Social networks and political knowledge

The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 241-252

  Eveland, William P ^a   Hutchens, Myiah J ^b   Morey, Alyssa C ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884207163     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446201015.n20     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Barabási, A. L.(2003) Linked: How Everything is Connected to Everything Else and What it Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life.New York: Plume.
2. Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., Greene, S. andHuckfeldt, R. 'The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices', American Political Science Review, (2002) 96 (1): 57-73.
3. Chambers, S. 'Deliberative Democratic Theory', Annual Review of Political Science, (2003) 6: 307-26.
4. Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., School, R. M. andGoitlieb, M. R. 'Campaigns, Reflection, and Deliberation: Advancing an O-S-O-R Model of Communication Effects', Communication Theory, (2009) 19 (1): 66-88.
5. Delli Carpini, M. X. andKeeter, S.(1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Eulau, H. andSiegel, J. W. 'Social Network Analysis and Political Behavior: A Feasibility Study', Western Political Quarterly, (1981) 34 (4): 499-509.
7. Eveland, W. P., Jr. 'The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration', Political Communication, (2004) 21 (2): 177-93.
8. Eveland, W. P., Jr andThomson, T. 'Is it Talking, Thinking, or Both? A Lagged Dependent Variable Model of Discussion Effects on Political Knowledge', Journal of Communication, (2006) 56 (3): 523-42.
9. Eveland, W. P., Jr andHively, M. H. 'Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size and "Heterogeneity" of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation', Journal of Communication, (2009) 59 (2): 205-24.
10. Eveland, W. P., Jr, Hively, M. H. andMorey, A. C.(2009) 'Discussing Measures of Political Discussion: An Evaluation of the Measurement of Network Size, Agreement, and Disagreement and Implications for Inferences', paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association. Chicago, IL.
11. Eveland, W. P., Jr, Hayes, A. F., Shah, D. V. andKwak, N. 'Understanding the Relationship Between Communication and Political Knowledge: A Model-Comparison Approach Using Panel Data', Political Communication, (2005) 22 (4): 423-46.
12. Granovetter, M. S. 'The Strength of Weak Ties', American Journal of Sociology, (1973) 78 (6): 1360-80.
13. Holbert, R. L., Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J. andWen, W. C. 'The Role of Communication in the Formation of an Issue-Based Citizenry', Communication Monographs, (2002) 69 (4): 296-310.
14. Huckfeldt, R. andSprague, J.(1995) Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign.New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E. andSprague, J.(2004) Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions Within Communication Networks.New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Johnson, J. C. andOrbach, M. K. 'Perceiving the Political Landscape: Ego Biases in Cognitive Political Networks', Social Networks, (2002) 24 (3): 291-310.
17. Katz, E. andLazarsfeld, P. F.(1955) Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
18. Knoke, D.(1990) Political Networks: The Structural Perspective.New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kwak, N., Williams, A. E., Wang, X. andLee, H. 'Talking Politics and Engaging Politics: An Examination of the Interactive Relationships Between Structural Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement', Communication Research, (2005) 32 (1): 87-111.
20. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. andGaudet, H.(1944) The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign.New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Marsden, P. V. 'Egocentric and Sociocentric Measures of Network Centrality', Social Networks, (2002) 24 (4): 407-22.
22. Marsden, P. V. 'Interviewer Effects in Measuring Network Size Using a Single Name Generator', Social Networks, (2003) 25 (1): 1-16.
23. Marsden, P. V.(2005) 'Recent Developments in Network Measurement', in P. J.Carrington, J.Scott and S.Wasserman (eds.), Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis.New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 8-30.
24. McClurg, S. D. 'The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation', American Journal of Political Science, (2006) 50 (3): 737-54.
25. Moy, P. andGastil, J. 'Predicting Deliberative Conversation: The Impact of Discussion Networks, Media Use, and Political Cognitions', Political Communication, (2006) 23 (4): 443-60.
26. Mutz, D. C. 'Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice', American Political Science Review, (2002) 96 (1): 111-26.
27. Mutz, D. C.(2006) Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy.New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Mutz, D. C. andMondak, J. J. 'The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse', Journal of Politics, (2006) 68 (1): 140-55.
29. Nir, L. 'Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation', International Journal of Public Opinion Research, (2005) 17 (4): 422-42.
30. Pingree, R. J. 'How Messages Affect Their Senders: A More General Model of Message Effects and Implications for Deliberation', Communication Theory, (2007) 17 (4): 439-61.
31. Putnam, R. D.(2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York: Simon & Schuster.
32. Reagans, R. andMcEvily, B. 'Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range', Administrative Science Quarterly, (2003) 48 (2): 240-67.
33. Richardson, B. andBeck, P. A.(2007). 'The Flow of Political Information: Personal Discussants, the Media, and Partisans', in R.Gunther, J. R.Montero and H. J.Puhle (eds.), Democracy, Intermediation, and Voting on Four Continents.New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 183-207.
34. Richey, S. 'Hierarchy in Political Discussion', Political Communication, (2009) 26 (2): 137-52.
35. Roch, C. H., Scholz, J. T. andMcGraw, K. M. 'Social Networks and Citizen Response to Legal Change', American Journal of Political Science, (2000) 44 (4): 777-91.
36. Sandström, A. andCarlsson, L. 'The Performance of Policy Networks: The Relation Between Network Structure and Network Performance', The Policy Studies Journal, (2008) 36 (4): 497-524.
37. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D. andNisbet, E. C. 'Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation', Political Communication, (2004) 21 (3): 315-38.
38. Straits, B. C. 'Bringing Strong Ties Back in: Interpersonal Gateways to Political Information and Influence', Public Opinion Quarterly, (1991) 55 (3): 432-48.
39. Wasserman, S. andFaust, K.(1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications.New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Weatherford, M. S. 'Interpersonal Networks and Political Behavior', American Journal of Political Science, (1982) 26 (1): 117-43.
41. Weimann, G. 'On the Importance of Marginality: One More Step into the Two-Step Flow of Communication', American Sociological Review, (1982) 47 (6): 764-73.
42. Zuckerman, A. S.(2005) 'Returning to the Social Logic of Politics', in A. S.Zuckerman (ed.), The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. pp. 3-20.