Interacting personalities: Behavioural ecology meets quantitative genetics

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 88-97

  Dingemanse, Niels J ^a,b   Araya Ajoy, Yimen G ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Indirect genetic effects; Interacting phenotypes; Personality; Phenotypic plasticity; Quantitative genetics; Reaction norm; Social environments; Social evolution

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PERSONALITY; PHENOTYPE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS, BEHAVIORAL; PERSONALITY; PHENOTYPE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84921868968     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.002     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Araya-Ajoy Y.G., Dingemanse N.J. Characterizing behavioural 'characters': a conceptual and statistical framework. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2014, 281:20132645.
2. Dingemanse N.J., et al. Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:81-89.
3. Houston A.I., McNamara J.M. Models of Adaptive Behaviour 1999, Cambridge University Press.
4. Dingemanse N.J., Wolf M. A review of recent models for adaptive personality differences. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:3947-3958.
5. Wolf M., Weissing F.J. An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:3959-3968.
6. Dingemanse N.J., Wolf M. Between-individual differences in behavioural plasticity: causes and consequences. Anim. Behav. 2013, 85:1031-1039.
7. Wolf M., McNamara J.M. On the evolution of personalities via frequency-dependent selection. Am. Nat. 2012, 179:679-692.
8. Sih A., Del Giudice M. Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:2762-2772.
9. Bergmüller R., Taborsky M. Animal personality and social niche specialisation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:504-511.
10. Montiglio P.O., et al. Social niche specialization under constraints: personality, social interactions and environmental heterogeneity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2013, 368:20120343.
11. Wolf M., McNamara J.M. Adaptive between-individual differences in social competence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:253-254.
12. Maynard Smith J. Evolution and the Theory of Games 1982, Cambridge University Press.
13. Dall S.R.X., et al. The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:734-739.
14. McNamara J.M., et al. Evolution of trust and trustworthiness: social awareness favours personality differences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 276:605-613.
15. Wolf M., et al. On the coevolution of social responsiveness and behavioural consistency. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 278:440-448.
16. Johnstone R.A., Manica A. Evolution of personality differences in leadership. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:8373-8378.
17. Moore A.J., et al. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. 1. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 1997, 51:1352-1362.
18. Wolf J.B., et al. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. Am. Nat. 1999, 153:254-266.
19. Bijma P., Wade M. The joint effects of kin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:1175-1188.
20. McGlothlin J.W., et al. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 2010, 64:2558-2574.
21. Wolf J.B., et al. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13:64-69.
22. Lynch M., Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits 1998, Sinauer.
23. Brommer J.E., Rattiste K. 'Hidden' reproductive conflict between mates in a wild bird population. Evolution 2008, 62:2326-2333.
24. Westneat D.F. Evolution in response to social selection: the importance of interactive effects of traits on fitness. Evolution 2011, 66:890-895.
25. Wolf J.B. Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:4655-4660.
26. Wilson A.J., et al. Indirect genetic effects and the evolution of aggression in a vertebrate system. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2009, 276:533-541.
27. Bailey N.W., Moore A.J. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process. Evolution 2012, 66:2674-2684.
28. Bailey N.W., Zuk M. Socially flexible female choice differs among populations of the Pacific field cricket: geographical variation in the interaction coefficient psi (ψ). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:3589-3596.
29. Chenoweth S.F., et al. Experimental evidence for the evolution of indirect genetic effects: changes in the interaction effect coefficient, psi (ψ), due to sexual selection. Evolution 2010, 64:1849-1856.
30. Smiseth P.T., et al. Parent-offspring conflict and co-adaptation: behavioural ecology meets quantitative genetics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 275:1823-1830.
31. Dingemanse N.J., Dochtermann N.A. Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. J. Anim. Ecol. 2013, 82:39-54.
32. Dingemanse N.J., Dochtermann N.A. Individual behaviour: behavioural ecology meets quantitative genetics. Quantitative Genetics in the Wild 2014, 54-67. Oxford University Press. A. Charmantier (Ed.).
33. Grafen A. Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach 1984, 62-84. Blackwell Scientific. J.R. Krebs, N.B. Davies (Eds.).
34. Nussey D.H., et al. The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:831-844.
35. Mathot K., et al. Disentangling the roles of frequency- versus state-dependence in generating individual differences in behavioural plasticity. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:1254-1262.
36. Westneat D.F., et al. Individual variation in parental care reaction norms: integration of personality and plasticity. Am. Nat. 2011, 178:652-667.
37. Wilson A.J., et al. Integrating animal personality research and animal context theory: aggressiveness in the green swordtail Xiphophorus helleri. Plos ONE 2011, 6:1-13.
38. Meaney M.J. Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 24:1161-1192.
39. Mathot K.J., et al. Adaptive strategies for managing uncertainty may explain personality-related differences in behavioural plasticity. Oikos 2012, 121:1009-1020.
40. Coppens C.M., et al. Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: towards underlying mechanisms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:4021-4028.
41. Natarajan D., et al. Delineation of violence from functional aggression in mice: an ethological approach. Behav. Gen. 2009, 39:73-90.
42. Schaeffer L.R. Application of random regression models in animal breeding. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004, 86:35-45.
43. Lloyd E.A., Gould S.J. Species selection on variability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90:595-599.
44. Bijma P., et al. Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 2007, 175:277-288.
45. Hadfield J.D., Wilson A.J. Multilevel selection 3: modeling the effects of interacting individuals as a function of group size. Genetics 2007, 177:667-668.
46. Bijma P. Multilevel selection 4: modeling the relationship of indirect genetic effects and group size. Genetics 2010, 186:1029-1031.
47. Costa e Silva J., Kerr R.J. Accounting for competition in genetic analysis, with particular emphasis on forest genetic trials. Tree Genet. Genomes 2013, 9:1-17.
48. Wey T., et al. Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim. Behav. 2008, 75:333-344.
49. Browne W.J., et al. Using cross-classified multivariate mixed response models with application to life history traits in great tits (Parus major). Stat. Model. 2007, 7:217-238.
50. Trubenová B., Hager R. Phenotypic and evolutionary consequences of social behaviours: interactions among individuals affect direct genetic effects. Plos ONE 2012, 7:e46273.
51. Sih A., et al. Animal personality and state-behaviour feedbacks: a review and guide for empiricists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015, 30:50-60.
52. Scharf I., et al. Characterizing the collective personality of ant societies: aggressive colonies do not abandon their home. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e33314.
53. Bijma P. The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modelling issues. Heredity 2014, 112:61-69.
54. Wilson A.J., et al. An ecologist's guide to the animal model. J. Anim. Ecol. 2010, 79:13-26.
55. McGlothlin J.W., Brodie E.D. How to measure indirect genetic effects: the congruence of trait-based and variance-partitioning approaches. Evolution 2009, 63:1785-1795.
56. McAdam A.G., et al. The effects of others' genes: maternal and other indirect genetic effects. Quantitative Genetics in the Wild 2014, 84-103. Oxford University Press. A. Charmantier (Ed.).
57. Mutzel A., et al. Temporal trade-offs between nestling provisioning and defence against nest predators in blue tits. Anim. Behav. 2013, 85:1459-1469.
58. Mutzel A., et al. Parental provisioning behaviour plays a key role in linking personality with reproductive success. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2013, 280:20131019.
59. Houston A.I. Evolutionary games and gambits. Behav. Ecol. 2013, 24:12.
60. Westneat D.F., et al. The biology hidden inside residual within-individual phenotypic variation. Biol. Rev. 2014, Published online July 30, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12131.
61. Luttbeg B., Sih A. Risk, resources, and state-dependent adaptive behavioural syndromes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:3977-3990.
62. Nicolaus M., et al. Experimental evidence for adaptive personalities in a wild passerine bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:4885-4892.
63. Laskowski K.L., Pruitt J.N. Evidence of social niche construction: persistent and repeated social interactions generate stronger personalities in a social spider. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2014, 281:20133166.
64. Moshgani M., Van Dooren T.J. Maternal and paternal contributions to egg size and egg number variation in the blackfin pearl killifish Austrolebias nigripinnis. Evol. Ecol. 2011, 25:1179-1195.
65. Brooks R., Endler J.A. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 2001, 55:1644-1655.
66. Daisley J.N., et al. Enhanced yolk testosterone influences behavioral phenotype independent of sex in Japanese quail chicks Coturnix japonica. Horm. Behav. 2005, 47:185-194.
67. Kölliker M., et al. The quantitative genetic basis of offspring solicitation and parental response in a passerine bird with parental care. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2000, 267:2127-2132.
68. van Oers K., et al. Personality is associated with extrapair paternity in great tits. Parus Major. Anim. Behav. 2008, 76:555-563.
69. Griffing B. Selection in reference to biological groups. I. Individual and group selection applied to populations of unordered groups. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1967, 20:127-142.
70. Modlmeier A.P., Foitzik S. Productivity increases with variation in aggression among group members in Temnothorax ants. Behav. Ecol. 2011, 22:1026-1032.
71. Kurvers R.H.J.M., et al. The evolutionary and ecological consequences of animal social networks: emerging issues. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29:326-335.
72. Wilson A.D.M., et al. Network position: a key component in the characterization of social personality types. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2013, 67:163-173.