Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish

Animal Cognition

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 161-166

  Sovrano, Valeria Anna ^a   Bisazza, Angelo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Amodal completion; Fish; Occlusion; Visual completion; Visual recognition

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ANIMALS; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FORM PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

AVES; MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA; XENOTOCA EISENI;

EID: 36749001523     PISSN: 14359448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0100-9     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aust U, Huber L (2006) Does the use of natural stimuli facilitate amodal completion in pigeons? Perception 35:333-349
2. Bakin JS, Nakayama K, Gilbert CD (2000) Visual responses in monkeys areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configuration. J Neurosci 20:8188-8198
3. Braithwaite VA (2006 ) Cognitive ability in fish. Fish Physiol 24:1-37
4. Bshary R, Wickler W, Fricke H (2002) Fish cognition: a primate's eye view. Anim Cogn 5:1-13
5. Cavoto B, Cook RG (2007) The contribution of monocular depth cues to scene perception in pigeons. Psychol Sci 17:628-634
6. Cerella J (1980) The pigeon's analysis of pictures. Pattern Recogn 12:1-6
7. Clara E, Regolin L, Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M (2006) Domestic chicks perceive stereokinetic illusions. Perception 35:983-992
8. Di Pietro NT, Wasserman EA, Young ME (2002) Effects of occlusion on pigeon's visual object recognition. Perception 31:1299-1312
9. Deruelle C, Barbet I, Dépy D, Fagot J (2000) Perception of partly occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio). Perception 39:1483-1497
10. Forkman B (1998) Hen use occlusion to judge depth in a two-dimensional picture. Perception 27:861-867
11. Forkman B, Vallortigara G (1999) Minimization of modal contours: an essential cross-species strategy in disambiguating relative depth. Anim Cogn 2:181-185
12. Fujita K (2001) Perceptual completion in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia). Percep Psychop 63:115-125
13. Grossberg S, Mingolla E (1985) Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon colour spreading. Psychol Rev 92:173-211
14. Jarvis ED, Güntürkün O, Bruce L, Csillag A, Karten HJ, Kuenzel W, Medina L, Paxinos G, Perkel DJ, Shimizu T, Striedter G, Wild M, Ball GF, Dugas-Ford J, Durand S, Hough G, Husband S, Kubikova L, Lee D, Mello C V, Powers A, Siang C, Smulders TV, Wada K, White S A, Yamamoto K, Yu J, Reiner A, Butler A B (2005) Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nature Rev Neurosci 6:151-159
15. Kanizsa G (1979) Organization in Vision. Praeger, New York
16. Kanizsa G, Renzi P, Conte S, Compostela C, Guerani L (1993) Amodal completion in mouse vision. Perception 22:713-721
17. Kellman PJ, Shipley TF (1991) A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cogn Psychol 23:141-221
18. Kellman PJ, Guttman S,Wickens T (2001) Geometric and neural models of contour and surface interpolation in visual object perception. In: Shipley TF, Kellman PJ (eds) From fragments to objects: segmentation and grouping in vision. Elsevier, New York pp 183-245
19. Kellman PJ, Garrigan P, Shipley TF (2005) Object interpolation in three dimensions. Psychol Rev 112:586-609
20. Lazareva OF, Wasserman EA, Biederman I (2007) Pigeons' recognition of partially occluded objects depends on specific training experience. Perception (in press)
21. Lea SEG, Stater AM, Ryan CME (1996) Perception of object unity in chicks: a comparison with human infant. Infant Behav Develop 19:501-504
22. Meyer MK, Wischnath L, Foerster W (1985) Lebendgebärende Zierfishe: Arten der Welt [Viviparous ornamental fishes: Species of the world]. Mergus Verlag, Melle
23. Michotte A, Thinés G, Crabbé G (1964) Les complements amodaux des structures perceptives. Publications Universitaires de Louvain, Louvain
24. Nagasaka Y Osada Y (2000) Subjective contours, amodal completion and transparemcy in animals. Jap J Anim Psychol 50:61-73
25. Nagasaka Y, Hori K, Osada Y (2005) Perceptual grouping in pigeons. Perception 34:625-632
26. Nagasaka Y, Lazareva OF, Wasserman EA (2007) Prior experience affects amodal completion in pigeons. Perception (in press)
27. Nieder A (2002) Seeing more than meets the eye : processing of illusory contours in animals. J Comp Physiol A 188:249-260
28. Okanoya K, Takahashi M (2000) Shikaku-teki hokan e no seitaigaku-teki apuroochi (Ecological approach to visual completion). Kokoro no hattatsu: ninchi-teki seicho no kikoo 1999 (Reports of the Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research for Priority Areas, pp 34-41)
29. Orger MB, Smear MC, Anstis SM, Baier H (2000) Perception of Fourier and non-Fourier motion by larval zebrafish. Nat Neurosci 11:1128-1133
30. Osada Y, Schiller P H (1994) Can monkeys see objects under condition of transparency and occlusion? Invest Ophthal Visual Sci 35:1664
31. Palmer SE (1999) Organizing objects and scenes. In: Palmer SE (ed) Vision science-photons to phenomenology. The MIT Press, Cambridge pp 254-310
32. Regolin L, Vallortigara G (1995) Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Percep Psychophys 57:971-976
33. Regolin L, Marconato F, Vallortigara G (2004) Hemispheric differences in the recognition of partly occluded objects by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Anim Cogn 7:162-70
34. Sato A, Kanazawa S, Fujita K (1997) Perception of objects unity in chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). Jap Psychol Res 39:191-199
35. Sekuler AB, Palmer SE (1992) Perception of partly occluded objects: a microgenetic analysis. J Exp Psychol: Gen 121:95-111
36. Sekuler AB, Lee JAJ, Shettleworth SJ (1996) Pigeons do not complete partly occluded figures. Perception 25:1109-1120
37. Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2002) Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: Encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cognition 85:51-59
38. Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2003) Modularity as a fish views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 29:199-210
39. Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2005) Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: Effects of the size of the experimental space. Cognition 97:121-133
40. Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2007) How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces. Anim Cogn 10:47-54
41. Spelke ES (2000) Core knowledge. Am Psychol 55:1233-1243
42. Spelke ES (2003) What makes us smart. Core knowledge and natural language. In: Gentner D, Goldin-Meadow S (eds) Language in mind. Advances in the study of language and thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 277-311
43. Sugita Y (1999) Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex. Nature 401:269-272
44. Ushitani T, Fujita K (2005) Pigeons do not perceptually complete partially occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the "pigeon problem." Behav Process 69:67-78
45. Vallortigara G (2004) Visual cognition and representation in birds and primates. In: Rogers LJ, Kaplan G (eds) Vertebrate comparative cognition: are primates superior to non-primates? Kluwer, Dodrecht, pp 57-94
46. Vallortigara G (2006) The cognitive chicken: visual and spatial cognition in a non-mammalian brain. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford pp 41-58
47. Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M (1989) Place and object learning in chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). J Comp Psychol 103:201-209
48. Vallortigara G, Tommasi L (2001) Minimization of modal contours: an instance of an evolutionary internalized geometric regularity? Brain Behav Sci 24:706-707
49. Vallortigara G, Regolin L (2002) Facing an obstacle: lateralization of object and spatial cognition. In: Andrew RJ, Rogers LJ (eds) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 383-444
50. Vallortigara G, Regolin L (2006) Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks. Curr Biol 16:279-280
51. Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M, Compostella S (1990) Perceptual organization in animal learning: cues or objects? Ethology 85:89-102
52. Vallortigara G, Regolin L, Marconato F (2005) Visually inexperienced chicks exhibit a spontaneous preference for biological motion patterns. PLoS Biol 3(7):1312-1316 (e208)