Reactions to graphic health warnings in the United States

Health Education Research

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 46-56

  Nonnemaker, James M ^a   Choiniere, Conrad J ^b   Farrelly, Matthew C ^a   Kamyab, Kian ^a   Davis, Kevin C ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MALE; PACKAGING; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COGNITION; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; PRODUCT LABELING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922544455     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyu036     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Slade J. The pack as advertisement. Tob Control 1997; 6: 169-70.
2. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan JK et al. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 2002; 11(Suppl. I): i73-80.
3. HammondD.Healthwarning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control 2011; 20: 327-37.
4. Borland R, Hill D. Initial impact of the new Australian tobacco health warnings on knowledge and beliefs. Tob Control 1997; 6: 317-25.
5. Borland R, Hill D. The path to Australias tobacco health warnings. Addiction 1997; 92: 1151e7.
6. Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald PW et al. Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behavior. Tob Control 2003; 12: 391-5.
7. Hammond D, Fong GT, Borland R et al. Text and graphic warnings on cigarettes packages: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Study. Am J Prev Med 2007; 32: 202-09.
8. Borland R, Yong HH, Wilson N et al. How reaction to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC Four Country survey. Addiction 2009; 104: 669e75.
9. Hammond D, Fong GT, Borland R et al. Effectiveness of cigarettewarning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006; 15(Suppl. III): iii19e25.
10. Thrasher JF, RousuMC, Anaya-Ocampo R et al. Estimating the impact of different cigarette package warning label policies: the auction method. Addict Behav 2007; 32: 2916-25.
11. Miller CL, Hill DJ, Quester PG et al. Impact on the Australian Quitline of new graphic cigarette pack warnings including the Quitline number. Tob Control 2009; 18: 235-7.
12. Williamsen MC, Simons C, Zeeman G. Impact of the new EU health warnings on the Dutch quit line. Tob Control 2002; 11: 382.
13. Wilson N, Li J, Hoek J et al. Long-Term benefit of increasing the prominence of a quitline number on cigarette packaging: 3 years of Quitline call data. N Z Med J 2010; 123: 109-11.
14. Moodie C, MacKintosh AM, Hammond D. Adolescents response to text-only tobacco health warnings: results from the 2008 UKYouth Tobacco Policy Survey. Eur J Public Health 2010; 20: 463-9.
15. Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald PW et al. Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 1442-5.
16. Kees J, Burton S, Andrews JC et al. Understanding how graphic pictorial warnings work on cigarette packaging. J Public Policy Market 2010; 29: 265-76.
17. Dillard JP, Peck E. Affect and persuasion: emotional responses to public service announcements. Communic Res 2000; 27: 461-95.
18. Hullett CR. Using functional theory to promote sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing the impact of value-expressive messages and guilt. Communic Res 2004; 31: 363-96.
19. Gunther AC, Storey JD. The influence of presumed influence. J Commun 2003; 53: 199-15.
20. Dillard JP, Shen L, Vail RG. Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Hum Commun Res 2007; 33: 467-88.
21. Dillard JP, Weber KM, Vail RG. The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: a meta-Analysis with implications for formative campaign research. J Commun 2007; 57: 613-31.
22. Davis KC, Nonnemaker J, Duke J et al. Perceived effectiveness of cessation advertisements: the importance of audience reactions and practical implications for media campaign planning. Health Commun 2013; 28: 461-72.
23. Hammond D, Reid JL, Driezen P et al. Pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs in the United States: an experimental evaluation of the proposed FDA warnings. Nicotine Tob Res 2013; 15: 93-102.
24. Villanti AC, Cantrell J, Pearson JL et al. Perceptions and perceived impact of graphic cigarette health warning labels on smoking behavior amongU.S. young adults. Nicotine Tob Res 2014; 16: 469-77.
25. Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA et al. Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol 1996; 15: 355-61.
26. Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr 1992; 59: 329-49.