How to involve stakeholders in fisheries management - A country case study in Trinidad and Tobago

Marine Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 47-58

  Soma, Katrine ^a  

^a FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS   (Italy)

Author keywords

AHP; Decision support; Fisheries management objectives; Responsible fisheries; Stakeholder participation; Sustainable fisheries

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION MAKING; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY;

TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO;

DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA);

EID: 0038807837     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-597X(02)00050-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. FAO. Fisheries management. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries 4, 1997.
2. FAO. The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA), 2001.
3. World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission). Our common future. Oxford: University Press, 1987.
4. FAO. Indicators for sustainable development of marine captured fisheries management. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries 8, 1999.
5. Charles A, Yang C-W. A strategic planning model for fisheries development. Fisheries Research 1991:10:287-307.
6. Stiglitz JE. Participation and development perspectives from the comprehensive development paradigm (27 February 1999). The World Bank Group, 1999.
7. Karl M. Monitoring and evaluating stakeholder participation in agriculture and rural development projects: an annotated bibliography. Sustainable Development Department (SD). FAO. 2000.
8. Rudqvist A. Woodford-Berger P. Evaluation and participation-Some Lessons. SIDA Studies in Evaluation 96/1, SIDA. 1996.
9. FAO. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, 1995.
10. World Bank. The World Bank Participation Sourcebook, 1996.
11. World Bank. Assessing aid: what works. What doesn't, and why, University Press, 1998.
12. Warren P. Developing participatory and integrated watershed management. Community Forestry Case Study Series 13, FAO, 1998.
13. Leung P, Muroka J, Nakamoto ST, Pooley S. Evaluating fisheries management options in Hawaii using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Fisheries Research 1998;36(2,3):171-83.
14. Mardle S, Pascoe S. A review of applications of multi-criteria decision-making techniques to fisheries. Marine Resource Economics, vol. 14, 1999. p. 41-63.
15. DiNardo G. Levy D, Golden B. Using decision-analysis to manage Maryland's River Herring-Fishery: and application of AHP. Journal of Environmental Management 1989;29:193-213.
16. Kangas J. Supporting the choice of the sport fishing site. Journal of Environmental Management 1995;43:219-31.
17. Merrit MF, Criddle KR. Evaluation of the analytic hierarchy process for aiding management decisions in recreational fisheries: a case study of the Chinook Salmon Fishery in the Kenai River, Alaska. In: International Symposium on Management Strategies for Exploited fish Populations. Management Exploited Fish. Alaska Sea Grant College Program (1993), 1992. p. 683-703.
18. FAO. Fishery country profile. The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, FID/CP/TRI Rev. 2, 2000.
19. Kuruvilla S. Ferreira L, Soomai S. The Trawl Fishery of Trinidad and Tobago. Fisheries Information Series No. 9. Ministry for Agriculture, Land and Marine Resources, Trinidad and Tobago, 2000.
20. WECAFC. Meeting of Fisheries Managers and Ministers of the WECAFC (Western Central Atlantic Fishery Commission) ad hoc Working Group of the Brazil-Guianas Shelf, Port of Spain, Trinidad, 26-29 March, FAO, 2001.
21. The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). Country Profile, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, Surinam, 2000.
22. Saaty TL. Fundamental of decision-making-and priority theory-with the analytic hierarchy process, vol. VI of the AHP Series, University of Pittsburgh, 1994.