Visual semiotics theory

Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 227-241

  Moriarty, Sandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85079523134     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Anderson, J. A. (1993). The role of interpretation in communication theory. In Nikos Metallinos (Ed.), Verbovisual literacy: Understanding and applying new educational communication media technologies (pp. 211-222). IVLA International Symposium, Delphi, Greece.
2. Barbatsis, G. (1998, June). Analyzing meaning in form: Domestic comedy's angle of refraction. Paper presented at the Visual Communication Conference, Winter Park, Colorado.
3. Barry, A. M. (1997). Visual intelligence. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4. Barthes, R. (1968). Elements of semiology. Annette Lavers & Colin Smith (Trans.). New York: Hill andWang.
5. Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. Richard Miller (Trans.). New York: Hill andWang.
6. Barthes, R. (1982). The empire of signs. New York: Hill andWang.
7. Berger, A. A. (1982). Media analysis techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Berger, A. A. (1984). Signs in contemporary culture. New York: Longman.
9. Buchler, J. (Ed.). (1955). Philosophial writings of perice. New York: Dover.
10. Deeley, J. (1990). Basics of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12. Eco, U. (1986). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, Midland Book Edition.
13. Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14. Eco, U., & Sebeok, T. A. (Eds.). (1983). The sign of three. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15. Fiske, J. (1990). Introduction to communication (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
16. Fry, D. L., & Fry, V. H. (1983). A semiotic model for the study of mass communication. Communication Yearbook, 9, 443-462.
17. Griffin, M. (1999). Camera as witness, image as sign: The study of visual communication. Communication Yearbook, 24, 433-463.
18. Hall, S. (1993). Encoding, decoding. In Simon During (Ed.), The cultural studies reader (pp. 90-103). New York and London: Routledge.
19. Hall, S. (1999). Introduction to Part III: Looking and subjectivity. In Jessica Evans & Stuart Hall (Eds.), Visual culture: the reader. London: Sage Publications.
20. Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21. Hoopes, J. (1991). Peirce on signs. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
22. Houser, N. (1991). Competiting icons. In John Deely & Terry Prewitt (Eds.), Semiotics 1991 (pp. 20-26). New York: University Press of America.
23. Jakobson, R. (1974). Main trends in the science of language. New York: Harper & Row.
24. Jakobson, R. (1985). Verbal art, verbal sign, verbal time. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25. Levi-Strauss, C. (1967). Structural anthropology. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
26. McKibbon, B. (1993). The age of missing information. New York: Dutton.
27. Moriarty, S. (1996). Abduction: A theory of visual interpretation." Communication Theory, 6(2), 167-187.
28. Muffoletto, R. (1994). Representations: You, me, and them. In David (Mike) Moore & Francis Dwyer (Eds.), Visual literacy (pp. 295-312). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
29. Neiva, E. (1999). Redefining the image: Mimesis, convention, and semiotics. Communication theory, 9(1) 75-91.
30. Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected papers. Vols 1-8. Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (Eds.). Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
31. Saussure, F. de. (1966). Course in general linguistics. Wade Baskin (Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Sebeok, T. A. (1991). A sign is just a sign. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
33. Shaw, D. (1994). Getting to the pulp of it: Sinead O'Connor and the iconoclastic pulpit. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Conference, New Orleans.
34. Silverman, K. (1983). The subject of semiotics. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Worth, S., & Gross L. (1981). Symbolic strategies. In Larry Gross (Ed.), Studying visual communication (pp. 134-147). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.