Mapping stakeholder values for coastal zone management

Marine Ecology Progress Series

Volumn 434, Issue , 2011, Pages 239-249

  Ruiz Frau, A ^a   Edwards Jones, G ^a   Kaiser, M J ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community values; Ecosystem service; Marine protected area; Marine spatial planning

Indexed keywords

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MARINE PARK; NATURE CONSERVATION; SPATIAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER;

UNITED KINGDOM; WALES;

EID: 79961078107     PISSN: 01718630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3354/meps09136     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alessa L, Kliskey A, Brown G (2008) Social-ecological hot spots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landsc Urban Plann 85:27-39 (Pubitemid 351305430)
2. Alvarez-Farizo B, Hanley N (2006) Improving the process of valuing non-market benefits: combining citizens' juries with choice modelling. Land Econ 82:465-478 (Pubitemid 44203850)
3. Beaumont NJ, Austen MC, Atkins JP, Burdon D and others (2007) Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar Pollut Bull 54: 253-265 (Pubitemid 46350744)
4. Beierle TC (2002) The quality of stakeholder-based decisions. Risk Anal 22:739-749 (Pubitemid 34977780)
5. Brown G (2004) Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications. Soc Nat Resour 18:17-39 (Pubitemid 40117729)
6. Brown G, Reed P (2000) Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For Sci 46:240-247 (Pubitemid 30322892)
7. Bryan BA, Raymond CM, Crossman ND, Macdonald DH (2010) Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how? Landsc Urban Plann 97:111-122
8. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2008) Conference of the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP9), decision IX/20: Marine and coastal biodiversity. Available at www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=11663
9. Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O'Farrell PJ and others (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9483-9488 (Pubitemid 352031326)
10. DEFRA (Department for Environment and Rural Affairs) (2009) Marine and coastal access act 2009. Department for Environment and Rural Affairs. Available at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/23/pdfs/ukpga-20090023-en.pdf (accessed November 2010)
11. Gilpin A (2000) Environmental economics: a critical overview. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
12. McIntyre N, Moore J, Yuan M (2008) A place-based, valuescentered approach to managing recreation on Canadian rown lands. Soc Nat Resour 21:657-670
13. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: a Framework Working Group for Assessment report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC
14. Mitchell A (2005) The ESRI guide to GIS analysis. Vol 2: spatial measurements and statistics. ESRI Press, Redlands, CA
15. Moore J, Balmford A, Allnutt T, Burgess N (2004) Integrating costs into conservation planning across Africa. Biol Conserv 117:343-350 (Pubitemid 38362128)
16. Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B and others (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9495-9500 (Pubitemid 352031328)
17. OSPAR Commission (2003) OSPAR Recommendation 2003/3 on a network of marine protected areas. Available at www.ospar.org/documents/DBASE/DECRECS/ Recommendations/or03-03e.doc
18. Raymond C, Brown G (2006) A method for assessing protected area allocations using a typology of landscape values. J Environ Plann Manag 49:797-812 (Pubitemid 44597005)
19. Raymond CM, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68:1301-1315
20. Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141: 2417-2431
21. Reed P, Brown G (2003) Values suitability analysis: a methodology for identifying and integrating public perceptions of forest ecosystem values in national forest planning. J Environ Plann Manage 46:643-658 (Pubitemid 37436333)
22. Richards C, Blackstock KL, Carter CE (2004) Practical approaches to participation. Socio-Economic Research Group (SERG) Policy Brief No. 1. Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen
23. Roberts CM, Andelman S, Branch G, Bustamante RH and others (2003) Ecological criteria for evaluating candidate sites for marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13:199-214
24. Tyrvainen L, Makinen K, Schipperijn J (2007) Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc Urban Plann 79:5-19 (Pubitemid 44830081)
25. UN (United Nations) (2002) Report of the world summit on sustainable development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August - 4 September 2002. United Nations, New York, NY. Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/ N02/636/93/PDF/N0263693.pdf?OpenElement (accessed November 2010)
26. Zhu X, Pfueller S, Whitelaw P, Winter C (2010) Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River region of Victoria, Australia. Environ Manag 45:896-911
27. Zube EH (1987) Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape Ecol 1:37-46