MS/MS-based strategies for proteomic profiling of invasive cell structures

Proteomics

Volumn 15, Issue 2-3, 2015, Pages 272-286

  Havrylov, Serhiy ^a,b   Park, Morag ^a,b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cancer cell invasiveness; Cell biology; Extracellular vesicles; Invadopodia; Podosomes; Pseudopodia

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY AFFINITY; BIOGENESIS; CANCER CELL; CELL INVASION; CELL STRUCTURE; COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY; CYTOLOGY; DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION; ELECTROPHORESIS; EXOCYTOSIS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; IMMUNOAFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; INVADOPODIA; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHENOTYPE; PLASTICITY; PODOSOMES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEOMICS; PSEUDOPODIUM; REVIEW; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TRANSFORMED CELL; TUMOR INVASION; ULTRACENTRIFUGATION; ANIMAL; EXOSOME; METABOLISM; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

PROTEOME;

ANIMALS; EXOSOMES; HUMANS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASMS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; PSEUDOPODIA; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84921353589     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400220     Document Type: Review

References (120)

1. McNiven, M. A., Breaking away: matrix remodeling from the leading edge. Trends Cell Biol. 2013, 23, 16-21.
2. Yamaguchi, H., Pathological roles of invadopodia in cancer invasion and metastasis. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 91, 902-907.
3. Hoshino, D., Branch, K. M., Weaver, A. M., Signaling inputs to invadopodia and podosomes. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126, 2979-2989.
4. Murphy, D. A., Courtneidge, S. A., The 'ins' and 'outs' of podosomes and invadopodia: characteristics, formation and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12, 413-426.
5. Klemke, R. L., Trespassing cancer cells: 'fingerprinting' invasive protrusions reveals metastatic culprits. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012, 24, 662-669.
6. Linder, S., Wiesner, C., Himmel, M., Degrading devices: invadosomes in proteolytic cell invasion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27, 185-211.
7. Insall, R., The interaction between pseudopods and extracellular signalling during chemotaxis and directed migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2013, 25, 526-531.
8. Wolf, K., Friedl, P., Mapping proteolytic cancer cell-extracellular matrix interfaces. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2009, 26, 289-298.
9. Oikawa, T., Itoh, T., Takenawa, T., Sequential signals toward podosome formation in NIH-src cells. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 182, 157-169.
10. Mader, C. C., Oser, M., Magalhaes, M. A., Bravo-Cordero, J. J. et al., An EGFR-Src-Arg-cortactin pathway mediates functional maturation of invadopodia and breast cancer cell invasion. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 1730-1741.
11. Sharma, V. P., Eddy, R., Entenberg, D., Kai, M. et al., Tks5 and SHIP2 regulate invadopodium maturation, but not initiation, in breast carcinoma cells. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 2079-2089.
12. Schoumacher, M., Goldman, R. D., Louvard, D., Vignjevic, D. M., Actin, microtubules, and vimentin intermediate filaments cooperate for elongation of invadopodia. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189, 541-556.
13. Vader, P., Breakefield, X. O., Wood, M. J., Extracellular vesicles: emerging targets for cancer therapy. Trends Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 385-393.
14. Zhang, H. G., Grizzle, W. E., Exosomes: a novel pathway of local and distant intercellular communication that facilitates the growth and metastasis of neoplastic lesions. Am. J. Pathol. 2014, 184, 28-41.
15. Shimoda, M., Khokha, R., Proteolytic factors in exosomes. Proteomics 2013, 13, 1624-1636.
16. Hoshino, D., Kirkbride, K. C., Costello, K., Clark, E. S. et al., Exosome secretion is enhanced by invadopodia and drives invasive behavior. Cell Rep. 2013, 5, 1159-1168.
17. Schlienger, S., Campbell, S., Claing, A., ARF1 regulates the Rho/MLC pathway to control EGF-dependent breast cancer cell invasion. Mol. Biol. Cell 2014, 25, 17-29.
18. Vaudel, M., Sickmann, A., Martens, L., Introduction to opportunities and pitfalls in functional mass spectrometry based proteomics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1844, 12-20.
19. Hoshino, D., Jourquin, J., Emmons, S. W., Miller, T. et al., Network analysis of the focal adhesion to invadopodia transition identifies a PI3K-PKCalpha invasive signaling axis. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5, 1-14.
20. Huang, S., Kauffman, S., How to escape the cancer attractor: rationale and limitations of multi-target drugs. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2013, 23, 270-278.
21. Creixell, P., Schoof, E. M., Erler, J. T., Linding, R., Navigating cancer network attractors for tumor-specific therapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 842-848.
22. Pawson, T., Linding, R., Network medicine. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 1266-1270.
23. Erler, J. T., Linding, R., Network medicine strikes a blow against breast cancer. Cell 2012, 149, 731-733.
24. Bensimon, A., Heck, A. J., Aebersold, R., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and network biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012, 81, 379-405.
25. Wang, Y., Kelber, J. A., Tran Cao, H. S., Cantin, G. T. et al., Pseudopodium-enriched atypical kinase 1 regulates the cytoskeleton and cancer progression [corrected]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 10920-10925.
26. Bowden, E. T., Barth, M., Thomas, D., Glazer, R. I., Mueller, S. C., An invasion-related complex of cortactin, paxillin and PKCmu associates with invadopodia at sites of extracellular matrix degradation. Oncogene 1999, 18, 4440-4449.
27. Attanasio, F., Caldieri, G., Giacchetti, G., van Horssen, R. et al., Novel invadopodia components revealed by differential proteomic analysis. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 90, 115-127.
28. Cervero, P., Himmel, M., Kruger, M., Linder, S., Proteomic analysis of podosome fractions from macrophages reveals similarities to spreading initiation centres. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 91, 908-922.
29. Wang, Y., Klemke, R. L., Proteomics method for identification of pseudopodium phosphotyrosine proteins. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 757, 349-365.
30. Klemke, R. L., Jiang, X., Choi, S., Kelber, J. A., Proteomic and biochemical methods to study the cytoskeletome. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 1046, 203-218.
31. Wang, Y., Ding, S. J., Wang, W., Yang, F. et al., Methods for pseudopodia purification and proteomic analysis. Sci. STKE 2007, 2007, 1-17.
32. Thery, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G., Clayton, A., Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2006, Chapter 3, Unit 3, 22, 1-29.
33. Witwer, K. W., Buzas, E. I., Bemis, L. T., Bora, A. et al., Standardization of sample collection, isolation and analysis methods in extracellular vesicle research. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2013, 2, 1-25.
34. Raimondo, F., Morosi, L., Chinello, C., Magni, F., Pitto, M., Advances in membranous vesicle and exosome proteomics improving biological understanding and biomarker discovery. Proteomics 2011, 11, 709-720.
35. Chen, C., Skog, J., Hsu, C. H., Lessard, R. T., et al., Microfluidic isolation and transcriptome analysis of serum microvesicles. Lab Chip 2010, 10, 505-511.
36. Mathivanan, S., Lim, J. W., Tauro, B. J., Ji, H. et al., Proteomics analysis of A33 immunoaffinity-purified exosomes released from the human colon tumor cell line LIM1215 reveals a tissue-specific protein signature. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 197-208.
37. Wang, Y., Ding, S. J., Wang, W., Jacobs, J. M. et al., Profiling signaling polarity in chemotactic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8328-8333.
38. Biao-xue, R., Xi-guang, C., Shuan-ying, Y., Wei, L., Zong-juan, M., EphA2-dependent molecular targeting therapy for malignant tumors. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2011, 11, 1082-1097.
39. Mitsudomi, T., Yatabe, Y., Epidermal growth factor receptor in relation to tumor development: EGFR gene and cancer. FEBS J. 2010, 277, 301-308.
40. Artym, V. V., Zhang, Y., Seillier-Moiseiwitsch, F., Yamada, K. M., Mueller, S. C., Dynamic interactions of cortactin and membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase at invadopodia: defining the stages of invadopodia formation and function. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 3034-3043.
41. Yu, X., Zech, T., McDonald, L., Gonzalez, E. G. et al., N-WASP coordinates the delivery and F-actin-mediated capture of MT1-MMP at invasive pseudopods. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 199, 527-544.
42. Yamaguchi, H., Lorenz, M., Kempiak, S., Sarmiento, C. et al., Molecular mechanisms of invadopodium formation: the role of the N-WASP-Arp2/3 complex pathway and cofilin. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 168, 441-452.
43. Sandoval, C. O., Simmen, T., Rab proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum: functions and interactors. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2012, 40, 1426-1432.
44. Kasmapour, B., Gronow, A., Bleck, C. K., Hong, W., Gutierrez, M. G., Size-dependent mechanism of cargo sorting during lysosome-phagosome fusion is controlled by Rab34. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 20485-20490.
45. Schweitzer, J. K., Sedgwick, A. E., D'Souza-Schorey, C., ARF6-mediated endocytic recycling impacts cell movement, cell division and lipid homeostasis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22, 39-47.
46. Sen, A., Madhivanan, K., Mukherjee, D., Aguilar, R. C., The epsin protein family: coordinators of endocytosis and signaling. Biomol. Concepts 2012, 3, 117-126.
47. Daumke, O., Roux, A., Haucke, V., BAR domain scaffolds in dynamin-mediated membrane fission. Cell 2014, 156, 882-892.
48. Cullen, P. J., Korswagen, H. C., Sorting nexins provide diversity for retromer-dependent trafficking events. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14, 29-37.
49. Kashatus, D. F., Ral GTPases in tumorigenesis: emerging from the shadows. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319, 2337-2342.
50. Tsyba, L., Nikolaienko, O., Dergai, O., Dergai, M. et al., Intersectin multidomain adaptor proteins: regulation of functional diversity. Gene 2011, 473, 67-75.
51. Parisis, N., Metodieva, G., Metodiev, M. V., Pseudopodial and beta-arrestin-interacting proteomes from migrating breast cancer cells upon PAR2 activation. J. Proteomics 2013, 80C, 91-106.
52. Traub, L. M., Tickets to ride: selecting cargo for clathrin-regulated internalization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 583-596.
53. Faini, M., Beck, R., Wieland, F. T., Briggs, J. A., Vesicle coats: structure, function, and general principles of assembly. Trends Cell Biol. 2013, 23, 279-288.
54. Ghislat, G., Knecht, E., New Ca(2+)-dependent regulators of autophagosome maturation. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2012, 5, 308-311.
55. Rotty, J. D., Wu, C., Bear, J. E., New insights into the regulation and cellular functions of the ARP2/3 complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 7-12.
56. White, C. D., Erdemir, H. H., Sacks, D. B., IQGAP1 and its binding proteins control diverse biological functions. Cell Signal. 2012, 24, 826-834.
57. Sakurai-Yageta, M., Recchi, C., Le Dez, G., Sibarita, J. B. et al., The interaction of IQGAP1 with the exocyst complex is required for tumor cell invasion downstream of Cdc42 and RhoA. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181, 985-998.
58. Kelber, J. A., Reno, T., Kaushal, S., Metildi, C. et al., KRas induces a Src/PEAK1/ErbB2 kinase amplification loop that drives metastatic growth and therapy resistance in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 2554-2564.
59. Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M. C., Yates, J. R., 3rd, Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 2343-2394.
60. Takkunen, M., Hukkanen, M., Liljestrom, M., Grenman, R., Virtanen, I., Podosome-like structures of non-invasive carcinoma cells are replaced in epithelial-mesenchymal transition by actin comet-embedded invadopodia. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2010, 14, 1569-1593.
61. Stolting, M., Wiesner, C., van Vliet, V., Butt, E. et al., Lasp-1 regulates podosome function. PLoS One 2012, 7, e35340.
62. Spinardi, L., Marchisio, P. C., Podosomes as smart regulators of cellular adhesion. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 85, 191-194.
63. Kim, D. H., Bae, J., Lee, J. W., Kim, S. Y. et al., Proteomic analysis of breast cancer tissue reveals upregulation of actin-remodeling proteins and its relevance to cancer invasiveness. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2009, 3, 30-40.
64. Hartman, M. A., Finan, D., Sivaramakrishnan, S., Spudich, J. A. Principles of unconventional myosin function and targeting. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27, 133-155.
65. de Hoog, C. L., Foster, L. J., Mann, M., RNA and RNA binding proteins participate in early stages of cell spreading through spreading initiation centers. Cell 2004, 117, 649-662.
66. Choi, D. S., Kim, D. K., Kim, Y. K., Gho, Y. S., Proteomics of extracellular vesicles: exosomes and ectosomes. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2014, 1-17. doi: 10.1002/mas.
67. Mathivanan, S., Fahner, C. J., Reid, G. E., Simpson, R. J., ExoCarta 2012: database of exosomal proteins, RNA and lipids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D1241-D1244.
68. Kalra, H., Simpson, R. J., Ji, H., Aikawa, E. et al., Vesiclepedia: a compendium for extracellular vesicles with continuous community annotation. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10, 1-5.
69. Fontana, S., Saieva, L., Taverna, S., Alessandro, R., Contribution of proteomics to understanding the role of tumor-derived exosomes in cancer progression: state of the art and new perspectives. Proteomics 2013, 13, 1581-1594.
70. Demory Beckler, M., Higginbotham, J. N., Franklin, J. L., Ham, A. J. et al., Proteomic analysis of exosomes from mutant KRAS colon cancer cells identifies intercellular transfer of mutant KRAS. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12, 343-355.
71. Luga, V., Zhang, L., Viloria-Petit, A. M., Ogunjimi, A. A. et al., Exosomes mediate stromal mobilization of autocrine Wnt-PCP signaling in breast cancer cell migration. Cell 2012, 151, 1542-1556.
72. Ji, H., Greening, D. W., Barnes, T. W., Lim, J. W. et al., Proteome profiling of exosomes derived from human primary and metastatic colorectal cancer cells reveal differential expression of key metastatic factors and signal transduction components. Proteomics 2013, 13, 1672-1686.
73. Peinado, H., Aleckovic, M., Lavotshkin, S., Matei, I. et al., Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 883-891.
74. Boecke, A., Carstens, A. C., Neacsu, C. D., Baschuk, N. et al., TNF-receptor-1 adaptor protein FAN mediates TNF-induced B16 melanoma motility and invasion. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 109, 422-432.
75. Enomoto, M., Hayakawa, S., Itsukushima, S., Ren, D. Y. et al., Autonomous regulation of osteosarcoma cell invasiveness by Wnt5a/Ror2 signaling. Oncogene 2009, 28, 3197-3208.
76. Buschman, M. D., Bromann, P. A., Cejudo-Martin, P., Wen, F. et al., The novel adaptor protein Tks4 (SH3PXD2B) is required for functional podosome formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20, 1302-1311.
77. Courtneidge, S. A., Cell migration and invasion in human disease: the Tks adaptor proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2012, 40, 129-132.
78. Oser, M., Dovas, A., Cox, D., Condeelis, J., Nck1 and Grb2 localization patterns can distinguish invadopodia from podosomes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 90, 181-188.
79. Grass, G. D., Tolliver, L. B., Bratoeva, M., Toole, B. P., CD147, CD44, and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway cooperate to regulate breast epithelial cell invasiveness. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 26089-26104.
80. Furmaniak-Kazmierczak, E., Crawley, S. W., Carter, R. L., Maurice, D. H., Cote, G. P., Formation of extracellular matrix-digesting invadopodia by primary aortic smooth muscle cells. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 1328-1336.
81. Sato, H., Takino, T., Coordinate action of membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MT1-MMP) and MMP-2 enhances pericellular proteolysis and invasion. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101, 843-847.
82. Albrechtsen, R., Kveiborg, M., Stautz, D., Vikesa, J. et al., ADAM12 redistributes and activates MMP-14, resulting in gelatin degradation, reduced apoptosis and increased tumor growth. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126, 4707-4720.
83. Tang, L., Han, X., The urokinase plasminogen activator system in breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2013, 67, 179-182.
84. Burianek, L. E., Soderling, S. H., Under lock and key: spatiotemporal regulation of WASP family proteins coordinates separate dynamic cellular processes. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2013, 24, 258-266.
85. Bear, J. E., Gertler, F. B., Ena/VASP: towards resolving a pointed controversy at the barbed end. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122, 1947-1953.
86. Muralidharan-Chari, V., Hoover, H., Clancy, J., Schweitzer, J. et al., ADP-ribosylation factor 6 regulates tumorigenic and invasive properties in vivo. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 2201-2209.
87. Lin, C. W., Sun, M. S., Liao, M. Y., Chung, C. H. et al., Podocalyxin-like 1 promotes invadopodia formation and metastasis through activation of Rac1/Cdc42/cortactin signaling in breast cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2014, 1-11. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgu139.
88. Di Martino, J., Paysan, L., Gest, C., Lagree, V. et al., Cdc42 and Tks5: a minimal and universal molecular signature for functional invadosomes. Cell Adh. Migr. 2014, 8, 280-292.
89. Bravo-Cordero, J. J., Hodgson, L., Condeelis, J. S., Spatial regulation of tumor cell protrusions by RhoC. Cell Adh. Migr. 2014, 8, 263-267.
90. Kwiatkowska, A., Didier, S., Fortin, S., Chuang, Y. et al., The small GTPase RhoG mediates glioblastoma cell invasion. Mol. Cancer 2012, 11, 65 (1-11).
91. Liu, J., Yue, P., Artym, V. V., Mueller, S. C., Guo, W., The role of the exocyst in matrix metalloproteinase secretion and actin dynamics during tumor cell invadopodia formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20, 3763-3771.
92. Jouvenet, N., Dynamics of ESCRT proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 4121-4133.
93. Jourquin, J., Duncan, D., Shi, Z., Zhang, B., GLAD4U: deriving and prioritizing gene lists from PubMed literature. BMC Genomics 2012, 13(Suppl 8), S20 (1-12).
94. Vailaya, A., Bluvas, P., Kincaid, R., Kuchinsky, A. et al., An architecture for biological information extraction and representation. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 430-438.
95. Smoot, M. E., Ono, K., Ruscheinski, J., Wang, P. L., Ideker, T., Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 431-432.
96. Franceschini, A., Szklarczyk, D., Frankild, S., Kuhn, M. et al., STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D808-D815.
97. Yamaguchi, H., Takeo, Y., Yoshida, S., Kouchi, Z. et al., Lipid rafts and caveolin-1 are required for invadopodia formation and extracellular matrix degradation by human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 8594-8602.
98. Dunham, W. H., Mullin, M., Gingras, A. C., Affinity-purification coupled to mass spectrometry: basic principles and strategies. Proteomics 2012, 12, 1576-1590.
99. Westermarck, J., Ivaska, J., Corthals, G. L., Identification of protein interactions involved in cellular signaling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12, 1752-1763.
100. Legrain, P., Rain, J. C., Twenty years of protein interaction studies for biological function deciphering. J. Proteomics 2014, 107, 93-97.
101. Grigera, P. R., Ma, L., Borgman, C. A., Pinto, A. F. et al., Mass spectrometric analysis identifies a cortactin-RCC2/TD60 interaction in mitotic cells. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 2153-2159.
102. Quintavalle, M., Elia, L., Price, J. H., Heynen-Genel, S., Courtneidge, S. A., A cell-based high-content screening assay reveals activators and inhibitors of cancer cell invasion. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4, ra49 (1-9).
103. Hashimoto, S., Onodera, Y., Hashimoto, A., Tanaka, M. et al., Requirement for Arf6 in breast cancer invasive activities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6647-6652.
104. Branch, K. M., Hoshino, D., Weaver, A. M., Adhesion rings surround invadopodia and promote maturation. Biol. Open 2012, 1, 711-722.
105. Mueller, S. C., Ghersi, G., Akiyama, S. K., Sang, Q. X. et al., A novel protease-docking function of integrin at invadopodia. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 24947-24952.
106. Humphries, J. D., Byron, A., Bass, M. D., Craig, S. E. et al., Proteomic analysis of integrin-associated complexes identifies RCC2 as a dual regulator of Rac1 and Arf6. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra51 (1-9).
107. Ewing, R. M., Chu, P., Elisma, F., Li, H. et al., Large-scale mapping of human protein-protein interactions by mass spectrometry. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3, 89 (1-17).
108. Havugimana, P. C., Hart, G. T., Nepusz, T., Yang, H. et al., A census of human soluble protein complexes. Cell 2012, 150, 1068-1081.
109. Jeyabal, P. V., Rubio, V., Chen, H., Zhang, J., Shi, Z. Z., Regulation of cell-matrix adhesion by OLA1, the Obg-like ATPase 1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 444, 568-574.
110. Havrylov, S., Rzhepetskyy, Y., Malinowska, A., Drobot, L., Redowicz, M. J., Proteins recruited by SH3 domains of Ruk/CIN85 adaptor identified by LC-MS/MS. Proteome Sci. 2009, 7, 21 (1-19).
111. Havrylov, S., Redowicz, M. J., Buchman, V. L., Emerging roles of Ruk/CIN85 in vesicle-mediated transport, adhesion, migration and malignancy. Traffic 2010, 11, 721-731.
112. Nam, J. M., Onodera, Y., Mazaki, Y., Miyoshi, H. et al., CIN85, a Cbl-interacting protein, is a component of AMAP1-mediated breast cancer invasion machinery. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 647-656.
113. Van Audenhove, I., Boucherie, C., Pieters, L., Zwaenepoel, O. et al., Stratifying fascin and cortactin function in invadopodium formation using inhibitory nanobodies and targeted subcellular delocalization. FASEB J. 2014, 28, 1805-1818.
114. McNiven, M. A., Baldassarre, M., Buccione, R., The role of dynamin in the assembly and function of podosomes and invadopodia. Front. Biosci. 2004, 9, 1944-1953.
115. Schroeder, B., Weller, S. G., Chen, J., Billadeau, D., McNiven, M. A., A Dyn2-CIN85 complex mediates degradative traffic of the EGFR by regulation of late endosomal budding. EMBO J. 2010, 29, 3039-3053.
116. Rosse, C., Lodillinsky, C., Fuhrmann, L., Nourieh, M. et al., Control of MT1-MMP transport by atypical PKC during breast-cancer progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E1872-E1879.
117. de Kreuk, B. J., Nethe, M., Fernandez-Borja, M., Anthony, E. C. et al., The F-BAR domain protein PACSIN2 associates with Rac1 and regulates cell spreading and migration. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124, 2375-2388.
118. Garcia, E., Jones, G. E., Machesky, L. M., Anton, I. M., WIP: WASP-interacting proteins at invadopodia and podosomes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 91, 869-877.
119. Tu, C., Ortega-Cava, C. F., Winograd, P., Stanton, M. J. et al., Endosomal-sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) pathway-dependent endosomal traffic regulates the localization of active Src at focal adhesions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 16107-16112.
120. Gillet, L. C., Navarro, P., Tate, S., Rost, H. et al., Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11, O111 016717.