A Theory of syntax: Minimal operations and universal grammar

A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-194

  Hornstein, Norbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922907181     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511575129     Document Type: Book

References (191)

1. Abels, K. 2003. “Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding,” PhD thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
2. Aoun, J. and D. Sportiche. 1983. “On the formal theory of government,” The Linguistic Review 2: 211-236.
3. Avelar, J. 2004. “Dinâmicas Morofssintáticas com Ter, Ser e Estar em Português Brasileiro,” MA thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
4. Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Belletti, A. 1988. “The case of unaccusatives,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1-34.
6. Berwick, R. 1980. “Computational analogues of constraints on grammars: A model of syntactic acquisition,” in 18th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Berwick, R. and A. Weinberg. 1984. The grammatical basis of linguistic performance: Language use and acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Bhatt, R. 2005. “Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu,” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 757-807.
9. Bobaljik, J. D. 1995a.“Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection,”PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge.
10. Bobaljik, J. D. 1995. “In terms of Merge: Copy and head movement,” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27: 41-64.
11. Bobaljik, J. D. and S. Brown. 1997. “Interarboreal operations: Head movement and the extension requirement,” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 345-356.
12. Bobaljik, J. D. and D. Jonas.1996. “Subject positions and the roles of TP,” Linguistic Inquiry 27: 195-236.
13. Bobaljik, J. D. and S. Wurmbrand. 2005. “The domain of agreement,” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 803-865.
14. Boeckx, C. 2003a.Islands and chains: Resumption as stranding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Boeckx, C. 2003b. “Intricacies of Icelandic agreement,” ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
16. Boeckx, C. 2004. “Long-distance agreement in Hindi: Some theoretical implications,” Studia Linguistica 58: 23-36.
17. Boeckx, C. 2006. Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, concepts, methods, and aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Boeckx, C. 2008. Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Boeckx, C. Forthcoming.“The nature of merge: Consequences for language, mind and biology,” in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, J. Uriagereka and P. Salaburu (eds.), Of minds and language: The Basque Country encounter with Noam Chomsky. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Boeckx, C. and N. Hornstein. 2004. “Movement under control,” Linguistic Inquiry 35: 431-452.
21. Boeckx, C. and N. Hornstein. 2006. Raising and control. Syntax 9: 188-130.
22. Boeckx, C. and N. Hornstein. 2007. “On (non-)obligatory control,” inW. D. Davies and S. Dubinsky (eds.), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising. Dordrecht: Springer, 251-262.
23. Boeckx, C., N. Hornstein and J. Nunes. 2007. “Overt copies in reflexive and control structures: A movement analysis,”in A. Conroy, C. Jing, C. Nakao and E. Takahashi (eds.), University of Maryland Working Papers in LinguisticsVol. 15, 1-46.
24. Boeckx, C., N. Hornstein and J. Nunes. In Progress.The movement theory of control.
25. Boeckx, C. and Y. Jeong. 2004. “The fine structure of intervention in syntax,”in C. Kwon and W. Lee (eds.), Issues in current linguistic theory: A festschrift for Hong Bae Lee. Seoul: Kyungchin, 83-116.
26. Boeckx, C. and S. Stjepanović. 2001. “Head-ing toward PF,” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 345-355.
27. Bošković, Ž. 1999. “On multiple feature checking: Multiple wh-fronting and multiple head movement,”in S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 159-187.
28. Bošković, Ž. 2007. “Agree, phases and intervention effects,” Linguistic Analysis 33: 54-96.
29. Bowers, J. 2005. “On reducing control to movement,” ms., Cornell University, Ithaca.
30. Cagri, I. 2005. “Minimality and Turkish relative clauses,” PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
31. Castillo, J. C., J. Drury and K. K. Grohmann. 1999. “Merge over Move and the Extended Projection Principle,” inS. Aoshima, J. Drury and T. Neuvonen (eds.), University of Maryland Working Papers in LinguisticsVol. 8, 63-103.
32. Chametzky, R. A. 1996. A theory of phrase markers and the extended base. Baffalo, NY: SUNY Press.
33. Chametzky, R. A. 2000. Phrase structure: From GB to Minimalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
34. Chandra, P. 2007. “(Dis)AGREE: Movement and agreement reconsidered,” PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
35. Chomsky, N. 1955. “The logical structure of linguistic theory,” ms., Harvard University and MIT. [Revised 1956 manuscript published in part as The logical structure of linguistic theory by New York, NY: Plenum 1975; Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1985.]
36. Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
37. Chomsky, N. 1959. “Review of B. F. Skinner Verbal Behavior,” Language 35: 26-58.
38. Chomsky, N. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.
39. Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Chomsky, N. 1976. “Conditions on rules of grammar,” Linguistic Analysis 2: 303-351.
41. Chomsky, N. 1977. “On wh-movement,” in P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press, 71-132.
42. Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
43. Chomsky, N. 1983. “Some conceptual shifts in the study of language,”in L. S. Cauman, I. Levi, C. D. Parson and R. Schwartz (eds.), How many questions? Essays in honor of Sidney Morgenbesser. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
44. Chomsky, N. 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Chomsky, N. 1986b. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York, NY: Praeger.
46. Chomsky, N. 1993. “A minimalist program for linguistic theory,”in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-52.
47. Chomsky, N. 1995a.The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Chomsky, N. 1995b.“Bare Phrase Structure,” in G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and Binding theory and the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell, 383-440.
49. Chomsky, N. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: The framework,” in R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 91-155.
50. Chomsky, N. 2001. “Derivation by phase,” in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-52.
51. Chomsky, N. 2004. “Beyond explanatory adequacy,” inA. Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104-131.
52. Chomsky, N. 2005. “Three factors in language design,” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1-22.
53. Chomsky, N. 2005b.“On Phases,” ms., MIT, Cambridge. [To appear in R. Freidin, C. P. Otero and M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]
54. Chomsky, N. and H. Lasnik.1993. “The theory of principles and parameters,”inJ. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 506-569.
55. Citko, B. 2003. “ATB wh-questions and the nature of Merge,” inM. Kadowaki and S. Kawahara (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-third annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
56. Collins, C. 1997. Local economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Collins, C. 2002. “Eliminating labels,” inS. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Oxford: Blackwell, 42-64.
58. Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby. 1992. “Cognitive adaptations for social exchange,” in J. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Dawkins, R. 1996. Climbing Mount Improbable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. de Marcken, C. 1996. “Unsupervised language acquisition,” PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge.
61. den Besten, H. 1983. “On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules,” in W. Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 47-121.
62. den Dikken, M. 1995. “Binding, expletives and levels,” Linguistic Inquiry 26: 347-354.
63. Diesing, M. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Donati, C. 2003. “Merge copy,” in K. Schwabe and S. Winkler (eds.), The interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 155-176.
65. Dresher, B. E. 1999. “Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting,” Linguistic Inquiry 30: 27-67.
66. Embick, D. and D. Poeppel. 2005a. “Mapping syntax using imaging: Prospects and problems for the study of neurolinguistic computation,” in K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd edn.). Oxford: Elsevier.
67. Embick, D. and D. Poeppel. 2005b.“Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience,” in A. Cutler (ed.), Twentiy-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 103-118. [To be reprinted in A. Di Sciullo (ed.), Biolinguistics. MIT Press, 2008.]
68. Enç, M. 1991. “The semantics of specificity,” Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1-25.
69. Epstein, S. D. 1999. “Un-principled syntax: The derivation of syntactic relations,”in S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 317-345.
70. Epstein, S. D., E. M. Groat, R. Kawashima and H. Kitahara. 1998. A derivational approach to syntactic relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Epstein, S. D. and T. D. Seely (eds.). 2002. Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Oxford: Blackwell.
72. Epstein, S. D. and T. D. Seely. 2006. Derivations in Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Fitzpatrick, J. 2006. “Deletion through movement,” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24: 399-431.
74. Fodor, J. A. 1998. In critical condition: Polemical essays on cognitive science and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Fodor, J. A. 2000. The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Fodor, J. D. 1998. “Unambiguous triggers,” Linguistic Inquiry 29: 1-36.
77. Fox, D. and D. Pesetsky. 2005. “Cyclic Linearization of syntactic structure,” Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1-45.
78. Fujii, T. 2006. “Some theoretical issues in Japanese control,” PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
79. Fukui, N. 1997. “Attract and the A-over-A principle,” UCI Working Papers in Linguistics #3: 51-67.
80. Groat, E. M. 1999. “Raising the case of expletives,”in S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 27-44.
81. Groat, E. M. and W. O’Neil. 1996. “Spell-out at the LF interface,” in W. Abraham, S. D. Epstein, H. Thráinsson and C. J.-W. Zwart (eds.), Minimal ideas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 113-139.
82. Grohmann, K. K. 2003. Prolific domains: On the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
83. Gussenhoven, C. 1984. “Testing the Reality of focus domain,” Language and Speech 26: 61-80.
84. Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Harley, H. 2004. “Merge, conflation, and head movement: The first sister principle revisited,” in K. Moulton and M. Wolf (ed.), Proceedings of the thirty-fourth annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
86. Hauser, M. D., N. Chomsky and W. T. Fitch. 2002. “The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?,” Science 298: 1569-1579.
87. Heim, I. 1982. “The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases,” PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
88. Heycock, C. 1994. Layers of predication. New York: Garland.
89. Hicks, G. 2006. “The derivation of anaphoric dependencies,” PhD thesis, University of York, York.
90. Higginbotham, J. 1986. “Linguistic theory and Davidson’s program in semantics,”in E. Lepore (ed.), Truth and interpretation: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 29-48.
91. Hornstein, N. 1995. Logical form: from GB to Minimalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
92. Hornstein, N. 1999. “Movement and control,” Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69-96.
93. Hornstein, N. 2001. Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
94. Hornstein, N. 2003. “On control,”in R. Hendrick (ed.), Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell, 6-81.
95. Hornstein, N. 2006. “Pronouns in a Minimalist setting,”in N. Kazanina, U. Minai, P. J. Monahan and H. L. Taylor (eds.), University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics. College Park, MD: 47-80. Revised version printed in The Copy Theory of Movement. N.Corver and J.Nunes eds. 2007. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
96. Hornstein, N. 2007. “A very short note on existential constructions,” Linguistic Inquiry 38: 410-411.
97. Hornstein, N. and H. Kiguchi. 2003. “PRO Gate and movement,”in S. Arunachalam, E. Kaiser and A. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Penn Linguistics.
98. Hornstein, N. and J. Nunes. 2002. “On asymmetries between parasitic gap and across-the-board constructions,” Syntax 5: 26-54.
99. Hornstein, N., H. Lasnik and J. Uriagereka. (2003/ 2007). “The dynamics of islands: speculations on the locality of movement,” Linguistic Analysis 33: 149-175.
100. Hornstein, N. and J. Nunes. 2008. “Some thoughts on adjunction,” Biolinguistics.
101. Hornstein, N. and J. Uriagereka. 2002. “Reprojections,”in S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Oxford: Blackwell, 106-132.
102. Hornstein, N. and J. Witkos. 2003. “Yet another approach to existential constructions,”in L.-O. Delsing, C. Falk, G. Joseffson and H. Sigurdsson (eds.), Grammar in Focus Festschrift for Christer Platzack. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, University of Lund, 167-184.
103. Hunter, T. 2008. “The meaning of movement and adjunction,” MS, University of Maryland, College Park.
104. Irurtzun, A. 2007. The grammar of focus at the interfaces. PhD Dissertation. The University of the Basque Country.
105. Jackendoff, R. 1994. Patterns in the mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
106. Johnson, K. 1991. “Object positions,” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9: 577-636.
107. Johnson, K. 2001. “What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why,”in M. R. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 439-480.
108. Kato, Mary and Jairo Nunes. 1998. “Two sources for relative clause formation in Brazilian Portuguese,” Paper presented at the Eighth Colloquium on Generative Grammar. Universidade de Lisboa.
109. Kawashima, R. and H. Kitahara. 1995. “Strict cyclicity, linear ordering, and derivational c-command,”in J. Camacho, L. Choueiri and M. Watanabe (eds.), The Proceedings of the Fourteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 255-269.
110. Kayne, R. 1972. “Subject inversion in French interrogatives,”in J. Casagrande and B. Saciuk (eds.), Generative studies in Romance languages. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 70-126.
111. Kayne, R. S. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
112. Kayne, R. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
113. Kayne, R. S. 2002. “Pronouns and their antecedents,”in S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Oxford: Blackwell, 133-166.
114. Kayne, R. S. 2005. “On parameters and on principles of pronunciation,”in H. van Riemsijk and H. Broekhuis (eds.), Organizating grammar: Studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 289-299.
115. Kitahara, H. 1997. Elementary operations and optimal derivations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
116. Kobele, G. 2006. “Generating copies,” PhD thesis, UCLA, Los Angeles.
117. Koopman, H. 1984. The syntax of verbs: From verb movement rules in the Kru languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
118. Kuno, M. 2004. “Reconstruction obeys minimality: A representational theory of symmetrical grammar,” Linguistic Research: Working Papers in English Linguistics 20: 39-101.
119. Lasnik, H. 1993. Lectures on minimalist syntax. Storrs: UConn Working Papers in Linguistics.
120. Lasnik, H. 1995. “Case and expletives revisited: On Greed and other human failings,” Linguistic Inquiry 26: 615-633.
121. Lasnik, H. 1999. Minimalist analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
122. Lasnik, H. 2001. “When can you save a structure by destroying it?,”In M. Kim and U. Strauss (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-first annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, 301-320.
123. Lasnik, H. and J. Kupin. 1977. “A restrictive theory of transformational grammar,” Theoretical Linguistics 4: 173-196.
124. Lewis, R. L. and S. Vasishth. 2005. “An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval,” Cognitive Science 29: 375-419.
125. Lidz, J. and W. J. Idsardi. 1998. “Chains and phono-logical form,”in A. Dimitriadis, H. Lee, C. Moisset and A. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. Philadelphia: Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 109-125.
126. Lightfoot, D. 1990. “Old heads and new heads,”in J. Mascaro and M. Nespor (eds.), Grammar in progress: GLOW studies for Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht: Foris.
127. May, R. 1985. Logical Form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
128. McCloskey, J. 2000. “Quantifier float and wh-movement in an Irish English,” Linguistic Inquiry 31: 57-84.
129. McKeown, R. 2007. “A movement account of Scandinavian reflexives,” Generals Paper, University of Maryland, College Park.
130. Merchant, J. 2001. The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
131. Müller, G. 1996. “A constraint on remnant movement,” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14: 355-407.
132. Motomura, M. 2001. “Zibun as a residue of overt A-movement,” Generals Paper, University of Maryland, College Park.
133. Murasugi, K. and M. Saito. 1995. “Adjunction and cyclicity,”in R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss and M. Senturia (eds.), The Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 302-317.
134. Muysken, P. 1982. “Parameterizing the notion ‘head’,” Journal of Linguistic Research 2: 57-75.
135. Nakao, C. 2007. “Copy free movement, swiping and the ECP,” Generals Paper, University of Maryland, College Park.
136. Newmeyer, F. J. 2004. “Typological evidence and Universal Grammar,” Studies in Language 28: 527-548.
137. Newmeyer, F. J. 2005. Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
138. Nunes, J. 1995. “The copy theory of movement and linearization of chains in the Minimalist Program,” PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
139. Nunes, J. 2001. “Sideward movement,” Linguistic Inquiry 31: 303-344.
140. Nunes, J. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
141. Nunes, J. and Ž. Bošković. 2007. “The Copy Theory of Movement: A view from PF,”in N. Corver and J. Nunes (eds.), The Copy Theory of Movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13-74.
142. Nunes, J. and J. Uriagereka. 2000. “Cyclicity and extraction domains,” Syntax 3: 20-43.
143. Ortega-Santos, I. 2006. “On postverbal subjects, PF and the copy theory: The Spanish case,”in N. Sagarra and A. J. Toribio (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 56-66.
144. Panagiotidis, P. 2003. “One, empty nouns and theta assignment,” Linguistic Inquiry 34: 281-292.
145. Parsons, T. 1990. Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
146. Pesetsky, D. 1982. “Paths and categories,” PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge.
147. Pesetsky, D. and E. Torrego. 2001. “T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences,”in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 355-426.
148. Phillips, C. 1996. “Order and structure,” PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge.
149. Pietroski, P. 2005. Events and semantic architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
150. Pietroski, P. 2007. “Induction and comparison,”in A. Conroy, C. Jing, C. Nakao and E. Takahashi (eds.), University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics. College Park, MD: 154-186.
151. Pinker, S. 1997. How the mind works. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
152. Pires, A. 2006. The minimalist syntax of defective domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
153. Poeppel, D. and P. J. Monahan. In press. “Speech perception: Cognitive foundations and cortical implementation,” Current Directions in Psychological Science.
154. Polinsky, M. and E. Potsdam. 2002. “Backward control,” Linguistic Inquiry 33: 245-282.
155. Polinsky, M. and E. Potsdam. 2006. “Expanding the scope of control and raising,” Syntax 9: 171-192.
156. Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. “Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP,” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-424.
157. Reinhart, T. 1983. “Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora questions,” Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 47-88.
158. Richards, N. 2001. Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
159. Rizzi, L. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
160. Rizzi, L. 2005. “Phase theory and the priviledge of the root,”in H. van Riemsijk and H. Broekhuis (eds.), Organizating grammar: Studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 529-537.
161. Roberts, I. 1994. “Two types of head movement in Romance,”in N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot (ed.), Verb movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 207-242.
162. Rodrigues, C. 2004. “Impoverished morphology and movement out of case domains,” PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
163. Rosenbaum, P. S. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
164. Ross, J. R. 1967. “Constraints on variables in syntax,” PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge.
165. Saito, M. 1989. “Scrambling as semantically vacuous A′-movement,”in M. R. Baltin and A. S. Kroch (eds.), Alternative concepts of phrase structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 182-200.
166. Saito, M. and N. Fukui. 1998. “Order in phrase structure and movement,” Linguistic Inquiry 29: 439-474.
167. Samuels, B. 2008. “A string theory of syllables,” MS, Harvard University.
168. Schein, B. 1993. Plurals and events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
169. Seely, T. D. 2006. “Merge, derivational c-command, and subcategorization in a label-free syntax,”in C. Boeckx (ed.), Minimalist essays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 182-217.
170. Selkirk, E. 1984. The relationship between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
171. Soltan. U. 2007. “On formal feature licensing in minimalism,” PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
172. Sportiche, D. 1988. “A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425-449.
173. Stabler, E. 2007. “Language structure, depth and processing.” Paper presented Mayfest 2007. University of Maryland, College Park.
174. Starke, M. 2001. “Move dissolves into merge: A theory of locality,” PhD thesis, University of Geneva, Geneva.
175. Stjepanović, S. 2003. “A word-order paradox resolved by copy deletion at PF,” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3: 139-177.
176. Stowell, T. A. 1981. “Origins of phrase structure,” PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge.
177. Szabolcsi, A. and F. Zwarts. 1993. “Weak islands and an algebraic semantics of scope taking,” Natural Language Semantics 1: 235-284.
178. Szczegielniak, A. 2005. “VP ellipsis and topicalization,”in L. Bateman and C. Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, 603-614.
179. Takahashi, D. 1994. “Minimality of movement,” PhD thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
180. Tallerman, M. 2006. “Challenging the syllabic model of ‘syntax-as-it-is’,” Lingua 116: 689-709.
181. Taraldsen, K. T. 1996. “Reflexives, pronouns and subject/verb agreement in Icelandic and Faroese,”in J. R. Black and V. Motopanyane (eds.), Microparametric syntax and dialect variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189-211.
182. Uriagereka, J. 1995. “Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance,” Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79-123.
183. Uriagereka, J. 1998. Rhyme and reason: An introduction to minimalist syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
184. Uriagereka, J. 1999. “Multiple Spell-Out,”in S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 251-282.
185. Uriagereka, J. 2002. “Pure adjuncts,” ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
186. Vassilieva, M. and R. Larson. 2001. “The semantics of the plural pronoun construction,”in R. Hastings, B. Jackson and Z. Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XI. Ithaca: CLC Publications, Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.
187. Vikner, S. 1991. “Verb movement and the licensing of NP positions in the Germanic languages,” PhD thesis, University of Geneva, Geneva.
188. Wagner, M. 2005. “Prosody and recursion,” PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge.
189. Wilder, C. 1999. “Right node raising and the LCA,”in S. Bird, A. Carnie, J. D. Haugen and P. Norquest (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 586-598.
190. Yoshida, M. 2006. “Sometimes smaller is better: sluicing, gapping and semantic identity,”in C. Davis, A. R. Deal and Y. Zabbal (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, 681-694.
191. Zwart, C. J.-W. 2002. “Issues relating to a derivational theory of binding,”in S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell, 269-304.