Dual high-stake emerging technologies: A review of the climate engineering research literature

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 255-268

  Linnér, Björn Ola ^a   Wibeck, Victoria ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; POLLUTION CONTROL;

CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; POTENTIAL METHODS; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; RADIATION MANAGEMENT; TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SCALE; VARIOUS TECHNOLOGIES;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LITERATURE REVIEW; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SOLAR RADIATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84922611158     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.333     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. The Royal Society. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty. London: The Royal Society; 2009.
2. Bodansky D. The who, what, and wherefore of geoengineering governance. Clim Chang 2013, 121:539-551. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0759-7.
3. Boucher O, Forster P, Gruber N, Ha-Duong M, Lawrence M, Lenton T, Maas A, Vaughan N. Rethinking climate engineering categorization in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation. WIREs Clim Change 2014, 5:23-35. doi: 10.1002/wcc.261.
4. Heyward C. Situating and abandoning geoengineering: a typology of five responses to dangerous climate change. Polit Sci Polit 2013, 46:23-27. doi: 10.1017/S1049096512001436.
5. Rayner S. Climate Change and Geoengineering Governance. NTS Insight. Singapore: RSIS Centre for Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Studies; 2011.
6. Carr W, Preston C, Yung L, Szerszynski B, Keith D, Mercer A. Public engagement on solar radiation management and why it needs to happen now. Clim Chang 2013, 121:567-577. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0763-y.
7. Corner A, Pidgeon N. Geoengineering the climate: the social and ethical implications. Environment 2010, 52:24-37. doi: 10.1080/00139150903479563.
8. Macnaghten P, Chilvers J. Governing risky technologies. In: Lane S, Klauser F, Kearnes M, eds. Critical Risk Research: Practices, Politics and Ethics. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell 2012, 99-124. doi: 10.1002/9781119962748.ch6.
9. Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan N, Lenton T. A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. WIRES Clim Change 2012, 3:597-615. doi: 10.1002/wcc.197.
10. Gardiner S. The desperation argument for geoengineering. Polit Sci Polit 2013, 46:28-33. doi: 10.1017/S1049096512001424.
11. IPCC 2013. Working Group I contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report 'Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Final Draft Underlying Scientific-Technical Assessment. WG-I: 12th/Doc. 2b (12.VIII.2013).
12. Shepherd J. Geoengineering: overview and update. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2012, 370:4166-4175. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0186.
13. Vaughan N, Lenton T. A review of climate geoengineering proposals. Clim Chang 2011, 109:745-790. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0027-7.
14. Corner A, Pidgeon N, Parkhill K. Perceptions of geoengineering: public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of 'upstream' engagement. WIREs Clim Change 2012, 3:451-466. doi: 10.1002/wcc.176.
15. Hulme M. Climate change: climate engineering through stratospheric aerosol injection. Prog Phys Geogr 2012, 36:694-705. doi: 10.1177/0309133312456414.
16. Huttunen S, Hildén M. Framing the controversial: geoengineering in academic literature. Sci Commun 2014, 36:3-29. doi: 10.1177/1075547013492435.
17. Pidgeon N, Corner A, Parkhill K, Spence A, Butler C, Poortinga W. Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2012, 370:4176-4196. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0099.
18. Preston C. Ethics and geoengineering: reviewing the moral issues raised by solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal. WIREs Clim Change 2013, 4:23-37. doi: 10.1002/wcc.198.
19. Dilling L, Hauser R. Governing geoengineering research: why, when and how? Clim Chang 2013, 121:553-565. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0835-z.
20. Belter C, Seidel D. A bibliometric analysis of climate engineering research. WIREs Clim Change 2013, 4:417-427. doi: 10.1002/wcc.229.
21. Weber N. Rainmakers, space mirrors and atmospheric vacuums: a bibliometric mapping of geoengineering research. In Proceedings of the 2012 iConference. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, New York, NY; 2012: 639-640. doi: 10.1145/2132176.2132320.
22. Oldham P, Szerszynski B, Stilgoe J, Brown C, Eacott B, Yuille A. Mapping the landscape of climate engineering: lessons for governance from scientometric research. Phil Trans R Soc A 2014, 372:20140065.
23. Crutzen P. Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulphur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim Chang 2006, 77:211-219. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y.
24. Persson O, Danell R, Wiborg Schneider J. How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In: Åström F, Danell R, Larsen B, Schneider J, eds. Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday. Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics; 2009, 9-24.
25. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 17-20 May, San Jose, CA; 2009.
26. Gamson W, Modigliani A. The changing culture of affirmative action. In: Braungart R, Braungart M, eds. Research in Political Sociology, vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1987, 137-177.
27. Nisbet M. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 2009, 51:12-23. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23.
28. Porter K, Hulme M. The emergence of the geoengineering debate in the UK print media: a frame analysis. Geogr J 2013, 179:343-355. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12003.
29. Scholte S, Vasileiadou E, Petersen A. Opening up the societal debate on climate engineering: how newspaper frames are changing. J Integr Environ Sci 2013, 10:1-16. doi: 10.1080/1943815X.2012.759593.
30. Macnaghten P, Kearnes B, Wynne B. Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 2005, 27:268-291. doi: 10.1177/1075547005281531.
31. Wibeck V. Genmat i fokus. Analyser av fokusgruppssamtal om genförändrade livsmedel. [Genetically modified food in focus. Analyses of focus group discussions on gene technology in food production]. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, 260. Linköpings University, Linköping, Sweden; 2002.
32. VanCuren R. The radiative forcing benefits of 'cool roof' construction in California: quantifying the climate impacts of building albedo modification. Clim Chang 2012, 112:1071-1083. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0250-2.
33. Singarayer JS, Davies-Barnard T. Regional climate change mitigation with crops: Context and assessment. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2012, 370:4301-4316. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0010.
34. Irvine PJ, Ridgwell A, Lunt DJ. Climatic effects of surface albedo geoengineering. J Geophys Res D Atmos 2011, 116:24112. doi: 10.1029/2011JD016281.
35. Baughman E, Gnanadesikan A, Degaetano A, Adcroft A. Investigation of the surface and circulation impacts of cloud-brightening geoengineering. J Clim 2012, 25:7527-7543. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00282.1.
36. Cole-Dai J. Volcanoes and climate. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2010, 1:824-839. doi: 10.1002/wcc.76.
37. Kosugi T. Role of sunshades in space as a climate control option. Acta Astron 2010, 67:241-253. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.02.009.
38. Matthews HD, Caldeira K. Transient climate-carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:9949-9954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.070041910.
39. Moore J, Jevrejevad S, Grinstede A. Efficacy of geoengineering to limit 21st century sea-level rise. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:15699-15703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008153107.
40. Renforth P. The potential of enhanced weathering in the UK. Int J Greenhouse Gas Cont 2012, 10:229-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.011.
41. 2 capture from the air. Clim Chang 2006, 74:17-45. doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-9026-x.
42. Hardman-Mountford NJ, Polimene L, Hirata T, Brewin RJW, Aiken J. Impacts of light shading and nutrient enrichment geo-engineering approaches on the productivity of a stratified, oligotrophic ocean ecosystem. J R Soc Interface 2013, 10:20130701. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0701.
43. Hulme M. Can Science Fix Climate Change? A Case Against Climate Engineering. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2014.
44. Keith D. A Case for Climate Engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2013.
45. Kasperson R, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown H, Emel J. The Social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 1988, 8:177. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x.
46. Linnér B-O. Authority through synergism: the roles of climate change linkages. Eur Environ 2006, 16:278-289. doi: 10.1002/eet.423.
47. Singarayer J, Ridgwell A, Irvine P. Assessing the benefits of crop albedo bio-geoengineering. Environ Res Lett 2009, 4:45110. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045110.
48. Lal R. Sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2009, 28:90-96. doi: 10.1080/07352680902782711.
49. Amelung D, Funke J. Dealing with the uncertainties of climate engineering: Warnings from a psychological complex problem solving perspective. Technol Soc 2013, 35:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.03.001.
50. Driscoll S, Bozzo A, Gray L, Robock A, Stenchikov G. Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions. J Geophys Res D Atmos 2012, 117:D17105. doi: 10.1029/2012JD017607.
51. Williamson P, Wallace D, Law C, Boyd P, Collos Y, Croot P, Denman K, Riebesell U, Takeda S, Vivian C. Ocean fertilization for geoengineering: a review of effectiveness, environmental impacts and emerging governance. Process Saf Environ Prot 2012, 90:475-488. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2012.10.007.
52. Kim Y, Kim B, Miller M, Min Q, Song C. Enhanced aerosol-cloud relationships in more stable and adiabatic clouds. Asia-Pac J Atmos Sci 2012, 48:283-293. doi: 10.1007/s13143-012-0028-0.
53. Nemet G, Holloway T, Meier P. Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environ Res Lett 2010, 5:14007. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014007.
54. Hartzell-Nichols L. Precaution and solar radiation management. Ethics Policy Environ 2012, 15:158-171. doi: 10.1080/21550085.2012.685561.
55. Angel R. Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:17184-17189. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608163103.
56. Bickel JE. Climate engineering and climate tipping-point scenarios. Environ Syst Decisions 2013, 33:152-167. doi: 10.1007/s10669-013-9435-8.
57. Stilgoe J, Watson M, Kuo K. Public engagement with biotechnologies offers lessons for the governance of geoengineering research and beyond. PLoS Biol 2013, 11:e1001707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001707.
58. Einsiedel E. Introduction: making sense of emerging technologies. In: Einsiedel E, ed. Emerging Technologies: From Hindsight to Foresight. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press; 2009, 3-9.
59. Allenby B. Thoughts on industrial ecology, emerging technologies, and sustainability science. Sustain Sci 2011, 6:119-122. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0134-4.
60. Gaskell G, Bauer M, Durant J. The representation of biotechnology: Policy, media and public perception. In: Durant J, Bauer M, Gaskell G, eds. Biotechnology in the Public Sphere. A European Sourcebook. London: Science Museum; 1998.
61. Paarlberg R. The global food fight. Foreign Aff 2000, 79:24-38.
62. Kearns M, Grove-White R, Macnaghten P, Wilsdon J, Wynne B. From bio to nano: learning the lessons, interrogating the comparison. Sci Cult 2006, 15:291-307.
63. Rogers-Hayden T, Pidgeon N. Moving engagement 'upstream'? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Underst Sci 2007, 16:345-364. doi: 10.1177/0963662506076141.
64. Gardiner S. Some early ethics of geoengineering the climate: a commentary on the values of the Royal Society report. Environ Values 2011, 20:163-188. doi: 10.3197/096327111X12997574391689.
65. Nerlich B, Jaspal R. Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor Symb 2012, 27:131-147. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2012.665795.
66. Gardiner S. Is arming the future with geoengineering really the lesser evil? Gardiner S, Caney S, Jamieson D, Shue, H. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK, 2010: 284-314.
67. Rayner S. How to eat an elephant: a bottom up approach to climate policy. Clim Pol 2010, 10:615-621. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2010.0138.
68. Román M, Linnér B-O, Mickwitz P. Development policies as a vehicle for addressing climate change. Clim Develop 2012, 3:251-260. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2012.698590.
69. O'Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S. 'Fear won't do it': promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 2009, 30:355-379. doi: 10.1177/1075547008329201.
70. Moser S. Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:31-53. doi: 10.1002/wcc.11.
71. Wibeck V. Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change - some lessons from recent literature. Environ Educ Res 2014, 20:387-411. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2013.812720.
72. Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE, Lento TM. 'Opening up' geoengineering appraisal: Multi-Criteria Mapping of options for tackling climate change. Glob Environ Chang 2013, 23:926-937. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.011.