Translation-priming effects on tip-of-the-tongue states

Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 274-288

  Gollan, Tamar H ^a   Ferreira, Victor S ^a   Cera, Cynthia ^a   Flett, Susanna ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bilingualism; Lexical competition; Spanish English; TOTs (tip of the tongue states); Translation priming

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BILINGUALISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LANGUAGE ABILITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REACTION TIME; SELF CONCEPT; SEMANTICS; TONGUE; TRANSLATING (LANGUAGE);

EID: 84922116530     PISSN: 23273798     EISSN: 23273801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.762457     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009a). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 713-734. doi:10.1080/01690960802597250
2. Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009b). Dismissing lexical competition does not make speaking any easier: A rejoinder to Mahon and Caramazza (2009). Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 749-760. doi:10.1080/01690960802648491
3. Abrams, L., & Rodriguez, E. L. (2005). Syntactic class influences phonological priming of tip-of-the-tongue resolution. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 1018-1023. doi:10.3758/BF03206437
4. Abrams, L., Trunk, D. L., & Merrill, L. A. (2007). Why a superman cannot help a tsunami: Activation of grammatical class influences resolution of young and older adults’ tip-of-the-tongue states. Psychology and Aging, 22, 835-845. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.835
5. Askari, N. (1999). Priming effects on tip-of-the-tongue stages in Farsi- English bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 197-212. doi:10.1023/A:1023214509959
6. Biedermann, B., Ruh, N., Nickels, L., & Coltheart, M. (2008). Information retrieval in tip of the tongue states: New data and methodological advances. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 171-198. doi:10.1007/s10936-007-9065-8
7. Bloem, I., & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 468-488. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00503-X
8. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the ‘‘tip-of-the-tongue’’ phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309-343. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00031-0
9. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). Psy Scope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271. doi:10.3758/BF03204507
10. Costa, A., Alario, F. X., & Caramazza, A. (2005). On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture[1]word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 125-131. doi:10.3758/BF03196357
11. Costa, A., Albareda, B., & Santesteban, M. (2008). Assessing the presence of lexical competition across languages: Evidence from the Stroop Task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 121-131. doi:10.1017/S1366728907003252
12. Costa, A., Colomé, À., Gómez, O., Sebastiàn-Gallés, N. (2003). Another look at cross-language competition in bilingual speech production: Lexical and phonological factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 167-179. doi:10.1017/S1366728903001111
13. Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual’s two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 365-397. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2651
14. Dixon, P. (2008). Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 447-456. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.004
15. Ecke, P. (2004). Words on the tip of the tongue: A study of lexical retrieval failures in Spanish speakers of the southwestern US and northern Mexico. Southwest Journal of Psycholinguistics, 23, 33-63. Available at: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~eckep/Ecke%2004%20TOTs%20in%20Spa%20Eng%20BL.pdf
16. Gollan, T. H., & Acenas, L. A. (2004). What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and Tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 246-269. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.246
17. Gollan, T. H., Bonanni, M. P., & Montoya, R. I. (2005). Proper names get stuck on bilingual and monolingual speakers tip-of-the-tongue equally often. Neuropsychology, 19, 278-287. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.278
18. Gollan, T. H., & Brown, A. S. (2006). From tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) data to theoretical implications in two steps: When more TOTs means better retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 462-483. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.462
19. Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 787-814. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001
20. Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Fennema-Notestine, C., & Morris, S. K. (2005). Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification. Memory and Cognition, 33, 1220-1234. doi:10.3758/BF03193224
21. Gollan, T. H., & Silverberg, N. B. (2001). Tip-of-the-tongue states in Hebrew[1]English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 63-83. doi:10.1017/S136672890100013X
22. Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 186-209. doi:10.1037/a0022256
23. Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., De Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 213-230. doi:10.1017/S1366728998000364
24. Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2008). Does the bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 127, 277-288. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.06.003
25. Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434-446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
26. James, L., & Burke, D. M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1378-1391. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1378
27. Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 249-256. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249
28. Jones, G. V. (1989). Back to Woodworth: Role of interlopers in the tip of the tongue phenomenon. Memory and Cognition, 17, 69-76. doi:10.3758/BF03199558
29. Jones, G. V., & Langford, S. (1987). Phonological blocking in the tip of the tongue state. Cognition, 26, 115-122. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90027-8
30. Kempen, G., & Huijbers, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 185-209. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90029-X
31. Knupsky, A. C., & Amrhein, P. C. (2007). Phonological facilitation through translation in a bilingual picture-naming task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 211-223. doi:10.1017/S1366728907003033
32. Koriat, A., & Lieblich, I. (1974). What does a person in a ‘‘TOT’’ state know that person in a ‘‘don’t know’’ state doesn’t know. Memory and Cognition, 2, 647-655. doi:10.3758/BF03198134
33. Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., Misra, M., & Guo, T. (2008). Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes. Acta Psychologica, 128, 416-430. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.001
34. Kuipers, J. R., La Heij, W., & Costa, A. (2006). A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 892-919. doi:10.1080/016909600824211
35. La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory and Cognition, 16, 400-410. doi:10.3758/BF03214220
36. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
37. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75. Available at: http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=URL+Levelt,+Roelofs,+%26+Meyer,+1999&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
38. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503-535. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
39. Meyer, A., & Bock, K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory and Cognition, 20, 715-726. doi:10.3758/BF03202721
40. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1997). Retrieval of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1410-1423. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1410
41. Navarrete, E., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition. Acta Psychologica, 134, 279-289. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009
42. Perfect, T. J., & Hanley, J. R. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Do experimenter-presented interlopers have any effect? Cognition, 45, 55-75. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90023-B
43. Pyers, J. E., Gollan, T. H., & Emmorey, K. (2009). Bimodal bilinguals reveal the source of tip-of-the-tongue states. Cognition, 112, 323-329. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.007
44. van Assche, E., Duyck, W., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Diependaele, K. (2009). Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context. Psychological Science, 20, 923-927. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02389.x
45. van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 780-789. doi:10.3758/BF03196335
46. Vitkovitch, M., Rutter, C., & Read, A. (2001). Inhibitory effects during object name retrieval: The effect of interval between prime and target on picture naming responses. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 483-506. doi:10.1348/000712601162301
47. Wheeldon, L. R., & Monsell, S. (1994). Inhibition of spoken word production by priming a semantic competitor. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 332-356. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1016
48. White, K. K., & Abrams, L. (2002). Does priming specific syllables during tip-of-the-tongue states facilitate word retrieval in older adults? Psychology and Aging, 17, 226-235. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.226