Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory

Communication Theory

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 46-69

  Geise, Stephanie ^a   Baden, Christian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Framing; Information processing; Visual communication

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; THEORETICAL STUDY; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84921457906     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/comt.12048     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Baden, C. (2010). Communication, contextualization, & cognition: Patterns & processes of frames' influence on people's interpretations of the EU Constitution. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
2. Baden, C., & Lecheler, S. K. (2012). Fleeting, fading, or far-Reaching? A knowledge-based model of the persistence of framing effects. Communication Theory, 22(4), 359-382. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01413.x
3. Baresch, B., Hsu, S.-H., & Reese, S. (2012). The power of framing: New challenges for researching the structure of meaning in news. In S. Allan (Ed.), Studies in News Framing (pp. 637-647). New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Borah, P. (2009). Comparing visual framing in newspapers: Hurricane Katrina versus tsunami. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(1), 50-58.
5. Brantner, C., Lobinger, K., & Wetzstein, I. (2011). Effects of visual framing on emotional responses and evaluations of news stories about the Gaza Conflict 2009. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(3), 523-540. doi:10.1177/107769901108800304.
6. Bucher, H.-J. (2012). Grundlagen einer interaktionalen Rezeptionstheorie. In H.-J. Bucher & P. Schumacher (Eds.), Interaktionale Rezeptionsforschung (pp. 17-50). Wiesbaden: Springer.
7. Bullier, J. (2001). Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Research Review, 36, 96-107. doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00085-6.
8. Bundesen, C., & Habekost, T. (2008). Principles of Visual Attention: Linking Mind and Brain. Oxford Portraits in Science. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Cantoni, V., Marinaro, M., & Petrosino, A. (2002). Visual Attention Mechanisms. New York, NY: Kluwer.
10. Childers, T. L., & Houston, M. J. (1984). Conditions for a picture superiority effect on consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 643-654.
11. Coleman, R. (2010). Framing the pictures in our heads. In P. D'Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing News Framing Analysis (pp. 233-262). New York, NY: Routledge.
12. Coleman, R., & Banning, S. (2006). Network TV news' affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 313-328. doi:10.1177/107769900608300206.
13. Cook, A. E., & Guéraud, S. (2005). What have we been missing? The role of general world knowledge in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 39(2&3), 265-278. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651683.
14. Cooke, L. (2003). Information acceleration and visual trends in print, television, and web news sources. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 155-182. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1202_2.
15. D'Angelo, P. (2010). Conclusion: Arriving at the horizons of news framing analysis. In P. D'Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis (pp. 356-368). New York, NY: Routledge.
16. de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Informational Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51-62.
17. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 95-109. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x.
18. Edy, J. A., & Meirick, P. C. (2007). Wanted, dead or alive: Media frames, frame adoption, and support for the war in Afghanistan. Journal of Communication, 57, 119-141. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00332.x.
19. Elkins, J. (2003). Visual Studies. A Skeptical Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
20. Ellsworth, P. C. (1994). Levels of thought and levels of emotion. In P. Ekman & R. L. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 192-196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x.
22. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
23. Entman, R. M., Matthes, J., & Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 175-190). New York, NY: Routledge.
24. Erisen, C., Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2014). Affective contagion in effortful political thinking. Political Psychology, 35(2), 187-206. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00937.x.
25. Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 603-637. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603.
26. Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active Vision. The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Eds.), Research in Political Sociology (Vol. 3, pp. 137-177). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
28. Geise, S. (2011). Vision that matters. Die Wirkungs- und Funktionslogik Visueller Politischer Kommunikation am Beispiel des Wahlplakats. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.
29. Geise, S. (2014). Eyetracking in media studies. Theory, method and its exemplary application in analyzing shock-inducing advertisements. In F. Darling-Wolf (Ed.), Research methods in media studies (pp. 100-137). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
30. Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D. (2000). Reading between the photographs. The influence of incidental pictorial information on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 355-366. doi:10.1177/107769900007700209.
31. Goldstein, B. E., & Fink, S. I. (1981). Selective attention in vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 954-967. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.7.5.954.
32. Graber, D. A. (1990). Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 134-155. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02275.x.
33. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual communication, 2(1), 29-57. doi:10.1177/1470357203002001751.
35. Jenkins, M., & Harris, L. (2001). Vision and Attention. New York, NY: Springer.
36. Kim, Y. S., & Kelly, J. (2007). Visual Framing and the Photographic Coverage of the Kwangju and Tiananmen Square Prodemocracy Movements: A Partial Replication. Conference Paper, ICA 2007.
37. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Knox, J. (2007). Visual-verbal communication on online newspaper home pages. Visual Communication, 6(1), 19-53. doi:10.1177/1470357207071464.
39. Kosslyn, S. (1995). Mental imagery. In S. Kosslyn, D. N. Osherson & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Visual Cognition. An Invitation to Cognitive Science (pp. 267-296). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
40. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. London, England: Routledge.
41. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
42. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2010). Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London, New York: Routledge.
43. Lane, R. D., Chua, P. M., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia, 37(9), 989-997. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00017-2.
44. LeVine, P., & Scollon, R. (Eds.) (2004). Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
45. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455-482. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x.
46. Martinec, R., & Salway, A. (2005). A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, 4(3), 337-371. doi:10.1177/1470357205055928.
47. Matthes, J. (2011). Framing politics: An integrative approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 247-259. doi:10.1177/0002764211426324.
48. Messaris, P., & Abraham, L. (2001). The role of images in framing news stories. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing Public Life (pp. 215-226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Mitchell, W. J. (1986). Iconology. Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
50. Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). There are no visual media. Journal of Visual Culture, 4(2), 257-266. doi:10.1177/1470412905054673.
51. Moriarty, S. (2005). Visual semiotics theory. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis & K. Kenney (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication (pp. 227-242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Mueller, M. G. (2007). What is visual communication? Past and future if an emerging field of communication research. Studies in Communication Sciences, 7(2), 7-34.
53. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behaviour, 19(3), 221-246. doi:10.1023/A:1024834831093.
54. Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., & Walling, J. R. (1976). Pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 523-528. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.523.
55. Neuman, R. W., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56. O'Halloran, K., & Smith, B. A. (Eds.) (2012). Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains. New York, NY: Routledge.
57. Paivio, A. (1979). Imagery and Verbal Processes. New Jersey: Psychology Press.
58. Paivio, A. (1991). Images in Mind. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
59. Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 5, 176-206. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90032-7.
60. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-75. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963.
61. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14(3), 521-533. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.521.
62. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (Vol. 13, pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
63. Proulx, M. (2007). The Strategic Control of Attention in Visual Search- Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM.
64. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Models for recall and recognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 205-234. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.001225.
65. Reese, S. D. (2001). Prologue: Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Jr. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 7-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. Rodgers, S., Kenix, L. J., & Thorson, E. (2007). Stereotypical portrayals of emotionality in news photos. Mass Communication and Society, 10(1), 119-138. doi:10.1080/15205430709337007.
67. Rodriguez, L., & Dimitrova, D. (2011). The levels of visual framing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 48-65.
68. Rose, G. (2012). Visual Methodologies. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.
69. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00326.x.
70. Schneider, W., & Maasen, S. (1998). Mechanisms of Visual Attention: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Visual Cognition. East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
71. Schuermann, E. (2011). Transitions from seeing to thinking. On the relation of perception, wordview and word-Disclosure. In K. Sachs-Hombach & R. Totzke (Eds.), Bilder, Sehen, Denken (pp. 93-105). Cologne, Germany: von Halem.
72. Schwan, S. (2005). Psychologie. In K. Sachs-Hombach (Ed.), Bildwissenschaft (pp. 124-133). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
73. Seymour, P. H. (1979). Human Visual Cognition. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
74. van Atteveldt, W., Ruigrok, N., & Kleinnijenhuis, J. (2006). Associative framing: A unified method for measuring media frames and the media agenda. Paper presented at the ICA 56th Annual Conference, Dresden, Germany.
75. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
76. van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57, 60-78. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x.
77. van Leeuwen, T. (2012). The semiotics of decoration. In K. O'Halloran & B. A. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal studies (pp. 115-130). New York, NY: Routledge.
78. Vanrullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 13(4), 454-461. doi:10.1162/08989290152001880.
79. Vliegenthart, R., & van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101-115. doi:10.1177/0267323111404838.
80. Vuilleumier, P., & Driver, J. (2007). Modulation of visual processing by attention and emotion: Windows on causal interactions between human brain regions. Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 837-855. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2092.
81. Weidenmann, B. (1988). Psychische Prozesse beim Verstehen von Bildern. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
82. Wessler, H. (1999). Öffentlichkeit als Prozess. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher.
83. Yantis, S. (2005). How visual salience wins the battle for awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 975-977. doi:10.1038/nn0805-975.
84. Yarbus, A. (1967). Eye Movements and Vision. New York, NY: Plenum Press.