A bibliometric analysis of climate engineering research

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 417-427

  Belter, Christopher W ^a   Seidel, Dian J ^b  

^a NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CLIMATE CHANGE; IRON RESEARCH; PUBLISHING;

ADAPTATION STRATEGIES; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS; NORTHERN HEMISPHERES; RADIATION MANAGEMENT; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE; SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENGINEERING; NORTHERN HEMISPHERE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH; SOLAR RADIATION;

EID: 84882277577     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.229     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AGU. Geoengineering the Climate System. 2009. Available at: http://www.agu.org/sci_pol/positions/ geoengineering.shtml. (Accessed 20 May 2013).
2. AMS. Geoengineering the Climate System: A Policy Statement of the American Meteorological Society. 2013. Available at: http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2013geoengineeringclimate_amsstatement.html. (Accessed 20 May 2013).
3. The Royal Society. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty. RS Policy Document 10/09, 2009, 84. Available at: http://royalsociety. org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2009/8693.pdf. (Accessed 20 May 2013).
4. Asilomar Scientific Organizing Committee. The Asilomar Conference Recommendations on Principles for Research into Climate Engineering Techniques. 2010. Available at: http://www.climateresponsefund. org/images/Conference/finalfinalreport.pdf. (Accessed 20 May 2013).
5. National Committee for Earth System Science. Geoengineering the Climate? A Southern Hemisphere Perspective. 2011. Available at: http://www.science.org.au/natcoms/nc-ess/documents/GEsymposium.pdf. (Accessed 20 May 2013).
6. Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative. Solar Radiation Management: The Governance of Research. 2011. Available at: http://www.srmgi.org/ report/. (Accessed 20 May 2013).
7. 2 from air. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:E1210-E1210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200990109.
8. Tollefson J. Geoengineering: ocean-fertilization project off Canada sparks furore. Nature 2012, 490:458-459.
9. de Solla Price DJ. Networks of scientific papers. Science 1965, 149:510-515. doi: 10.1126/science. 149.3683.510.
10. Garfield E, Pudovkin AI, Istomin VS. Why do we need algorithmic historiography? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2003, 54:400-412. doi: 10.1002/asi.10226.
11. Garfield E, Sher IH, Torpie RJ. The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Scientific Information Inc; 1964.
12. McCain KW. Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1986, 37:111-122. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198605)37:3<111::aid-asi2>3.0.co;2-d.
13. Morris SA, Van der Veer Martens B. Mapping research specialties. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 2008, 42:213-295. doi: 10.1002/aris.2008.1440420113.
14. Keith DW. Geoengineering the climate: history and prospect. Annu Rev Energy Environ 2000, 25:245-284. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.245.
15. Thompson MT, Launder B. Geo-Engineering Climate Change: Environmental Necessity or Pandora's Box? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
16. Vaughan NE, Lenton TM. A review of climate geoengineering proposals. Clim Change 2011, 109:745-790. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0027-7.
17. Crabbe MJC. Modelling effects of geoengineering options in response to climate change and global warming: implications for coral reefs. Comput Biol Chem 2009, 33:415-420. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2009. 09.004.
18. Lenton TM, Vaughan NE. The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options. Atmos Chem Phys 2009, 9:5539-5561. doi: 10.5194/acp-9-5539-2009.
19. Moore JC, Jevrejeva S, Grinsted A. Efficacy of geoengineering to limit 21st century sea-level rise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:15699-15703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008153107.
20. Keith DW. Photophoretic levitation of engineered aerosols for geoengineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:16428-16431. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 1009519107.
21. Robock A. Atmospheric science-Whither geoengineering? Science 2008, 320:1166-1167. doi: 10.1126/science.1159280.
22. Heyward C. Situating and abandoning geoengineering: a typology of five responses to dangerous climate change. PS Polit Sci Polit 2013, 46:23-27. doi: 10.1017/S1049096512001436.
23. Li JF, Wang MH, Ho YS. Trends in research on global climate change: a science citation index expanded-based analysis. Global Planet Change 2011, 77:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.02.005.
24. Schwechheimer H, Winterhager M. Highly dynamic specialities in climate research. Scientometrics 1999, 44:547-560. doi: 10.1007/bf02458495.
25. Stanhill G. The growth of climate change science: a scientometric study. Clim Change 2001, 48:515-524. doi: 10.1023/a:1010721600896.
26. Bjurstrom A, Polk M. Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report. Clim Change 2011, 108:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0018-8.
27. Bjurstrom A, Polk M. Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report. Scientometrics 2011, 87:525-550. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0356-3.
28. Vasileiadou E, Heimeriks G, Petersen AC. Exploring the impact of the IPCC Assessment Reports on science. Environ Sci Policy 2011, 14:1052-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.07.002.
29. Anderegg WRL, Prall JW, Harold J, Schneider SH. Expert credibility in climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:12107-12109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003187107.
30. Li JF, Zhang YH, Wang XS, Ho YS. Bibliometric analysis of atmospheric simulation trends in meteorology and atmospheric science journals. Croat Chem Acta 2009, 82:695-705.
31. Xie S, Zhang J, Ho Y-S. Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2008, 77:113-130. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1928-0.
32. Janssen MA, Schoon ML, Ke WM, Borner K. Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global Environ Change 2006, 16:240-252. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.001.
33. Jappe A. Explaining international collaboration in global environmental change research. Scientometrics 2007, 71:367-390. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1676-1.
34. Kajikawa Y, Ohno J, Takeda Y, Matsushima K, Komiyama H. Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network. Sustain Sci 2007, 2:221-231. doi: 10.1007/s11625-007-0027-8.
35. Bettencourt LM, Kaur J. Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:19540-19545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102712108.
36. Schoolman ED, Guest JS, Bush KF, Bell AR. How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain Sci 2012, 7:67-80. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z.
37. Aguillo IF. Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics 2011, 91:343-351. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0582-8.
38. Jacso P. Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar. Online Inf Rev 2010, 34:175-191. doi: 10.1108/ 14684521011024191.
39. Sci2 Team. Science of Science (Sci2) Tool. 2009. Available at: http://sci2.cns.iu.edu.
40. Kessler MM. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am Document 1963, 14:10-25. doi: 10.1002/ asi.5090140103.
41. Newman MEJ. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98:404-409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.021544898.
42. Albert R, Barabasi AL. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 2002, 74:47-97. doi: 10.1103/ RevModPhys.74.47.
43. Newman MEJ. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 2003, 45:167-256. doi: 10.1137/s003614450342480.
44. Borner K, Chen CM, Boyack KW. Visualizing knowledge domains. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 2003, 37:179-255.
45. Boyack KW, Klavans R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2010, 61:2389-2404. doi: 10.1002/asi.21419.
46. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1973, 24:265-269. doi: 10.1002/ asi.4630240406.
47. Glanzel W, Czerwon HJ. A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics 1996, 37:195-221. doi: 10.1007/bf02093621.
48. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose, CA; 2009.
49. Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2008:P10008. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008.
50. Lambiotte R, Delvenne JC, Barahona M.Laplacian dynamics and multiscale modular structure in networks. 2009. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.1770.
51. Mercer AM, Keith DW, Sharp JD. Public understanding of solar radiation management. Environ Res Lett 2011, 6:044006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044006.
52. Crutzen PJ. Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim Change 2006, 77:211-219. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y.
53. Boyd PW, Jickells T, Law CS, Blain S, Boyle EA, Buesseler KO, Coale KH, Cullen JJ, de Baar HJW, Follows M, et al. Mesoscale iron enrichment experiments 1993-2005: synthesis and future directions. Science 2007, 315:612-617. doi: 10. 1126/science.1131669.
54. Boyd PW. Implications of large-scale iron fertilization of the oceans-introduction and synthesis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2008, 364:213-218. doi: 10.3354/meps07541.
55. van Leeuwen TN, Moed HF, Tijssen RJW, Visser MS, van Raan AFJ. Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics 2001, 51:335-346.
56. Morrow DR, Kopp RE, Oppenheimer M. Toward ethical norms and institutions for climate engineering research. Environ Res Lett 2009, 4:045106. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045106.
57. Barabasi AL, Jeong H, Neda Z, Ravasz E, Schubert A, Vicsek T. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 2002, 311:590-614. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4371(02)00736-7.
58. Franceschet M. Collaboration in computer science: a network science approach. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2011, 62:1992-2012. doi: 10.1002/asi.21614.