Issues Relating to a Derivational Theory of Binding

Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 269-304

  Zwart, Jan Wouter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anaphoricity; Derivational approach; Derivational theory; Lexical feature; Syntactic relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948759661     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470755662.ch12     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Akmajian, Adrian and Ray S. Jackendoff. 1970. "Coreferentiality and stress." Linguistic Inquiry 1: 124-6.
2. Anagnostopoulou, Elena and Martin Everaert. 1996. "Asymmetries in binding: configurational and thematic effects on anaphora." GLOW Newsletter 36: 14-15.
3. Bobaljik, Jonathan D. and S. Brown. 1997. "Interarboreal operations: head movement and the Extension Requirement." Linguistic Inquiry 28: 345-56.
4. Branigan, Phil. 1992. "Subjects and complementizers." Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
5. Branigan, Phil. 2000. "Binding effects with covert movement." Linguistic Inquiry 31:553-7.
6. Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-binding Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989. "Anaphora and attitudes 'de se'." In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas, eds., Semantics and Contextual Expression. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 1-31.
8. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
9. Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. "A minimalist program for linguistic theory." In N. Chomsky, 1995, The Minimalist Program, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 167-217.
11. Chomsky, Noam. 2001a. "Derivation by phase." In M. Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Chomsky, Noam. 2001b. "Beyond explanatory adequacy." MS, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
13. Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik. 1993. "The theory of principles and parameters." In N. Chomsky, 1995, The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 13-127.
14. Demirdache, Hamida. 1997. "Condition C." In H. Bennis, P. Pica, and J. Rooryck, eds., Atomism and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 51-87.
15. Epstein, Samuel D. 1995. "Un-principled syntax and the derivation of syntactic relations." MS, University of Harvard. In S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein, eds., 1999, Working Minimalism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 317-45.
16. Epstein, S. D., Erich M. Groat, Ruriko Kawashima, and Hisatsugu Kitahara. 1998. A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Epstein, Samuel D. and Daniel Seely. 1999. "Spec-ifying the GF 'subject': eliminating A-chains and the EPP within a derivational model." MS, University of Michigan.
18. Evans, Gareth. 1980. "Pronouns." Linguistic Inquiry 11: 337-62.
19. Everaert, Martin. 1990. "Nominative anaphors in Icelandic: morphology or syntax?" In W. Abraham, W. Kosmeijer, and E. Reuland, eds., Issues in Germanic Syntax. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 277-305.
20. Fiengo, Robert and Robert May. 1994. Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Fox, Danny. 1995. "Condition C effects in ACD." MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27:105-19.
22. Fox, Danny. 1999. "Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains." Linguistic Inquiry 30, 157-96.
23. Gazdar, Gerald. 1981. "Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure." Linguistic Inquiry 12: 155-84.
24. Hale, Kenneth and Samuel J. Keyser. 1998. "The basic elements of argument structure." MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32: 73-118.
25. Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz. 1993. "Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection." In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser, eds., The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111-76.
26. Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Heim, Irene. 1998. "Anaphora and semantic interpretation: a reinterpretation of Reinhart's approach." MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25: 205-46.
28. Heycock, Caroline. 1995. "Asymmetries in reconstruction." Linguistic Inquiry 26: 547-70.
29. Higginbotham, James. 1980. "Pronouns and bound variables." Linguistic Inquiry 11:679-708.
30. Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Jayaseelan, K. A. 1997. "Anaphors as pronouns." Studia Linguistica 51: 186-234.
32. Johnson, Kyle. 1991. "Object positions." Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 577-636.
33. Kayne, Richard S. 2000. "How movement, binding, and agreement are related." Paper presented at the 19th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Los Angeles, February 4. Also presented as "Toward an understanding of Condition C effects" at the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, Groningen, May 27.
34. Kayne, Richard S. This volume. "Pronouns and their antecedents." Klein, Maarten. 1980. "Anaforische relaties in het Nederlands." In M. Klein, ed., Taal kundig beschouwd. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 206-21.
35. Koster, Jan. 1984. "On binding and control." Linguistic Inquiry 15: 417-59.
36. Koster, Jan. 2000. "Pied piping and the word orders of English and Dutch." Proceedings of NELS 30: 415-26.
37. Lakoff, George. 1968. "Pronouns and reference." In J. McCawley, ed., 1976, Notes from the Linguistic Underground. New York: Academic Press, pp. 273-335.
38. Lasnik, Howard. 1976. "Remarks on coreference." Linguistic Analysis 2: 1-22.
39. Lasnik, Howard. 1998. "Some reconstruction riddles." University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 83-98.
40. Lebeaux, David. 1988. "Language acquisition and the form of grammar." Dissertation, University of Maryland.
41. Lebeaux, David. 1998. "Where does the binding theory apply?" MS, NEC Research Institute, Princeton, NJ.
42. Martin, Roger. 1996. "A minimalist theory of PRO and control." Dissertation, University of Connecticut.
43. McGinnis, Martha-Jo. 1998. "Locality in A-movement." Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
44. Montalbetti, Mario. 1984. "After binding: on the interpretation of pronouns." Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
45. Osumi, Midori. 1995. Tinrin Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
46. Postma, Gertjan. 1997. "Logical entailment and the possessive nature of reflexive pronouns." In H. Bennis, P. Pica, and J. Rooryck, eds., Atomism and Binding. Dordrecht:Foris Publications, pp. 295-322.
47. Rehg, Kenneth L. 1981. Ponapean Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
48. Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. "The syntactic domain of anaphora." Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
49. Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
50. Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland. 1993. "Reflexivity." Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657-720.
51. Rooryck, Johan and Guido VandenWyngaerd. 1998. "The self as other." Proceedings of NELS 28: 359-73.
52. Rullmann, Hotze. 1988. "Referential dependency." MA thesis, University of Groningen.
53. Saltarelli, Mario. 1988. Basque. London: Croom Helm.
54. Schütze, Carson. 1997. "Infl in child and adult language: agreement, Case and licensing." Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
55. Sells, Peter. 1987. "Aspects of logophoricity." Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445-79.
56. Sylla, Yèro. 1993. Syntaxe peule: contribution à la récherche sur les universaux du langage. Dakar: Les Nouvelles Éditions Africaines du Sénégal.
57. Tancredi, Christopher. 1992. "Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition." Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
58. Tancredi, Christopher. 1997. "Pronouns and perspectives." In H. Bennis, P. Pica, and J. Rooryck, eds., Atomism and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 381-407.
59. Ter Meulen, Alice G. B. 2000. "On the economy of interpretation: semantic constraints on se-reflexives in Dutch." In H. Bennis, M. Everaert, and E. Reuland, eds., Interface Strategies. Amsterdam: KNAW, pp. 239-55.
60. Torrego, Esther. 1996. "Experiencers and raising verbs." In R. Freidin, ed., Current Issues in Comparative Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 101-20.
61. Ura, Hiroyaki. 2000. "On the typology of subject raising and English." English Linguistics 17: 417-26.
62. van Riemsdijk, Henk and Edwin S. Williams. 1981. "NP-structure." The Linguistic Review 1: 171-217.
63. Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1991. "Clitics in Dutch: evidence for the position of infl." Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 33: 71-92.
64. Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1998a. "Where is syntax? Syntactic aspects of left-dislocation in Dutch and English." In P. Culicover and L. McNally, eds., The Limits of Syntax (Syntax and Semantics 29). San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 365-93.
65. Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1998b. "A note on 'Principle C' in ellipsis constructions." MIT Press Chomsky Celebration web site (http://mitpress2.mit.edu/celebration)
66. Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1999a. "A dynamic theory of binding." In E. van Gelderen and V. Samiian, eds., Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics 10, Fresno:California State University, pp. 533-52.
67. Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1999b. " 'Referentie' en de typologie van NPs: de status van pro." Tabu 29: 49-66.
68. Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2001. "Syntactic and phonological verb movement." Syntax 4:34-62.