
78. Wolpaw J.R. Brain-computer interfaces as new brain output pathways. J. Physiol. Lond. 2007, 579:613-619. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125948.
79. Wu J., Srinivasan R., Kaur A., Cramer S.C. Resting-state cortical connectivity predicts motor skill acquisition. NeuroImage 2014, 91C:84-90. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.026.