Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate/hyaluronic acid semi-interpenetrating network compositions for 3-D cell spreading and migration

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 14, Issue , 2015, Pages 43-52

  Lee, Ho Joon ^a   Sen, Atanu ^a   Bae, Sooneon ^a   Lee, Jeoung Soo ^a   Webb, Ken ^a  

^a AMRL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell spreading; Hyaluronic acid; Hybrid hydrogel; PEG diacrylate; Semi interpenetrating polymer network

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CELL CULTURE; DEGRADATION; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; FIBROBLASTS; HYALURONIC ACID; HYDROGELS; ORGANIC ACIDS; PHASE SEPARATION; POLYOLS;

CELL MIGRATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLULARS; DIACRYLATES; HYBRID HYDROGELS; HYDROLYTIC DEGRADATION; NETWORK COMPOSITION; PEG DIACRYLATE; SEMIINTERPENETRATING POLYMER NETWORKS (SEMI-IPNS);

POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

HYALURONIC ACID; MACROGOL; POLY(ETHYLENE GLYCOL) DIACRYLATE; POLYMER; SEMI INTERPENETRATING POLYMER NETWORK; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ACTIN; HYDROGEL; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; POLY(ETHYLENE GLYCOL)DIACRYLATE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CELL ENCAPSULATION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION KINETICS; ENZYMATIC DEGRADATION; FIBROBLAST; FIBROBLAST CULTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHASE SEPARATION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYNTHESIS; TURBIDITY; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; YOUNG MODULUS; CELL MOTION; CELL SHAPE; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; DERMIS; DRUG EFFECTS; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PHARMACOLOGY; PHOTOMETRY; PROCEDURES;

ACTINS; ADULT; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL SHAPE; DERMIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; HYALURONIC ACID; HYDROGEL; KINETICS; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NEPHELOMETRY AND TURBIDIMETRY; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

EID: 84921728969     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Nicodemus GD, Bryant SJ. Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2008;14:149-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2007.0332.
2. Slaughter BV, Khurshid SS, Fisher OZ, Khademhosseini A, Peppas NA. Hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv Mater 2009;21:3307-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.200802106.
3. Kopecek J. Hydrogel biomaterials: a smart future? Biomaterials 2007;28:5185-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.044.
4. Jia X, Kiick KL. Hybrid multicomponent hydrogels for tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci 2009;9:140-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200800284.
5. Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS. Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009;103:655-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.22361.
6. West J, Hubbell J. Polymeric biomaterials with degradation sites for proteases involved in cell migration. Macromolecules 1999:241-4.
7. Hern DL, Hubbell JA. Incorporation of adhesion peptides into nonadhesive hydrogels useful for tissue resurfacing. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:266-76.
8. Anderson SB, Lin C-C, Kuntzler DV, Anseth KS. The performance of human mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in cell-degradable polymer-peptide hydrogels. Biomaterials 2011;32:3564-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.064.
9. Lutolf MP, Raeber GP, Zisch AH, Tirelli N, Hubbell JA. Cell-responsive synthetic hydrogels. Adv Mater 2003;15:888-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.200304621.
10. Sokic S, Papavasiliou G. Controlled proteolytic cleavage site presentation in biomimetic PEGDA hydrogels enhances neovascularization in vitro. Tissue Eng Part A 2012;18:2477-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0173.
11. Lutolf MP, Weber FE, Schmoekel HG, Schense JC, Kohler T, Müller R, et al. Repair of bone defects using synthetic mimetics of collagenous extracellular matrices. Nat Biotechnol 2003;21:513-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt818.
12. Ehrbar M, Rizzi SC, Hlushchuk R, Djonov V, Zisch AH, Hubbell JA, et al. Enzymatic formation of modular cell-instructive fibrin analogs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007;28:3856-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.027.
13. Mariner PD, Wudel JM, Miller DE, Genova EE, Streubel S-O, Anseth KS. Synthetic hydrogel scaffold is an effective vehicle for delivery of INFUSE (rhBMP2) to critical-sized calvaria bone defects in rats. J Orthop Res 2013;31:401-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.22243.
14. Phelps EA, Landázuri N, Thulé PM, Taylor WR, García AJ. Bioartificial matrices for therapeutic vascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:3323-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905447107.
15. Leslie-Barbick JE, Saik JE, Gould DJ, Dickinson ME, West JL. The promotion of microvasculature formation in poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels by an immobilized VEGF-mimetic peptide. Biomaterials 2011;32:5782-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.060.
16. Jo YS, Rizzi SC, Ehrbar M, Weber FE, Hubbell JA, Lutolf MP. Biomimetic PEG hydrogels crosslinked with minimal plasmin-sensitive tri-amino acid peptides. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;93:870-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32580.
17. Chung EH, Gilbert M, Virdi AS, Sena K, Sumner DR, Healy KE. Biomimetic artificial ECMs stimulate bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;79:815-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30809.
18. Ehrbar M, Sala A, Lienemann P, Ranga A, Mosiewicz K, Bittermann A, et al. Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3D cell migration and remodeling. Biophys J 2011;100:284-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2010.11.082.
19. Bott K, Upton Z, Schrobback K, Ehrbar M, Hubbell JA, Lutolf MP, et al. The effect of matrix characteristics on fibroblast proliferation in 3D gels. Biomaterials 2010;31:8454-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.046.
20. Loessner D, Stok KS, Lutolf MP, Hutmacher DW, Clements JA, Rizzi SC. Bioengineered 3D platform to explore cell-ECM interactions and drug resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Biomaterials 2010; 31:8494-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.064.
21. Patterson J, Hubbell JA. Enhanced proteolytic degradation of molecularly engineered PEG hydrogels in response to MMP-1 and MMP-2. Biomaterials 2010;31:7836-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.061.
22. Patterson J, Hubbell JA. SPARC-derived protease substrates to enhance the plasmin sensitivity of molecularly engineered PEG hydrogels. Biomaterials 2011;32:1301-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.016.
23. Sokic S, Papavasiliou G. FGF-1 and proteolytically mediated cleavage site presentation influence three-dimensional fibroblast invasion in biomimetic PEGDA hydrogels. Acta Biomater 2012;8:2213-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.017.
24. Ghosh K, Ren X, Shu X. Fibronectin functional domains coupled to hyaluronan stimulate adult human dermal fibroblast responses critical for wound healing. Tissue Eng Part A 2006;12:601-13.
25. Almany L, Seliktar D. Biosynthetic hydrogel scaffolds made from fibrinogen and polyethylene glycol for 3D cell cultures. Biomaterials 2005;26:2467-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.047.
26. Peled E, Boss J, Bejar J, Zinman C, Seliktar D. A novel poly(ethylene glycol)-fibrinogen hydrogel for tibial segmental defect repair in a rat model. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;80:874-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30928.
27. Sarig-Nadir O, Seliktar D. Compositional alterations of fibrin-based materials for regulating in vitro neural outgrowth. Tissue Eng Part A 2008;14:401-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tea.2007.0029.
28. Zhang G, Drinnan CT, Geuss LR, Suggs LJ. Vascular differentiation of bone marrow stem cells is directed by a tunable three-dimensional matrix. Acta Biomater 2010;6:3395-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.019.
29. Zhang G, Wang X, Wang Z, Zhang J, Suggs L. A PEGylated fibrin patch for mesenchymal stem cell delivery. Tissue Eng 2006;12:9-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.9.
30. Connors RC, Muir JJ, Liu Y, Reiss GR, Kouretas PC, Whitten MG, et al. Postoperative pericardial adhesion prevention using Carbylan-SX in a rabbit model. J Surg Res 2007;140:237-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.014.
31. Zheng Shu X, Liu Y, Palumbo FS, Luo Y, Prestwich GD. In situ crosslinkable hyaluronan hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2004;25:1339-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.014.
32. Hansen JK, Thibeault SL, Walsh JF, Shu XZ, Prestwich GD. In vivo engineering of the vocal fold extracellular matrix with injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogels: early effects on tissue repair and biomechanics in a rabbit model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2005;114:662-70.
33. Kutty JK, Cho E, Lee JS, Vyavahare NR, Webb K. The effect of hyaluronic acid incorporation on fibroblast spreading and proliferation within PEG-diacrylate based semi-interpenetrating networks. Biomaterials 2007;28:4928-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.007.
34. Kutty JK, Webb K. Mechanomimetic hydrogels for vocal fold lamina propria regeneration. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009;20:737-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856209X426763.
35. Cho E, Kutty JK, Datar K, Lee JS, Vyavahare NR, Webb K. A novel synthetic route for the preparation of hydrolytically degradable synthetic hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;90:1073-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32172.
36. Gao L, McBeath R, Chen CS. Stem cell shape regulates a chondrogenic versus myogenic fate through Rac1 and N-cadherin. Stem Cells 2010;28:564-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stem.308.
37. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004;6:483-95.
38. Chen CS. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997;276:1425-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5317.1425.
39. Kuo JW. Practical aspects of hyaluronan based medical products. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2005.
40. Dick HB, Schwenn O. Viscoelastics in ophthalmic surgery. Berlin: Springer; 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59779-4.
41. Ouasti S, Donno R, Cellesi F, Sherratt MJ, Terenghi G, Tirelli N. Network connectivity, mechanical properties and cell adhesion for hyaluronic acid/PEG hydrogels. Biomaterials 2011;32:6456-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.044.
42. Cowman MK, Matsuoka S. Experimental approaches to hyaluronan structure. Carbohydr Res 2005;340:791-809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2005.01.022.
43. Raeber GP, Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA. Molecularly engineered PEG hydrogels: a novel model system for proteolytically mediated cell migration. Biophys J 2005;89:1374-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.050682.
44. Rizzi SC, Ehrbar M, Halstenberg S, Raeber GP, Schmoekel HG, Hagenmüller H, et al. Recombinant protein-co-PEG networks as cell-adhesive and proteolytically degradable hydrogel matrixes. Part II: Biofunctional characteristics. Biomacromolecules 2006;7:3019-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bm060504a.
45. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044.
46. Huebsch N, Arany PR, Mao AS, Shvartsman D, Ali OA, Bencherif SA, et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat Mater 2010;9:518-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2732.
47. Yang PJ, Levenston ME, Temenoff JS. Modulation of mesenchymal stem cell shape in enzyme-sensitive hydrogels is decoupled from upregulation of fibroblast markers under cyclic tension. Tissue Eng Part A 2012;18:2365-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0727.
48. Quick DJ, Anseth KS. DNA delivery from photocrosslinked PEG hydrogels: encapsulation efficiency, release profiles, and DNA quality. J Control Release 2004;96:341-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.01.021.