Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: A meta-analysis

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 267-277

  Voyer, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Gender differences; Mental rotation; Meta analysis; Spatial cognition; Time pressure

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; META ANALYSIS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ROTATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ROTATION; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955755031     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-010-0042-0     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Brownlow, S., McPheron, T. K., & Acks, C. N. (2003). Science background and spatial abilities in men and women. Journal of Science Education Technology, 12, 371-380.
2. Brownlow, S., & Miderski, C. A. (2002). How gender and college chemistry experience influence mental rotation ability. Themes in Education, 3, 133-140.
3. Carr, M., Shing, Y. L, Janes, P., & Hettinger Steiner, H. (2007, April). Early gender differences in strategy use and fluency: Implications for the emergence of gender differences in mathematics. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, MA.
4. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
5. Cooke-Simpson, A., & Voyer, D. (2007). Confidence and gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 181-186. doi: 10. 1016/j. lindif. 2007. 03. 009.
6. Delgado, A. R. & Prieto, G. (1996). Sex differences in visuospatial ability: Do performance factors play such an important role? Memory & Cognition, 24, 504-510.
7. Dollinger, S. M. C. & Patrick, C. L. (1993). Gender and age differences in mental rotation ability: Without time constraints. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois.
8. Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95-103. doi: 10. 1037/0003-066X. 43. 2. 95.
9. Gallagher, S. A. (1989). Predictors of SAT mathematics scores of gifted male and gifted female adolescents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 191-203. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1471-6402. 1989. tb00996. x.
10. Gallagher, S. A. & Johnson, E. S. (1992). The effect of time limits on performance of mental rotations by gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 19-22. doi: 10. 1177/001698629203600105.
11. Gluck, J., & Fabrizii, C. (2010). Gender differences in the Mental Rotations Test are partly explained by response format. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 106-109. doi: 10. 1027/1614-0001/a000019.
12. Goldstein, D., Haldane, D., & Mitchell, C. (1990). Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: The role of performance factors. Memory & Cognition, 18, 546-550.
13. Greenwald, A. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1-20. doi: 10. 1037/h0076157.
14. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
15. Hedges, L. V., & Becker, B. J. (1986). Statistical methods in the meta-analysis of research on gender differences. In J. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advance through meta-analysis (pp. 14-50). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
16. Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.
17. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
18. Heil, M., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2008). Gender differences in math and mental rotation accuracy but not in mental rotation speed in 8 year old children. European Journal of Developmental Science, 2, 190-196.
19. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 107. 2. 139.
20. Janas, A. J., Mellon, L. M., & Brownlow, S. (2006). Are women's spatial abilities improved by successful peer models? Poster presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
21. Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 691-705. doi: 10. 1037/a0013834.
22. Kanoy, A. E., Jordan, B., & Brownlow, S. (2009, February). Can external justification for performance obviate stereotype threat effects? Poster presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.
23. Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35, 211-223. doi: 10. 1016/j. intell. 2006. 07. 009.
24. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterisation of gender differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498. doi: 10. 1111/1467-8624. ep7252392.
25. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). Gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science performance. In J. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advance through meta-analysis (pp. 67-101). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
26. Lohman, D. F. (1986). The effect of speed-accuracy tradeoff on sex differences in mental rotation. Perception and Psychophysics, 39, 427-436.
27. MacLeod, M. V. (2000). Effect of timing conditions on the magnitude of gender differences on the Water Level Test and the Mental Rotations Test. Unpublished Honors Thesis, St. Francis Xavier University.
28. Masters, M. (1998). The gender difference on the Mental Rotations Test is not due to performance factors. Memory & Cognition, 26, 444-448.
29. Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2010, April). Spatial training narrows gender gap in visuospatial skills. Poster presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Cancun.
30. Ortner, T. M. & Sieverding, M. (2008). Where are the gender differences? Male priming boosts spatial skills in women. Sex Roles, 59, 274-281. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-008-9448-9.
31. Peters, M. (2005). Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems. Brain and Cognition, 57, 176-184. doi: 10. 1016/j. bandc. 2004. 08. 052.
32. Resnick, S. M. (1993). Sex differences in mental rotation: An effect of time limits? Brain and Cognition, 21, 71-79. doi: 10. 1006/brcg. 1993. 1005.
33. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 86. 3. 638.
34. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Revth ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage.
35. Scali, R. M., & Brownlow, S. (2001). Impact of instructional manipulation and stereotype activation on sex differences in spatial task performance. Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research, 6, 3-13.
36. Scali, R. M., Brownlow, S., & Hicks, J. L. (2000). Gender differences in spatial task performance as a function of speed or accuracy orientation. Sex Roles, 43, 359-376. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1026699310308.
37. Schmader, T., Forbes, C. E., Zhang, S., & Mendes, W. B. (2009). A metacognitive perspective on the cognitive deficits experienced in intellectually threatening environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 584-596. doi: 10. 1177/0146167208330450.
38. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 85. 3. 440.
39. Titze, C., Heil, M., & Jansen, P. (2008). Gender differences in the Mental Rotations Test (MRT) are not due to task complexity. Journal of Individual Differences, 29, 130-133. doi: 10. 1027/1614-0001. 29. 3. 130.
40. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotation, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
41. Voyer, D. (1997). Scoring procedure, performance factors, and magnitude of sex differences in spatial performance. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 259-276. doi: 10. 2307/1423717.
42. Voyer, D., & Doyle, R. A. (2010). Item type and gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Learning and Individual Differences. Published online May 17, 2010. doi: 10. 1016/j. lindif. 2010. 04. 010.
43. Voyer, D., & Hou, J. (2006). Type of items and the magnitude of gender differences on the mental rotations test. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 91-100. doi: 10. 1037/cjep2006010.
44. Voyer, D., Postma, A., Brake, B., & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 23-38.
45. Voyer, D., Rodgers, M. A., & McCormick, P. A. (2004). Timing conditions and magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Memory and Cognition, 32, 72-82.
46. Voyer, D. & Sullivan, A. M. (2003). The relation between spatial and mathematical abilities: Potential factors underlying suppression. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 11-23. doi: 10. 1080/00207590244000241.
47. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 117. 2. 250.
48. Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.