Fear of failure in conservation: The problem and potential solutions to aid conservation of extremely small populations

Biological Conservation

Volumn 184, Issue , 2015, Pages 209-217

  Meek, Mariah H ^a   Wells, Caitlin ^a   Tomalty, Katharine M ^a   Ashander, Jaime ^a   Cole, Esther M ^a   Gille, Daphne A ^a   Putman, Breanna J ^a,b   Rose, Jonathan P ^a   Savoca, Matthew S ^a   Yamane, Lauren ^a   Hull, Joshua M ^a,c   Rogers, Deborah L ^d   Rosenblum, Erica Bree ^e   Shogren, Jason F ^f   Swaisgood, Ronald R ^g   May, Bernie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

^d Center for Natural Lands Management   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^g INSTITUTE FOR CONSERVATION RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Endangered; Failure; Fear; Imperiled species; Management; Psychology

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN ACTIVITY; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; PSYCHOLOGY; STAKEHOLDER; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 84923007577     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.025     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Alagona P. Biography of a "feathered pig": the California condor conservation controversy. J. Hist. Biol. 2004, 37:557-583.
2. Allen C.R., Fontaine J.J., Pope K.L., Garmestani A.S. Adaptive management for a turbulent future. J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92:1339-1345.
3. Arlettaz R., Schaub M., Fournier J., Reichlin T.S., Sierro A., Watson J.E.M., Braunisch V. From publications to public actions: when conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. Bioscience 2010, 60:835-842.
4. Black S.A., Groombridge J.J., Jones C.G. Leadership and conservation effectiveness: finding a better way to lead. Conserv. Lett. 2011, 4:329-339.
5. Bottrill M.C., Pressey R.L. The effectiveness and evaluation of conservation planning. Conserv. Lett. 2012, 5:407-420.
6. Bottrill M.C., Walsh J.C., Watson J.E.M., Joseph L.N., Ortega-Argueta A., Possingham H.P. Does recovery planning improve the status of threatened species?. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:1595-1601.
7. Brechin S.R., Wilshusen P.R., Fortwangler C.L., West P.C. Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2002, 15:41-64.
8. Brewer G.D., Clark T.W. A policy sciences perspective: improving implementation. Endangered Species Recovery: Finding the Lessons, Improving the Process 1994, 391-416. Island Press, Washington, D. C. T.W. Clark, R.P. Reading, A.L. Clarke (Eds.).
9. Burgman M., Carr A., Godden L., Gregory R., McBride M., Flander L., Maguire L. Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment. Conserv. Lett. 2011, 4:81-87.
10. Caro T. Behavior and conservation: a bridge too far?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:394-400.
11. Clark J.A. The endangered species act: Its history, provisions, and effectiveness. Endangered Species Recovery: Finding the Lessons, Improving the Process 1994, 19-46. Island Press, Washington, D. C. T.W. Clark, R.P. Reading, A.L. Clarke (Eds.).
12. Clark S.G. An informational approach to sustainability: "Intelligence" in conservation and natural resource management policy. J. Sustain. Forest. 2009, 28:636-662.
13. Clark T., Westrum R. High-performance teams in wildlife conservation: a species reintroduction and recovery example. Environ. Manage. 1989, 13:663-670.
14. Clark T.W. Averting Extinction: Reconstructing Endangered Species Recovery 1997, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
15. Clark T.W., Reading R.P. A professional perspective: improving problem solving, communication and effectiveness. Endangered Species Recovery: Finding the Lessons, Improving the Process 1994, 351-369. Island Press, Washington, D. C. T.W. Clark, R.P. Reading, A.L. Clarke (Eds.).
16. Clark T.W., Reading R.P., Clarke A.L. Synthesis. Endangered Species Recovery: Finding the Lessons, Improving the Process 1994, 417-431. Island Press, Washington, D. C. T.W. Clark, R.P. Reading, A.L. Clarke (Eds.).
17. CMP, 2007. The conservation measures partnership. Open standards for the practice of conservation. <>. http://www.Conservationmeasures.Org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cmp_open_standards_version_2.0.pdf.
18. Conroy D.E., Willow J.P., Metzler J.N. Multidimensional fear of failure measurement: the performance failure appraisal inventory. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2002, 14:76-90.
19. Conroy M.J., Peterson J.T. Decision Making in Natural Resource Management: A Structured, Adaptive Approach 2012, John Wiley & Sons.
20. Cook C.N., Hockings M., Carter R.W. Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 8:181-186.
21. Cook C.N., Mascia M.B., Schwartz M.W., Possingham H.P., Fuller R.A. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27:669-678.
22. Cook C.N., Possingham H.P., Fuller R.A. Contribution of systematic reviews to management decisions. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27:902-915.
23. Cooke B., Langford W.T., Gordon A., Bekessy S. Social context and the role of collaborative policy making for private land conservation. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 2011, 55:469-485.
24. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inquiry 2000, 11:227-268.
25. Decker D.J., Chase L.C. Human dimensions of living with wildlife: a management challenge for the 21st century. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 1997, 25:788-795.
26. Desjardins-Proulx P., White E.P., Adamson J.J., Ram K., Poisot T., Gravel D. The case for open preprints in biology. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11:e1001563.
27. Dixit A.K., Pindych R.S. Investment Under Uncertainty 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
28. Doremus H. Adaptive management, the endangered species act, and the institutional challenges of new age environmental protection. Washburn L.J. 2001, 41:50-89.
29. Ferraro P.J., Pattanayak S.K. Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e105.
30. Fieberg J., Ellner S.P. Stochastic matrix models for conservation and management: a comparative review of methods. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4:244-266.
31. Gagné M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J. Org. Behav. 2005, 26:331-362.
32. Game E.T., Kareiva P., Possingham H.P. Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27:480-485.
33. Ginsparg P. Arxiv at 20. Nature 2011, 476:145-147.
34. Gregory R., Failing L., Harstone M., Long G., McDaniels T., Ohlson D. Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices 2012, Wiley-Blackwell.
35. Gregory R., Long G., Colligan M., Geiger J.G., Laser M. When experts disagree (and better science won't help much): using structured deliberations to support endangered species recovery planning. J. Environ. Manage. 2012, 105:30-43.
36. Haghbin M., McCaffrey A., Pychyl T. The complexity of the relation between fear of failure and procrastination. J. Ration.-Emotive Cogn.-Behav. Ther. 2012, 10.1007/s10942-012-0153-9:1-15.
37. Jacobson C.A., Organ J.F., Decker D.J., Batcheller G.R., Carpenter L.E.N. A conservation institution for the 21st century: implications for state wildlife agencies. J. Wildlife Manage. 2010, 74:203-209.
38. James A.N., Gaston K.J., Balmford A. Balancing the earth's accounts. Nature 1999, 401:323-324.
39. Kapos V., et al. Calibrating conservation: new tools for measuring success. Conserv. Lett. 2008, 1:155-164.
40. Keene M., Pullin A.S. Realizing an effectiveness revolution in environmental management. J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92:2130-2135.
41. Keith D.A., Martin T.G., McDonald-Madden E., Walters C. Uncertainty and adaptive management for biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:1175-1178.
42. Knight A.T. Failing but learning: writing the wrongs after Redford and Taber. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:1312-1314.
43. Knight A.T. Is conservation biology ready to fail?. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23. 517-517.
44. Knight A.T., Cowling R.M., Rouget M., Balmford A., Lombard A.T., Campbell B.M. Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:610-617.
45. Kuhnert P.M., Martin T.G., Griffiths S.P. A guide to eliciting and using expert knowledge in bayesian ecological models. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:900-914.
46. Lach D., List P., Steel B., Shindler B. Advocacy and credibility of ecological scientists in resource decisionmaking: a regional study. Bioscience 2003, 53:170-178.
47. Langpap C., Kerkvliet J. Endangered species conservation on private land: assessing the effectiveness of habitat conservation plans. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2012, 64:1-15.
48. Lindenmayer D.B., Piggott M.P., Wintle B.A. Counting the books while the library burns: why conservation monitoring programs need a plan for action. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2013, 11:549-555.
49. Linklater W.L. Science and management in a conservation crisis: a case study with rhinoceros. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17:968-975.
50. Ludwig D., Hilborn R., Walters C. Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation-lessons from history. Science 1993, 260:17.
51. Ludwig D., Mangel M., Haddad B. Ecology, conservation, and public policy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32:481-517.
52. Mace G.M., Possingham H., Leader-Williams N. Prioritizing choices in conservation. Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2007, 17-34. Blackwell Publications, Oxford. D.M. Macdonald, K. Service (Eds.).
53. Martin J., Runge M.C., Nichols J.D., Lubow B.C., Kendall W.L. Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19:1079-1090.
54. Martin T.G., Burgman M.A., Fidler F., Kuhnert P.M., Low-Choy S., McBride M., Mengersen K. Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conserv. Biol. 2012, 26:29-38.
55. Martin T.G., et al. Acting fast helps avoid extinction. Conserv. Lett. 2012, 5:274-280.
56. Mattson D.J., Craighead J.J. The yellowstone grizzly bear recovery program: uncertain information, uncertain policy. Endangered Species Recovery: Finding the Lessons, Improving the Process 1994, 101-130. Island Press, Washington, D. C. T.W. Clark, R.P. Reading, A.L. Clarke (Eds.).
57. McDonald-Madden E., Chades I., McCarthy M.A., Linkie M., Possingham H.P. Allocating conservation resources between areas where persistence of a species is uncertain. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:844-858.
58. McNie E.C. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10:17-38.
59. Meffe G.K. Crisis in a crisis discipline. Conserv. Biol. 2001, 15:303-304.
60. Melbourne B.A., Hastings A. Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity. Nature 2008, 454:100-103.
61. Miteva D.A., Pattanayak S.K., Ferraro P.J. Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: what works and what doesn't?. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 2012, 28:69-92.
62. Murcia C., Kattan G. Application of science to protected area management: overcoming the barriers. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 2009, 96:508-520.
63. Newton A.C., Stewart G.B., Diaz A., Golicher D., Pullin A.S. Bayesian belief networks as a tool for evidence-based conservation management. J. Nat. Conserv. 2007, 15:144-160.
64. Peterson G.D., Cumming G.S., Carpenter S.R. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17:358-366.
65. Pullin A.S., Knight T.M. Doing more good than harm - building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:931-934.
66. Redford K.H., Taber S. Writing the wrongs: developing a safe-fail culture in conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2000, 14:1567-1568.
67. Regan T.J., Taylor B.L., Thompson G.G., Cochrane J.F., Ralls K., Runge M.C., Merrick R. Testing decision rules for categorizing species' extinction risk to help develop quantitative listing criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27:821-831.
68. Rist L., Campbell B.M., Frost P. Adaptive management: where are we now?. Environ. Conserv. 2013, 40:5-18.
69. Runge M.C. An introduction to adaptive management for threatened and endangered species. J. Fish Wildlife Manage. 2011, 2:220-233.
70. Runge M.C., Converse S.J., Lyons J.E. Which uncertainty? Using expert elicitation and expected value of information to design an adaptive program. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:1214-1223.
71. Schwartz M.W. The performance of the endangered species act. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol Syst. 2008, 39:279-299.
72. Schwartz M.W., Deiner K., Forrester T., Grof-Tisza P., Muir M.J., Santos M.J., Souza L.E., Wilkerson M.L., Zylberberg M. Perspectives on the open standards for the practice of conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 155:169-177.
73. Shear M.D., Nixon R. U.S. Workers are Grounded by Deep Cuts 18 August 2013, New York Times.
74. Shilling F. Do habitat conservation plans protect endangered species?. Science 1997, 276:1662-1663.
75. Sims C., Finnoff D. When is a "wait and see" approach to invasive species justified?. Resource and Energy Economics 2013, 35:235-255.
76. Slooten E., Fletcher D., Taylor B.L. Accounting for uncertainty in risk assessment: Case study of hector's dolphin mortality due to gillnet entanglement. Conservation Biology 2000, 14:1264-1270.
77. Smith C.S., Howes A.L., Price B., McAlpine C.A. Using a bayesian belief network to predict suitable habitat of an endangered mammal - the julia creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi). Biol. Conserv. 2007, 139:333-347.
78. Speirs-Bridge A., Fidler F., McBride M., Flander L., Cumming G., Burgman M. Reducing overconfidence in the interval judgments of experts. Risk Anal. 2010, 30:512-523.
79. Sutherland W.J., Pullin A.S., Dolman P.M., Knight T.M. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:305-308.
80. Treves A., Karanth K.U. Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17:1491-1499.
81. Tulloch A.I.T., Maloney R.F., Joseph L.N., Bennett J.R., Di Fonzo M.M.I., Probert W.J.M., O'Connor S.M., Densem J.P., Possingham H.P. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects. Conserv. Biol. 2014, 10.1111/cobi.12386.
82. U.S.House, 2010. 111th congress. 2nd session. H.R. 2142. Government performance and results modernization act of 2010.
83. U.S.Senate, 2011. 112th congress. 1st session. Budget control act of 2011.
84. Walters J.R., Crowder L.B., Priddy J.A. Population viability analysis for red-cocaded woodpeckers using an individual-based model. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12:249-260.
85. Young K.D., Van Aarde R.J. Science and elephant management decisions in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:876-885.