Evolution in response to social selection: The importance of interactive effects of traits on fitness

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 890-895

  Westneat, David F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Fitness; Models simulations; Quantitative genetics; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; CUTICLE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; GAME THEORY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INSECT; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MORPHOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HEMIPTERA; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; HEMIPTERA; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

GERRIDAE;

EID: 84857691770     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01490.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arnqvist, G. 1989. Sexual selection in a water strider: the function, mechanism of selection and heritability of a male grasping apparatus. Oikos 56:344-350.
2. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe 1995. Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261:123-127.
3. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe 2002. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56:936-947.
4. Bohrnstedt, G. W., and A. S. Goldberger 1969. On the exact covariance of products of random variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64:1439-1442.
5. Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London, UK
6. Folstad, I., and A. J. Karter 1992. Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am. Nat. 139:603-622.
7. Fox, C. W., and D. F. Westneat 2010. Adaptation. Pp. 16-31 in D. F. Westneat and C. W. Fox, eds. Evolutionary behavioral ecology. Oxford Univ. Press, New York
8. Gagnon, M. C., and J. Turgeon 2011. Sexual conflict inGerris gillettei(Insecta: Hemoptera): intraspecific intersexual correlated morphology and experimental assessment of behaviour and fitness. J. Evol. Biol. 24:1505-1516.
9. Hamilton, W. D. 1964a. The genetical evolution of social behavior. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7:1-16.
10. Hamilton, W. D. 1964b. The genetical evolution of social behavior. II. J. Theor. Biol. 7:17-52.
11. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge UK
12. Maynard Smith, J., and G. A. Parker 1976. The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim. Behav. 24:159-175.
13. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA
14. McGlothlin, J. W., A. J. Moore, J. B. Wolf, and E. D. Brodie, III. 2010. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 64:2558-2574.
15. Moore, A. J., E. D. Brodie, III, and J. B. Wolf 1997. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51:1352-1362.
16. Price, G. R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520-521.
17. Queller, D. C. 1985. Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social behaviour. Nature 318:366-367.
18. Queller, D. C. 2011. Expanded social fitness and Hamilton's rule for kin, kith, and kind. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108(Suppl 2):10792-10799.
19. Ronkainen, K., A. Kaitala, and R. Huttunen 2005. The effect of abdominal spines on female mating frequency and fecundity in a water strider. J. Insect Behav. 18:619-631.
20. Rowe, L., G. Arnqvist, A. Sih, and J. J. Krupa 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:289-293.
21. Selander, R. K. 1972. Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. Pp. 180-230 in B. G. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971. Aldine, Chicago, IL
22. Sober, E. 1984. The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
23. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pp. 136-179 in B. G. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971. Aldine, Chicago, IL
24. Westneat, D. F., and A. Sih 2009. Sexual conflict as a partitioning of selection. Biol. Lett. 5:675-677.
25. Williams, G. C. 1966a. Natural selection, the costs of reproduction and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am. Nat. 100:687-690.
26. Williams, G. C. 1966b. Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
27. Wingfield, J. C., R. E. Hegner, A. M. J. Dufty, and G. F. Ball 1990. The 'challenge hypothesis': theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. Am. Nat. 136:829-846.
28. Wolf, J. B., E. D. Brodie, III, and A. J. Moore 1999. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. Am. Nat. 153:254-266.