The New Separation of Powers: A Theory for the Modern State

The New Separation of Powers: A Theory for the Modern State

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-320

  Carolan, Eoin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Accountability; Administrative discretion; Administrative state; Legitimate governance; Separation of powers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921603617     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568673.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (148)

1. Ackerman, B, 'The New Separation of Powers' (2000) 113 Harvard Law Review 633.
2. Allan, TRS, Law, Liberty and Justice (Clarendon Press, 1993).
3. Allan, TRS, Constitutional Justice (Oxford University Press, 2001).
4. Allan, TRS, 'Dworkin and Dicey: The Rule of Law as Integrity' (1988) 8 OJLS 266.
5. Bagehot, Sir W, The English Constitution (Smith, P, ed., Cambridge University Press 2001).
6. Baldwin, R, Rules and Government (Oxford University Press, 1995).
7. Barber, N, The Academic Mythologians' (2001a) 21 OJLS 369.
8. Barber, N, 'Prelude to the Separation of Powers' (2001b) 60 CLJ 59.
9. Barendt, E, An Introduction to Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 1998).
10. Barendt, E, 'Separation of Powers and Constitutional Government' (1995) PL 599.
11. Bator, P, 'Constitution as Architecture: Legislative and Administrative Courts under Article III' (1990) 65 Indiana Law Journal 233.
12. Bogdanor, V ed., The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century (Oxford University Press, 2003).
13. Bressman, L, 'Beyond Accountability: Arbitrariness and Legitimacy in the Administrative State' (2003) 78 NYU Law Review 461.
14. Bressman, L, 'Procedures as Politics in Administrative Law' (2007) 107 Columbia Law Review 1749.
15. Brown R, 'Separated Powers and Ordered Liberty' (1990) 139 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1513.
16. Brown R, 'Accountability, Liberty and the Constitution' (1998) 98 Columbia Law Review 531.
17. Cartier, G, 'Procedural Fairness in Legislative Functions: The End of Judicial Abstinence?' (2003) 53 University of Toronto Law Journal 217.
18. Cartier, G, 'Willis and the Contemporary Administrative State: Administrative Discretion as Dialogue' (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 629.
19. Chamberlain M, 'Democracy and Deference in Resource Allocation Cases' (2003) 8 Judicial Review 12.
20. Charles I, His Majesty's Answer to the Nineteen Propositions of Both Houses of Parliament (1642).
21. Chayes, A, 'The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation' (1976) 89 Harvard Law Review 1281.
22. Coase, R, 'The Problem of Social Cost'(1960) 3 Journal of Law & Economics 1.
23. Coleman, J and Kraus, J, 'Rethinking the Theory of Legal Rights' (1986) 95 Yale Law Journal 1335.
24. Craig, PP, Public Law and Democracy in the United Kingdom and the United States of America (Clarendon Press, 1990).
25. Craig, PP, 'Legitimate Expectations: A Conceptual Analysis' (1992) 108 LQR 79.
26. Craig, PP, 'Democracy and Rule-Making Within the EC: An Empirical and Normative Assessment' (1997) 3 European Law Journal 105.
27. Craig, PP, 'Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review' (1998) 57 CLJ 63.
28. Craig, PP, 'Competing Models of Judicial Review' [1999] PL 428.
29. Craig, PP, 'Public law, political theory and legal theory' (2000) PL 211.
30. Curtin, D, Postnational Democracy: The European Union in Search of a Political Philosophy (Kluwer, 1997).
31. Daintith, T and Page, A, The Executive in the Constitution (Oxford University Press, 1999).
32. Day O'Connor, S, 'Altered States: Federalism and Devolution at the Turn of the "Real" Millennium' (2001) 60 CLJ 493.
33. Dehousse, R, 'European Institutional Architecture after Amsterdam: Parliamentary system or regulatory structure?' (1998) 35 CML Rev 595.
34. DeSmith, S, 'The Separation of Powers in New Dress' (1966) 12 McGill Law Journal 491.
35. Dicey, AV, Law and Public Opinion in England (2nd ed., Macmillan, 1914).
36. du Gay, P ed., The Values of Bureacracy (Oxford University Press, 2005).
37. Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (Duckworth, 1977).
38. Dworkin, R., A Matter of Principle (Harvard University Press, 1985).
39. Edley Jr, J, 'The Governance Crisis, Legal Theory and Political Ideology' (1991) 41 Duke Law Journal 561.
40. Ellickson, RC, 'The Case for Coase and against "Coaseanism"' (1989) 99 Yale Law Journal 611.
41. Elliott, M, 'The Ultra Vires Doctrine in a Constitutional Setting: Still the Central Principles of Judicial Review' (1998) 57 CLJ 63.
42. Elliott, M, 'Sovereignty and the New Constitutional Settlement: Legislative Freedom, Political Reality and Convention' (2002) 22 LS 340.
43. Ely, J H, Democracy and Distrust (Harvard University Press, 1980).
44. Ely, J H, On Constitutional Ground (Princeton University Press, 1996).
45. Fanning, R, 'Reflections on the legislative process following Leontjava' (2004) XXXIX Irish Jurist 286.
46. Farina, C, 'Statutory Interpretation and the Balance of Power in the Administrative State' (1989) 89 Columbia Law Review 452
47. Fisher, E and Schmidt, P, 'Seeing the Blind Spots in Administrative Law: Theory, Practice and Rule-Making Settlements in the United States' (2001) 30 Common Law World Review 272.
48. Forsyth, C, ed., Judicial Review and the Constitution (Hart, 2000).
49. Forsyth, C, 'Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review' (1996) 55 CLJ 122.
50. Fried, C, 'Is Liberty Possible?' in Liberty, Equality and the Law (University of Utah Press, 1987).
51. Frug, G, 'The Ideology of Bureacracy in American Law' (1984) 97 Harvard Law Review 1277.
52. Fuller, L., 'The Forms and Limits of Adjudication' (1978) 92 Harvard Law Review 353.
53. Galligan, DJ, Due Process and Fair Procedures (Clarendon Press, 1996).
54. Goldsworthy, J, The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Clarendon, 1999).
55. Greco, G, 'Standards or Safeguards: A Survey of the Delegation Doctrine in the United States' 8 Administrative Law Journal of the American University 567.
56. Griffith, JAG, 'The Political Constitution' (1979) 42 MLR 1.
57. Griffith, JAG, 'The Brave New World of Sir John Laws' (2000) 63 MLR 159.
58. Hadfield, G, 'Bias in the Evolution of Legal Rules' (1992) 80 Georgetown Law Journal 583.
59. Hale, R L, 'Bargaining, Duress and Economic Liberty' (1943) 43 Columbia Law Review 603.
60. Harrington, J, The Commonwealth of Oceana (1656).
61. Hart, HLA, The Concept of Law (Clarendon, 1961).
62. Hart, HLA, Law, Liberty and Morality (Oxford University Press, 1963).
63. Lord Hoffman, 'The COMBAR Lecture 2001: Separation of Powers' (2002) 7 Judicial Review 137.
64. Hogan, G, 'Judicial Review, the Doctrine of Reasonableness and the Immigration Process' (2001) 6 Bar Review 329.
65. Hogan G and Whyte G, Kelly: The Irish Constitution (4th ed., Butterworths, 2003).
66. Hogan G and Morgan DG, Administrative Law in Ireland (3rd ed., Round Hall Sweet & Maxwell, 1998).
67. Irvine, D, 'Judges and Decision-Makers: The Theory and Practice of Wednesbury Review' (1996) PL 59.
68. Jennings, I, The Law and the Constitution (5th ed., University of London Press, 1959).
69. Joerges, C and Neyer, J, 'From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology' (1997) 3 European Law Journal 273.
70. Jones, G, Selections from Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England (Macmillan Press, 1973).
71. Jowell, J, 'Beyond the rule of law: towards constitutional judicial review' (2000) PL 671.
72. Kagan, E, 'Presidential Administration' (2001) 114 Harvard Law Review 2245
73. Kant, I, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Gregor, M, ed., Cambridge University Press, 1997).
74. Kagan, E, Political Writings (2nd ed., Reiss, H, ed., Cambridge University Press, 1991).
75. Kennedy, D, 'Cost-Benefit Analysis of Entitlement Problems: A Critique' (1981) 33 Stanford Law Review 387.
76. Klosko, G, Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus (Oxford University Press, 2000).
77. Klosko, G, Political Obligations (Oxford University Press, 2005).
78. Komesar, N, Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law, Economics and Public Policy (University of Chicago Press, 1994).
79. Kopecky, P, 'Power to the executive! The changing executive-legislative relations in Eastern Europe' (2004)10 Journal of Legislative Studies 142.
80. Kronman, A T, 'Contract Law and Distributive Justice' (1980) 89 Yale Law Journal 472.
81. Laws, J, 'Law and Democracy' [1995] PL 72.
82. Lenaerts, K, 'Constitutionalism and the Many Faces of Federalism' (1990) 38 AJCL 205.
83. Lenaerts, K, 'Some Reflections on the Separation of Powers in the European Community' (1991) 28 CML Rev 11.
84. Lord Lester of Herne Hill, 'Developing constitutional principles of public law' (2001) PL 684.
85. Leyland, T and Woods, T eds., Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (Blackstone Press, 1997).
86. Lindseth, P, '"Weak" constitutionalism? Reflections on comitology and transnational governance in the European Union' (2001) 21 OJLS 145.
87. Leyland, T 'The Paradox of Parliamentary Supremacy: Delegation, Democracy, and Dictatorship in Germany and France, 1920s-1950s' (2004) 113 Yale Law Journal 1341.
88. Lobel, O, 'The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought' (2004) 89 Minnesota Law Review 342.
89. Locke, J, Two Treatises of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration (Shapiro, I, ed., Yale University Press, 2003).
90. Loughlin, M, 'Procedural Fairness: A Study in the Crisis in Administrative Law Theory' (1978) 28 University of Toronto Law Journal 215.
91. Loughlin, M, 'Constitutional Law: The Third Order of the Political' in Bamforth, N and Leyland, T eds., Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Hart, 2003) 27
92. Loughlin, M, and Walker, N, eds., The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press, 2007).
93. Loveland, I, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights (4th ed., Oxford University Press, 2006).
94. Macchiavelli, N, The Prince (2nd ed., Adams, R, ed., Norton, 1992)
95. Madison, J, The Federalist (2nd ed., University of Chicago, 1990)
96. Madison, J, Hamilton, A, and Jay, J: The Federalist Papers (Kramnick, I, ed., Penguin, 1987).
97. Madwick, P and Woodhouse, D, The Law and Politics of the Constitution (Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1995).
98. Magill, E, 'The Real Separation in Separation of Powers Law' (2000) 86 Virginia Law Review 1127.
99. Malleson, K, 'Modernising the Constitution: Completing the Unfinished Business' (2004) 24 LS 119
100. Marshall, G, Constitutional Theory (Clarendon, 1971).
101. Mashaw, JL, Due Process in the Administrative State (Yale University Press, 1985).
102. Mashaw, JL, Greed, Chaos and Governance (Yale University Press, 1997).
103. Masterman, R, 'A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back' (2004) PL 48.
104. Merry, H J, Five-Branch Government: The Full Measure of Constitutional Checks and Balances (University of Illinois Press, 1980).
105. Morgan, DG, The Separation of Powers in the Irish Constitution (Round Hall Sweet & Maxwell, 1997).
106. Morgan, DG, 'Judicial-o-centric separation of powers on the wane?' (2004) XXXIX Irish Jurist 142.
107. Mosher, F, 'The Changing Responsibilities and Tactics of the Federal Government' (1980) 40 Public Administration Review 541.
108. Mullan, D J, 'Fairness: The New Natural Justice' (1975) 25 University of Toronto Law Journal 281.
109. Munro, C, Studies in Constitutional Law (2nd ed, Butterworths, 1999).
110. Oliver, D, 'Is the Ultra Vires rule the basis of Judicial Review?' [1987] PL 543.
111. Pocock, JGA, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (2nd ed., Princeton University Press, 2003).
112. Poole, T, 'Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism' (2003) 23 (3) OJLS 435.
113. Pym, J, On Grievances in the Reign of Charles I (1640).
114. Rawls, J, A Theory of Justice (revised ed., Oxford University Press, 1999).
115. Rawls, J, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Belknap, 2001).
116. Richards, DAJ, Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 1989).
117. Richardson, G, and Genn, H (ed.), Administrative Law and Government Action (Clarendon, 1994).
118. Richardson, HS, Democratic Autonomy: Public reasoning about the ends of policy (Oxford University Press, 2002).
119. Rivers, J, 'Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review' (2006) 65 CLJ 174
120. Rubin, E, 'The Myth of Accountability and the Anti-Administrative Impulse' (2005) 103 Michigan Law Review 2073.
121. Salamon, L, (ed), Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance (Oxford University Press, 2002).
122. Salamon, L, 'The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action' (2001) 28 Fordham Urban Law Journal 1611.
123. Sargentich, TO, 'The Uneasy Constitutional Status of Administrative Agencies (1987) 36 American University Law Review 419.
124. Schmitt, C, The Concept of the Political (1932), (G Schwab (tr.), University of Chicago Press, 1996).
125. Sedley, S, 'Human Rights-a Twenty-First Century Agenda' [1995] PL 386.
126. Shapiro, MH, 'The Technology of Perfection: Performance Enhancement and the Control of Attributes' (1991) 65S Southern California Law Review 11.
127. Stevens, R, The Independence of the Judiciary (Clarendon, 1993).
128. Stevens, R, 'A Loss of Innocence: Judicial Independence and the Separation of Powers' (1999) 19 OJLS 365.
129. Stewart, R, 'The Reformation of American Administrative Law' (1974-5) 88 Harvard Law Review 1667.
130. Stewart, R, 'Administrative Law in the 21st Century' (2003) 78 NYU Law Review 437.
131. Lord Steyn, 'The Case for a Supreme Court' (2002) 118 LQR 382.
132. Strauss, R, 'The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch' (1984) Columbia Law Review 573.
133. Thibault, L and Walker, J, Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (Hillsdale, 1975).
134. Tribe, L, American Constitutional Law: Volume 1 (3rd ed., Foundation Press, 2000).
135. Unger, R, 'The Critical Legal Studies Movement' (1983) 96 Harvard Law Review 561.
136. Verkuil, PR, Outsourcing Sovereignty (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
137. Vermuele, A, 'Our Schmittian Administrative Law' (2009) 122 Harvard Law Review 1095.
138. Vile, MJC, Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers (Clarendon, 1967).
139. Wade, W & Forsyth, C, Administrative Law (9th ed., Oxford University Press, 2004).
140. Walker, L, Lind, A, and Thibault, J, 'The Relation between Procedural and Distributive Justice' (1979) 65 Virginia Law Review 1401.
141. Weiler, J, The Constitution of Europe: 'Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?' and Other Essays in European Integration (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
142. Weinrib, E, 'Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law' (1988) 97 Yale Law Journal 949.
143. Whittington, KE, 'Legislative Sanctions and the Strategic Environment Of Judicial Review' (2003) 1 International Journal of Constitutional Law 446.
144. Wolff, J, An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2006).
145. Woodhouse, D, In Pursuit of Good Administration: Ministers, Civil Servants and Judges (Clarendon Press, 1997).
146. Woodhouse, D, 'The Constitutional and Political Implications of a United Kingdom Supreme Court' (2004) 24 LS 134.
147. Woolf, H, 'Droit Public-English Style' [1995] PL 57.
148. Woolf, H, 'Judicial review-the tensions between the executive and the judiciary' (1998) 114 LQR 579.