Functional roles of nucleosome stability and dynamics

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 50-60

  Chereji, Răzvan V ^a,b   Morozov, Alexandre V ^c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^c State University of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromatin; DNA; Gene regulation; Nucleosome; Stress response; Transcription factor

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; DNA; HISTONE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; NUCLEOSOME; PROTEIN BINDING;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA HISTONE INTERACTION; DNA SEQUENCE; ENERGY TRANSFER; GENE CONTROL; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; METABOLISM; THERMODYNAMICS;

EUKARYOTA;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUCLEOSOMES; PROTEIN BINDING; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84922441986     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elu038     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Grosberg AY, Khokhlov AR. Statistical Physics of Macromolecules. Woodbury, NY: AIP Press, 1994.
2. Frank-Kamenetskii MD. Biophysics of the DNA molecule. Phys Rep 1997;288: 13-60.
3. van Holde KE. Chromatin. New York: Springer, 1989.
4. Arents G, Moudrianakis EN. Topography of the histone octamer surface: repeating structural motifs utilized in the docking of nucleosomal DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90: 10489-93.
5. McBryant SJ, Adams VH, Hansen JC. Chromatin architectural proteins. Chromosome Res 2006;14: 39-51.
6. Rippe K, Mazurkiewicz J, Kepper N. Interactions of histones with DNA: nucleosome assembly, stability, dynamics, and higher order structure. In: Dias R, Lindman B. (eds). DNA Interactions with Polymers and Surfactants. John Wiley & Sons, Isnc., 2008:135-72.
7. Kornberg RD. Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 1974;184: 868-71.
8. Brogaard K, Xi L, Wang JP, et al. A map of nucleosome positions in yeast at base-pair resolution. Nature 2012;486: 496-501.
9. Felsenfeld G, Groudine M. Controlling the double helix. Nature 2003;421: 448-53.
10. Davey C, Sargent D, Luger K, et al. Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 2002;319: 1097-13.
11. Richmond TJ, Davey CA. The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core. Nature 2003;423: 145-50.
12. Vasudevan D, Chua EYD, Davey C. Crystal structures of nucleosome core particles containing the 601 strong positioning sequence. J Mol Biol 2010;403: 1-10.
13. Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 1997;389: 251-60.
14. Schiessel H. The physics of chromatin. J Phys Cond Matter 2003;15: R699-774.
15. Morozov AV, Kortemme T, Tsemekhman K, et al. Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101: 6946-51.
16. Travers AA, Vaillant C, Arneodo A, et al. DNA structure, nucleosome placement and chromatin remodelling: a perspective. Biochem SocTrans 2012;40: 335-40.
17. Forties R, North J, Javaid S, et al. A quantitative model of nucleosome dynamics. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39: 8306-13.
18. Lowary PT, Widom J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol 1998;276: 19-42.
19. Thåström A, Lowary P, Widom J. Measurement of histone-DNA interaction free energy in nucleosomes. Methods 2004;33: 33-44.
20. Pennings S, Meersseman G, Bradbury EM. Mobility of positioned nucleosomes on 5 S rDNA. J Mol Biol 1991;220: 101-10.
21. Flaus A, Richmond TJ. Positioning and stability of nucleosomes on MMTV 3'LTR sequences. J Mol Biol 1998;275: 427-41.
22. Pennings S, Meersseman G, Bradbury EM. Linker histones H1 and H5 prevent the mobility of positioned nucleosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91: 10275-9.
23. Zlatanova J, Seebart C, Tomschik M. The linker-protein network: control of nucleosomal DNA accessibility. Trends Biochem Sci 2008;33: 247-53.
24. Syed SH, Goutte-Gattat D, Becker N, et al. Single-base resolution mapping of H1-nucleosome interactions and 3D organization of the nucleosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107: 9620-5.
25. Schiessel H, Widom J, Bruinsma R, et al. Polymer reptation and nucleosome repositioning. Phys Rev Lett 2001;86: 4414-7.
26. Kulic I, Schiessel H. Chromatin dynamics: nucleosomes go mobile through twist defects. Phys Rev Lett 2003;91: 148103.
27. Saha A, Wittmeyer J, Cairns BR. Chromatin remodelling: the industrial revolution of DNA around histones. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006;7: 437-47.
28. Erdel F, Krug J, Längst G, et al. Targeting chromatin re-modelers: signals and search mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1809: 497-508.
29. Ozalp VC, Pedersen TR, Nielsen LJ, et al. Time-resolved measurements of intracellular ATP in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a new type of nanobiosensor. J Biol Chem 2010;285: 37579-88.
30. 31P NMR magnetization transfer study of the control of ATP turnover in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93: 6399-404.
31. Rippe K, Schrader A, Riede P, et al. DNA sequence- and conformation-directed positioning of nucleosomes by chromatin-remodeling complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104: 15635-40.
32. Polach KJ, Widom J. Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. J Mol Biol 1995;254: 130-49.
33. Li G, Widom J. Nucleosomes facilitate their own invasion. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004;11: 763-9.
34. Li G, Levitus M, Bustamante C, et al. Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004;12: 46-53.
35. Jiang C, Pugh BF. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10: 161-72.
36. Tolkunov D, Morozov AV. Genomic studies and computational predictions of nucleosome positions and formation energies. Adv Prot Chem Struc Biol 2010;79: 1-57.
37. Kaplan N, Moore IK, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature; 458:362-6.
38. Cole HA, Howard BH, Clark DJ. Activation-induced disruption of nucleosome position clusters on the coding regions of Gcn4-dependent genes extends into neighbouring genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39: 9521-35.
39. Chung HR, Dunkel I, Heise F, et al. The effect of micrococcal nuclease digestion on nucleosome positioning data. PLoS One 2010;5: e15754.
40. Brogaard K, Xi L, Wang JP, et al. A chemical approach to mapping nucleosomes at base pair resolution. Meth Enzymol 2012;513: 315-34.
41. Flaus A, Luger K, Tan S, et al. Mapping nucleosome position at single base-pair resolution by using site-directed hydroxyl radicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93: 1370-5.
42. Chereji RV, Morozov AV. Ubiquitous nucleosome crowding in the yeast genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111: 5236-41.
43. Locke G, Tolkunov D, Moqtaderi Z, et al. Highthroughput sequencing reveals a simple model of nucleosome energetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107: 20998-1003.
44. Widom J. A relationship between the helical twist of DNA and the ordered positioning of nucleosomes in all eukaryotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89: 1095-9.
45. Wang JP, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Xi L, et al. Preferentially quantized linker DNA lengths in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4: e1000175.
46. Chereji RV, Tolkunov D, Locke G, et al. Statistical mechanics of nucleosome ordering by chromatin-structure-induced two-body interactions. Phys Rev E 2011;83: 050903.
47. Elfving N, Chereji RV, Bharatula V, et al. A dynamic interplay of nucleosome and Msn2 binding regulates kinetics of gene activation and repression following stress. Nucleic Acids Res2014;42: 5468-82.
48. Zentner GE, Tsukiyama T, Henikoff S. ISWI and CHD chromatin remodelers bind promoters but act in gene bodies. PLoS Genet 2013;9: e1003317.
49. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2000;11: 4241-57.
50. Martinez-Pastor M, Marchler G, Schuller C, et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE). EMBO J 1996;15: 2227-35.
51. Zawadzki KA, Morozov AV, Broach JR. Chromatin-dependent transcription factor accessibility rather than nucleosome remodeling predominates during global transcriptional restructuring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2009;20: 3503-13.
52. Tolkunov D, Zawadzki KA, Singer C, et al. Chromatin remodelers clear nucleosomes from intrinsically unfavorable sites to establish nucleosome-depleted regions at promoters. Mol Biol Cell 2011;22: 2106-18.
53. Weiner A, Hughes A, Yassour M, et al. High-resolution nucleosome mapping reveals transcription-dependent promoter packaging. Genome Res 2010;20: 90-100.
54. Petrenko N, Chereji RV, McClean MN, et al. Noise and interlocking signaling pathways promote distinct transcription factor dynamics in response to different stresses. Mol Biol Cell 2013;24: 2045-57.
55. Ganguli D, Chereji RV, Iben JR, et al. RSC-dependent constructive and destructive interference between opposing arrays of phased nucleosomes in yeast. Genome Res 2014 gr.177014.114.
56. Anderson JD, Thåström A, Widom J. Spontaneous access of proteins to buried nucleosomal DNA target sites occurs via a mechanism that is distinct from nucleosome translocation. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22: 7147-57.
57. Teif VB, Ettig R, Rippe K. A lattice model for transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA. Biophys J 2010;99: 2597-607.
58. Adams CC, Workman JL. Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Mol Cell Biol 1995;15: 1405-21.
59. Miller JA, Widom J. Collaborative competition mechanism for gene activation in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 2003;23: 1623-32.
60. Moyle-Heyrman G, Tims HS, Widom J. Structural constraints in collaborative competition of transcription factors against the nucleosome. J Mol Biol 2011;412: 634-46.
61. Afek A, Sela I, Musa-Lempel N, et al. Nonspecific transcription-factor-DNA binding influences nucleosome occupancy in yeast. BiophysJ 2011;101: 2465-75.
62. Afek A, Lukatsky DB. Genome-wide organization of eukaryotic preinitiation complex is influenced by noncon-sensus protein-DNA binding. BiophysJ 2013;104: 1107-15.