Reconsidering the Simple View of Reading in an Intriguing Case of Equivalent Models: Commentary on Tunmer and Chapman (2012)

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 115-119

  Wagner, Richard K ^a   Herrera, Sarah K ^a   Spencer, Mercedes ^a   Quinn, Jamie M ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

comprehension; individual difference predictors of reading; quantitative; reading; research method

Indexed keywords

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RECOGNITION;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84922811948     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219414544544     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Catts H. W.,Adlof S. M.,Weismer S. E.Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2006;49 (2): 278-293
2. Georgiou G. K.,Das J. P.,Hayward D.Revisiting the “simple view of reading” in a group of children with poor reading comprehension.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2009;42 (1): 76-84
3. Gough P. B.,Hoover W. A.,Peterson C. L.Some observations on a simple view of reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996:1-13.
4. Gough P. B.,Tunmer W. E.Decoding, reading, and reading disability.Remedial and Special Education. 1986;7:6-10
5. Gustafson S.,Samuelsson C.,Johansson E.,Wallmann J.How simple is the simple view of reading?.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2013;57 (3): 292-308
6. Hershberger S. L.Structural equation modeling: A second course. Hancock G. R.Mueller R. O., ed. Greenwich, CT: Information Age; 2006:13-41.
7. Hoover W. A.,Gough P. B.The simple view of reading.Reading and Writing. 1990;2 (2): 127-160
8. Kendeou P.,Papadopoulos T. C.,Kotzapoulou M.Evidence for the early emergence of the simple view of reading in a transparent orthography.Reading and Writing. 2013;26 (2): 189-204
9. Kendeou P.,Savage R.,Van den Broek P.Revisiting the simple view of reading.British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2009;79 (2): 353-370
10. Kershaw S.,Schatschneider C.A latent variable approach to the simple view of reading.Reading and Writing. 2012;25 (2): 433-464
11. Kirby J. R.,Savage R. S.Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading?.Literacy. 2008;42 (2): 75-82
12. Lee S.,Hershberger S.A simple rule for generating equivalent models in covariance structure modeling.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1990;25:313-334
13. MacCallum R. C.,Wegener D. T.,Uchino B. N.,Fabrigar L. R.The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis.Psychological Bulletin. 1993;114:185-199
14. Ouellette G.,Beers A.A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story?.Reading and Writing. 2010;23 (2): 189-208
15. Protopapas A.,Simos P. G.,Sideridis G. D.,Mouzaki A.The components of the simple view of reading: A confirmatory factor analysis.Reading Psychology. 2012;33 (3): 217-240
16. Raykov T.,Marcoulides G. A.Can there be infinitely many models equivalent to a given covariance structure model?.Structural Equation Modeling. 2001;8 (1): 142-149
17. Silverman R. D.,Speece D. L.,Harring J. R.,Ritchey K. D.Fluency has a role in the simple view of reading.Scientific Studies of Reading. 2013;17 (2): 108-133
18. Stelzl I.Changing the causal hypothesis without changing the fit: Some rules for generating equivalent path models.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1986;21:309-331
19. Stuart M.,Stainthorp R.,Snowling M.Literacy as a complex activity: Deconstructing the simple view of reading.Literacy. 2008;42 (2): 59-66
20. Tilstra J.,McMaster K.,Van den Broek P.,Kendeou P.,Rapp D.Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels.Journal of Research in Reading. 2009;32 (4): 383-401
21. Tunmer W. E.,Chapman J. W.The simple view of reading redux: Vocabulary knowledge and the independent components hypothesis.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2012;45 (5): 453-466