Seafood Purchasing Preferences of Hawaii Chefs: Comparing Actual Purchase to Stated Preferences From Conjoint Choice Experiment

Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 50-63

  Geslani, Cheryl ^a   Loke, Matthew K ^a,b   Barnes Mauthe, Michele ^a   Leung, Pingsun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b Hawai i State Department of Agriculture   (United States)

Author keywords

chef preference; conjoint choice experiment; farm raised; Hawaii; imports; local; seafood; wild

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921416281     PISSN: 08974438     EISSN: 15286983     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08974438.2013.833569     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chrzan, K., & Orme, B. (2000). An overview and comparison of design strategies for choice-based conjoint analysis. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/desgncbc.pdf
2. Davidson, K., Pan, M., Hu, W., & Poerwanto, D. (2012). Consumers’ willingness to pay for farm-raised fish products vs. wild-caught seafood: A case study in Hawaii. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 16(2), 136–154. doi:10.1080/13657305.2012.678554
3. Evgeniou, T., Boussios, C., & Zacharia, G. (2005). Generalized robust conjoint estimation. Marketing Science, 24(3), 416–249.
4. Geslani, C., Loke, M., Takenaka, B., & Leung, P. (2012). Hawaii’s seafood consumption and its supply sources. Honolulu, HI: Joint Institute of Marine Atmospheric Research.
5. Green, P., & Rao, V. (1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(3), 355–363.
6. Grobe, D., Sylvia, G., & Morrissey, M. (2008). Designing a Culinology based research and development framework for seafood products. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 11(2), 61–71.
7. Hanson, G., Herrmann, R., & Dunn, J. (1995). Determinants of seafood purchase behavior: Consumers, restaurants, and grocery stores. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(5), 1301–1305.
8. Holland, D., & Wessells, C. (1998). Predicting consumer preference for fresh salmon: The influence of safety inspection and production method attributes. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 27, 1–14. Retrieved from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/31513/1/27010001.pdf
9. Johnson, R., & Orme, B. (2003). Getting the most from CBC. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/cbcmost.pdf
10. Lancaster, K. (1971). A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132–57.
11. Lenk, P., DeSarbo, W., Green, P., & Young, M. (1996). Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Marketing Science, 15(2), 173–191.
12. Michalek, J., Ebbes, P., Adiguzel, R., Feinberg, F., & Papalambros, P. (2011). Enhancing marketing with engineering: Optimal product line design for heterogeneous markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(1), 1–12.
13. Mulhern, M. (1999). Assessing the relative efficiency of fixed and randomized experimental designs: Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Sawtooth.
14. Naylor, R., Goldburg, R., Primavera, J., Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M., Clay, J., & Troell,M. (2000). Effect of farm-raised on world fish supplies. Nature, 405(6790), 1017–1024. doi:10.1038/35016500
15. Orme, B. (2010). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research (2nd ed.). Madison, WI: Research Publishers LLC.
16. Palma, M. A., Wirth, F. F., Adams, C. M., & Degner, R. L. (2010). Market preferences toward farm-raised sturgeon in the Southeastern United States: A conjoint analysis. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 14(3), 235–253. doi:10.1080/13657305.2010.503479
17. Roheim, C. A., Sudhakaran, P. O., & Durham, C. A. (2012). Certification of shrimp and salmon for best farm-raised practices: Assessing consumer preferences in Rhode Island. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 16(3), 266–286. doi:10.1080/13657305.2012.713075
18. Sawtooth Software. (2011a). Sawtooth Software CBC HB (Version 5.0.8) [Computer software]. Orem, UT: Sawtooth Software, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/
19. Sawtooth Software. (2011b). SSI Web, Choice-Based Conjoint Module (Version 7.0.26) [Computer software]. Orem, UT: Sawtooth Software, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/
20. Smith, M., Roheim, C., Crowder, L., Halpern, B., Turnipseed, M., Anderson, J., andSelkoe, K. (2010). Sustainability and global seafood. Science, 329(5967), 784–786.
21. Wellman, G., & Vidican, C. (2008). Pilot study of a hierarchical Bayes method for utility estimation in a choice-based conjoint analysis of prescription benefit plans including medication therapy management services. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 4(3), 218–230.
22. Wilson, M., & Liu, S. (2008). Evaluating the non-market value of ecosystem goods and services provided by coastal and nearshore marine systems. In M. Patterson & B. Glavovic (Eds.), Ecological economics of the oceans and coasts (pp. 119–139). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
23. Wirth, F. F., Love, L. A., & Palma, M. A. (2007). Purchasing shrimp for at-home consumption: The relative importance of credence versus physical product features. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 11(1), 17–37. doi:10.1080/13657300701202668