Productivity increases with variation in aggression among group members in Temnothorax ants

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1026-1032

  Modlmeier, Andreas P ^a,b   Foitzik, Susanne ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

aggression; competition; division of labor; fitness; habitat quality; natural selection; personality; social insects; Temnothorax

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ANT; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BODY SIZE; COLONY; CORRELATION; FITNESS; HABITAT QUALITY; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; LABOR DIVISION; MORPHOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; REPRODUCTIVE PRODUCTIVITY; SOCIAL INSECT; SPECIALIZATION; WORKER CASTE;

FORMICIDAE; HEXAPODA; TEMNOTHORAX; TEMNOTHORAX LONGISPINOSUS;

EID: 80052228166     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arr086     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Beshers SN, Fewell JH. 2001. Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 46:413-440. (Pubitemid 32304995)
2. Billick I. 2002. The relationship between the distribution of worker sizes and new worker production in the ant Formica neorufibarbis. Oecologia. 132:244-249. (Pubitemid 36064409)
3. Billick I, Carter C. 2007. Testing the importance of the distribution of worker sizes to colony performance in the ant species Formica ob-scuripes Forel. Insectes Soc. 54:113-117. (Pubitemid 46713201)
4. Bock CE, Jones ZF. 2004. Avian habitat evaluation: should counting birds count? Front Ecol Environ. 2:403-410.
5. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL. 1996. Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 263:1565-1569.
6. Careau V, Thomas D, Humphries MM, Réale D. 2008. Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos. 117:641-653. (Pubitemid 351614845)
7. Chittka L, Muller H. 2009. Learning, specialisation, efficiency and task allocation in social insects. Commun Integr Biol. 2:151-154.
8. Cole BJ, Wiernasz DC. 1999. The selective advantage of low related-ness. Science. 285:891-893.
9. Collias NE. 1944. Aggressive behavior among vertebrate animals. Phys-iol Zool. 17:83-123.
10. Couvillon MJ, Dornhaus A. 2010. Small worker bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) are hardier against starvation than their larger sisters. Insectes Soc. 57:193-197.
11. Crosland MWJ. 1990. Variation in ant aggression and kin discrimination ability within and between colonies. J Insect Behav. 3:359-379.
12. Dingemanse NJ, Réale D. 2005. Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour. 142:1165-1190.
13. Dornhaus A. 2008. Specialisation does not predict individual efficiency in an ant. PLoS Biol. 6:2368-2375.
14. Dornhaus A, Holley J-A, Pook VG, Worswick G, Franks NR. 2008. Why do not all workers work? Colony size and workload during emigrations in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 63:43-51.
15. Fewell JH, Page RE. 1993. Genotypic variation in foraging responses to environmental stimuli by honey bees, Apis mellifera. Experientia. 49:1106-1112.
16. Foitzik S, Achenbach A, Brandt M. 2009. Locally adapted social parasite affects density, social structure, and life history of its ant hosts. Ecology. 90:1195-1206.
17. Foitzik S, Backus VL, Trindl A, Herbers JM. 2004. Ecology of Leptothor-ax ants: impact of food, nest sites and social parasites. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 55:484-455.
18. Foitzik S, Heinze J. 1998. Nest site limitation and colony take over in the ant, Leptothorax nylanderi. Behav Ecol. 9:367-375. (Pubitemid 28367539)
19. Gobin B, Heinze J, Strätz M, Roces F. 2003. The energetic cost of reproductive conflicts in the ant Pachycondyla obscuricornis. J Insect Physiol. 49:747-752. (Pubitemid 36967367)
20. Goulson D, Peat J, Stout JC, Tucker J, Darvill B, Derwent LC, Hughes WOH. 2002. Can alloethism in workers of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, be explained in terms of foraging efficiency? Anim Behav. 64:123-130.
21. Headley AE. 1943. Population studies of two species of ants, Leptothor-ax longispinosus Roger and Leptothorax curvispinosus Mayr. Ann En-tomol Soc Am. 36:743-753.
22. Heinze J, Foitzik S, Hippert A, Hölldobler B. 1996. Apparent dear-enemy phenomenon and environment-based recognition cues in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Ethology. 102:510-522.
23. Herbers JM. 1986. Nest site limitation and facultative polygyny in the ant Leptothorax longispinosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 19:115-122.
24. Herbers JM, Cunningham M. 1983. Social organization in Leptothorax longispinosus Mayr. Anim Behav. 31:759-771.
25. Herbers JM, Stuart RJ. 1996. Multiple queens in ant nests: impact on genetic structure and inclusive fitness. Am Nat. 147:161-187.
26. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. 1990. The ants. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
27. Holway DA, Suarez AV, Case TJ. 1998. Loss of intraspecific aggression in the success of a widespread invasive social insect. Science. 282:949-952. (Pubitemid 28507529)
28. Jones JC, Myerscough MR, Graham S, Oldroyd BP. 2004. Honey bee nest thermoregulation: diversity promotes stability. Science. 305:402-404. (Pubitemid 38938157)
29. Kaspari M, O'Donnell S, Kercher JP. 2000. Energy, density, and constraints to species richness: ant assemblages along a productivity gradient. Am Nat. 155:280-293. (Pubitemid 30187799)
30. Kipyatkov VE. 1993. Annual cycles of development in ants: diversity, evolution, regulation. In: Kipyatkov VE, editor. Proceedings of the colloquia on social insects. St. Petersburg (Russia): Russian-speaking Section of the IUSSI, Socium. p. 25-48.
31. Kontiainen P, Pietäinen H, Huttunen K, Karell P, Kolunen H, Brom-mer JE. 2009. Aggressive Ural owl mothers recruit more offspring. Behav Ecol. 20:789-796.
32. Korb J, Heinze J. 2004. Multilevel selection and social evolution of insect societies. Naturwissenschaften. 91:291-304. (Pubitemid 38916483)
33. Michener CD. 1964. Reproductive efficiency in relation to colony size in hymenopterous societies. Insectes Soc. 11:317-342.
34. Nowak MA, Tarnita CE, Wilson EO. 2010. The evolution of eusociality. Nature. 466:1057-1062.
35. Okasha S. 2010. Altruism researchers must cooperate. Nature. 467:653-655.
36. Oster GF, Wilson EO. 1978. Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
37. Page RE, Erber J. 2002. Levels of behavioral organization and the evolution of division of labor. Naturwissenschaften. 89:91-106. (Pubitemid 34264054)
38. Page RE, Robinson GE, Fondrk MK, Nasr ME. 1995. Effects of worker genotypic diversity on honey bee colony development and behavior (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 36:387-396. (Pubitemid 26448124)
39. Pérot A, Villard M-A. 2009. Putting density back into the habitat-quality equation: case study of an open-nesting forest bird. Conserv Biol. 23:1550-1557.
40. Porter SD, Tschinkel WR. 1985. Fire ant polymorphism: the ergonomics of brood production. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 16:323-336.
41. Ravary F, Lecoutey E, Kaminski G, Châline N, Jaisson P. 2007. Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Curr Biol. 17:1308-1312. (Pubitemid 47176886)
42. Réale D, Gallant BY, Leblanc M, Festa-Bianchet M. 2000. Consistency of temperament in bighorn ewes and correlates with behaviour and life history. Anim Behav. 60:589-597.
43. Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ. 2007. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev. 82:291-318. (Pubitemid 46587935)
44. Robinson GE. 1992. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol. 37:637-665. (Pubitemid 24406665)
45. Ross KG, Keller L. 1998. Genetic control of social organization in an ant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:14232-14237. (Pubitemid 28549350)
46. Roulston TH, Buczkowski G, Silverman J. 2003. Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior. Insectes Soc. 50:151-159. (Pubitemid 36533200)
47. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC. 2004. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:372-378. (Pubitemid 38800923)
48. Smith BR, Blumstein DT. 2008. Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol. 19:448-455.
49. Spaethe J, Weidenmüller A. 2002. Size variation and foraging rate in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Insectes Soc. 49:142-146. (Pubitemid 34635246)
50. Stuart RJ, Page RE. 1991. Genetic component to division of labor among workers of a Leptothoracine ant. Naturwissenschaften. 78: 375-377.
51. Tarpy DR. 2003. Genetic diversity within honeybee colonies prevents severe infections and promotes colony growth. Proc R Soc Lond B. 270:99-103. (Pubitemid 36140428)
52. Tarpy DR, Seely TD. 2006. Lower disease infections in honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies headed by polyandrous vs monandrous queens. Naturwissenschaften. 93:195-199.
53. Thomas ML, Payne-Makrisâ CM, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Holway DA. 2007. Contact between supercolonies elevates aggression in Argentine ants. Insectes Soc. 54:225-233. (Pubitemid 47283060)
54. Van Wilgenburg E, Clémencet J, Tsutsui ND. 2010. Experience influences aggressive behaviour in the Argentine ant. Biol Lett. 6: 152-155.
55. Verbeek MEM, Drent PJ, Wiepkema PR. 1994. Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behaviour in male great tits. Anim Behav. 48:1113-1121.
56. Wiernasz DC, Perroni CL, Cole BJ. 2004. Polyandry and fitness in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Mol Ecol. 13:1601-1606. (Pubitemid 38688909)
57. Wilson EO. 1980a. Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). I. The overall pattern in Atta sexdens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 7:143-156.
58. Wilson EO. 1980b. Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). II. The ergonomic optimization of leaf cutting Atta sexdens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 7:157-165.
59. Wilson EO. 1987. Causes of ecological success: the case of the ants. J Anim Ecol. 56:1-9.