Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure

Theoretical Linguistics

Volumn 31, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 1-45

  Fox, Danny ^a   Pesetsky, David ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21744441548     PISSN: 03014428     EISSN: 16134060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/thli.2005.31.1-2.1     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003). The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Barss, A. (1986). Chains and Anaphoric Dependence: On Reconstruction and Its Implications, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Doctoral Dissertation.
3. Blevins, J. (1990). Syntactic Complexity: Evidence for Discontinuity and Multidomination, University of Massachusetts at Amherst: Doctoral dissertation.
4. Bobaljik, J. (1994). What Does Adjacency Do? In: Harley, H. & Phillips, C. (eds.) The Morphology-Syntax Connection (pp. 1-32). MIT.
5. _(1995). Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Doctoral Dissertation.
6. _(2002). A-Chains at the PF-Interface: Copies and 'Covert' Movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20, 197-267.
7. Bošković, Ž. (2001). On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related Phenomena. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
8. Chomsky, N. (1972). Some Empirical Issues in the Theory of Transformational Grammar. In: Peters, P. S. (ed.) Goals of Linguistic Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. _(1973). Conditions on Transformations. In: Anderson, S. & Kiparsky, P. (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 232-286). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
10. _(1993). A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In: Hale, K. & Keyser, J. (eds.) The View from Building 20 (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
11. _(2000). Minimalist Inquiries. In: Martin, R., Michaels, D. & Uriagereka, J. (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-156). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
12. _(2001a). Derivation by Phase. In: Kenstowicz, M. (ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
13. _(2001b). Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
14. Christensen, K. K. (1986). Norwegian Ingen: A Case of Post-Syntactic Lexicalization. In: Osten, D. & Holmberg, A. (eds.) Workshop at the Ninth Scandinavian Conference (pp. 21-35). Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
15. _(1995). Quantifier-Movement and Its Syntactic Reflexes. Ms., University of Bergen.
16. Den Besten, H. (1983). On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. In: Abraham, W. (ed.) On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Epstein, S. D., Groat, E. M., Kawashima, R. & Kitahara, H. (1998). A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Fox, D. (1999). Reconstruction, Binding Theory, and the Interpretation of Chains. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 157-196.
19. Fox, D. & Lasnik, H. (2003). Successive Cyclic Movement and Island Repair: The Difference between Sluicing and VP Ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 143-154.
20. Fox, D. & Nissenbaum, J. (1999). Extraposition and Scope: A Case for Overt QR. In: Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 18 (pp. 132-144). Somerville, MA: Casadilla Press.
21. Fox, D. & Pesetsky, D. (in prep.). Cyclic Linearization and the Typology of Movement.
22. Fujita, N. (1994). On the Nature of Modification: A Study of Floating Quantifiers and Related Constructions, University of Rochester.: PhD.
23. Fukui, N. & Takano, Y. (1998). Symmetry in Syntax: Merge and Demerge. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 7, 27-86.
24. Graeanin, M. (2004). V-N Compounds in Italian and Croatian. Ms., MIT.
25. Groat, E. & O'Neil, J. (1996). Spell-out at the LF Interface. In: Abraham, W., Epstein, S. D., Thráinsson, H. & Zwart, C. J.-W. (eds.) Minimal Ideas (pp. 113-139). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
26. Haider, H. (1992). Branching and Discharge, vol. 23. Working Papers of the SF13 340. University of Stuttgart.
27. Haig, J. H. (1980). Some Observations on Quantifier Float in Japanese. Linguistics, 18, 1065-1083.
28. Hale, K. L. & Keyser, S. J. (1993). On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations. In: Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (eds.) The View from Building 20 (pp. 53-110). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
29. _(2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
30. Holmberg, A. (1986). Word Order and Syntactic Features, Stockholm: Doctoral Dissertation.
31. _(1998). Remarks on Holmberg's Generalization. Studio Linguistica, 53, 1-39.
32. Iatridou, S. & Kroch, A. (1992). The Licensing of CP-Recursion and Its Relevance to the Germanic Verb-Second Phenomenon. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 50, 1-24.
33. Johnson, K. & Vikner, S. (1994). The Position of the Verb in Scandinavian Infinitives: In V or C but Not in I. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 53, 61-84.
34. Jónsson, J. G. (1996). Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic, Linguistics, University of Massachusetts: Doctoral Dissertation.
35. Kathol, A. (2000). Linear Syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Kayne, R. S. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
37. Ko, H. (2003). Asymmetry in Scrambling and Cyclic Spell-Out. Paper presented at Approaching Asymmetry at the Interface Conference, Université du Québec à Montréal.
38. _(2004). Asymmetries in Scrambling and Cyclic Linearization. Ms., MIT.
39. Kuroda, S.-Y. (1983). What Can Japanese Say About Government and Binding. In: Barlow, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 153-164). Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association.
40. Landau, I. (2003). Modular Recoverability: Chain Resolution in Hebrew V(P)-Fronting. Ms., Ben Gurion University.
41. Lasnik, H. (2001). When Can You Save a Structure by Destroying It? Paper presented at Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Georgetown University.
42. Lebeaux, D. (1991). Relative Clauses, Licensing, and the Nature of the Derivation. In: Rothstein, S. D. (ed.) Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing. San Diego: Academic Press.
43. Matushansky, O. (to appear). Head Movement in Linguistic Theory. In: Sabbagh, J. & Hiraiwa, K. (eds.) MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
44. McCloskey, J. (2000). Quantifier Float and WA-Movement in an Irish English. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 57-84.
45. McDaniel, D. (1989). Partial and Multiple WA-Movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 7, 565-604.
46. Merchant, J. (to appear). Variable Island Repair under Ellipsis. In: Johnson, K. (ed.) Topics in Ellipsis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Miyagawa, S. (1989). Structure and Case Marking in Japanese. San Diego: Academic Press.
48. Müller, G. (2000). Shape Conservation and Remnant Movement. Paper presented at Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Rutgers University.
49. Nilsen, Ø. (2003). Eliminating Positions: Syntax and Semantics of Sentence Modification, University of Utrecht: Doctoral dissertation.
50. Nissenbaum, J. (2000). Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement, Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Doctoral Dissertation.
51. Perlmutter, D. (1972). Evidence for Shadow Pronouns in French Relativization. In: Peranteau, P. M., Levi, J. N. & Phares, G. C. (eds.) The Chicago Which Hunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival, April 13, 1972. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
52. Pesetsky, D. (1998). Some Optimality Principles of Sentence Pronunciation. In: Barbosa, P., Fox, D., Hagstrom, P., McGinnis, M. & Pesetsky, D. (eds.) Is the Best Good Enough? (pp. 337-384). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
53. Pesetsky, D. & Torrego, E. (2004). Tense, Case, and the Nature of Syntactic Categories. In: Guéron, J. & Lecarme, J. (eds.) The Syntax of Time. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
54. Rögnvaldsson, E. (1987). On Word Order in Icelandic. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of Teachers of Scandinavian Studies in Great Britain and Northern Ireland (pp. 33-49). London: University College London.
55. Ross, J. R. (1969). Guess Who? In: Binnick, R., Davison, A., Green, G. and Morgan, J. (eds.) Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago.
56. Sabbagh, J. (2003). Ordering and Linearizing Rightward Movement. Ms., MIT.
57. Saito, M. (1985). Some Asymmetries in Japanese and Their Theoretical Implications, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Doctoral Dissertation.
58. Sells, P. (2001). Structure, Alignment and Optimality in Swedish. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
59. Sigurdsson, H. Á. (1989). Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic, University of Lund: Doctoral Dissertation.
60. Svenonius, P. (2000). Quantifier Movement in Icelandic. In: P. Svenonius (ed.) The Derivation of VO and OV. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
61. Takahashi, S. (2004). Pseudo-Gapping and Cyclic Linearization. In: Moulton, K. and Wolf, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 34.
62. Toyoshima, T. (2001). Head-to-Spec Movement. In: Alexandrova, G. M. & Arnaudova, O. (eds.) The Minimalist Parameter: Selected Papers from the Open Linguistics Forum, Ottawa, 12-23 March 1997. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
63. Travis, L. D. (1984). Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Doctoral Dissertation.
64. _(1991). Parameters of Phrase Structure and Verb-Second Phenomena. In: Freidin, R. (ed.) Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar (pp. 339-364). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
65. Uriagereka, J. (1999). Multiple Spell-Out. In: Epstein, S. & Hornstein, N. (eds.) Working Minimalism (pp. 251-282). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
66. Williams, E. (2003). Representation Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
67. Zwart, C. J.-W. (1996). Morphosyntax of Verb Movement: A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch, vol. 39. Dordrecht: Kluwer.