Laterality of brain activity during motor imagery is modulated by the provision of source level neurofeedback

NeuroImage

Volumn 101, Issue , 2014, Pages 159-167

  Boe, Shaun ^a   Gionfriddo, Alicia ^a   Kraeutner, Sarah ^a   Tremblay, Antoine ^a   Little, Graham ^b   Bardouille, Timothy ^a,b  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b IWK HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cortical oscillations; Functional neuroimaging; Imagery; Magnetoencephalography; Neurofeedback

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BETA RHYTHM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; GUIDED IMAGERY; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MOTOR IMAGERY; NEUROFEEDBACK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; IMAGINATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN WAVES; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; NEUROFEEDBACK; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904734921     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.066     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Akaike H. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle, Budapest 1973.
2. Arora S., Aggarwal R., Sirimanna P., Moran A., Grantcharov T., Kneebone R., Sevdalis N., Darzi A. Mental practice enhances surgical technical skills: a randomized controlled study. Ann. Surg. 2011, 253:265-270.
3. Askim T., Indredavik B., Vangberg T., Haberg A. Motor network changes associated with successful motor skill relearning after acute ischemic stroke: a longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2009, 23:295-304.
4. Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 2008, 59:390-412.
5. Bai O., Huang D., Fei D.Y., Kunz R. Effect of real-time cortical feedback in motor imagery-based mental practice training. NeuroRehabilitation 2014, 34(2):355-363.
6. Barclay-Goddard R.E., Stevenson T.J., Poluha W., Thalman L. Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, 5:CD005950. (Online).
7. Bardouille T., Picton T.W., Ross B. Attention modulates beta oscillations during prolonged tactile stimulation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31:761-769.
8. Bates D.M., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S. lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using Eigen and S4. p. R Package Version 1.0.4 2013.
9. Boe S.G., Cassidy R.J., McIlroy W.E., Graham S.J. Single session motor learning demonstrated using a visuomotor task: evidence from fMRI and behavioural analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2012, 209:308-319.
10. Bovend'eerdt T.J.H., Dawes H., Sackley C., Wade D.T. Practical research-based guidance for motor imagery practice in neurorehabilitation. Disabil. Rehabil. 2012, 34:2192-2200.
11. Braun S.M., Beurskens A.J., Borm P.J., Schack T., Wade D.T. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2006, 87:842-852.
12. Braun S., Kleynen M., Schols J., Schack T., Beurskens A., Wade D. Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a framework. Clin. Rehabil. 2008, 22:579-591.
13. Buch E., Weber C., Cohen L.G., Braun C., Dimyan M.A., Ard T., Mellinger J., Caria A., Soekadar S., Fourkas A., Birbaumer N. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke 2008, 39:910-917.
14. Caria A., Veit R., Sitaram R., Lotze M., Weiskopf N., Grodd W., Birbaumer N. Regulation of anterior insular cortex activity using real-time fMRI. Neuroimage 2007, 35:1238-1246.
15. Chieffo R., Inuggi A., Straffi L., Coppi E., Gonzalez-Rosa J., Spagnolo F., Poggi A., Comi G., Comola M., Leocani L. Mapping early changes of cortical motor output after subcortical stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Stimul. 2013, 6:322-329.
16. Chiew M., LaConte S.M., Graham S.J. Investigation of fMRI neurofeedback of differential primary motor cortex activity using kinesthetic motor imagery. Neuroimage 2012, 61:21-31.
17. Davidson D.J. Functional mixed-effect models for electrophysiological responses. Neurophysiology 2009, 41:71-79.
18. Decety J. The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav. Brain Res. 1996, 77:45-52.
19. deCharms R.C., Christoff K., Glover G.H., Pauly J.M., Whitfield S., Gabrieli J.D.E. Learned regulation of spatially localized brain activation using real-time fMRI. Neuroimage 2004, 21:436-443.
20. deCharms R.C., Maeda F., Glover G.H., Ludlow D., Pauly J.M., Soneji D., Gabrieli J.D., Mackey S.C. Control over brain activation and pain learned by using real-time functional MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102:18626-18631.
21. Dong Y., Dobkin B.H., Cen S.Y., Wu A.D., Winstein C.J. Motor cortex activation during treatment may predict therapeutic gains in paretic hand function after stroke. Stroke 2006, 37:1552-1555.
22. Doyon J., Benali H. Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2005, 15:161-167.
23. Florin E., Bock E., Baillet S. Targeted reinforcement of neural oscillatory activity with real-time neuroimaging feedback. Neuroimage 2013, 88C:54-60.
24. Gelman A., Hill J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multi-level/Hierarchical Models 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Halsband U., Lange R.K. Motor learning in man: a review of functional and clinical studies. J. Physiol. Paris 2006, 99:414-424.
26. Hamalainen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to non-invasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1993, 65:413-503.
27. Hanakawa T., Dimyan M.A., Hallett M. Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:2775-2788.
28. Hetu S., Gregoire M., Saimpont A., Coll M.P., Eugene F., Michon P.E., Jackson P.L. The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013, 37:930-949.
29. Hsu C.H., Lee C.Y., Marantz A. Effects of visual complexity and sublexical information in the occipitotemporal cortex in the reading of Chinese phonograms: a single-trial analysis with MEG. Brain Lang. 2011, 117:1-11.
30. Ietswaart M., Johnston M., Dijkerman H.C., Scott C.L., Joice S.A., Hamilton S., Macwalter R.S. Recovery of hand function through mental practice: a study protocol. BMC Neurol. 2006, 6:39.
31. Jeannerod M., Frak V. Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1999, 9:735-739.
32. Lacourse M.G., Orr E.L., Cramer S.C., Cohen M.J. Brain activation during execution and motor imagery of novel and skilled sequential hand movements. Neuroimage 2005, 27:505-519.
33. Lebon F., Collet C., Guillot A. Benefits of motor imagery training on muscle strength. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010, 24:1680-1687.
34. Malouin F., Richards C.L., Durand A., Descent M., Poire D., Fremont P., Pelet S., Gresset J., Doyon J. Effects of practice, visual loss, limb amputation, and disuse on motor imagery vividness. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2009, 23:449-463.
35. Miller K.J., Schalk G., Fetz E.E., den Nijs M., Ojemann J.G., Rao R.P. Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:4430-4435.
36. Mokienko O.A., Chervyakov A.V., Kulikova S.N., Bobrov P.D., Chernikova L.A., Frolov A.A., Piradov M.A. Increased motor cortex excitability during motor imagery in brain-computer interface trained subjects. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2013, 7:168.
37. Newell K.M. Motor skill acquisition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1991, 42:213-237.
38. Newell K.M., Ranganathan R. Some contemporary issues in motor learning. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2009, 629:395-404.
39. Newman A.J., Tremblay A., Nichols E.S., Nevill H.J., Ullman M.T. The influence of language proficiency on lexical semantic processing in native and late learners of English. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24:1205-1223.
40. Nilsen D.M., Gillen G., Gordon A.M. Use of mental practice to improve upper-limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2010, 64:695-708.
41. Nudo R.J., Milliken G.W. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 1996, 75:2144-2149.
42. Nudo R.J., Milliken G.W., Jenkins W.M., Merzenich M.M. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16:785-807.
43. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
44. Ono T., Kimura A., Ushiba J. Daily training with realistic visual feedback improves reproducibility of event-related desynchronisation following hand motor imagery. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2013, 124:1779-1786.
45. Ora H., Takano K., Kawase T., Iwaki S., Parkkonen L., Kansaku K. Implementation of a beam forming technique in real-time magnetoencephalography. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2013, 12:331-341.
46. Orr E.L., Lacourse M.G., Cohen M.J., Cramer S.C. Cortical activation during executed, imagined, and observed foot movements. Neuroreport 2008, 19:625-630.
47. Page S.J., Levine P., Hill V. Mental practice as a gateway to modified constraint-induced movement therapy: a promising combination to improve function. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2007, 61:321-327.
48. Page S.J., Dunning K., Hermann V., Leonard A., Levine P. Longer versus shorter mental practice sessions for affected upper extremity movement after stroke: a randomized controlled trial RID F-7081-2011. Clin. Rehabil. 2011, 25:627-637.
49. Pfurtscheller G., Lopes da Silva F.H. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110:1842-1857.
50. Pfurtscheller G., Neuper C., Brunner C., da Silva F.L. Beta rebound after different types of motor imagery in man. Neurosci. Lett. 2005, 378:156-159.
51. Porro C.A., Francescato M.P., Cettolo V., Diamond M.E., Baraldi P., Zuiani C., Bazzocchi M., di Prampero P.E. Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16:7688-7698.
52. Prasad G., Herman P., Coyle D., McDonough S., Crosbie J. Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2010, 7:60.
53. Riccio I., Iolascon G., Barillari M.R., Gimigliano R., Gimigliano F. Mental practice is effective in upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized single-blind cross-over study. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2010, 46:19-25.
54. Salmoni A.W., Schmidt R.A., Walter C.B. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychol. Bull. 1984, 95:355-386.
55. Schmidt R.A. Control processes in motor skills. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 1976, 4:229-261.
56. Schnitzler A., Salenius S., Salmelin R., Jousmaki V., Hari R. Involvement of primary motor cortex in motor imagery: a neuromagnetic study. Neuroimage 1997, 6:201-208.
57. Schuster C., Hilfiker R., Amft O., Scheidhauer A., Andrews B., Butler J., Kischka U., Ettlin T. Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines. BMC Med. 2011, 9:75.
58. Soekadar S.R., Witkowski M., Mellinger J., Ramos A., Birbaumer N., Cohen L.G. ERD-based online brain-machine interfaces (BMI) in the context of neurorehabilitation: optimizing BMI learning and performance. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2011, 19:542-549.
59. Sudre G., Parkkonen L., Bock E., Baillet S., Wang W., Weber D.J. rtMEG: a real-time software interface for magnetoencephalography. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 327953.
60. Tremblay A., Ransijn J. Package 'LMERConvenienceFunctions' 2013.
61. Tremblay A., Tucker B.V. The effects of N-gram probabilistic measures on the recognition and production of four-word sequences. Mental Lexicon 2011, 6:302-324.
62. Venables W. Exegeses on Linear Models 1998, S-Plus User's Conference, Washington, D.C.
63. Weisz N., Wienbruch C., Hoffmeister S., Elbert T. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex probed with frequency-modulated tones. Hear. Res. 2004, 191:49-58.
64. Winstein C.J. Knowledge of results and motor learning-implications for physical therapy. Phys. Ther. 1991, 71:140-149.
65. Wu H., Zhang J. Non-parametric Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Analysis 2006, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.
66. Zuur A.F., Ieno E.N., Walker N.J., Saveliev A.A., Smith G.M. Mixed Effects Models and Extension in Ecology with R 2009, Springer, New York.