Biofunctionalization strategies on tantalum-based materials for osseointegrative applications

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1-12

  Mas Moruno, Carlos ^a,b   Garrido, Beatriz ^a   Rodriguez, Daniel ^a,b   Ruperez, Elisa ^a   Gil, F Javier ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b BIOMATERIALES Y NANOMEDICINA CIBER BBN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BODY FLUIDS; CELL ADHESION; CELL IMMOBILIZATION; CELLS; CHEMICAL STABILITY; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COBALT ALLOYS; CONTACT ANGLE; PEPTIDES; TITANIUM ALLOYS; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

BIOFUNCTIONALIZATION; COBALT-CHROMIUM ALLOYS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; HYDROPHILIC SURFACES; METALLIC BIOMATERIALS; ORTHOPEDIC APPLICATIONS; OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS; PHYSICAL ADSORPTION;

TANTALUM;

ARGINYLGLYCYLASPARTIC ACID; OZONE; TANTALUM; ARGINYL-GLYCYL-ASPARTIC ACID; BIOCOMPATIBLE COATED MATERIAL; OLIGOPEPTIDE; PROTEIN BINDING;

ADSORPTION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVALENT BOND; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN CELL CULTURE; HYDROPHILICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN IMMOBILIZATION; SAOS 2 CELL LINE; SILANIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; BONE REGENERATION; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; MATERIALS TESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIATION RESPONSE; SYNTHESIS;

ADSORPTION; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; OLIGOPEPTIDES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; OZONE; PROTEIN BINDING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TANTALUM; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 84922817666     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-015-5445-z     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Mas-Moruno C, Espanol M, Montufar EB, Mestres G, Aparicio C, Gil FJ, Ginebra MP. Bioactive ceramic and metallic surfaces for bone engineering. In: Taubert A, Mano JF, Rodríguez-Cabello JC, editors. Biomaterials surface science. Weinheim: Wiley; 2013. p. 337–74.
2. Mantripragada VP, Lecka-Czernik B, Ebraheim NA, Jayasuriya AC. An overview of recent advances in designing orthopedic and craniofacial implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101:3349–64.
3. Williams DF. Titanium for medical applications. In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P, editors. Titanium in medicine: material science, surface science, engineering, biological responses and medical applications. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 13–24.
4. Black J. Biological performance of tantalum. Clin Mater. 1994;16:167–73.
5. Matsuno H, Yokoyama A, Watari F, Uo M, Kawasaki T. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants, titanium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum and rhenium. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1253–62.
6. Findlay DM, Welldon K, Atkins GJ, Howie DW, Zannettino AC, Bobyn D. The proliferation and phenotypic expression of human osteoblasts on tantalum metal. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2215–27.
7. Maccauro G, Iommetti PR, Muratori F, Raffaelli L, Manicone PF, Fabbriciani C. An overview about biomedical applications of micron and nano size tantalum. Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2009;3:157–65.
8. Müller R, Abke J, Schnell E, Macionczyk F, Gbureck U, Mehrl R, Ruszczak Z, Kujat R, Englert C, Nerlich M, Angele P. Surface engineering of stainless steel materials by covalent collagen immobilization to improve implant biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6962–72.
9. Pham V-H, Lee S-H, Li Y, Kim H-E, Shin K-H, Koh Y-H. Utility of tantalum (Ta) coating to improve surface hardness in vitro bioactivity and biocompatibility of Co–Cr. Thin Solid Films. 2013;536:269–74.
10. Sun Y-S, Chang J-H, Huang H-H. Corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of titanium surface coated with amorphous tantalum pentoxide. Thin Solid Films. 2013;528:130–5.
11. Balla VK, Banerjee S, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Direct laser processing of a tantalum coating on titanium for bone replacement structures. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2234–329.
12. 2 nanotubes induces superior rate of matrix mineralization and osteofunctionality in human osteoblasts. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;37:332–41.
13. Tang Z, Xie Y, Yang F, Huang Y, Wang C, Dai K, Zheng X, Zhang X. Porous tantalum coatings prepared by vacuum plasma spraying enhance BMSCs osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66263.
14. Stiehler C, Bünger C, Overall RW, Royer L, Schroeder M, Foss M, Besenbacher F, Kruhøffer M, Kassem M, Günther K-P, Stiehler M. Whole-genome expression analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cells exposed to ultrasmooth tantalum vs. titanium oxide surfaces. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2013;6:199–209.
15. Kaivosoja E, Myllymaa S, Takakubo Y, Korhonen H, Myllymaa K, Konttinen YT, Lappalainen R, Takagi M. Osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells on micro-patterned surfaces. J Biomater Appl. 2013;27:862–71.
16. Sevilla P, Aparicio C, Planell JA, Gil FJ. Comparison of the mechanical properties between tantalum and nickel–titanium foams implant materials for bone ingrowth applications. J Alloys Compd. 2007;439:67–73.
17. Deglurkar M, Davy DT, Stewart M, Goldberg VM, Welter JF. Evaluation of machining methods for trabecular metal implants in a rabbit intramedullary osseointegration model. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2007;80:528–40.
18. Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4671–81.
19. Balla VK, Bodhak S, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Porous tantalum structures for bone implants: fabrication, mechanical and in vitro biological properties. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3349–59.
20. Stilling M, Madsen F, Odgaard A, Rømer L, Andersen NT, Rahbek O, Søballe K. Superior fixation of pegged trabecular metal over screw-fixed pegged porous titanium fiber mesh. A randomized clinical RSA study on cementless tibial components. Acta Orthop. 2011;82:177–86.
21. Villanueva-Martínez M, De la Torre-Escudero B, Rojo-Manaute JM, Ríos-Luna A, Chana-Rodriguez F. Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:988–93.
22. Lachiewicz PF, Bolognesi MP, Henderson RA, Soileau ES, Vail TP. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:199–204.
23. Stiehl JB. Trabecular metal in hip reconstructive surgery. Orthopedics. 2005;28:662–70.
24. Jafari SM, Bender B, Coyle C, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:459–65.
25. Nakashima Y, Mashima N, Imai H, Mitsugi N, Taki N, Mochida Y, Owan I, Arakaki K, Yamamoto T, Mawatari T, Motomura G, Ohishi M, Doi T, Kanazawa M, Iwamoto Y. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip arthroplasties using porous tantalum modular acetabular components: 5-year follow-up of clinical trial. Mod Rheumatol. 2013;23:112–8.
26. Budge MD, Kurdziel MD, Baker KC, Wiater JM. A biomechanical analysis of initial fixation options for porous-tantalum-backed glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:709–15.
27. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallen O, Öhman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1–132.
28. Hanawa T. A comprehensive review of techniques for biofunctionalization of titanium. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011;41:263–72.
29. Bauer S, Schmuki P, von der Mark K, Park J. Engineering biocompatible implant surfaces Part I: materials and surfaces. Prog Mater Sci. 2013;58:261–326.
30. Schliephake H, Scharnweber D. Chemical and biological functionalization of titanium for dental implants. J Mater Chem. 2008;18:2404–14.
31. Shekaran A, Garcia AJ. Extracellular matrix-mimetic adhesive biomaterials for bone repair. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;96:261–72.
32. Chen X, Li Y, Aparicio C. Biofunctional coatings for dental implants. In: Nazarpour S, editor. Thin films and coatings in biology biological and medical physics, biomedical engineering. Netherlands: Springer; 2013. p. 105–43.
33. Morra M, Cassinelli C, Cascardo G, Cahalan P, Cahalan L, Fini M, Giardino R. Surface engineering of titanium by collagen immobilization. Surface characterization and in vitro and in vivo studies. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4639–54.
34. Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Liljenberg B, Berglundh T. Soft tissue healing at titanium implants coated with type I collagen. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:452–8.
35. Petrie TA, Raynor JE, Reyes CD, Burns KL, Collard DM, Garcia AJ. The effect of integrin-specific bioactive coatings on tissue healing and implant osseointegration. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2849–57.
36. Petrie TA, Reyes CD, Burns KL, Garcia AJ. Simple application of fibronectin-mimetic coating enhances osseointegration of titanium implants. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:2602–12.
37. Schuler M, Hamilton DW, Kunzler TP, Sprecher CM, de Wild M, Brunette DM, Textor M, Tosatti SG. Comparison of the response of cultured osteoblasts and osteoblasts outgrown from rat calvarial bone chips to nonfouling KRSR and FHRRIKA-peptide modified rough titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2009;91:517–27.
38. Mas-Moruno C, Dorfner PM, Manzenrieder F, Neubauer S, Reuning U, Burgkart R, et al. Behavior of primary human osteoblasts on trimmed and sandblasted Ti6Al4V surfaces functionalized with integrin αvβ3-selective cyclic RGD peptides. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101:87–97.
39. Chen X, Sevilla P, Aparicio C. Surface biofunctionalization by covalent co-immobilization of oligopeptides. Colloid Surf B. 2013;107:189–97.
40. Mas-Moruno C, Fraioli R, Albericio F, Manero JM, Gil FJ. Novel peptide-based platform for the dual presentation of biologically active peptide motifs on biomaterials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:6525–36.
41. Dahmen C, Auernheimer J, Meyer A, Enderle A, Goodman SL, Kessler H. Improving implant materials by coating with nonpeptidic, highly specific integrin ligands. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:6649–52.
42. Rechenmacher F, Neubauer S, Polleux J, Mas-Moruno C, De Simone M, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Spatz JP, Fässler R, Kessler H. Functionalizing αvβ3- or α5β1-selective integrin antagonists for surface coating: a method to discriminate integrin subtypes in vitro. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52:1572–5.
43. Rechenmacher F, Neubauer S, Mas-Moruno C, Dorfner PM, Polleux J, Guasch J, Conings B, Boyen HG, Bochen A, Sobahi TR, Burgkart R, Spatz JP, Fässler R, Kessler H. A molecular toolkit to functionalize Ti-based biomaterials that selectively control integrin-mediated cell adhesion. Chem Eur J. 2013;19:9218–23.
44. Kato H, Nakamura T, Nishiguchi S, Matsusue Y, Kobayashi M, Miyazaki T, Kim HM, Kokubo T. Bonding of alkali- and heat-treated tantalum implants to bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:28–35.
45. Miyazaki T, Kim H-M, Kokubo T, Ohtsuki C, Kato H, Nakamura T. Mechanism of bonelike apatite formation on bioactive tantalum metal in a simulated body fluid. Biomaterials. 2002;23:827–32.
46. Barrère F, van der Valk CM, Meijer G, Dalmeijer RA, de Groot K, Layrolle P. Osteointegration of biomimetic apatite coating applied onto dense and porous metal implants in femurs of goats. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2003;67:655–65.
47. Liu P, Smits J, Ayers DC, Song J. Surface mineralization of Ti6Al4V substrates with calcium apatites for the retention and local delivery of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:3488–95.
48. Aubry D, Volcke C, Arnould Ch, Humbert C, Thiry PA, Delhalle J, Mekhalif Z. Molecular functionalization of tantalum oxide surface towards development of apatite growth. Appl Surf Sci. 2009;255:4765–72.
49. Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Jensen T, Kraft DC, Foss M, Kingshott P, Hansen JL, Larsen AN, Chevallier J, Besenbacher F. Fibronectin adsorption, cell adhesion, and proliferation on nanostructured tantalum surfaces. ACS Nano. 2010;4:2874–82.
50. McNichols C, Wilkins J, Kubota A, Shiu YT, Aouadi SM, Kohli P. Investigating surface topology and cyclic-RGD peptide functionalization on vascular endothelialization. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:532–9.
51. Bellis SL. Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2011;32:4205–10.
52. Hersel U, Dahmen C, Kessler H. RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4385–415.
53. Xiao SJ, Textor M, Spencer ND, Wieland M, Keller B, Sigrist H. Immobilization of the cell-adhesive peptide Arg–Gly–Asp–Cys (RGDC) on titanium surfaces by covalent chemical attachment. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997;8:867–72.
54. Xiao SJ, Textor M, Spencer ND, Sigrist H. Covalent attachment of cell-adhesive, (Arg-Gly-Asp)-containing peptides to titanium surfaces. Langmuir. 1998;14:5507–16.
55. 2. Surf Sci. 2010;604:346–53.
56. Zhu M, Lerum MZ, Chen W. How to prepare reproducible, homogeneous, and hydrolytically stable aminosilane-derived layers on silica. Langmuir. 2012;28:416–23.
57. Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E. Cell Attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the molecule. Nature. 1984;309:30–3.
58. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000;21:667–81.
59. Siebers MC, ter Brugge PJ, Walboomers XF, Jansen JA. Integrins as linker proteins between osteoblasts and bone replacing materials. A critical review. Biomaterials. 2005;26:137–46.
60. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:211–22.
61. Kennedy SB, Washburn NR, Simon CG Jr, Amis EJ. Combinatorial screen of the effect of surface energy on fibronectin-mediated osteoblast adhesion, spreading and proliferation. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3817–24.