Including the Z in an effective field theory for dark matter at the LHC

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Davidson, Sacha ^a,b  

^a CNRS/IN2P3 ^*  (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921964955     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2014)084     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
2. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
3. CDMS Collaboration, EDELWEISS collaboration, Z. Ahmed et al., Combined limits on WIMPs from the CDMS and EDELWEISS Experiments, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 011102 [arXiv: 1105. 3377] [INSPIRE].
4. LUX collaboration, D. S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv: 1310. 8214] [INSPIRE].
5. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv: 1207. 5988] [INSPIRE].
6. M. Felizardo et al., Final analysis and results of the phase II SIMPLE dark matter search, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 201302 [arXiv: 1106. 3014] [INSPIRE].
7. th Rencontres de Moriond on Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe, March 9–16, La Thiule, Italy (2013).
8. V. Zacek et al., Dark matter search with PICASSO, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 375 (2012) 012023 [INSPIRE].
9. CMS Collaboration, Search for new physics in monojet events in pp collisions at √s = 8TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-048 (2012).
10. 1 of pp collisions at √s = 8TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-147 (2012).
11. S. Profumo, W. Shepherd and T. Tait, Pitfalls of dark matter crossing symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 056018 [arXiv: 1307. 6277] [INSPIRE].
12. T. G. Rizzo, Dark matter complementarity in the pMSSM and the ILC, arXiv: 1402. 5870 [INSPIRE].
13. Y. Bai, P. J. Fox and R. Harnik, The Tevatron at the frontier of dark matter direct detection, JHEP 12 (2010) 048 [arXiv: 1005. 3797] [INSPIRE].
14. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on light Majorana dark matter from colliders, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 185 [arXiv: 1005. 1286] [INSPIRE].
15. P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing energy signatures of dark matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 056011 [arXiv: 1109. 4398] [INSPIRE].
16. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on dark matter from colliders, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv: 1008. 1783] [INSPIRE].
17. P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, R. Primulando and C.-T. Yu, Taking a razor to dark matter parameter space at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015010 [arXiv: 1203. 1662] [INSPIRE].
18. N. Zhou, D. Berge and D. Whiteson, Mono-everything: combined limits on dark matter production at colliders from multiple final states, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 095013 [arXiv: 1302. 3619] [INSPIRE].
19. L. M. Carpenter, A. Nelson, C. Shimmin, T. M. P. Tait and D. Whiteson, Collider searches for dark matter in events with a Z boson and missing energy, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 074005 [arXiv: 1212. 3352] [INSPIRE].
20. I. M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi, Unitarity and monojet bounds on models for DAMA, CoGeNT and CRESST-II, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015023 [arXiv: 1112. 5457] [INSPIRE].
21. A. A. Petrov and W. Shepherd, Searching for dark matter at LHC with mono-Higgs production, Phys. Lett. B 730 (2014) 178 [arXiv: 1311. 1511] [INSPIRE].
22. M. T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, A. Preston, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, LHC and Tevatron bounds on the dark matter direct detection cross-section for vector mediators, JHEP 07 (2012) 123 [arXiv: 1204. 3839] [INSPIRE].
23. M. Papucci, A. Vichi and K. M. Zurek, Monojet versus rest of the world I: t-channel models, arXiv: 1402. 2285 [INSPIRE].
24. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, J. Gramling, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, Part II: complete analysis for the s-channel, JCAP 06 (2014) 060 [arXiv: 1402. 1275] [INSPIRE].
25. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015011 [arXiv: 1307. 8120] [INSPIRE].
26. A. DiFranzo, K. I. Nagao, A. Rajaraman and T. M. P. Tait, Simplified models for dark matter interacting with quarks, JHEP 11 (2013) 014 [arXiv: 1308. 2679] [INSPIRE].
27. A. De Simone, G. F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Benchmarks for dark matter searches at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2014) 081 [arXiv: 1402. 6287] [INSPIRE].
28. H. Georgi, Effective field theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43 (1993) 209 [INSPIRE].
29. H. Georgi, On-shell effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 361 (1991) 339 [INSPIRE].
30. M. B. Krauss, S. Morisi, W. Porod and W. Winter, Higher dimensional effective operators for direct dark matter detection, JHEP 02 (2014) 056 [arXiv: 1312. 0009] [INSPIRE].
31. M. Endo and Y. Yamamoto, Unitarity bounds on dark matter effective interactions at LHC, JHEP 06 (2014) 126 [arXiv: 1403. 6610] [INSPIRE].
32. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
33. J. F. Kamenik and C. Smith, FCNC portals to the dark sector, JHEP 03 (2012) 090 [arXiv: 1111. 6402] [INSPIRE].
34. K. Sigurdson, M. Doran, A. Kurylov, R. R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Dark-matter electric and magnetic dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 083501 [Erratum ibid. D 73 (2006) 089903] [astro-ph/0406355] [INSPIRE].
35. V. Barger, W.-Y. Keung, D. Marfatia and P.-Y. Tseng, Dipole moment dark matter at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 717 (2012) 219 [arXiv: 1206. 0640] [INSPIRE].
36. H. Simma, Equations of motion for effective Lagrangians and penguins in rare B decays, Z. Phys. C 61 (1994) 67 [hep-ph/9307274] [INSPIRE].
37. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv: 1008. 4884] [INSPIRE].
38. R. C. Cotta, J. L. Hewett, M. P. Le and T. G. Rizzo, Bounds on dark matter interactions with electroweak gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 116009 [arXiv: 1210. 0525] [INSPIRE].
39. S. Banerjee, S. Mukhopadhyay and B. Mukhopadhyaya, New Higgs interactions and recent data from the LHC and the Tevatron, JHEP 10 (2012) 062 [arXiv: 1207. 3588] [INSPIRE].
40. P. P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data, JHEP 06 (2012) 117 [arXiv: 1203. 4254] [INSPIRE].
41. U. Haisch, F. Kahlhoefer and E. Re, QCD effects in mono-jet searches for dark matter, JHEP 12 (2013) 007 [arXiv: 1310. 4491] [INSPIRE].
42. U. Haisch and F. Kahlhoefer, On the importance of loop-induced spin-independent interactions for dark matter direct detection, JCAP 04 (2013) 050 [arXiv: 1302. 4454] [INSPIRE].
43. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2. 2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [arXiv: 0803. 2360] [INSPIRE].
44. HERMES collaboration, A. Airapetian et al., Precise determination of the spin structure function g(1) of the proton, deuteron and neutron, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 012007 [hep-ex/0609039] [INSPIRE].