Expanding the scope of control and raising

Syntax

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 171-192

  Polinsky, Maria ^a   Potsdam, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749074084     PISSN: 13680005     EISSN: 14679612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9612.2006.00090.x     Document Type: Article

References (237)

1. ALEXIADOU A., E. ANAGNOSTOPOULOU. 1999. Raising without infinitives and the nature of agreement. In WCCFL 18: Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 14-26. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
2. ANDREWS, A. D. 1971. Case agreement of predicate modifiers in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 2:127-151.
3. ANDREWS, A. D. 1976. The VP-complement analysis in Modern Icelandic. In Northeast Linguistics Society (NELS) 6, 1-21. Reprinted 1990 in Syntax and semantics 24: Modern Icelandic syntax, J. Maling & A. Zaenen (eds.), 165-185. New York: Academic Press.
4. AOUN, J. & L. CHOUERI. 1996. Resumption and last resort. Ms., University of Southern California.
5. ASUDEH, A. 2004. Resumption as resource management. Stanford University dissertation.
6. ASUDEH, A. 2005. Control and semantic resource sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 41:465-511.
7. AYGEN, G. 2004. Finiteness, case, and clausal architecture (MIT dissertation). MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL).
8. BABBY, L. H. 1998. Subject Control as direct predication: Evidence from Russian. In Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL), 17-37. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
9. BABBY, L. H. & S. FRANKS. 1998. The syntax of adverbial participles in Russian revisited. Slavic and East European Journal 42:117-149.
10. BACH, E. 1977. Review article on Postal, On Raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Language 53:621-654.
11. BALTIN, M. & L. BARRETT. 2002. The null content of null Case. Ms., New York University.
12. BHATT, R. 2005. Long-distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23:757-807.
13. BOBALJIK, J. D. 2002. A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and "covert" movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20:197-267.
14. BOBALJIK, J. D. & S. WURMBRAND. 2004. The domain of agreement. Ms., University of Connecticut.
15. BOECKX, C. 2000. A note on contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 31:357-366.
16. BOECKX, C. 2003a. (In)direct binding. Syntax 6:213-236.
17. BOECKX, C. 2003b. Islands and chains: Resumption as stranding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. BOECKX, C. 2005. Bare syntax. Ms., Harvard University.
19. BOECKX, C. & N. HORNSTEIN. 2003. Reply to Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 34:269-280.
20. BOECKX, C. & N. HORNSTEIN. 2004. Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry 35:431-452.
21. BOECKX, C. & N. HORNSTEIN. In press. Control in Icelandic and theories of control. Linguistic Inquiry.
22. BOECKX, C. & N. HORNSTEIN. To appear. On (non-)obligatory control. In New horizons in the analysis of Control and Raising, W. Davies & S. Dubinsky (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer.
23. BOECKX, C., N. HORNSTEIN & J. NUNES. In preparation, a. Overt copies in reflexive and control structures: A movement analysis. Ms., Harvard University and University of Maryland, College Park.
24. BOECKX, C., N. HORNSTEIN & J. NUNES. In preparation, b. Control as movement. Ms., Harvard University, University of Maryland, College Park, and University of Sao Paulo.
25. BOLINGER, D. 1961. Syntactic blends and other matters. Language 37:366-381.
26. BOLINGER, D. 1967. Apparent constituents in surface structure. Word 23:47-56.
27. BORER, H. 1994. The projection of arguments. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers (UMOP) 17: Functional Projections, E. Benedicto & J. T. Runner (eds.), 19-47. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
28. BOŠKOVIĆ, Ž. 2001. On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. London: Elsevier.
29. BOŠKOVIĆ, Ž. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33:351-383.
30. BOUCHARD, D. 1984. On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
31. BOWERS, J. 1973. Grammatical relations. MIT dissertation.
32. BRAME, M. 1976. Conjectures and refutations in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
33. BRANIGAN, P. & M. M ac KENZIE. 2002. Altruism, A-movement, and object agreement in Innu-aimûn. Linguistic Inquiry 33:385-407.
34. BRESNAN, J. 1978. A realistic transformational grammar. In Linguistic theory and psychological reality, M. Halle, J. Bresnan & G. A. Miller (eds.), 1-60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. BRESNAN, J. 1982a. Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry 13:343-434.
36. BRESNAN, J. 1982b. The passive in lexical theory. In The mental representation of grammatical relations, J. Bresnan (ed.), 3-86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. BRESNAN, J. 2001. Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
38. BRESNAN, J. & J. KANERVA. 1989. Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20:1-50.
39. BRUENING, B. 2001. Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. MIT dissertation.
40. CANTRALL, W. R. 1974. Viewpoint, reflexives, and the nature of noun phrases. The Hague: Mouton.
41. CARNIE, A. 1995. Nonverbal predication and head movement. MIT dissertation.
42. CARNIE, A. & H. HARLEY. 1997. PRO, the EPP, and nominative Case: Evidence from Irish infinitivals. UPenn Working papers in Linguistics 4(3):71-86.
43. CECCHETTO, C. & R. ONIGA. 2004. A challenge to null Case theory. Linguistic Inquiry 35:141-149.
44. CHOMSKY, N. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (eds.), 184-221. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Co.
45. CHOMSKY, N. 1971. Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in linguistics and psychology, D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (eds.), 183-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. CHOMSKY, N. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A festschrift for Morris Halle, S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds.), 232-286. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
47. CHOMSKY, N. 1977. On wh -movement. In Formal syntax, P. Culicover, T. Wasow & A. Akmajian (eds.), 71-132. New York: Academic Press.
48. CHOMSKY, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
49. CHOMSKY, N. 1989 [1991]. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Functional heads and clause structure, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, I. Laka & A. Mahajan (eds.), 43-74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL). Reprinted 1991 in Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, R. Freidin (ed.), 417-454. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted with minor revisions in Chomsky 1995 (pp. 129-166).
50. CHOMSKY, N. 1992 [1993]. A Minimalist Program for linguistic theory. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL). Reprinted 1993 in The view from Building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.), 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted with minor revisions in Chomsky 1995 (pp. 167-217).
51. CHOMSKY, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Includes Chomsky 1989 [1991], Chomsky 1992 [1993], and Chomsky & Lasnik 1993.)
52. CHOMSKY, N. 1998 [2000]. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL). Reprinted 2000 in Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds.), 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. CHOMSKY, N. 1999 [2001]. Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL). Reprinted 2001 in Ken Hale: A life in language, M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. CHOMSKY, N. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and beyond, A. Belletti (ed.), 104-131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. CHOMSKY, N. 2005a. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36:1-22.
56. CHOMSKY, N. 2005b. On phases. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
57. CHOMSKY, N. & H. LASNIK. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, J. Jacobs, A. Stechow von, W. Sternefeld & T. Vennemann (eds.), 506-569. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
58. CHUNG, S. 1978. Case marking and grammatical relations in Polynesian. Austin: University of Texas Press.
59. CHUNG, S. 1998. The design of agreement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. CHUNG, S. 2004. Restructuring and verb-initial order in Chamorro. Syntax 7:221-255.
61. COLARUSSO, J. 1992. A grammar of the Kabardian language. Calgary: The University of Calgary Press.
62. COMOROVSKI, I. 1985. Control and obviation in Romanian. In ESCOL (Eastern States Conference on Linguistics) '85, 47-56. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
63. CRAIG, C. G. 1974. A wrong cyclical rule in Jakaltec? In Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 10:103-116. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
64. CRAIG, C. G. 1977. The structure of Jacaltec. Austin: University of Texas Press.
65. CULICOVER, P. W. & R. JACKENDOFF. 2001. Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 30:483-512.
66. CULICOVER, P. W. & R. JACKENDOFF. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67. CULICOVER, P. W. & W. WILKINS. 1986. Control, PRO, and the projection principle. Language 62:12-153.
68. DAVIES, W. D. 2005. Madurese prolepsis and its implications for a typology of Raising. Language 81:645-665.
69. DAVIES, W. D. & S. DUBINSKY. 2003. On extraction from NPs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21:1-37.
70. DAVIES, W. D. & S. DUBINSKY. 2004. The grammar of Raising and Control: A course in syntactic argumentation. Oxford: Blackwell.
71. DEN DIKKEN, M. 1995. Binding, expletives, and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 26:347-354.
72. DÉPREZ, V. 1992. Raising constructions in Haitian Creole. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10:191-232.
73. DIESING, M. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. DUBINSKY, S. & S. HAMANO. 2006a. Control into adverbial predicate PPs. Japanese/Korean Linguistics (J/KL) 14:177-188. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
75. DUBINSKY, S. & S. HAMANO. 2006b (to appear). A window into the syntax of Control: Event opacity in Japanese and English. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics (UMWPiL). College Park: The University of Maryland Department of Linguistics.
76. DU PLESSIS, J. A. 1989. Distribution of the complementizer ukuba in the Xhosa sentence. South African Journal of African Languages 9:43-51.
77. ENÇ, M. 1987. Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18:633-657.
78. ENÇ, M. 1989. Pronouns, licensing, and binding. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 7:51-92.
79. ENÇ, M. 1996. Tense and modality. In The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, S. Lappin (ed.), 345-358. Oxford: Blackwell.
80. ENGDAHL, E. 1985. Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions. Linguistics 23:3-44.
81. FARRELL, P. 1995. Backward Control in Brazilian Portuguese. ESCOL (Eastern States Conference on Linguistics) '95, 116-127. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
82. FEATHERSTON, S., M. GROSS, T. F. MÜNTE & H. CLAHSEN. 2000. Brain potentials in the processing of complex sentences: An ERP study of control and raising constructions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29:141-154.
83. FELIX, S. 1989. Finite infinitives in Modern Greek. In Syntactic phrase structure phenomena, C. Bhatt, E. Löbel & C. Schmidt (eds.), 113-131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
84. FERREIRA, M. 2004. Hyperraising and null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
85. FRANKS, S. 1998. Parameters of Slavic morphosyntax revisited: A minimalist retrospective. In Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL), 134-165. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
86. FRANKS, S. & N. HORNSTEIN. 1992. Secondary predication in Russian and proper government of PRO. In Control and grammar, R. Larson, S. Iatridou, U. Lahiri & J. Higginbotham (eds.), 1-50. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
87. GORDON, P. & R. HENDRICK. 1997. Intuitive knowledge of linguistic co-reference. Cognition 62:325-370.
88. GREENBERG, G. & J. KORNFILT. 1989. The hierarchy from +Tense to -Tense. ESCOL (Eastern States Conference on Linguistics) '89, 117-125. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
89. GRIMSHAW, J. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90. GRINDER, J. 1970. Super equi-NP deletion. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 6:297-317. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
91. GROVER, C. 1995. Rethinking some empty categories: Missing objects and parasitic gaps in HPSG. University of Essex dissertation.
92. HADDAD, Y. 2006. Control in Assamese. Questionnaire for NSF project Variation in Control Structures (http://accent.ucsd.edu/index.html). University of California, San Diego and University of Florida.
93. HAEBERLI, E. 2003. Categorial features as the source of EPP and abstract case phenomena. In New perspectives on Case theory, E. Brandner & H. Zinsmeister (eds.), 89-126. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
94. HARADA, S. I. 1973. Counter equi-NP deletion. University of Tokyo Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics Annual Bulletin 7:113-47.
95. HARLEY, H. 1995. Subjects, events, and licensing. MIT dissertation.
96. HARLEY, H. 2000. Irish, the EPP, and PRO. Ms., University of Arizona.
97. HEYCOCK, C. 1994. Layers of predication. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland.
98. HIGGINS, R. 1973. The pseudocleft construction in English. MIT dissertation.
99. HORNSTEIN, N. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30:69-96.
100. HORNSTEIN, N. 2001. Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
101. HORNSTEIN, N. 2003. On Control. In Minimalist syntax, R. Hendrick (ed.), 6-81. Oxford: Blackwell.
102. HORNSTEIN, N. & J. URIAGEREKA. 2002. Reprojections. In Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely (eds.), 106-132. Oxford: Blackwell.
103. HUDSON, R. 1998. Functional control with and without structure-sharing. In Typological studies in language 38: Case, typology, and grammar, A. Siewierska & J. J. Song (eds.), 151-169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
104. HUDSON, R. 2003. Case-agreement, PRO, and structure sharing. Research in language (University of Łódź) 1:7-33.
105. INGRIA, R. 1981. Sentential complementation in Modern Greek. MIT dissertation.
106. JACKENDOFF, R. 1999. The natural logic of rights and obligations. In Language, logic, and concepts: Essays in memory of John Macnamara, R. Jackendoff, P. Bloom & K. Wynn (eds.), 67-95. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
107. JACKENDOFF, R. In press. Language, culture, consciousness: Essays on mental structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
108. JACKENDOFF, R. & P. W. CULICOVER. 2003. The semantic basis of control in English. Language 79:517-556.
109. JACOBSON, P. 1992. Raising without movement. In Control and grammar, R. K. Larson, S. Iatridou, U. Lahiri & J. Higginbotham (eds.), 149-194. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
110. JAEGGLI, O. 1980. Remarks on to contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 1:239-245.
111. JAKE, J. & D. ODDEN. 1979. Raising in Kipsigis. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 9:131-155.
112. JOHNSON, K. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9:577-636.
113. JONAS, D. 1996. Clause structure, expletives and movement. In Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework, W. Abraham, S. D. Epstein, H. Thráinsson & C. Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds.), 167-188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
114. JOSEPH, B. D. 1976. Raising in Modern Greek: A copying process? In Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics 2, J. Hankamer & J. Aissen (eds.), 241-281. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
115. KAYNE, R. S. 1989. Facets of Romance past participle agreement. In Dialect variation and the theory of grammar, P. Benincà (ed.), 85-103. Dordrecht: Foris.
116. KIBRIK, A. E., ed. 1999. Elementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologiçeskom osveščenii [Aspects of Tsaxur grammar in a cross-linguistic perspective]. Moscow: Nasledie. (In Russian.)
117. KIGUCHI, H. (2002). Unchained syntax. University of Maryland, College Park, dissertation.
118. KOIZUMI, M. 1993. Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis. In Papers on case and agreement I, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18, C. Phillips & J. Bobalijk (eds.), 99-148. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL).
119. KOIZUMI, M. 1995. Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. MIT dissertation.
120. KOSTER, J. 1984. Binding and control. Linguistic Inquiry 15:417-459.
121. KRAPOVA, I. & V. PETKOV. 1999. Subjunctive complements, null subjects, and Case checking in Bulgarian. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL), 267-285. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
122. KRATZER, A. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, C. Phillips & J. Bobalijk (eds.), 109-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
123. KROEGER, P. 1993. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
124. KUMAXOV, M. & K. VAMLING. 1998. Dopolnitel'nye konstrukcii v kabardinskom jazyke [Complementation in Kabardian]. Lund: Lund University Press. (In Russian.)
125. KURODA, S.-Y. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. MIT dissertation. [Reprinted 1979 in Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics series by New York: Garland.]
126. KURODA, S.-Y. 1978. Case-marking, canonical sentence patterns, and Counter-Equi in Japanese. In Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics, J. Hinds (ed.), 30-51. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
127. KWON, N.-Y. & M. POLINSKY. 2006. Object control in Korean: Structure and processing. Japanese/Korean Linguistics (J/KL) 15. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
128. LADUSAW, W. & DOWTY, D. 1988. Toward a nongrammatical account of thematic roles. In Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic relations, W. Wilkins (ed.), 62-74. San Diego: Academic Press.
129. LAKOFF, G. 1965/1970. Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
130. LANDAU, I. 1999. Elements of control. MIT dissertation.
131. LANDAU, I. 2000. Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
132. LANDAU, I. 2003. Movement out of Control. Linguistic Inquiry 34:471-498.
133. LANDAU, I. 2004. The scale of finiteness and the calculus of Control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22:811-877.
134. LANDAU, I. To appear. Movement-resistant aspects of Control. Ms., Ben Gurion University.
135. LANGACKER, R. W. 1995. Raising and transparency. Language 71:1-62.
136. LAPPIN, S. 1984. Predication and Raising. Northeast Linguistics Society (NELS) 14, 236-251. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
137. LASNIK, H. 1995. A note on pseudogapping. In Papers on minimalist syntax, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27, 143-163. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL). [Reprinted with minor revisions in Lasnik 1999.]
138. LASNIK, H. 1999. Minimalist analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
139. LASNIK, H. & M. SAITO. 1991. On the subject of infinitives. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 27:324-343. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
140. LEE, F. 2003. Anaphoric R-expressions as bound variables. Syntax 6:84-114.
141. MADIGAN, S. 2005 (to appear). Exhaustive and partial Control in Korean: Controlled caki as an overt form of PRO. In Harvard studies in Korean Linguistics 11. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Department of Linguistics.
142. MARANTZ, A. 2000. Case and licensing. In Arguments and Case: Explaining Burzio's generalization, E. Reuland (ed.), 11-30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
143. MARTIN, R. A. 2001. Null case and the distribution of PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 32:141-166.
144. MASSAM, D. 1985. Case theory and the projection principle. MIT dissertation.
145. McCLOSKEY, J. 1984. Raising, subcategorization, and selection in Modern Irish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1:441-486.
146. McCLOSKEY, J. 2000. Quantifier float and wh -movement in an Irish English. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 57-84.
147. McCLOSKEY, J. 2001. The distribution of subject properties in Irish. In Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, W. D. Davies & S. Dubinsky (eds.), 157-192. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
148. McCLOSKEY, J. 2002. Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations. In Derivation and explanation, S. D. Epstein & D. T. Seely (eds.), 184-226. Oxford: Blackwell.
149. McCLOSKEY, J. 2005. Resumption. Ms., University of California,.Santa Cruz.
150. McFADDEN, T. 2004. The position of morphological case in the derivation: A study on the syntax-morphology interface. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
151. MILLER, D. G. 2002. Non-finite structures in theory and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
152. MILSARK, G. 1974. Existential sentences in English. MIT dissertation.
153. MINOR, S. 2005. Nulevaja anafora v konstrukcijax s sentencial'nymi aktantami, ili. [Zero anaphora under complementation or when pro isn't there.]. Ms., Moscow University. (In Russian.)
154. MIYAGAWA, S. 1999. Causatives. In The handbook of Japanese linguistics, N. Tsujimura (ed.), 236-268. Oxford: Blackwell.
155. MIYAGAWA, S. 2004. On the EPP. Ms., MIT.
156. MOHAMMAD, M. 2000. Word order, agreement, and pronominalization in Standard and Palestinian Arabic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
157. MONAHAN, P. 2003. Backward object control in Korean. WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 101-114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
158. MONAHAN, P. 2004. Backward object control in Korean. Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
159. MOORE, J. 1998. Turkish copy-raising and A-chain locality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16:149-189.
160. MOTAPANYANE, V. 1995. Theoretical implications of complementation in Romanian. Padova: Unipress.
161. MOYSE-FAURIE, C. 1997. Syntactic and pragmatic functions of pronominal arguments in some Western Polynesian languages. Oceanic Linguistics 36:6-28.
162. NAPOLI, D. J. 1989. Predication theory: A case study in indexing theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
163. NUNES, J. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32:303-344.
164. NUNES, J. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
165. NUNES, J. & J. URIAGEREKA. 2000. Cyclicity and extraction domains. Syntax 3:20-43.
166. O'HERIN, B. 2002. Case and agreement in Abaza. Arlington: SIL International.
167. O'NEIL, J. 1995. Out of control. Northeast Linguistics Society (NELS) 25, 361-371. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
168. PARTEE, B. 1973. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy 70:601-609.
169. PARTEE, B. 1984. Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7:243-286.
170. OTSUKA, Y. 2003. VOS in Tongan: Passive or scrambling? In Proceedings of AFLA9, Proceedings of the 9th annual meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA 9), Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 19, 122-136. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
171. PERLMUTTER, D. & J. MOORE. 2002. Language-internal explanation: The distribution of Russian impersonals. Language 78:619-650.
172. PERLMUTTER, D. & S. SOAMES. 1979. Syntactic argumentation and the structure of English. Berkeley: University of California Press.
173. PESETSKY, D. & E. TORREGO. 2001. T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In Ken Hale: A life in language, M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 355-426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
174. PHILIPPAKI-WARBURTON, I. 1987. The theory of empty categories and the pro -drop parameter in Modern Greek. Journal of Linguistics 23:289-318.
175. PHILIPPAKI-WARBURTON, I. & G. CATSIMALI. 1999. On Control in Greek. In Studies in Greek syntax, A. Alexiadou, G. C. Horrocks & M. Stavrou (eds.), 153-167. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
176. POLINSKY, M. 1999. Tsez beginnings. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 25: Special session on Caucasian, Dravidian, and Turkic linguistics, 14-29. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
177. POLINSKY, M. 2002a. Control and Raising in Bezhta. Ms., University of California, San Diego.
178. POLINSKY, M. 2002b. The marvels of Tsakhur. Linguistic Typology 6:403-422.
179. POLINSKY, M. & B. COMRIE. 1999. Agreement in Tsez. Folia Linguistica 33:109-130.
180. POLINSKY, M. & E. POTSDAM. 2001. Long-distance agreement and topic in Tsez. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19:583-646.
181. POLINSKY, M. & E. POTSDAM. 2002. Backward control. Linguistic Inquiry 33:245-282.
182. POLINSKY, M. & E. POTSDAM. 2003. Control in Malagasy. In Proceedings of AFLA9, Proceedings of the 9th annual meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA 9), Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 19, 173-187. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
183. POLINSKY, M. & E. POTSDAM. 2005. Malagasy Control and its theoretical implications. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 30. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
184. POLLARD, C. & I. SAG. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
185. POSTAL, P. M. 1969. Anaphoric islands. In Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 5, 205-235. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
186. POSTAL, P. M. 1974. On raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
187. POSTAL, P. M. 2004. Skeptical linguistic essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
188. POSTAL, P. M. & G. K. PULLUM. 1988. Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19:635-670.
189. POTSDAM, E. & J. T. RUNNER. 2001. Richard returns: Copy Raising and its implications. In Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 37, 453-468. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
190. PRZEPIÓRKOWSKI, A. & A. ROSEN. 2005. Czech and Polish Raising/ Control with or without structure sharing. Research in Language (University of Łódź) 3:33-66.
191. RACKOWSKI, A. & L. TRAVIS. 2000. V-initial languages: X or XP movement and adverbial placement. In The syntax of verb initial languages, A. Carnie & E. Guilfoyle (eds.), 117-142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
192. RAPOSO, E. 1987. Case theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 18:85-109.
193. REINHART, T. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. MIT dissertation.
194. REINHART, T. & E. REULAND. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24:657-720.
195. REULAND, E. & T. REINHART. 1995. Pronouns, anaphors, and case. In Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, H. Haider, S. Olsen & S. Vikner (eds.), 241-268. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
196. RICHARDS, N. 2001. Movement in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
197. RIVERO, M.-L. 1990. Exceptional Case marking effects in Rumanian subjunctive complements. In New analyses in Romance linguistics, D. Wanner & D. Kibbee (eds.), 273-298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
198. RIZZI, L. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
199. RIZZI, L. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
200. RIZZI, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, L. Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
201. RIZZI, L. 2004. On the format of chains. Ms., University of Siena.
202. RODRIGUES, C. 2004. Impoverished morphology and movement out of case-domains. University of Maryland, College Park dissertation.
203. ROGERS, A. 1974. Physical perception of verbs in English: A study in lexical relatedness. UCLA dissertation.
204. ROSENBAUM, P. S. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
205. RUNNER, J. T. 1995. Noun phrase licensing and interpretation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.
206. RUNNER, J. T. 1998. Noun phrase licensing. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics New York: Garland.
207. RUNNER, J. T. 2006. The accusative plus infinitive construction in English. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, Vol. 1, M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.
208. SAG, I. & POLLARD, C. 1991. An integrated theory of complement control. Language 67:63-113.
209. SAG, I., T. WASOW & E. BENDER. 2003. Syntactic theory: A formal introduction, 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
210. SAN MARTIN, I. 2004. On subordination and the distribution of PRO. University of Maryland, College Park dissertation.
211. SAY, S. 2004a. Sentential complements in Adyghe. Ms., St. Petersburg University. (In Russian.)
212. SAY, S. 2004b. On so-called backward control in Adyghe. Paper presented at the Workshop on Control Structures, Zentrum für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, May 2004.
213. SCHÜTZE, C. 1999. English expletive constructions are not infected. Linguistic Inquiry 30:467-484.
214. SIGURDSSON, H. A. 1991. Icelandic Case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9:327-363.
215. SOBIN, N. 1997. Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 28:318-343.
216. STEPANOV, A. 2001. The end of CED? In WCCFL 20: Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 524-537. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
217. STOWELL, T. 1989. Raising in Irish and the projection principle. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 7:317-359.
218. STOWELL, T. 1995. What is the meaning of the present and past tenses? In Temporal reference, aspect, and actionality. Vol. 1: Semantic and syntactic perspectives, P. M. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, J. Higginbotham & M. Squartini (eds.), 381-396. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.
219. TALLERMAN, M. 1998. The uniform case-licensing of subjects in Welsh. The Linguistic Review 15:69-133.
220. TANAKA, H. 2002. Raising to object out of CP. Linguistic Inquiry 33:637-652.
221. THRÁINSSON, H. 2001. Object shift and scrambling. In A handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, M. Baltin & C. Collins (eds.), 148-202. Oxford: Blackwell.
222. TÓTH, I. 2000. Inflected infinitives in Hungarian. Tilburg University dissertation.
223. TRAVIS, L. 1991. Inner aspect and the structure of VP. Paper presented at the 21st annual meeting of the Northeast Linguistic Society (NELS), University of Ottawa.
224. UCHIBORI, A. 1997. Opacity and subjunctive complements in Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics (J/KL) 6:399-414. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
225. UCHIBORI, A. 2000. The syntax of subjunctive complements: Evidence from Japanese. University of Connecticut dissertation.
226. URA, H. 1994. Varieties of Raising and their implications for the theory of case & agreement. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 7. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL).
227. URA, H. 1998. Checking, economy, and copy-raising in Igbo. Linguistic Analysis 28:67-88.
228. URA, H. 2000. Checking theory and grammatical functions in Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
229. URIAGEREKA, J. 1999. Multiple Spell-Out. In Working minimalism, S. D. Epstein & N. Hornstein (eds.), 251-282. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
230. URIAGEREKA, J. 2001. T. Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
231. VAN VALIN, R. D. & R. J. La POLLA 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
232. VON STECHOW, A. 2002. Binding by verbs: Tense, person, and mood under attitudes. Ms., University of Tübingen.
233. WALENSKI, M. 2002. Relating parsers and grammars: On the structure and real-time comprehension of English infinitival complements. University of California, San Diego dissertation.
234. WILLIAMS, E. 1985. PRO and the subject of NP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3:297-315.
235. WURMBRAND, S. 2003. Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
236. YANG, D.-W. 1985. On the integrity of Control theory. In Northeast Linguistics Society (NELS) 14, 389-408. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
237. YOON, H.-S. J. 1996. Ambiguity of government and the chain condition. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14:105-162.