Examining our hidden curricula: Powerful, visible, gendered and discriminatory

Medical Education

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 244-246

  Giles, James A ^a   Hill, Elspeth J R ^a,b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROCEDURES; STEREOTYPING;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; STEREOTYPING; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84922969181     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12664     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cheng L-F, Yang H-C. Learning about gender on campus: an analysis of the hidden curriculum for medical students. Med Educ 2015;49: 321-31.
2. Bleakley A. Gender matters in medical education. Med Educ 2013;47:59-70.
3. Hafferty FW, Hafler JP. The hidden curriculum, structural disconnects and the socialisation of new professionals. Innov Change Prof Educ 2011;6:17-35.
4. Hill E, Bowman K, Stalmeijer R, Hart J. You've got to know the rules to play the game: how medical students negotiate the hidden curriculum of surgical careers. Med Educ 2014;48:884-94.
5. MacLeod A. The hidden curriculum: is it time to re-consider the concept? Med Teach 2014;36 (6):539-40.
6. Hill E, Vaughan S. The only girl in the room: how paradigmatic trajectories deter female students from surgical careers. Med Educ 2013;47:547-56.
7. Hill EJR, Bowman K, Stalmeijer R, Solomon Y, Dornan T. Can I cut it? Medical students' perceptions of surgeons and surgical careers Am J Surg 2014;208 (5):860-7.
8. Keuken DG, Haafkens JA, Moerman CJ, Klazinga NS, Ter Riet G. Attention to sex-related factors in the development of clinical practice guidelines. J Womens Health 2007;16 (1):82-93.
9. Dijkstra AF, Verdonk P, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Gender bias in medical textbooks: examples from coronary heart disease, depression, alcohol abuse and pharmacology. Med Educ 2008;42:1021-8.
10. Glick P. BS at Work: How Benevolent Sexism Undermines Women and Justifies Backlash. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2013.
11. Davis K. Intersectionality as buzzword: a sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory 2008;9:67-85.
12. Tsouroufli M, Rees CE, Monrouxe LV, Sundaram V. Gender, identities and intersectionality in medical education research. Med Educ 2011;45:213-6.
13. Moulton B, King JS. Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice. J Law Med Ethics 2010;38 (1):85-97.
14. MacLeod A. Caring, competence and professional identities in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2011;16 (3):375-94.
15. Bourdieu P. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1977.
16. Hodges BD. When I say ... critical theory. Med Educ 2014;48:1043-4.
17. Risberg G, Johansson EE, Hamberg K. 'Important... but of low status': male education leaders' views on gender in medicine. Med Educ 2011;45:613-24.
18. Albert M, Laberge S, Hodges BD, Regehr G, Lingard L. Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research. Soc Sci Med 2008;66 (12):2520-31.