Genipin-crosslinked catechol-chitosan mucoadhesive hydrogels for buccal drug delivery

Biomaterials

Volumn 37, Issue , 2015, Pages 395-404

  Xu, Jinke ^a   Strandman, Satu ^b   Zhu, Julian X X ^b   Barralet, Jake ^a   Cerruti, Marta ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Buccal drug delivery; Catechols; Chitosan; Hydrogel; Mucoadhesion

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CHITOSAN; DRUG DELIVERY; DRUG PRODUCTS; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; GELATION; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; PHENOLS; POLYMERS;

BUCCAL DRUG DELIVERY; CATECHOLS; COVALENT BOND FORMATION; DRUG DELIVERY STRATEGIES; ENHANCED MUCOADHESION; GASTROINTESTINAL DRUGS; MUCOADHESION; MUCOADHESIVE POLYMERS;

HYDROGELS;

CATECHOL; CATECHOL 19 CHITOSAN GENIPIN; CATECHOL 9 CHITOSAN GENIPIN; CHITOSAN DERIVATIVE; GENIPIN; LIDOCAINE; MUSSEL ADHESIVE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CATECHOL DERIVATIVE; CHITOSAN; CROSS LINKING REAGENT; HYDROGEL; IRIDOID;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CHEEK MUCOSA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVALENT BOND; CROSS LINKING; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG CONJUGATION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG RELEASE; GELATION; HYDROGEL; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MOUTH CAVITY; MUCOADHESION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SWINE; TABLET; ANIMAL; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHEMISTRY; DIFFUSION; DRUG EFFECTS; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MOUTH MUCOSA; PIG; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

MYTILIDAE; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS; SUS;

ANIMALS; CARBON-13 MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; CATECHOLS; CHITOSAN; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; DIFFUSION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; IRIDOIDS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOUTH MUCOSA; RABBITS; RHEOLOGY; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 84922321779     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.024     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Smart J.D. Buccal drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2005, 2:507-517.
2. Shojaei A.H. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. JPharm Pharm Sci 1998, 1:15-30.
3. Squier C.A., Kremer M.J. Biology of oral mucosa and esophagus. JNCI Monogr 2001, 2001:7-15.
4. Lesch C.A., Squier C.A., Cruchley A., Williams D.M., Speight P. The permeability of human oral mucosa and skin to water. JDent Res 1989, 68:1345-1349.
5. Patel V.F., Liu F., Brown M.B. Modeling the oral cavity: invitro and invivo evaluations of buccal drug delivery systems. JControl Release 2012, 161:746-756.
6. Patel V.F., Liu F., Brown M.B. Advances in oral transmucosal drug delivery. JControl Release 2011, 153:106-116.
7. Darwish M., Kirby M., Robertson P., Tracewell W., Jiang J.G. Absolute and relative bioavailability of fentanyl buccal tablet and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate. JClin Pharmacol 2007, 47:343-350.
8. Xu H.B., Huang K.X., Zhu Y.S., Gao Q.H., Wu Q.Z., Tian W.Q., et al. Hypoglycaemic effect of a novel insulin buccal formulation on rabbits. Pharmacol Res 2002, 46:459-467.
9. El-Samaligy M.S., Afifi N.N., Mahmoud E.A. Increasing bioavailability of silymarin using a buccal liposomal delivery system: preparation and experimental design investigation. Int J Pharm 2006, 308:140-148.
10. Rana P., Murthy R.S.R. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal films impregnated with carvedilol nanosuspension: a potential approach for delivery of drugs having high first-pass metabolism. Drug Deliv 2013, 20:224-235.
11. Perioli L., Ambrogi V., Rubini D., Giovagnoli S., Ricci M., Blasi P., et al. Novel mucoadhesive buccal formulation containing metronidazole for the treatment of periodontal disease. JControl Release 2004, 95:521-533.
12. Aksungur P., Sungur A., Ünal S., Iskit A.B., Squier C.A., Senel S. Chitosan delivery systems for the treatment of oral mucositis: invitro and invivo studies. JControl Release 2004, 98:269-279.
13. Codd J.E., Deasy P.B. Formulation development and invivo evaluation of a novel bioadhesive lozenge containing a synergistic combination of antifungal agents. Int J Pharm 1998, 173:13-24.
14. Sudhakar Y., Kuotsu K., Bandyopadhyay A.K. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery - a promising option for orally less efficient drugs. JControl Release 2006, 114:15-40.
15. Morales J.O., McConville J.T. Manufacture and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal films. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2011, 77:187-199.
16. Rao S., Song Y., Peddie F., Evans A.M. Anovel tri-layered buccal mucoadhesive patch for drug delivery: assessment of nicotine delivery. JPharm Pharmacol 2011, 63:794-799.
17. Maurya S.K., Bali V., Pathak K. Bilayered transmucosal drug delivery system of pravastatin sodium: statistical optimization, invitro, exvivo, invivo and stability assessment. Drug Deliv 2012, 19:45-57.
18. Yehia S.A., El-Gazayerly O.N., Basalious E.B. Fluconazole mucoadhesive buccal films: invitro/invivo performance. Curr Drug Deliv 2009, 6:17-27.
19. Peh K.K., Wong C.F. Polymeric films as vehicle for buccal delivery: swelling, mechanical, and bioadhesive properties. JPharm Pharm Sci 1999, 2:53-61.
20. Jaipal A., Pandey M.M., Abhishek A., Vinay S., Charde S.Y. Interaction of calcium sulfate with xanthan gum: effect on invitro bioadhesion and drug release behavior from xanthan gum based buccal discs of buspirone. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2013, 111:644-650.
21. Langoth N., Kahlbacher H., Schoffmann G., Schmerold I., Schuh M., Franz S., et al. Thiolated chitosans: design and invivo evaluation of a mucoadhesive buccal peptide drug delivery system. Pharm Res 2006, 23:573-579.
22. Martin L., Wilson C.G., Koosha F., Uchegbu I.F. Sustained buccal delivery of the hydrophobic drug denbufylline using physically cross-linked palmitoyl glycol chitosan hydrogels. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003, 55:35-45.
23. Remunan-Lopez C., Portero A., Vila-Jato J.L., Alonso M.J. Design and evaluation of chitosan/ethylcellulose mucoadhesive bilayered devices for buccal drug delivery. JControl Release 1998, 55:143-152.
24. Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 2006, 31:603-632.
25. Sogias I.A., Williams A.C., Khutoryanskiy V.V. Why is chitosan mucoadhesive?. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9:1837-1842.
26. Lehr C.-M., Bouwstra J.A., Schacht E.H., Junginger H.E. Invitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers. Int J Pharm 1992, 78:43-48.
27. Grabovac V., Guggi D., Bernkop-Schnürch A. Comparison of the mucoadhesive properties of various polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005, 57:1713-1723.
28. Sandri G., Rossi S., Bonferoni M.C., Ferrari F., Zambito Y., Colo G.D., et al. Buccal penetration enhancement properties of N-trimethyl chitosan: influence of quaternization degree on absorption of a high molecular weight molecule. Int J Pharm 2005, 297:146-155.
29. Bernkop-Schnurch A., Freudl J. Comparative invitro study of different chitosan-complexing agent conjugates. Pharmazie 1999, 54:369-371.
30. Kast C.E., Bernkop-Schnürch A. Thiolated polymers - thiomers: development and invitro evaluation of chitosan-thioglycolic acid conjugates. Biomaterials 2001, 22:2345-2352.
31. Snyder G.H., Reddy M.K., Cennerazzo M.J., Field D. Use of local electrostatic environments of cysteines to enhance formation of a desired species in a reversible disulfide exchange reaction. Biochim Biophys Acta 1983, 749:219-226.
32. Leitner V.M., Marschütz M.K., Bernkop-Schnürch A. Mucoadhesive and cohesive properties of poly(acrylic acid)-cysteine conjugates with regard to their molecular mass. Eur J Pharm Sci 2003, 18:89-96.
33. Jewett S.L., Eddy L.J., Hochstein P. Is the autoxidation of catecholamines involved in ischemia-reperfusion injury?. Free Radic Biol Med 1989, 6:185-188.
34. Wu J., Zhang L., Wang Y., Long Y., Gao H., Zhang X., et al. Mussel-inspired chemistry for robust and surface-modifiable multilayer films. Langmuir 2011, 27:13684-13691.
35. Lee H., Dellatore S.M., Miller W.M., Messersmith P.B. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 2007, 318:5.
36. Lee C., Shin J., Lee J.S., Byun E., Ryu J.H., Um S.H., et al. Bioinspired, calcium-free alginate hydrogels with tunable physical and mechanical properties and improved biocompatibility. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14:2004-2013.
37. Fullenkamp D.E., Rivera J.G., Y-k Gong, Lau K.H.A., He L., Varshney R., et al. Mussel-inspired silver-releasing antibacterial hydrogels. Biomaterials 2012, 33:3783-3791.
38. Hong S., Yang K., Kang B., Lee C., Song I.T., Byun E., et al. Hyaluronic acid catechol: a biopolymer exhibiting a ph-dependent adhesive or cohesive property for human neural stem cell engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23:1774-1780.
39. Ryu J.H., Lee Y., Kong W.H., Kim T.G., Park T.G., Lee H. Catechol-functionalized chitosan/pluronic hydrogels for tissue adhesives and hemostatic materials. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:2653-2659.
40. Zhang H., Bré L.P., Zhao T., Zheng Y., Newland B., Wang W. Mussel-inspired hyperbranched poly(amino ester) polymer as strong wet tissue adhesive. Biomaterials 2014, 35:711-719.
41. Xu J., Soliman G.M., Barralet J., Cerruti M. Mollusk glue inspired mucoadhesives for biomedical applications. Langmuir 2012, 28:14010-14017.
42. Kawai R., Fujita S., Suzuki T. Simultaneous quantitation of lidocaine and its four metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography: application to studies on invitro and invivo metabolism of lidocaine in rats. JPharm Sci 1985, 74:1219-1224.
43. Thompson S.W. Selected histochemical and histopathological methods 1966, C.C. Thomas.
44. Sheehan D.C., Hrapchak B.B. Theory and practice of histotechnology 1987, Battelle Press.
45. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method). Br Med J 1998, 317:1572-1580.
46. Mi F.-L., Sung H.-W., Shyu S.-S. Release of indomethacin from a novel chitosan microsphere prepared by a naturally occurring crosslinker: examination of crosslinking and polycation-anionic drug interaction. JAppl Polym Sci 2001, 81:1700-1711.
47. Butler M.F., Ng Y.-F., Pudney P.D.A. Mechanism and kinetics of the crosslinking reaction between biopolymers containing primary amine groups and genipin. JPolym Sci Part A Polym Chem 2003, 41:3941-3953.
48. Mi F.-L., Sung H.-W., Shyu S.-S., Su C.-C., Peng C.-K. Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable TPP/genipin co-crosslinked chitosan gel beads. Polymer 2003, 44:6521-6530.
49. Kawadkar J., Chauhan M.K. Intra-articular delivery of genipin cross-linked chitosan microspheres of flurbiprofen: preparation, characterization, invitro and invivo studies. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2012, 81:563-572.
50. Chen H., Ouyang W., Lawuyi B., Martoni C., Prakash S. Reaction of chitosan with genipin and its fluorogenic attributes for potential microcapsule membrane characterization. JBiomed Mater Res A 2005, 75:917-927.
51. Ofner J., Krüger H.U., Grothe H., Schmitt-Kopplin P., Whitmore K., Zetzsch C. Physico-chemical characterization of SOA derived from catechol and guaiacol - a model substance for the aromatic fraction of atmospheric HULIS. Atmos Chem Phys 2011, 11.
52. Heux L., Brugnerotto J., Desbrières J., Versali M.F., Rinaudo M. Solid state NMR for determination of degree of acetylation of chitin and chitosan. Biomacromolecules 2000, 1:746-751.
53. Zhang M., Haga A., Sekiguchi H., Hirano S. Structure of insect chitin isolated from beetle larva cuticle and silkworm (Bombyx mori) pupa exuvia. Int J Biol Macromol 2000, 27:99-105.
54. Fründ R., González-Vila F.J., Lüdemann H.-D., Martín Martínez F. Comparison of the solid state CPMAS and solution carbon-13-NMR spectra of humic acids extracted from composted municipal refuse. Zfür Naturforsch 1987, 42:205-208.
55. Wyman C.E. Aqueous pretreatment of plant biomass for biological and chemical conversion to fuels and chemicals 2013, John Wiley & Sons.
56. Salamat-Miller N., Chittchang M., Johnston T.P. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005, 57:1666-1691.
57. Ritger P.L., Peppas N.A. Asimple equation for description of solute release II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. JControl Release 1987, 5:37-42.
58. Ritger P.L., Peppas N.A. Asimple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. JControl Release 1987, 5:23-36.
59. Moura M.J., Figueiredo M.M., Gil M.H. Rheological study of genipin cross-linked chitosan hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:3823-3829.
60. Bhattarai N., Gunn J., Zhang M. Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localized drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2010, 62:83-99.
61. Sung H.W., Huang R.N., Huang L.L., Tsai C.C. Invitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of a naturally occurring cross-linking reagent for biological tissue fixation. JBiomater Sci Polym Ed 1999, 10:63-78.
62. Okamoto H., Taguchi H., Iida K., Danjo K. Development of polymer film dosage forms of lidocaine for buccal administration: I. Penetration rate and release rate. JControl Release 2001, 77:253-260.
63. Leopold A., Wilson S., Weaver J.S., Moursi A.M. Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine delivered from a transmucosal patch in children. Anesth Prog 2002, 49:82-87.
64. Routledge P.A., Barchowsky A., Bjornsson T.D., Kitchell B.B., Shand D.G. Lidocaine plasma protein binding. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980, 27:347-351.
65. Collinsworth K.A., Kalman S.M., Harrison D.C. The clinical pharmacology of lidocaine as an antiarrhythymic drug. Circulation 1974, 50:1217-1230.
66. Hersh E., Houpt M., Cooper S., Feldman R., Wolff M., Levin L. Analgesic efficacy and safety of an intraoral lidocaine patch. JAm Dent Assoc 1996, 127:1626-1634.