A spatial typology for the sea: A contribution from the Baltic

Marine Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2013, Pages 190-197

  Janßen, Holger ^a   Kidd, Sue ^b   Kvinge, Torunn ^c  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR BALTIC SEA RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Baltic Sea; Classification; Land use planning; Marine spatial planning; Marine typology; Sea use planning

Indexed keywords

LAND USE PLANNING; MARINE POLICY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIAL PLANNING;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA;

EID: 84875778880     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Suárez de Vivero J.L., Rodríguez Mateos J.C. Florido del Corral D. Geopolitical factors of maritime policies and marine spatial planning: state, regions, and geographical planning scope. Marine Policy 2009, 33:624-634.
2. Berry BJL, Pred A. Central place studies: a bibliography of theory and applications. Bibliography series number 1 1961, Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Cefas. England's marine plan areas selection-technical report. Cefas contract report C5169A; 2010.
4. MMO. Decision on first marine plan areas, [accessed 07.11.12]. http://www.marinemanagement.org.uk/marineplanning/documents/first_marine_plan_areas_report.pdf.
5. Hughes RM. Use of ecoregions in biological monitoring. In: Loeb SL, Spacie A, editors. Biological monitoring of aquatic systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997. p. 125-151.
6. Moog O., Schmidt-Kloiber A., Ofenböck T., Gerritsen J. Does the ecoregion approach support the typological demands of the EU Water Framework Directive?. Hydrobiologia 2004, 516(1):21-33.
7. Reiniger C. Bioregional planning and ecosystem protection. In: Thompson GF, Steiner F, editors. Ecological design and planning. New York: Wiley; 1997. p. 185-200.
8. Haggett P. Trend surface mapping in the inter-regional comparison of intra-regional structures. Papers of the Regional Science Association 1698, 20:19-28.
9. Grilli AR, Spaulding ML, Damon C. Methods for wind farm siting optimization: New England case study. In: Proceedings of the twentieth international offshore and polar engineering conference. vol. 1; 2010. p. 727-734.
10. St.Martin K., Hall-Arber M. Creating a place for 'Community' in New England fisheries. Human Ecology Review 2008, 15(2):161-170.
11. Schernewski G, Wielgat MA. Baltic Sea typology according to the EC-Water Framework Directive: integration of national typologies and the water body concept. In: Schernewski G, Wielgat M, editors. Baltic Sea Typology. Coastline reports 4; 2004. p. 1-26.
12. Tym & Partners & OCSI. Maximising the socio-economic benefits of marine planning for English coastal communities. Final Report for the Marine Management Organisation (MMO); 2011.
13. ESPON. ESPON Typology Compilation. Scientific Platform and Tools 2013/3/022. Interim report. Version 15/06/2009. [accessed 07.11.12]. http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ScientificPlatform/TypologyCompilation/fir-090615.pdf.
14. ESPON. ESaTDOR-European Seas and Territorial Development Opportunities and Risks. Applied Research 2013/1/15. Interim Report|Version 01/09/2011. [accessed 07.11.12]. http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/ESaTDOR/ESTaDOR-Interim_report_disclaimer.pdf.
15. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute. The Baltic Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak-sea areas and drainage basins [map]. Norrköping; 2004.
16. HELCOM. The Baltic Marine Environment 1999-2002. Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings No. 87; 2010.
17. HELCOM. Maritime Activities in the Baltic Sea. Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings No. 123; 2010.
18. Kiel-Canal. [accessed 07.11.12]. http://www.kiel-canal.org/.
19. ICES. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2011. ICES Advice, 2011. Book 8-The Baltic Sea, 132p.
20. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions -20 20 by 2020-Europe's climate change opportunity. COM/2008/0030 final.
21. BMU. Eckpunktepapier der Bundesregierung zur Energiewende vom 6.6.2011. Bonn/Berlin: German Federal Environmental Ministry; 2011.
22. ENS. Aftale mellem regeringen og Venstre, Dansk Folkeparti, Enhedslisten og Det Konservative; 2012.
23. Regeringskansliet. An integrated climate and energy policy-information sheet about the Government bills 2008/09:162 and 163. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet; 2009.
24. HELCOM, 2012. [accessed 07.11.12]. http://www.helcom.fi/groups/en_GB/MSPWG/.
25. Kidd S., Plater A., Frid C. The ecosystem approach to marine planning and management 2011, Earthscan, London.
26. European Environmental Agency (EEA), [accessed 02.08.11]. http://www.eea.europa.eu/.
27. Helsinki Commission (HELCOM), [accessed 02.08.11]. http://www.helcom.fi/.
28. Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie (BSH), [accessed 02.08.11]. http://www.bsh.de/.
29. BALANCE, [accessed 26.07.11]. http://www.balance-eu.org/.
30. Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (IOW), [accessed 02.08.11]. http://www.io-warnemuende.de/.
31. HELCOM. Towards a tool for quantifying anthropogenic pressures and potential impacts on the Baltic Sea marine environment: a background document on the method, data and testing of the Baltic Sea pressure and impact indices. Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings. No. 125; 2010.
32. Eurostat. Population statistics at regional level, [accessed 22.01.11]. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/images/9/98/Population_RYB2012.xls.
33. Eurostat. NACE Rev. 2-statistical classification of economic activities in the European community. Luxembourg; 2008.
34. Korpinen S., Meski L., Andersen J.H., Laamanen M. Human pressures and their potential impact on the Baltic Sea ecosystem. Ecological Indicators 2012, 15(1):105-114.
35. Halpern B.S., Walbridge S., Selkoe1 K.A., Kappel C.V., Micheli F., D'Agrosa C., et al. Global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 2008, 319:948-952.
36. Eurostat. [accessed 11.05.12]. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Employment_statistics.
37. European Cluster Observatory. [accessed 11.05.12]. http://www.clusterobservatory.eu/index.html#!view=sectors;mode=one;sort=name;uid=Maritime.
38. Malczewski J. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in Planning 2004, 62(1):3-65.
39. Kirkkala T., Oravainen R. Uudenkaupungin edustalta Merikarvialle. Miten voit Selkämeri? Merialueen tila Satakunnan ja Vakka-Suomen rannikolla 2005, 10-13. Southwest Finland Regional Environment Centre, Turku, [in Finnish with an English summary]. M. Sarvala, J. Sarvala (Eds.).
40. European Commission. [accessed 11.10.12]. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/maritime/motorways_sea/.
41. Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung. Grundriss der Raumordnung und Raumentwicklung, Hannover; 2011.