The Structure of Communication Networks Matters: How Network Diversity, Centrality, and Context Influence Political Ambivalence, Participation, and Knowledge

Political Communication

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 83-108

  Song, Hyunjin ^a   Eveland, William P ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

political deliberation and conversation; political knowledge and sophistication; quantitative network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922289383     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2014.882462     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Alvarez, R., & Brehm, J. (1995). American ambivalence toward abortion policy: Development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1055–1082.
2. Arceneaux, K., & Nickerson, D. W. (2009). Modeling certainty with clustered data: A comparison of methods. Political Analysis, 17, 177–190.
3. Bailenson, J. N., Garland, P., Iyengar, S., & Yee, N. (2006). Transformed facial similarity as a political cue: A preliminary investigation. Political Psychology, 27, 373–385.
4. Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task orientated groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 725–730.
5. Bello, J. (2012). The dark side of disagreement: Revisiting the effect of disagreement an political participation. Electoral Studies, 31, 782–795.
6. Bennett, S. E., Flickinger, R. S., & Rhine, S. L. (2000). Political talk over here, over there, over time. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 99–119.
7. Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
8. Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 55–71.
9. Borgatti, S. P., Carley, K., & Krackhardt, D. (2006). Robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks, 28, 124–136.
10. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
11. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Burbank, M. J. (1997). Explaining contextual effects on vote choice. Political Behavior, 19, 113–132.
13. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339–365.
14. Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37–54.
15. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349–399.
16. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
17. Cho, J. (2011). Geography of political communication: Effects of regional variations in campaign advertising on citizen communication. Human Communication Research, 37, 434–462.
18. Craig, S. C., Kane, J. G., & Martinez, M. D. (2002). Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don’t: Citizens’ ambivalence about abortion. Political Psychology, 23, 285–301.
19. Dylko, I. B. (2010). An examination of methodological and theoretical problems arising from the use of political participation indexes in political communication research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 523–534.
20. Erbring, L., & Young, A. A. (1979). Individuals and social structure: Contextual effects as endogenous feedback. Sociological Methods and Research, 7, 436–430.
21. Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205–224.
22. Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hutchens, M. J. (2013). The role of conversation in developing accurate political perceptions: A multilevel social network approach. Human Communication Research, 39, 422–444.
23. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Hutchens, M. J., & Morey, A. C. (2012). Social networks and political knowledge. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political communication (pp. 241–252). London, England: Sage.
24. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Hutchens, M. J., & Morey, A. C. (2013). Political network size and its antecedents and consequences. Political Communication, 30, 371–394.
25. Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Kleinman, S. B. (2013). Comparing general and political discussion networks within voluntary organizations using social network analysis. Political Behavior, 35, 65–87.
26. Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Thomson, T. (2006). Is it talking, thinking, or both? A lagged dependent variable model of discussion effects on political knowledge. Journal of Communication, 56, 523–542.
27. Faas, T., & Schmitt-Beck, R. (2010). Voters’ political conversations during the 2005 German parliamentary election campaign. In M. R. Wolf, L. Morales, & K. Ikeda (Eds.), Political discussion in modern democracies: A comparative perspective (pp. 99–116). New York, NY: Routledge.
28. Fowler, J. (2005). Turnout in a small world. In A. S. Zuckerman (Ed.), The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior (pp. 269–287). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
29. Fowler, J. H. (2006). Connecting the congress: A study of cosponsorship networks. Political Analysis, 14, 456–487.
30. Fowler, J. H., Heaney, M. T., Nickerson, D. W., Padgett, J. F., & Sinclair, B. (2011). Causality in political networks. American Politics Research, 39, 437–480.
31. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 251–239.
32. Friedkin, N. E. (1983). Horizons of observability and limits of informal control in organizations. Social Forces, 62, 54–77.
33. Friedkin, N. E. (2001). Norm formation in social influence networks. Social Networks, 23, 167–189.
34. Garson, G. D. (2012). Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Giles, M. W., & Dantico, M. K. (1982). Political participation and neighborhood social context revisited. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 144–150.
36. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
37. Hayes, A. F. (2006). A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research, 32, 385–410.
38. Hayes, A. F. (2007). Exploring the forms of self-censorship: On the spiral of silence and the use of opinion expression avoidance strategies. Journal of Communication, 57, 785–802.
39. Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013–1057.
40. Hively, M. H., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2009). Contextual antecedents and political consequences of adolescent political discussion, discussion elaboration, and network diversity. Political Communication, 26, 30–47.
41. Holbert, R. L., Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J., & Wen, W. C. (2002). The role of communication in the formation of an issue-based citizenry. Communication Monographs, 69, 296–310.
42. Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25, 65–95.
43. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44. Johnson, J. C., & Orbach, M. K. (2002). Perceiving the political landscape: Ego biases in cognitive political networks. Social Networks, 24, 291–310.
45. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
46. Keele, L., & Wolak, J. (2008). Contextual sources of ambivalence. Political Psychology, 29, 653–673.
47. Kenny, C. B. (1992). Political participation and effects from the social environment. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 259–267.
48. Kim, Y., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2006). Community storytelling network, neighborhood context, and civic engagement: A multilevel approach. Human Communication Research, 32, 411–439.
49. Klofstad, C. A. (2007). Talk leads to recruitment: How discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 180–191.
50. Klofstad, C. A. (2009). Civic talk and civic participation: The moderating effect of individual predispositions. American Political Research, 37, 856–878.
51. Klofstad, C. A. (2011). Civic talk: Peers, politics, and the future of democracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
52. Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A., & McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 120–134.
53. Knoke, D. (1990). Political networks: The structural perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
54. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1968). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
55. Lazer, D., Rubineau, B, Chetkovich, C., Katz, N., & Neblo, M. (2010). The coevolution of networks and political attitudes. Political Communication, 27, 248–274.
56. Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38–50.
57. Levitan, L. C., & Visser, P. S. (2009). Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1057–1067.
58. Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 127–151.
59. McClurg, S. D. (2003). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 448–464.
60. McClurg, S. D. (2006). Political disagreement in context: The conditional effects of neighborhood context, disagreement, and political talk on electoral participation. Political Behavior, 28, 349–366.
61. Mcdermott, M. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 895–918.
62. McDonald, D. G., & Dimmick, J. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Communication Research, 30, 60–79.
63. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315–336.
64. Mizruchi, M. S., & Potts, B. B. (1998). Centrality and power revisited: Actor success in group decision making. Social Networks, 20, 353–387.
65. Morey, A. C. (2010, November). What politics means to everyday citizens and why definitions matter. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL.
66. Morey, A. C., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hutchens, M. J. (2012). The “who” matters: Types of interpersonal relationships and avoidance of political disagreement. Political Communication, 29, 86–103.
67. Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838–855.
68. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
69. Nickerson, D. W. (2008). Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments. American Political Science Review, 102, 49–57.
70. Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 422–442.
71. Nir, L. (2011). Disagreement and opposition in social networks: Does disagreement discourage turnout? Political Studies, 59, 674–692.
72. Pan, Z., & McLeod, J. (1991). Multilevel analysis in mass communication research. Communication Research, 18, 140–173.
73. Pattie, C. J., & Johnston, R. J. (2009). Conversation, disagreement and political participation. Political Behavior, 31, 261–285.
74. Perry, B. L., & Pescosolido, B. A. (2010). Functional specificity in discussion networks: The influence of general and problem-specific networks on health outcomes. Social Networks, 32, 345–357.
75. Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 19–34.
76. Quintelier, E., Stolle, D., & Harell, A. (2012). Politics in peer groups: Exploring the causal relationship between network diversity and political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 65, 868–881.
77. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78. Roch, C. H., Scholz, J. T., & McGraw, K. M. (2000). Social networks and citizen response to legal change. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 777–791.
79. Rodan, S. (2010). Structural holes and managerial performance: Identifying the underlying mechanisms. Social Networks, 32, 168–179.
80. Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2010). Democrats and Republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PLoS ONE, 5(1), e8733.
81. Saphir, M. N., & Chaffee, S. H. (2002). Adolescents’ contributions to family communication patterns. Human Communication Research, 28, 86–106.
82. Scheufele, D. A., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2001). Perceptions of “public opinion” and “public” opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 25–44.
83. Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56, 728–753.
84. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21, 315–338.
85. Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Yoon, S. (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28, 464–506.
86. Sheingold, C. A. (1973). Social networks and voting: The resurrection of a research agenda. American Sociological Review, 38, 712–720.
87. Shieh, Y-Y., & Fouladi, R. T. (2003). The effect of multicollinearity on multilevel modeling parameter estimates and standard errors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 951–985.
88. Siegel, D. A. (2009). Social networks and collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 122–138.
89. Sinclair, B. (2012). The social citizen: Peer networks and political behavior. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
90. Slater, M. D., Snyder, L., & Hayes, A. F. (2006). Thinking and modeling at multiple levels: The potential contribution of multilevel modeling to communication theory and research. Human Communication Research, 32, 375–384.
91. Streiner, D. L. (2003). Being inconsistent about consistency: When coefficient alpha does and doesn’t matter. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 217–222.
92. Thompson, M. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1995). The conflicted individual: Personality-based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. Journal of Personality, 63, 259–288.
93. Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M., & Griffin, D. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty. & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
94. Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
95. Wang, D. J., Shi, X., McFarland, D. A., & Leskovec, J. (2012). Measurement error in network data: A re-classification. Social Networks, 34, 396–409.
96. Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50, 71–92.