Socially flexible female choice differs among populations of the pacific field cricket: Geographical variation in the interaction coefficient psi (ψ)

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 279, Issue 1742, 2012, Pages 3589-3596

  Bailey, Nathan W ^a,c   Zuk, Marlene ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Indirect genetic effect; Mate choice plasticity; Psi; Sexual selection; Social environment

Indexed keywords

CONSPECIFIC; CRICKET; GENE EXPRESSION; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SUBSPECIES; THEORETICAL STUDY;

GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLINAE; TELEOGRYLLUS OCEANICUS;

EID: 84864335750     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0631     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983 Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58, 155-183. (doi:10.1086/413215)
2. Moore, A. J., Brodie III, E. D. & Wolf, J. B. 1997 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51, 1352-1362. (doi:10.2307/2411187)
3. Wolf, J. B., Brodie III, E. D. & Moore, A. J. 1999 Inter-acting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. Am. Nat. 153, 254-266. (doi:10.1086/303168)
4. Agrawal, A. F., Brodie III, E. D. & Wade, M. J. 2001 On indirect genetic effects in structured populations. Am. Nat. 158, 308-323. (doi:10.1086/321324)
5. McGlothlin, J. W., Moore, A. J., Wolf, J. B. & Brodie III, E. D. 2010 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 64, 2558-2574. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01012.x)
6. Wolf, J. B., Brodie III, E. D., Cheverud, J. M., Moore, A. J. & Wade, M. J. 1998 Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 64-69. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01233-0)
7. Moore, A. J. & Pizzari, T. 2005 Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting pheno-types. Am. Nat. 165, S88-S98. (doi:10.1086/429354)
8. Bleakley, B. H., Wolf, J. B. & Moore, A. J. 2010 The quantitative genetics of social behaviour. In Social behavior (eds T. Székely, A. J. Moore & J. Komdeur), pp. 29-54. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bailey, N. W. & Moore, A. J. In press. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process. Evolution.
10. Svensson, E. I., Eroukhmanoff, F., Karlsson, K., Runemark, A. & Brodin, A. 2010 A role for learning in population divergence of mate preferences. Evolution 64, 3101-3113. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01085.x)
11. Godin, J.-G. J., Herdman, E. J. E. & Dugatkin, L. A. 2005 Social influences on female choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: generalized and repeatable trait-copying behaviour. Anim. Behav. 69, 999-1005. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.016)
12. Fowler-Finn, K. D. & Rodríguez, R. L. 2012 Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment. Evolution 66, 459-468. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01446.x)
13. Ten Cate, C. & Vos, D. 1999 Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds. Ard. Stud. Behav. 28, 1-31. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60214-4)
14. Kent, C., Azanchi, R., Smith, B., Formosa, A. & Levine, J. D. 2008 Social context influences chemical communications in D. melanogaster males. Curr. Biol. 18, 1384-1389. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.088)
15. Bleakley, B. H. & Brodie III, E. C. 2009 Indirect genetic effects influence antipredator behavior in guppies: estimates of the coefficient of interaction psi and the inheritance of reciprocity. Evolution 63, 1796-1806. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00672.x)
16. Chenoweth, S. F., Rundle, H. D. & Blows, M. W. 2010 Experimental evidence for the evolution of indirect genetic effects: changes in the interaction coefficient, psi (C), due to sexual selection. Evolution 64, 1849-1856. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00952.x)
17. Simmons, L. W., Zuk, M. & Rotenberry, J. T. 2001 Geo-graphic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Evolution 55, 1386-1394.
18. Bailey, N. W. 2008 Love will tear you apart: different components of female choice exert contrasting selection pressures on male field crickets. Behav. Ecol. 19, 960-966. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arn054)
19. Zuk, M., Rotenberry, J. T. & Tinghitella, R. M. 2006 Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol. Lett. 22, 521-524. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0539)
20. Tinghitella, R. M. 2008 Rapid evolutionary change in a sexual signal: genetic control of the mutation 'flatwing' that renders male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) mute. Heredity 100, 261-267. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6801069)
21. Bailey, N. W. & Zuk, M. 2008 Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2645-2650. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0859)
22. Bailey, N. W. & Zuk, M. 2009 Field crickets change mating preferences using remembered social information. Biol. Lett. 5, 449-451. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0112)
23. Rebar, D., Zuk, M. & Bailey, N. W. 2011 Mating experience in field crickets modifies pre- and post-copulatory female choice in parallel. Behav. Ecol. 22, 303-309. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arq195)
24. Bailey, N. W. 2011 Mate choice plasticity in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: effects of social experience in multiple modalities. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 2269-2278. (doi:10.1007/s00265-011-1237-8)
25. Tinghitella, R. M. & Zuk, M. 2009 Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal. Evolution 63, 2087-2098. (doi:10. 1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00698.x)
26. Bailey, N. W., Gray, B. & Zuk, M. 2010 Acoustic experience shapes alternative mating tactics and reproductive investment in field crickets. Curr. Biol. 20, 845-849. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.063)
27. Balakrishnan, R. & Pollack, G. S. 1997 The role of antennal sensory cues in female responses to courting males in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 511-522.
28. Ryan, K. M. & Sakaluk, S. K. 2009 Dulling the senses: the role of the antennae in mate recognition, copulation and mate guarding in decorated crickets. Anim. Behav. 77, 1345-1350. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.011)
29. Shackleton, M. A., Jennions, M. D. & Hunt, J. 2005 Fighting success and attractiveness as predictors of male mating success in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus: the effectiveness of no-choice tests. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58, 1-8. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.011)
30. Tinghitella, R. M., Zuk, M., Beveridge, M. & Simmons, L. W. 2011 Island hopping introduces Polynesian field crickets to novel environments, genetic bottlenecks and rapid evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 1199-1211. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02255.x)
31. Zuk, M., Simmons, L. W. & Cupp, L. 1993 Calling characteristics of parasitized and unparasitized populations of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33, 339-343.
32. Simmons, L. W. 2004 Genotypic variation in calling song and female preferences of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Anim. Behav. 68, 313-322. (doi:10.1016/j. anbehav.2003.12.004)
33. Bijma, P. 2010 Estimating indirect genetic effects: precision of estimates and optimum designs. Genetics 186, 1013-1028. (doi:10.1534/genetics.110.120493)
34. Bijma, P. & Wade, M. J. 2008 The joint effects of kin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 1175-1188. (doi:10. 1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01550.x)
35. Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. 1997 Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 72, 283-327. (doi:10.1017/S0006323196005014)
36. Widemo, F. & Sæther, S. A. 1999 Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 26-31. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01531-6)
37. Collins, S. A. 1995 The effect of recent experience on female choice in zebra finches. Anim. Behav. 49, 479-486. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0062)
38. Hebets, E. A. 2003 Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13390-13395. (doi:10.1073/pnas.2333262100)
39. King, A. P., West, M. J. & White, D. J. 2003 Female cow-bird song perception: evidence for plasticity of preference. Ethology 109, 1-13. (doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00837.x)
40. Welch, A. M. 2003 Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent. Evolution 57, 883-893.
41. Kozak, G. M. & Boughman, J. W. 2009 Learned conspecific mate preference in a species pair of stickle-backs. Behav. Ecol. 20, 1282-1288. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arp134)
42. Lehmann, G. U. C. 2007 Density-dependent plasticity of sequential mate choice in a bushcricket (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Aust. J. Zool. 55, 123-130. (doi:10.1071/ ZO06105)
43. Dukas, R. 2005 Learning affects mate choice in female fruit flies. Behav. Ecol. 16, 800-804. (doi:10.1093/beheco/ari057)
44. Kasumovic, M. M., Hall, M. D., Try, H. & Brooks, R. C. 2011 The importance of listening: juvenile allocation shifts in response to acoustic cues of the social environment. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 1325-1334. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02267.x)
45. Kokko, H. & Mappes, J. 2005 Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed. Evolution 59, 1876-1885.
46. Petfield, D., Chenoweth, S. F., Rundle, H. D. & Blows, M. W. 2005 Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6045-6050. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0409378102)
47. Shaw, K. L. & Lugo, E. 2001 Mating asymmetry and the direction of evolution in the Hawaiian cricket genus Lau-pala. Mol. Ecol. 10, 751-759. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x. 2001.01219.x)
48. Lande, R. 1981 Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721-3725. (doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721)
49. Wade, M. J., Bijma, P., Ellen, E. D. & Muir, W. 2010 Group selection and social evolution in domesticated animals. Evol. Appl. 3, 453-465. (doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571. 2010.00147.x)
50. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1989 Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51. Wcislo, W. T. 1989 Behavioral environments and evolutionary change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 137-169. (doi:10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001033)
52. Meffert, L. M. 1995 Bottleneck effects on genetic variance for courtship repertoire. Genetics 139, 365-374.