Framing the Controversial: Geoengineering in Academic Literature

Science Communication

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 3-29

  Huttunen, Suvi ^a   Hildén, Mikael ^a  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

climate change; framing; geoengineering; politicization of science; science communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892462338     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547013492435     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. BarrettS. (2008). The incredible economics of geoengineering. Environmental Resource Economics, 39, 45-54. Retrieved from http://media.cigionline.org/geoeng/2008%20-%20Barrett%20-%20Incredible%20Econ%20of%20GeoEng.pdf.
2. Benford R. D.,Snow D. A.Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment.Annual Review of Sociology. 2000;26:611-639.
3. Bickerstaff K.,Lorenzoni I.,Pidgeon N. F.,Poortinga W.,Simmons P.Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste.Public Understanding of Science. 2008;17:145-169.
4. Bodansky D.May we engineer the climate?.Climatic Change. 1996;33:309-321.
5. Böschen S.Hybrid regimes of knowledge? Challenges for constructing scientific evidence in the context of the GMO-debate.Environmental Science Pollution Research. 2009;16:508-520.
6. Brooks S.Biotechnology and the politics of truth: From the green revolution to an evergreen revolution.Sociologia Ruralis. 2005;45:360-379.
7. Cicerone R. J.Geoengineering: Encouraging research and overseeing implementation.Climatic Change. 2006;77:221-226.
8. Crutzen P. J.Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: A contribution to resolve a policy dilemma?.Climatic Change. 2006;77:211-220.
9. Devos Y.,Maeseele P.,Reheul D.,van Speybroeck L.,de Waele D.Ethics in the societal debated on genetically modified organisms: a (re)quest for sense and sensibility.Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 2008;21:29-61.
10. Dibden J.,Gibbs D.,Cocklin C.Framing GM crops as a food security solution.Journal of Rural Studies. 2013;29:59-70.
11. Dickinson R.Climate engineering: A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balance.Climatic Change. 1996;33:279-290.
12. Donk A.,Metag J.,Kohring M.,Marcinkowski F.Framing emerging technologies: Risk perceptions of nanotechnology in the German press.Science Communication. 2012;34:5-29.
13. Entman R. M.Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication. 1993;43:51-58.
14. Entman R. M.Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2004:.
15. Entman R. M.Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. D'Angelo P.Kuypers J., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:331-355.
16. Frickel S.Building an interdiscipline: Collective action framing and the rise of genetic toxicology.Social Problems. 2004;51:269-287.
17. GardinerS. M. (2010). Ethics and climate change: An introduction. Wires Climate Change, 1, 54-66. Retrieved from https://www.u-cursos.cl/ingenieria/2011/1/EH1D4/1/material_docente/previsualizar?id_material=347774.
18. Gillan K.Understanding meaning in movements: A hermeneutic approach to frames and ideologies.Social Movement Studies. 2008;7:247-263.
19. Granqvist N.,Laurila J.Rage against self-replicating machines: Framing science and fiction in the US nanotechnology field.Organization Studies. 2011;32:253-280.
20. HansenJ. E. (2007). Scientific reticence and sea level rise. Environmental Research Letters, 2, 1-6. Retrieved from http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/2/2/024002/fulltext/.
21. HolmP.GoodsiteM. E.CloetinghS.AgnolettiM.MoldanB.LangD. J.ZondervanR. (2012). Collaboration between the natural, social and human sciences in global change research. Environmental Science & Policy. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://www.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/dpto_ciencia_pol_soc/Collaboration%20between%20the%20natural.pdf.
22. Hoppe R.Rethinking the science-policy nexus: From knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements.Poiesis & Praxis. 2005;3:199-215.
23. Meeting report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Expert Meeting on Geoengineering. Potsdam, Germany: IPCC Working Group III Technical Support Unit, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research; 2012:.
24. Jamieson D.Ethics and intentional climate change.Climatic Change. 1996;33:323-336.
25. Jasanoff S.Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science.Social Studies of Science. 1987;17:195-230.
26. Joronen S.,Oksanen M.,Vuorisalo T.Towards weather ethics: From change to choice with weather modification.Ethics, Policy & Environment. 2011;14:55-67.
27. Kiehl J. T.Geoengineering climate change: Treating the symptom over the cause?.Climatic Change. 2006;77:227-228.
28. Ladle R. J.,Gillson L.The (im)balance of nature: A public perception time-lag?.Public Understanding of Science. 2008;18:229-242.
29. Levidow L.,Carr S.GM crops on trial: Technological development as a real world experiment.Futures. 2007;39:408-431.
30. Luokkanen M.,Huttunen S.,Hildén M.Geoengineering, news media and metaphors: Framing the controversial.Public Understanding of Science. 2013;:.
31. Matthes J.,Kohring M.The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity.Journal of Communication. 2008;58:258-279.
32. Nerlich B.,Jaspal R.Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe.Metaphor and Symbol. 2012;27:131-147.
33. NisbetM. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment, 51, 12-23. Retrieved from http://www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/March-April%202009/Nisbet-full.html.
34. Pielke R. A.When scientists politicise science: Making sense of controversy over the skeptical environmentalist.Environmental Science & Policy. 2004;7:405-417.
35. Pralle S.,Boscarino J.Framing trade-offs: The politics of nuclear power and wind energy in the age of global climate change.Review of Policy Research. 2011;28:323-345.
36. Preston C. J.Re-thinking the unthinkable: Environmental ethics and the presumptive argument against geoengineering.Environmental Values. 2011;20:457-479.
37. Ralston S. J.Engineering an artful and ethical solution to the problem of global warming.Review of Policy Research. 2009;26:821-837.
38. Reese S. D.The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited.Journal of Communication. 2007;57:148-154.
39. Sarewitz D.How science makes environmental controversies worse.Environmental Science & Policy. 2004;7:385-403.
40. Schelling T.The economic diplomacy of geoengineering.Climatic Change. 1996;33:303-307.
41. Schneider S. H.Geoengineering: Could-or should-we do it?.Climatic Change. 1996;33:291-302.
42. Scholte S.,Vasileiadou E.,Petersen A. C.Opening up the societal debate on climate engineering: How newspaper frames are changing.Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences. 2013;10:1-16.
43. Schön D. A.,Rein M.Frame reflection. Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1994:.
44. Scoones I.New ecology and the social sciences: What prospects for a fruitful engagement?.Annual Review of Anthropology. 1999;28:479-507.
45. Shepherd J.,Caldeira K.,Haigh J.,Keith D.,Launder B.,Mace G.,Watson A.Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. London, England: The Royal Society; 2009:.
46. TrenberthK. E.DaiA. (2007). Effects of Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption on the hydrological cycle as an analog of geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters, 34. Retrieved from http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/adai/papers/TrenberthDai_GRL07.pdf.
47. Van Gorp BDoing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. D'Angelo P.Kuypers J. A., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:84-109.
48. Vaughan N. E.,Lenton T. E.A review of climate geoengineering proposals.Climatic Change. 2011;109:745-790.
49. Victor D. G.On the regulation of geoengineering.Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2008;24:322-336.
50. Virgoe J.International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change.Climatic Change. 2009;95:103-119.
51. Vliegenthart R.,van Zoonen L.Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis.European Journal of Communication. 2011;26:101-115.
52. von Storch H.,Bray D.Against politicization of science.Poiesis & Praxis. 2010;7:211-219.
53. Weaver D. A.,Lively E.,Bimber B.Searching for a frame: News media tell the story of technology progress, risk and regulation.Science Communication. 2009;31:139-165.
54. Weingart P.Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics.Science and Public Policy. 1999;26:151-161.
55. Wigley T. M. L.A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization.Science. 2006;314:452-454.