The Power and Purpose of International Law: Insights from the Theory and Practice of Enforcement

The Power and Purpose of International Law: Insights from the Theory and Practice of Enforcement

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-406

  O'Connell, Mary Ellen ^a  

^a NOTRE DAME LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Armed Force; Authority; Countermeasures; Courts; Enforcement; Natural Law; Positive Law; Process Theory; Sanctions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922892551     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368949.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (187)

1. Joachim von Elbe, The Evolution of the Concept of the Just War in International Law, 33 AJIL 665, 667 (1939).
2. Geoffrey Parker, Early Modern Europe, in THE LAWS OF WAR, CONSTRAINTS ON WARFARE IN THE WESTERN WORLD 40, 42-44 (Michael Howard et al. eds., 1994).
3. Hersch Lauterpacht, The Grotian Tradition in International Law, 23 BRIT. Y.B. INT'L L. 1, 16 (1946).
4. Alexander Orakhelashvili, The Idea of European International Law, 17 EJIL 315, 325 (2006).
5. Lassa Oppenheim, The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method, 2 AJIL 313, 332 (1908).
6. Amos J. Peaslee, The Sanction of International Law, 10 AJIL 328, 329 (1916).
7. A. Bulmerincq, Die Staatsstreitigkeiten und ihre Entscheidung ohne Krieg, in 4 HOTLZENDORFFS HANDBUCH DES VöLKERRECHTS 85, 87 (1889).
8. Hans Kelsen, The Natural Law Doctrine Before the Tribunal of Science, in WHAT IS JUSTICE? JUSTICE, LAW AND POLITICS IN THE MIRROR OF SCIENCE: COLLECTED ESSAYS 144 (1957).
9. Roscoe Pound, Law and the Science of Law in Recent Theories, 43 YALE L.J. 525, 532 (1934).
10. H.L.A. Hart, Kelsen Visited, 10 UCLA L. REV. 709, 728 (1963).
11. Quincy Wright, Enforcement of International Law, 38 ASIL PROC. 77, 78 (1944).
12. Josef L. Kunz, Sanctions in International Law, 54 AJIL 31, 32 (1960).
13. Hans Kelsen, The Legal Status of Germany According to the Declaration of Berlin, 39 AJIL 518, (1945).
14. Hans Kelsen, Collective and Individual Responsibility in International Law with Particular Regard to the Punishment of War Criminals, 31 CAL. L. REV. 530, (1943).
15. Alfred Verdross and Heribert Franz Koeck, Natural Law: The Tradition of Universal Reason and Authority, in THE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: ESSAYS IN LEGAL PHILOSOPHY DOCTRINE AND THEORY 17 (R. St. J. Macdonald & D.M. Johnston eds., 1983).
16. George W. Bush, Address to the United Nations General Assembly, Sept. 12, 2002, available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020912-1.htm.
17. Mary Ellen O'Connell, Resolution 1441: Compelling Saddam, Restraining Bush, JURIST, Nov. 21, 2002, available at http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forum/forumnew73.php.
18. Richard Norton-Taylor, Revealed: The Government's Secret Legal Advice on the Iraq War, GUARDIAN (London), Apr. 28, 2005, at 1.
19. Sean D. Murphy, Assessing the Legality of Invading Iraq, 92 GEO. L.J. 173, (2005).
20. Richard A. Falk, What Future for the UN Charter System of War Prevention?, 97 AJIL 590, (2003).
21. Mary Ellen O'Connell, Addendum to Armed Force in Iraq: Issues of Legality, INSIGHTS, Apr. 2003, available at http://www.asil.org/insights/insigh99a1.htm.
22. Richard C. Edis, A Job Well Done: The Founding of the United Nations Revisited, 6 CAMBRIDGE REV. INT'L AFF. 29, 36-38 (1992).
23. Jochen Frowein and Nico Krisch, Chapter VII. Action with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace, and Acts of Aggression, in I THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS, A COMMENTARY 701 (Bruno Simma et al. eds., 2d ed. 2002).
24. Mary Ellen O'Connell, The Prospects for Enforcing Monetary Judgments of the International Court of Justice: A Study of Nicaragua's Judgment Against the United States, 30 VA. J. INT'L L. 891, (1990).
25. Mary Ellen O'Connell, CONTINUING LIMITS ON UN INTERVENTION IN CIVIL WAR, 67 Ind. L. J. 903, 909-10 (1992).
26. James B. Steinberg, International Involvement in the Yugoslavia Conflict, in ENFORCING RESTRAINT: COLLECTIVE INTERVENTION IN INTERNAL CONFLICTS 27 (Lori F. Damrosch ed., 1993).
27. Lucia Mouat, UN to Break New Ground in Plan for Peacekeepers in Somalia, CHRISTIAN SCI. MONITOR, Mar. 16, 1993, at 2.
28. Mark R. Hutchinson, Restoring Hope: U.N. Security Council Resolutions for Somalia and an Expanded Doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention, 34 HARV. INT'L L.J. 624, 626 (1993).
29. Michael J. Glennon, Sovereignty and Community after Haiti: Rethinking the Collective Use of Force, 89 AJIL 70, 72 (1995).
30. W. Michael Reisman, Assessing the Lawfulness of Nonmilitary Enforcement: The Case of Economic Sanctions, 89 ASIL PROC. 350, 350-351 (1995).
31. Michael Reisman & Douglas Stevick, The Applicability of International Law Standards United Nations Economic Sanctions Programmes, 9 EJIL 86, 117-24 (1996).
32. John Mueller & Karl Mueller, Sanctions of Mass Destruction, 78 FOR. AFF., May/June 1999, at 43, (1999).
33. John Longo, Preventive Wars, Just War Principles, and the United Nations, in CURRENT DEBATES IN GLOBAL JUSTICE, 247, 263-64 (Gillian Brock & Darrel Moellendorf eds., 2005).
34. John Quigley, The United States Invasion of Grenada: Stranger than Fiction, 18 U. MIAMI INTER-AM. L. REV. 271, 330-37 (1986/87).
35. Jane Perlez, Italy's Troops in Albania Are Treading on Thin Ice, N.Y. TIMES, Apr. 25, 1997, at A3.
36. Bakhityar Tuzmukhamedov, Peacekeeping/Peacemaking Russia/CIS, MOSCOW SEGODNYA, Feb. 23, 1996, at 9.
37. David Wippman, Enforcing the Peace: ECOWAS and the Liberian Civil War, in ENFORCING RESTRAINT 157, 185-86.
38. Ian Brownlie, The Decisions of Political Organs of the United Nations and the Rule of Law, in ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF WANG TIEYA 91, 100-02 (Ronald St. John Macdonald ed., 1994).
39. W. Michael Reisman, The Constitutional Crisis in the United Nations, 87 AJIL 83, 96 (1993).
40. John Diamond, On Shaky Ground/No Diplomatic Charter Justifies NATO Air Assaults, Scholars Say, HOUS. CHRON., Mar. 28, 1999 at 1.
41. Lee Feinstein & Anne-Marie Slaughter, A Duty to Prevent, 83 FOREIGN AFF., Jan./Feb. 2004, at 136, 137, 148-49.
42. Michael J. Glennon, The New Interventionism: The Search for a Just International Law, FOREIGN AFF., May/June 1999, at 2.
43. Rudolf L. Bindschedler, International Organizations, General Aspects, 1289, 1289-90 in 2 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (Rudolf Bernhardt ed., 1992).
44. David J. Bederman, The Souls of International Organizations: Legal Personality and the Lighthouse at Cape Spartel, 36 VA. J. INT'L L. 275, 377 (1996).
45. Krzysztof Skubiszewski, Enactment of Law by International Organizations, 41 BRIT. Y.B. INT'L. 198, 226 (1965-66).
46. Cahier, Le Droit Interne des Organisations Internationales, 67 REVUE GENERALE DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC 563, 581-82 (1963).
47. A.I.L. Campbell, The Limits of the Powers of International Organizations, 32 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 523, (1983).
48. Elihu Lauterpacht, The Legal Effect of Illegal Acts of International Organizations, in CAMBRIDGE ESSAYS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF LORD MC NAIR 88, 100 (1965).
49. David J. Bederman, The Reparation for Injuries Case: The Law of Nations is Transformed into International Law, in INTERNATIONAL LAW STORIES 307 (John E. Noyes et al. eds., 2007).
50. John W. Head, Suspension of Debtor Countries' Voting Rights in the IMF: An Assessment of the Third Amendment to the IMF Charter, 33 VA. J. INT'L L. 591, 628 (1993).
51. Joseph Gold, The IMF Invents New Penalties, in 1 TOWARDS MORE EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF HENRY G. SCHERMERS 127, 134 (Niels Blokker & Sam Muller eds., 1994).
52. Fernando R. Tesón, Collective Humanitarian Intervention, 17 MICH J. INT'L L. 323, 369 (1996).
53. Peter Malanczuk, Countermeasures and Self-Defense as Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the International Law Commission's Draft Articles on State Responsibility, in UNITED NATIONS CODIFICATION OF STATE RESPONSIBILITY 197, 236 (Marina Spinedi & Bruno Simma eds., 1987).
54. John Dugard, Judicial Review of Sanctions, in UNITED NATIONS SANCTIONS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW 83 (Vera Gowlland-Debbas ed., 2001).
55. Larissa van den Herik, The Security's Targeted Sanctions Regimes: In Need of Better Protection of the Individual, 20 LEIDEN J. INT'L L. 797, (2007).
56. Ted L. McDorman, Port State Enforcement: A Comment on Article 218 of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, 28 J. MAR. L. & COM. 305, (1997).
57. Mary Ellen O'Connell, Enforcing the New International Law of the Environment, 35 GER. Y.B. INT'L L. 293, 298 (1992).
58. Ted L.McDorman, Regional Port State Control Agreements: Some Issues of International Law, 5 OCEAN & COASTAL L.J. 207, (2000).
59. Charlotte de Fontaubert, The United Nations Conference on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks: Another Step in the Implementation of the Law of the Sea Conventions, 12 OCEAN Y.B. 82, 87 (1996).
60. Moritaka Hayashi, Enforcement by Non-Flag States on the High Seas Under the 1995 Agreement on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, 9 GEO. INT'L ENVTL. L. REV. 1, 11 (1996).
61. David H. Anderson, The Straddling Stocks Agreement of 1995-An Initial Assessment, 45 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 463, 471-72 (1996).
62. Amy E. Vulpio, Note: From the Forests of Asia to the Pharmacies of New York City: Searching for a Safe Haven for Rhinos and Tigers, 11 GEO. INT'L ENVT'L L. REV. 463, 479 (1979).
63. Tom Kenworthy, U.S. Pressures China, Taiwan on Animal Trade, WASH. POST, June 10, 1993, at A28.
64. Shennie Patel, Comment, The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species: Enforcement and the Last Unicorn, 18 HOUS. J. INT'L L. 157, 199 (1995).
65. Allan Rosas, Reactions to Non-Compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention, in THE NEW CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION-IMPLEMENTATION AND PROSPECTS 415, 417.
66. Frederic L. Kirgis, Jr., Remarks, 85 ASIL PROC. 434, 435 (1991).
67. David G. Victor, The Operation and Effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol's Non-Compliance Procedure, in THE IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS: THEORY AND PRACTICE 137, 148 (David G. Victor et al. eds., 1998).
68. Malvina Halberstam, Note, Excluding Israel from the General Assembly by a Rejection of its Credentials, 78 AJIL 179, (1984).
69. Richard W. Nelson, International Law and U.S. Withholding of Payments to International Organizations, 80 AJIL 973, 979 (1986).
70. Frederic L. Kirgis, Jr., Admission of "Palestine" as a Member of a Specialized Agency and Withholding the Payment of Assessments in Response, 84 AJIL 218, (1990).
71. Paul Lewis, U.N. Health Agency Seeks Compromise on P.L.O., N.Y. TIMES, May 7, 1989, at 15.
72. Thomas M. Franck, The "Powers of Appreciation": Who Is the Ultimate Guardian of UN Legality?, 86 AJIL 519, (1992).
73. José Alvarez, Legal Remedies and the United Nations' A La Cárte Problem, 12 MICH. J. INT'L L. 229, 232-44 (1991).
74. Michael Singer, Jurisdictional Immunity of International Organizations: Human Rights and Functional Necessity Concerns, 36 VA. J. INT'L L. 53 (1995).
75. Richard J. Oparil, Immunity of International Organizations in United States Courts: Absolute or Restrictive?, 24 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 689, (1991).
76. Charles H. Brower, II, International Immunities: Some Dissident Views on the Role of Municipal Courts, 41 VA. J. INT'L L. 1, (2000).
77. Detlev F. Vagts, International Law in the Third Reich, 84 AJIL 661, 671 (1990).
78. Leo Gross, Editorial Comment: Hans Kelsen, October 11, 1886-April 15, 1973, 67 AJIL 491, 493 (1973).
79. Hans J. Morgenthau, Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law, 34 AJIL 260, (1940).
80. Richard H. Steinberg & Jonathan M. Zasloff, Power and International Law, 100 AJIL 64, 74 (2006).
81. Anthony Carty, Why Theory?-The Implications for International Law Teaching, in THEORY AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: AN INTRODUCTION 75, 83-84 (1991).
82. W. Michael Reisman, Sanctions and Enforcement, in THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER 273 (Cyril E. Black & Richard A. Falk eds., 1971).
83. Myres S. McDougal, Perspectives for an International Law of Human Dignity, 53 ASIL PROC. 107, 108 (1959).
84. Roger Fisher, Internal Enforcement of International Rules, in DISARMAMENT: ITS POLITICS AND ECONOMICS 99, 106-20 (S. Melman ed., 1962).
85. John Finnis, On Hart's Ways: Law as Reason and as Fact, 52 AM. J. JURIS. 25, 53 (2007).
86. H.L.A. Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, 71 HARV. L. REV. 593, (1958).
87. Lon L. Fuller, Positivism and Fidelity to Law-A Reply to Professor Hart, 71 HARV. L. REV. 630, (1958).
88. Anthony D'Amato, Is International Law really 'Law,' 79 Nw. U. L. REV. 1293 (1984).
89. George W. Downs, Enforcement and the Evolution of Cooperation, 19 MICH. J. INT'L L. 319, 320 (1998).
90. George W. Downs, Compliance and Enforcement in Regime Management, 91 PROC. ASIL 59, (1997).
91. Harold K. Jacobson & Edith Brown Weiss, Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords: Preliminary Observations from a Collaborative Project, 1 GLOBAL GOVERNANCE 119, 123 (1995);.
92. Oona A.Hathaway, Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?, 111 YALE L.J. 1935, (2002).
93. Bruno Simma, From Bilateralism to Community Interest, in 250 RECUEIL DES COURS 217 (1994 VI)(1997).
94. Christian Tomuschat, Obligations Arising for States Without or Against Their Will, in 241 RECUEIL DES COURS 193 (1993 IV)(1994).
95. Joachim A. Frowein, Das Staagengemeinschtsinteresse - Probleme bei Formulierung und Durchsetzung, in FESTSCHRIFT FÜR KARL DOEHRING ZUM 70 GEBURTSTAG 219 (Kai Hailbronner et al. eds., 1989).
96. Martti Koskenniemi, Breach of Treaty or Non-Compliance? Reflections on the Enforcement of the Montreal Protocol, 3 Y.B. INT'L ENVTL. L. 123, (1992).
97. Hans Bertens, The Postmodern Weltaanschauung and its Relation to Modernism: An Introductory Survey, in APPROACHING POSTMODERNISM 9 (Douwe Fokkema and Hans Bertens eds., 1986).
98. Louis Henkin, That "S" Word: Sovereignty, and Globalization, and Human Rights, Et Cetera, 68 FORDHAM L. REV. 1, 2 (1999).
99. Andreas L. Paulus, International Law After Postmodernism: Towards Renewal or Decline of International Law? 14 LEIDEN J. INT'L L. 727, 729 n.7 (2001).
100. Brad R. Roth, Governmental Illegitimacy and Neocolonialism: Response to Review by James Thuo Gathii, 98 MICH. L. REV. 2056, 2057 (2000).
101. Martti Koskenniemi, The Pull of the Mainstream, 88 MICH. L. REV. 1946-47 (1990).
102. Mary Ellen O'Connell, The UN, NATO, and International Law After Kosovo, 22 HUM. RTS. Q. 57, 80 (2002).
103. John Greenwald, The Inmate of Spandau's Last Wish, TIME, Aug. 31, 1987, at 31.
104. Julian J.E. Schutte, Legal and Practical Implications, from the Perspective of the Host Country, Relating to the Establishment of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 5 CRIM. L.F. 423, 426 (1994).
105. Stephen M. Schwebel, Commentary, in COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL COURTS 39, 42 (M.K. Bulterman & M. Kuijer eds., 1996).
106. Robert Jennings, The Judicial Enforcement of International Obligations, 47 ZAÖRV 3, 4 (1987).
107. Mary Ellen O'Connell, Preserving World Peace and the World Court, The Nicaragua Case, in INTERNATIONAL LAW STORIES 339, 366-68 (John E. Noyes et al. eds., 2007).
108. Manley O. Hudson, The Bar Associations and the World Court, Committee I, as to the ICJ, 31 A.B.A.J. 383, 386 (1945).
109. Hermann Mosler and Karin Oellers-Frahm, Article 94, in II THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS, A COMMENTARY 1174-79 (Bruno Simma et al. eds., 2d ed. 2002).
110. Louis B. Sohn, How American International Lawyers Prepared for the San Francisco Bill of Rights, 89 AJIL 540, 540, n.1 (1995).
111. Mary Ellen O'Connell, The Prospects for Enforcing Monetary Judgments of the International Court of Justice: A Study of Nicaragua's Judgment Against the United States, 30 VA. J. INT'L L. 891, 908-10 (1990).
112. Per Magid, The Post-Adjudicative Phase, in INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 324, 328 (C. Peck & R. Lee eds., 1997).
113. Bruno Simma & Carsten Hoppe, The LaGrand Case: A Story of Many Miscommunications, in INTERNATIONAL LAW STORIES 371 (John Noyes et al. eds., 2007).
114. O'Connell, The Prospect of Enforcing Monetary Judgments, 40, at 909, n.75.
115. Bernard H. Oxman, Jurisdiction and the Power to Indicate Provisional Measures, in THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT A CROSSROADS 331 (Lori Fisler Damrosch ed., 1987).
116. Mary Ellen O'Connell, The Failure to Observe Provisional Measures of Protection in the Case of Bosnia v. Yugoslavia, WALTHER-SCHÜCKINGKOLLEG, No. 15 (Institut für Internationales Recht an der Universität Kiel) (1994).
117. Sean D. Murphy, State Jurisdiction and Jurisdictional Immunities: Satisfaction of U.S. Judgments Against State Sponsors of Terrorism, 94 AJIL 117, 118-20 (2000).
118. David D. Caron, Interim Measures of Protection: Theory and Practice in Light of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 46 ZAÖRV 465, (1986).
119. Mary Ellen O'Connell, International Legal Issues of the Dayton Accords: Arresting the Indicted and Preventing Partition, in A CLOSE-UP VIEW OF EUROPEAN SECURITY (Institute for Strategic and Defence Studies, Budapest, 1996).
120. Volker Nienaber, The Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, in UNDERSTANDING TRANSNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (2000).
121. Susan Choi, Judicial Enforcement of Arbitration Awards Under the ICSID and New York Conventions, 28 N.Y.U. J. INT'L L. & POL. 175, 189 (1999).
122. Patrick E. Tyler & Felicity Barringer, Annan Says U.S. Will Violate Charter if It Acts Without Approval, NY TIMES, Mar. 11, 2003, at A8.
123. Jess Bravin, Pentagon Report Sought to Justify Use of Torture, WALL ST. J., June 7, 2004, at A1.
124. Jack L. Goldsmith III, "Memorandum to Alberto R. Gonzales, Re Permissibility of Relocating Certain 'Protected Persons' from Occupied Iraq", (March, 19, 2004).
125. John R. Bolton, War and the United States Military: Is there Really 'Law' in International Affairs? 10 TRANSNAT'L L. & CONTEMP. PROBS. 1 (2000).
126. Mary Ellen O'Connell, The Prospects for Enforcing Monetary Judgments of the International Court of Justice, 30 VA. J. INT'L L. 891, 908-9 (1990).
127. G.O.W. Mueller & Douglas J. Becharov, Evolution and Enforcement of International Criminal Law, in I INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW 257 (2d ed. 1999).
128. Bruce Zagaris, French Prosecutors Dismiss Torture Case Against Rumsfeld, 24 INT'L ENF. L. REP. 84 (Feb. 2008).
129. Antonio Cassese, Modern Constitutions and International Law, 192 RECUEIL DES COURS 331 (1985 III).
130. Jennifer Zoe Brooks, A Survey of the Court Enforcement of International Wildlife Trade Regulations Under United States Law, 17 WM. & MARY J. ENVT'L. L. 145, 146 (1993).
131. Gerhard Werle, Völkerstrafrecht und geltendes deutsches Strafrecht, 2000 JURISTEN ZEITUNG 755.
132. Christoph J.M. Saeferling, Public Prosecutor v. Djajić, No. 20/96, excerpted in 1998 Neue Juristiche Wochenschrift 392, 92 AJIL 528, n. 25 (1998).
133. Francisco Orrego Vicuna, Diplomatic and Consular Immunities and Human Rights, 40 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 34, 47-48 (1991).
134. Rick Wilson, The Dreams of the Neocons: Cheney, Rumsfeld Targeted Iraq Long Before Sept. 11 Attacks, CHARLESTON GAZETTE, Aug. 13, 2004, at 5A (paragraph breaks omitted).
135. Francis Fukuyama, The Neoconservative Moment, THE NAT'L INT., at 57, 57-8 (Summer 2004).
136. Scott Shane, Waterboarding Focus of Inquiring by Justice Dept., Legal Basis is at Issue, Internal Ethics Review on Torture Question May Be Disclosed, N.Y. TIMES, Feb. 23, 2008, at A1.
137. Leila Nadya Sadat, Ghost Prisoners and Black Sites: Extraordinary Rendition under International Law, 37 CASE W. RES. J. INT'L L. 309, 324-38 (2006).
138. Jack Goldsmith & Eric Posner, A Theory of Customary International Law, 66 U. CHI. L. REV. 1113, (1999).
139. Detlev Vagts, International Relations Looks at Customary International Law: A Traditionalist's Defence, 15 EJIL 1031, (2004).
140. Anne Van Aaken, To do Away with International Law? Some Limits to the Limits of International Law, 17 EJIL 289, 307 (2006).
141. David Golove, Leaving Customary International Law Where It Is: Goldsmith and Posner's The Limits of International Law, 34 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 333, 340-41 (2006).
142. George W. Downs, Enforcement and the Evolution of Cooperation, 19 MICH. J. INT'L L. 319, (1998).
143. William S. Dodge, The Paquete Habana: Customary International Law as Part of Our Law, in INTERNATIONAL LAW STORIES 175, 197 (John E. Noyes et al. eds., 2007).
144. Alec Stone Sweet, The Juridical Coup d'État and the Problem of Authority, 8 GERMAN L.J. 915, (2007).
145. José E. Alvarez, The New Dispute Settlers: (Half) Truths and Consequences, 38 TEX. INT'L L.J. 405, (2003).
146. Mary Ellen O'Connell, New International Legal Process, 93 AJIL 334, (1999).
147. Michael P. Van Alstine, Dynamic Treaty Interpretation, 146 U. PA. L. REV. 687, (1998).
148. Dianne Otto, Rethinking the 'Universality' of Human Rights Law, 29 COLUM. HUM. RTS. L. REV. 1, 5 (1997).
149. Andreas L. Paulus, International Law After Postmodernism: Towards Renewal or Decline of International Law? 14 LEIDEN J. INT'L L. 727, 752 (2001).
150. A.A. AnNa'im, State Responsibility Under International Human Rights Law to Change Religious and Customary Laws, in R.J. Cook (ed.) Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives 167, at 173 (1994).
151. Dinah Shelton, Normative Hierarchy in International Law, 100 AJIL 291, 312-13 (2006).
152. Patrick E. Tyler & Felicity Barringer, Annan Says U.S. Will Violate Charter if It Acts Without Approval, NY TIMES, Mar. 11, 2003, at A8.
153. Mary Ellen O'Connell, Occupation Failures and the Legality of Armed Conflict: The Case of Iraqi Cultural Property, 9 ART ANTIQUITY AND LAW 323 (Dec. 2004).
154. R. W. Apple, Invading Iraqis Seize Kuwait and Its Oil; U.S. Condemns Attack, Urges United Action, N.Y. TIMES, Aug. 3, 1990, at A1.
155. Joachim von Elbe, The Evolution of the Concept of the Just War in International Law, 33 AJIL 665, 685 (1939).
156. Stephen W. Schwebel, The Reality of International Adjudication and Arbitration, 12 WILLIAMETTE J. INT'L L. & DISP. RESOL. 359, 364 (2004).
157. V. S. Mani, Development of Effective Mechanism(s) for Settlement Disputes Arising in Relation to Space Commercialization, 5 SING. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 191, 193 (2001).
158. Henry T. King & James D. Graham, Orgins of Modern International Abritration, 51 MARQUETTE DISP. RESOL. J. 42, 48 (1996).
159. David D. Caron, War and International Adjudication: Reflections on the 1899 Peace Conference, 94 AJIL 4, 7 (2000).
160. Hans Kelsen, Contribution a l'étude de la révision juridico-technique du Statut de la Societé des Nations, 44 REV. GEN. DROIT INT'L PUBLIC 625, 649-51 (1937).
161. Michael N. Schmitt, Computer Network Attack and the Use of Force in International Law: Thoughts on a Normative Framework, 37 COLUM. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 885, (1999).
162. George K. Walker, Information Warfare and Neutrality, 33 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 1079, 1177 n. 458, (2000).
163. Thomas Franck, Who Killed Article 2(4)? Or: Changing Norms Governing the Use of Force by States, 64 AJIL 809, 809 (1970).
164. Thomas Franck, Terrorism and the Right of Self-Defense, 95 AJIL 839, (2001).
165. Louis Henkin, The Reports of the Death of Article 2(4) Are Greatly Exaggerated, 65 AJIL 544, 545 (1971).
166. Michael J. Glennon, Preempting Terrorism: The Case for Anticipatory Self-Defense, WKLY. STANDARD, Jan. 28, 2002, at 24.
167. W. Michael Reisman, The Constitutional Crisis in the United Nations, 87 AJIL 83, 96 (1993).
168. Mary Ellen O'Connell, Lawful Self-Defense to Terrorism, 63 U. PITT. L. REV. 889, 889-904 (2002).
169. C. H. M. Waldock, The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law, 81 RECUEIL DES COURS 451, 498 (1952 II)(1968).
170. Oscar Schachter, The Right of States to Use Armed Force, 82 MICH. L. REV. 1620, 1634-35 (1984).
171. John E. Noyes, The Caroline, in INTERNATIONAL LAW STORIES 263 (John E. Noyes et al. eds., 2007).
172. Oscar Schachter, In Defense of International Rules on the Use of Force, 53 U. CHI. L. REV. 113, 133 (1986).
173. Richard B. Lillich, Humanitarian Intervention: A Reply to Ian Brownlie and a Plea for Constructive Alternatives, in LAW AND CIVIL WAR IN THE MODERN WORLD 229, 244-51 (John Norton Moore ed., 1974).
174. Christopher Greenwood, International Law and the United States' Air Operation Against Libya, 89 W. VA. L. REV. 933, 948 (1987).
175. Mary Ellen O'Connell, Continuing Limits on UN Intervention in Civil War, 67 IN. L.J. 903, 905-6 (1992).
176. Colin B. Picker, Fishing for Answers in Canada's Inside Passage: Exploring the Use of the Transit Fee as a Countermeasure, 21 YALE J. INT'L L. 349, 382 (1996).
177. Christian Hillgruber, The Right of Third States to Take Countermeasures, in THE FUNDAMENTAL RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER, JUS COGENS AND OBLIGATIONS ERGA OMNES 265, 266 (Christian Tomuschat & Jean-Marc Thouvenin eds., 2006).
178. Lori Fisler Damrosch, Retaliation or Arbitration-or Both? The 1978 United States-France Aviation Dispute, 74 AJIL 785, 805-6 (1980).
179. David J. Bederman, Counterintuiting Countermeasures, 96 AJIL 817, 821 (2002).
180. Denis Alland, Countermeasurs of General Interest, 13 EJIL 1221, 1223 (2002).
181. John Norton Moore, Enhancing Compliance with International Law: A Neglected Remedy, 39 VA. J. INT'L L. 881, 949 (1999).
182. Karl Zemanek, The Unilateral Enforcement of International Obligations, 47 ZAÖRV (1987).
183. Brice M. Clagett, Title III of the Helms-Burton Act is Consistent with International Law, 90 AJIL 434, 436 (1996).
184. Ted Stein, Contempt, Crisis and the Court, 76 AJIL 499, (1982).
185. D. W. Greig, Reciprocity, Proportionality and the Law of Treaties, 34 VA. J. INT'L L. 295, 373 (1994).
186. Bruno Simma, Self-Contained Regimes, 16 NETH. Y.B. INT'L L. 111, (1985).
187. Andreas F. Lowenfeld, AGORA: The Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act, Congress and Cuba: The Helms-Burton Act, 90 AJIL 419, (1996).