Sumoylation is developmentally regulated and required for cell pairing during conjugation in Tetrahymena thermophila

Eukaryotic Cell

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 170-181

  Nasir, Amjad M ^a   Yang, Qianyi ^a   Chalker, Douglas L ^b   Forney, James D ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CILIOPHORA; EUKARYOTA; TETRAHYMENA; TETRAHYMENA THERMOPHILA;

PROTOZOAL PROTEIN; SUMO 1 PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE;

GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LIFE CYCLE STAGE; METABOLISM; SUMOYLATION; TETRAHYMENA THERMOPHILA;

GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; LIFE CYCLE STAGES; PROTOZOAN PROTEINS; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; SUMOYLATION; TETRAHYMENA THERMOPHILA; UBIQUITIN-ACTIVATING ENZYMES;

EID: 84922777605     PISSN: 15359778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00252-14     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Komander D, Rape M.2012. The ubiquitin code. Annu Rev Biochem 81: 203–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328.
2. Dohmen RJ.2004. SUMO protein modification. Biochim Biophys Acta 1695:113–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.09.021.
3. Gareau JR, Lima CD.2010. The SUMO pathway: emerging mechanisms that shape specificity, conjugation and recognition. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:861–871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3011.
4. Wilkinson KA, Henley JM.2010. Mechanisms, regulation and consequences of protein SUMOylation. Biochem J 428:133–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20100158.
5. Flotho A, Melchior F.2013. Sumoylation: a regulatory protein modification in health and disease. Annu Rev Biochem 82:357–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-061909-093311.
6. Meluh PB, Koshland D.1995. Evidence that the MIF2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a centromere protein with homology to the mammalian centromere protein CENP-C. Mol Biol Cell 6:793–807. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.6.7.793.
7. Dasso M.2008. Emerging roles of the SUMO pathway in mitosis. Cell Div 3:5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-3-5.
8. Lomeli H, Vazquez M.2011. Emerging roles of the SUMO pathway in development. Cell Mol Life Sci 68:4045–4064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007 /s00018-011-0792-5.
9. Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N.2011. The ubiquitin- and SUMOdependent signaling response to DNA double-strand breaks. FEBS Lett 585:2914–2919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.056.
10. Bologna S, Ferrari S.2013. It takes two to tango: ubiquitin and SUMO in the DNA damage response. Front Genet 4:106. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389 /fgene.2013.00106.
11. Dieckhoff P, Bolte M, Sancak Y, Braus GH, Irniger S.2004. Smt3/ SUMOand Ubc9 are required for efficient APC/C-mediated proteolysis in budding yeast. Mol Microbiol 51:1375–1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03910.x.
12. Biggins S, Bhalla N, Chang A, Smith DL, Murray AW.2001. Genes involved in sister chromatid separation and segregation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159:453–470.
13. Karrer KM.2000. Tetrahymena genetics: two nuclei are better than one. Methods Cell Biol 62:127–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091 -679X(08)61529-0.
14. Schoeberl UE, Mochizuki K.2011. Keeping the soma free of transposons: programmed DNA elimination in ciliates. J Biol Chem 286:37045–37052. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R111.276964.
15. Jahn CL, Klobutcher LA.2002. Genome remodeling in ciliated protozoa. Annu Rev Microbiol 56:489–520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160916.
16. Chan SR, Blackburn EH.2004. Telomeres and telomerase. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:109–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1370.
17. Duharcourt S, Yao MC.2002. Role of histone deacetylation in developmentally programmed DNA rearrangements in Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryot Cell 1:293–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.1.2.293-303.2002.
18. Altschuler MI, Yao M-C.1985. Macronuclear DNA of Tetrahymena thermophila exists as defined subchromosomal-sized molecules. Nucleic Acids Res 13:5817–5831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/13.16.5817.
19. Coyne RS, Chalker DL, Yao MC.1996. Genome downsizing during ciliate development: nuclear division of labor through chromosome restructuring. Annu Rev Genet 30:557–578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146 /annurev.genet.30.1.557.
20. Matsuda A, Forney JD.2006. The SUMO pathway is developmentally regulated and required for programmedDNAelimination in Paramecium tetraurelia. Eukaryot Cell 5:806–815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.5.5.806-815.2006.
21. Shang Y, Song X, Bowen J, Corstanje R, Gao Y, Gaertig J, Gorovsky MA.2002. A robust inducible-repressible promoter greatly facilitates gene knockouts, conditional expression, and overexpression of homologous and heterologous genes in Tetrahymena thermophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3734–3739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.052016199.
22. Bruns PJ, Cassidy-Hanley D.2000. Biolistic transformation of macroand micronuclei. Methods Cell Biol 62:501–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)61553-8.
23. Hai B, Gaertig J, Gorovsky MA.2000. Knockout heterokaryons enable facile mutagenic analysis of essential genes in Tetrahymena. Methods Cell Biol 62:513–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)61554-X.
24. Matsuda A, Shieh AW, Chalker DL, Forney JD.2010. The conjugationspecific Die5 protein is required for development of the somatic nucleus in both Paramecium and Tetrahymena. Eukaryot Cell 9:1087–1099. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.00379-09.
25. Gaertig J, Thatcher TH, Gu L, Gorovsky MA.1994. Electroporationmediated replacement of a positively and negatively selectable betatubulin gene in Tetrahymena thermophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:4549–4553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.10.4549.
26. Stover NA, Krieger CJ, Binkley G, Dong Q, Fisk DG, Nash R, Sethuraman A, Weng S, Cherry JM.2006. Tetrahymena Genome Database (TGD): a new genomic resource for Tetrahymena thermophila research. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D500–D503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj054.
27. Miao W, Xiong J, Bowen J, Wang W, Liu Y, Braguinets O, Grigull J, Pearlman RE, Orias E, Gorovsky MA.2009. Microarray analyses of gene expression during the Tetrahymena thermophila life cycle. PLoS One 4:e4429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004429.
28. Evdokimov E, Sharma P, Lockett SJ, Lualdi M, Kuehn MR.2008. Loss of SUMO1 in mice affects RanGAP1 localization and formation of PML nuclear bodies, but is not lethal as it can be compensated by SUMO2 or SUMO3. J Cell Sci 121:4106–4113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.038570.
29. La Salle S, Sun F, Zhang XD, Matunis MJ, Handel MA.2008. Developmental control of sumoylation pathway proteins in mouse male germ cells. Dev Biol 321:227–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.06.020.
30. Nie M, Xie Y, Loo JA, Courey AJ.2009. Genetic and proteomic evidence for roles of DrosophilaSUMOin cell cycle control, Ras signaling, and early pattern formation. PLoS One 4:e5905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005905.
31. Donaghue C, Bates H, Cotterill S.2001. Identification and characterisation of the Drosophila homologue of the yeast Uba2 gene. Biochim Biophys Acta 1518: 210–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4781(01)00185-3.
32. Dohmen RJ, Stappen R, McGrath JP, Forrova H, Kolarov J, Goffeau A, Varshavsky A.1995. An essential yeast gene encoding a homolog of ubiq- uitin-activating enzyme. J Biol Chem 270:18099–18109. http://dx.doi.org /10.1074/jbc.270.30.18099.
33. Johnson ES.2004. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 355–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074118.
34. Jones D, Crowe E, Stevens TA, Candido EP.2002. Functional and phylogenetic analysis of the ubiquitylation system in Caenorhabditis elegans: ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, ubiquitin-activating enzymes, and ubiquitin-like proteins. Genome Biol 3:RESEARCH0002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2001-3-1-research0002.
35. Johnson ES, Schwienhorst I, Dohmen RJ, Blobel G.1997. The ubiquitinlike protein Smt3p is activated for conjugation to other proteins by an Aos1p/Uba2p heterodimer. EMBO J 16:5509–5519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.18.5509.
36. Saracco SA, Miller MJ, Kurepa J, Vierstra RD.2007. Genetic analysis of SUMOylation in Arabidopsis: conjugation of SUMO1 and SUMO2 to nuclear proteins is essential. Plant Physiol 145:119–134. http://dx.doi.org /10.1104/pp.107.102285.
37. Nacerddine K, Lehembre F, Bhaumik M, Artus J, Cohen-Tannoudji M, Babinet C, Pandolfi PP, Dejean A.2005. The SUMO pathway is essential for nuclear integrity and chromosome segregation in mice. Dev Cell 9:769–779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.10.007.
38. Chalker DL, Fuller P, Yao MC.2005. Communication between parental and developing genomes during tetrahymena nuclear differentiation is likely mediated by homologous RNAs. Genetics 169:149–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.032300.
39. Ho JC, Warr NJ, Shimizu H, Watts FZ.2001. SUMO modification of Rad22, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of the recombination protein Rad52. Nucleic Acids Res 29:4179–4186. http://dx.doi.org /10.1093/nar/29.20.4179.
40. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S.2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038 /nature00991.
41. Maeda D, Seki M, Onoda F, Branzei D, Kawabe Y, Enomoto T.2004. Ubc9 is required for damage-tolerance and damage-induced interchromosomal homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae.DNARepair 3:335–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2003.11.011.
42. Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Polo S, Miller KM, Jackson SP.2009. MammalianSUMOE3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 462:935–939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08657.
43. Morris JR, Boutell C, Keppler M, Densham R, Weekes D, Alamshah A, Butler L, Galanty Y, Pangon L, Kiuchi T, Ng T, Solomon E.2009. The SUMOmodification pathway is involved in theBRCA1response to genotoxic stress. Nature 462:886–890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08593.
44. Frankenberg-Schwager M, Kirchermeier D, Greif G, Baer K, Becker M, Frankenberg D.2005. Cisplatin-mediated DNA double-strand breaks in replicating but not in quiescent cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Toxicology 212:175–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2005.04.015.
45. Cunha D, Cunha R, Corte-Real M, Chaves SR.2013. Cisplatin-induced cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is programmed and rescued by proteasome inhibition. DNA Repair 12:444–449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.02.005.
46. Ormerod MG, Orr RM, Peacock JH.1994. The role of apoptosis in cell killing by cisplatin: a flow cytometric study. Br J Cancer 69:93–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1994.14.
47. Golebiowski F, Matic I, Tatham MH, Cole C, Yin Y, Nakamura A, Cox J, Barton GJ, Mann M, Hay RT.2009. System-wide changes to SUMO modifications in response to heat shock. Sci Signal 2:ra24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2000282.
48. Sydorskyy Y, Srikumar T, Jeram SM, Wheaton S, Vizeacoumar FJ, Makhnevych T, Chong YT, Gingras AC, Raught B.2010. A novel mechanism for SUMO system control: regulated Ulp1 nucleolar sequestration. Mol Cell Biol 30:4452–4462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00335-10.
49. Chalker DL.2008. Dynamic nuclear reorganization during genome remodeling of Tetrahymena. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783:2130–2136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.07.012.
50. Deyrieux AF, Rosas-Acosta G, Ozbun MA, Wilson VG.2007. Sumoylation dynamics during keratinocyte differentiation. J Cell Sci 120:125– 136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03317.
51. Johnson ES, Blobel G.1997. Ubc9p is the conjugating enzyme for the ubiquitin-like protein Smt3p. J Biol Chem 272:26799–26802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.43.26799.
52. Yurchenko V, Xue Z, Sadofsky MJ.2006. SUMO modification of human XRCC4 regulates its localization and function in DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 26:1786–1794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128 /MCB.26.5.1786-1794.2006.
53. Kapusta A, Matsuda A, Marmignon A, Ku M, Silve A, Meyer E, Forney JD, Malinsky S, Betermier M.2011. Highly precise and developmentally programmed genome assembly in Paramecium requires ligase IVdependent end joining. PLoS Genet 7:e1002049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002049.
54. Wang Y, Dohlman HG.2006. Pheromone-regulated sumoylation of transcription factors that mediate the invasive to mating developmental switch in yeast. J BiolChem281:1964–1969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M508985200.
55. Nixon CE, Wilcox AJ, Laney JD.2010. Degradation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating-type regulator 1: genetic dissection of cisdeterminants and trans-acting pathways. Genetics 185:497–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.115907.
56. Cervantes MD, Hamilton EP, Xiong J, Lawson MJ, Yuan D, Hadjithomas M, Miao W, Orias E.2013. Selecting one of several mating types through gene segment joining and deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila. PLoS Biol 11:e1001518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001518.