Movement under control

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 431-452

  Boeckx, Cedric ^a   Harnstein, Norbert ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

role; Control; Minimalism; Movement; Raising

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844473783     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/0024389041402625     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Alboiu, Gabriela. 2003. The ups and downs of obligatory control. Paper presented at the 1st North-American Syntax Conference, Concordia University, May 2003.
2. Barrie, Michael. 2003. Moving toward partial control. Paper presented at NELS 34, SUNY Stony Brook.
3. Boeckx, Cedric. 2000. A note on contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 31:357-366.
4. Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. 2003a. Control in Icelandic. Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., and University of Maryland, College Park.
5. Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. 2003b. On eliminating D-Structure: The case of binominal each. Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., and University of Maryland, College Park.
6. Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. 2003c. Reply to "Control is not movement." Linguistic Inquiry 34:269-280.
7. Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. In preparation. Control and minimalism. Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., and University of Maryland, College Park.
8. Borer, Hagit. 2003. Structuring sense. Ms., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
9. Bošković, Željko. 1994. D-Structure, Theta-Criterion, and movement into theta-positions. Linguistic Analysis 24:247-286.
10. Bošković, Željko. 1995. Case properties of clauses and the Greed Principle. Studia Linguistica 49:32-53.
11. Boškovic, Željko, and Daiko Takahashi. 1998. Scrambling and Last Resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29:347-366.
12. Bowers, John. 1973. Grammatical relations. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
13. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
14. Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal syntax, ed. by Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71-132. New York; Academic Press.
15. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Kennéth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
16. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
17. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
18. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
19. Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon, and C.-T. James Huang, eds. 2001. Long-distance reflexives. Syntax and Semantics 33. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
20. Courtenay, Karen. 1998. Summary: Subject control verb PROMISE in English, http://linguist.org/issues/9/9-651.html.
21. Culicover, Peter, and Ray Jackendoff. 2001. Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32:493-512.
22. Dowty, David. 1989. On the semantic content of the notion of "thematic role." In Properties, types, and meanings, vol. 2, ed. by Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara Partee, and Raymond Turner, 69-129. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
23. Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
24. Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2003. Prolific domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Higginbotham, James. 1980. Pronouns and bound variables. Linguistic Inquiry 11:679-708.
26. Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30:69-96.
27. Hornstein, Norbert. 2001. Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Hornstein, Norbert. 2003. On control. In Minimalist syntax, ed. by Randall Hendrick, 6-81. Oxford: Blackwell.
29. Hornstein, Norbert, and Hirohisa Kiguchi. 2001. PRO-gate and movement. Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
30. Hornstein, Norbert, and Mituse Motomura. 2002. Psych verbs, theta roles and reconstruction. In Proceedings of 2002 LSK International Summer Conference, vol. 2, 39-58. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.
31. Hornstein, Norbert, Sara Rosen, and Juan Uriagereka. 1996. Integral predication. In Proceedings of the 14th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Jose Camacho, Lina Choueiri, and Maki Watanabe, 169-183. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
32. Kapetangianni, Konstantia, and Daniel Seely. 2003. Control in Greek: Explanation by deduction, agreement by degrees. Ms., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti.
33. Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
34. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
35. Kayne, Richard. 2002. Pronouns and their antecedents. In Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, ed. by Samuel David Epstein and T. Daniel Seely, 133-166. Oxford: Blackwell.
36. Kiguchi, Hirohisa. 2002. Syntax unchained. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
37. Koster, Jan. 1978. Why subject sentences don't exist. In Recent transformational studies in European languages, ed. by Samuel Jay Keyser, 53-64. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
38. Landau, Idan. 1999. Elements of control. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
39. Landau, Idan. 2001. Elements of control. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
40. Landau, Idan. 2003. Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34:471-498.
41. Lasnik, Howard. 1988. Subjects and the Theta-Criterion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6:1-17.
42. Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34:506-516.
43. Lidz, Jeffrey, and William Idsardi. 1997. Chains and phono-logical form. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, ed. by Alexis Dimitriadis, Hikyoung Lee, Christine Moisset, and Alexander Williams, 109-126. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 5.1. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Linguistics Club.
44. Lin, Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
45. Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 25:609-665.
46. Manzini, Maria Rita, and Anna Roussou. 2000. A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Lingua 110:409-447.
47. Martin, Roger. 1996. A minimalist theory of PRO and control. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
48. Marušič, Franc. 2003. CP under control. Paper presented at Formal Description of Slavic Languages 6, Leipzig.
49. McGinnis, Martha. 1998. Locality in A-movement. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
50. Monahan, Philip. 2003. Backward control in Korean. Paper presented at the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, University of California, San Diego.
51. Nunes, Jairo. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32:303-344.
52. O'Neil, John. 1997. Means of control. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
53. Ozturk, Balkiz. 2004. Case, referentiality, and phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
54. Polinsky, Maria, and Eric Potsdam. 2002. Backward control. Linguistic Inquiry 33:240-282.
55. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1998. On the syntax of subnominal clitics: Cliticization and ellipsis. Syntax 1:300-330.
56. Ramchand, Gillian. 2002. First phase syntax. Ms., Oxford University.
57. Rizzi, Luigi. 1986a. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17:501-557.
58. Rizzi, Luigi. 1986b. On chain formation. In The syntax of pronominal clitics, ed. by Hagit Borer, 65-95. New York: Academic Press.
59. Rodrigues, Cilene. 2003. Thematic chains. Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
60. Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
61. Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
62. Safir, Ken. 1999. Vehicle change and reconstruction in A-chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30:587-620.
63. Safir, Ken, and Tim Stowell. 1987. Binominal each. In Proceedings of NELS 18, vol. 2, ed. by James Blevins and Juli Carter, 426-450. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
64. Sigurosson, Halldór Ármann. 1991. Icelandic Case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9:327-363.
65. Sugisaki, Koji. 2002. Innate constraints on language variation: Evidence from child language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
66. Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983. The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review 3:89-102.
67. Tellier, Christine. 1990. Underived nominals and the Projection Principle: Inherent possessors. In Proceedings of NELS 20, vol. 2, ed. by Juli Carter, Rose-Marie Dechaine, Bill Philip, and Tim Sherer, 472-486. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
68. Thornton, Rosalind. 1990. Adventures in long-distance moving. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
69. Ura, Hiroyuki. 1996. Multiple feature checking: A theory of grammatical function splitting. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, Mass.
70. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 2002. Issues relating to a derivational theory of binding. In Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, ed. by Samuel David Epstein and T. Daniel Seely, 269-304. Oxford: Blackwell.