Do fish perceive illusory motion?

Scientific Reports

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Gori, Simone ^a,b   Agrillo, Christian ^a   Dadda, Marco ^a   Bisazza, Angelo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; FISH; ILLUSION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL CORTEX;

ANIMALS; FISHES; ILLUSIONS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 84921655805     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep06443     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Shichida, Y. & Matsuyama, T. Evolution of opsins and phototransduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 364, 2881-2895. (2009).
2. Hubel, D. H. &Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. The Journal of physiology 148, 574-591 (1959).
3. Hubel, D. H. &Wiesel, T. N. Ferrier Lecture: Functional Architecture of Macaque Monkey Visual Cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 198, 1-59, doi:10.1098/rspb.1977.0085 (1977).
4. Eagleman, D.M. Visual illusions and neurobiology. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 920-926 (2001).
5. Nieder, A. Seeing more than meets the eye: processing of illusory contours in animals. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 188, 249-260 (2002).
6. Kelley, L. A. &Kelley, J. L. Animal visual illusion and confusion: the importance of a perceptual perspective. Behavioral Ecology, art118 (2013).
7. Pinna, B. & Brelstaff, G. J. A new visual illusion of relative motion. Vision Research 40, 2091-2096 (2000).
8. Gori, S. & Hamburger, K. A new motion illusion: the Rotating-Tilted-Lines illusion. Perception 35, 853-857 (2006).
9. Gori, S. & Yazdanbakhsh, A. The riddle of the Rotating-Tilted-Lines illusion. Perception 37, 631-635 (2008).
10. Gori, S., Giora, E. & Stubbs, D. A. Perceptual compromise between apparent and veridical motion indices: The Unchained-Dots illusion. Perception 39, 863 (2010).
11. Gori, S., Giora, E., Yazdanbakhsh, A. &Mingolla, E. A new motion illusion based on competition between two kinds of motion processing units: The Accordion Grating. Neural networks 24, 1082-1092 (2011).
12. Yazdanbakhsh, A. & Gori, S. Mathematical analysis of the Accordion Grating illusion: a differential geometry approach to introduce 3D aperture problem. Neural networks 24, 1093-1101 (2011).
13. Kitaoka, A. & Ashida, H. Phenomenal characteristics of the peripheral drift illusion. Vision 15, 261-262 (2003).
14. Gori, S., Hamburger, K. & Spillmann, L. Reversal of apparent rotation in the Enigma-figure with and without motion adaptation and the effect of T-junctions. Vision research 46, 3267-3273 (2006).
15. Spillmann, L. TheO uchi-Spillmann illusion revisited. Perception 42, 413-429 (2013).
16. Murakami, I., Kitaoka, A. & Ashida, H. A positive correlation between fixation instability and the strength of illusory motion in a static display. Vision research 46, 2421-2431 (2006).
17. Troncoso, X. G., Macknik, S. L., Otero-Millan, J. & Martinez-Conde, S. Microsaccades drive illusory motion in the Enigma illusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 16033-16038 (2008).
18. Otero-Millan, J., Macknik, S. L. & Martinez-Conde, S. Microsaccades and blinks trigger illusory rotation in the "Rotating Snakes" illusion. The Journal of Neuroscience 32, 6043-6051 (2012).
19. Zeki, S., Watson, J. & Frackowiak, R. S. Going beyond the information given: the relation of illusory visual motion to brain activity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 252, 215-222 (1993).
20. Conway, B. R., Kitaoka, A., Yazdanbakhsh, A., Pack, C. C. & Livingstone, M. S. Neural basis for a powerful static motion illusion. The Journal of neuroscience 25, 5651-5656 (2005).
21. Ruzzoli, M. et al. The neural basis of the Enigma illusion: A transcranialmagnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 49, 3648-3655 (2011).
22. Fraser, A. &Wilcox, K. J. Perception of illusory movement. Nature 281, 565-566 (1979).
23. Billino, J., Hamburger, K. & Gegenfurtner, K. R. Age effects on the perception of motion illusions. Perception 38, 508 (2009).
24. Gori, S. et al. The DCDC2 intron 2 deletion impairs illusory motion perception unveiling the selective role of magnocellular-dorsal stream in reading (dis)ability. Cerebral Cortex (in press).
25. Scott, T. R. & Powell, D. A. Measurement of a visual motion aftereffect in the rhesus monkey. Science 140, 57-59 (1963).
26. Srinivasan, M. V. & Dvorak, D. The waterfall illusion in an insect visual system. Vision research 19, 1435-1437 (1979).
27. Xiao, Q. & Güntürkün, O. Do pigeons perceive the motion aftereffect? A behavioral study. Behavioural brain research 187, 327-333 (2008).
28. Tuthill, J. C., Chiappe, M. E. & Reiser, M. B. Neural correlates of illusory motion perception in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 108, 9685-9690 (2011).
29. Orger, M. B., Smear, M. C., Anstis, S. M. & Baier, H. Perception of Fourier and non-Fouriermotion by larval zebrafish. Nature neuroscience 3, 1128-1133 (2000).
30. Kuriki, I., Ashida, H., Murakami, I. & Kitaoka, A. Functional brain imaging of the Rotating Snakes illusion by fMRI. Journal of Vision 8, 16 (2008).
31. Ashida, H., Kuriki, I., Murakami, I., Hisakata, R. & Kitaoka, A. Direction-specific fMRI adaptation reveals the visual cortical network underlying the "Rotating Snakes" illusion. Neuroimage 61, 1143-1152 (2012).
32. Morrone, M. et al. A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI. Nature neuroscience 3, 1322-1328 (2000).
33. Portugues, R. & Engert, F. The neural basis of visual behaviors in the larval zebrafish. Current opinion in neurobiology 19, 644-647 (2009).
34. Maurer, C. M., Huang, Y.-Y. & Neuhauss, S. C. Application of zebrafish oculomotor behavior to model human disorders. Reviews in the Neurosciences 22, 5-16 (2011).
35. Cronly-Dillon, J. Units sensitive to direction of movement in goldfish optic tectum. (1964) Nature. 203, 214-215 (1964).
36. Barlow, H. B. & Hill, R. M. Selective sensitivity to direction of movement in ganglion cells of the rabbit retina. Science. 139, 412-414 (1963).
37. Maximov, V., Maximova, E. & Maximov, P. Direction selectivity in the goldfish tectum revisited. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1048, 198-205 (2005).
38. Azzopardi, P. & Hock, H. S. Illusory motion perception in blindsight. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 876-881 (2011).
39. Miller, S. M. et al. Genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 2664-2668 (2010).
40. Vogel, F., Schalt, E., Krüger, J., Propping, P. & Lehnert, K. F. The electroencephalogram (EEG) as a research tool in human behavior genetics: Psychological examinations in healthymales with various inherited EEG variants. Human Genetics 47, 1-45, doi:10.1007/BF00295569 (1979).
41. Cronin-Golomb, A. et al. Genetic influence on contrast sensitivity in middle-aged male twins. Vision research 47, 2179-2186 (2007).
42. Stein, J. &Walsh, V. To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in neurosciences 20, 147-152 (1997).
43. Franceschini, S., Gori, S., Ruffino, M., Pedrolli, K. & Facoetti, A. A causal link between visual spatial attention and reading acquisition. Current Biology 22, 814-819 (2012).
44. Franceschini, S. et al. Action video games make dyslexic children read better. Current Biology 23, 462-466 (2013).
45. Ronconi, L., et al. Decreased Coherent Motion Discrimination in Autism Spectrum Disorder: The Role of Attentional Zoom-out Deficit. Plos One 7, e49019 (2012).
46. Ronconi, L., Gori, S., Ruffino, M., Molteni, M.&Facoetti, A. Zoom-out attentional impairment in children with autism spectrum disorder. cortex 49, 1025-1033 (2013).
47. Gori, S. & Facoetti, A. Perceptual learning as a possible new approach for remediation and prevention of developmental dyslexia. Vision research 99, 78-87 (2014).
48. Gori, S., Cecchini, P., Bigoni, A., Molteni, M. & Facoetti, A. Magnocellular-dorsal pathway and sub-lexical route in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in human neuroscience 8, 460 (2014).
49. Bradford, Y. et al. ZFIN: enhancements and updates to the Zebrafish Model Organism Database. Nucleic acids research 39, D822-D829 (2011).
50. Fraser, B. A., Weadick, C. J., Janowitz, I., Rodd, F. H. & Hughes, K. A. Sequencing and characterization of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) transcriptome. BMC genomics 12, 202 (2011).
51. Neuhauss, S. C. et al. Genetic disorders of vision revealed by a behavioral screen of 400 essential loci in zebrafish. The Journal of neuroscience 19, 8603-8615 (1999).
52. Steinke, D., Salzburger, W. &Meyer, A. Novel relationships among ten fish model species revealed based on a phylogenomic analysis using ESTs. Journal of molecular evolution 62, 772-784 (2006).
53. Magurran, A. E. Evolutionary ecology: the Trinidadian guppy. (Oxford University Press, 2005).
54. Sovrano, V. A. & Bisazza, A. Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish. Animal cognition 11, 161-166 (2008).
55. Agrillo, C., Miletto Petrazzini, M. E., Piffer, L., Dadda, M. & Bisazza, A. A new training procedure for studying discrimination learning in fish. Behavioural brain research 230, 343-348 (2012).
56. Agrillo, C., Miletto Petrazzini, M. E., Tagliapietra, C. & Bisazza, A. Inter-specific differences in numerical abilities among teleost fish. Frontiers in psychology 3 (2012).
57. Miletto Petrazzini, M. E., Agrillo, C., Piffer, L., Dadda, M. & Bisazza, A. Development and application of a new method to investigate cognition in newborn guppies. Behavioural brain research 233, 443-449 (2012).
58. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. (Freeman and Company, 1995).