Gender and Genetics: Sociology of the prenatal

Gender and Genetics: Sociology of the Prenatal

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-198

  Reed, Kate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921320190     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203870020     Document Type: Book

References (244)

1. Acker, J. (1990) ‘Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations’, Gender and Society, 4(2): 139-58.
2. Adam, B. (1992) ‘Time and health implicated: a conceptual critique’ in R. Frankenberg (ed.) Time, Health and Medicine, London: Sage.
3. Ahmad, W.I.U. and Bradby, H. (2007) ‘Locating ethnicity and health: exploring concepts and contexts’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 29(6): 795-810.
4. Ainsworth, S. and Cutcher, L. (2008) ‘Expectant mothers and absent fathers: paid maternity leave in Australia’, Gender, Work and Organization, 15(4): 375-93.
5. Allison, P. (1954) ‘Protection afforded to sickle cell trait against subtertian malarial infection’, British Medical Journal, 1: 290-94.
6. Annandale, E. (2009) Women’s Health and Social Change, London: Routledge.
7. Annandale, E. and Clark, J. (1996) ‘What is gender? Feminist theory and the sociology of human reproduction’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 18(1): 17-44.
8. Annandale, E. and Hunt, K. (eds) (2000) Gender Inequalities in Health, Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. Atkin, K., Ahmad, W.I.U. and Anionwu, E.N. (1998) ‘Screening and counselling for sickle cell disorders and thalassaemia: the experience of parents and health professionals’, Social Science and Medicine, 47(11): 1639-51.
10. Austrin, T. and Farnsworth, J. (2005) ‘Hybrid genes: fieldwork, detection and the method of Bruno Latour’, Qualitative Research, 5(2): 147-65.
11. Babay, Z. (2004) ‘Attitudes of a high-risk group of pregnant Saudi Arabian women to prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies’, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 10(4/5): 522-7.
12. Babycentre UK www.babycentre.co.uk/ (accessed February 2011).
13. Baillie, C., Smith, J., Hewison, J. and Mason, G. (2000) ‘Ultrasound screening for fetal abnormality: women’s reactions to false positive results’, British Journal of Health Psychology, 5: 377-94.
14. Barclay, L. and Lupton, D. (1999) ‘The experiences of new fatherhood: a sociocultural analysis’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(4): 1013-20.
15. Barnes, L. and Boddy, J. (1994) Aman, the Story of a Somali Girl, London: Bloomsbury.
16. Bartlett, E. (2004) ‘The effects of fatherhood on the health of men: a review of the literature’, The Journal of Men’s Health and Gender, 1(2-3): 159-69.
17. BBC News (2008) ‘Many keeping babies with Down’s’ (24/11/2008) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7741411.stm (accessed June 2011).
18. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, New Delhi: Sage.
19. Berry, L. (1988) ‘Realistic expectations of the labour coach’, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 17: 354-5.
20. Bourdieu, P. (1979) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, trans. Richard Nice, 1984. Boston, USA: Harvard University Press.
21. Bowler, I. (1993) ‘They’re not the same as us: midwives’ stereotypes of South Asian descent maternity patients’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 15(2): 157-78.
22. Brandth, B. and Kvande, K. (1998) ‘Masculinity and fathering: the reconstruction of childcare’, Sociological Review, 46(2): 293-313.
23. Brett, K., Schoendorf, K.C. and Kiely, J.L. (1994) ‘Differences between black and white women’s use of prenatal care technologies’, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 170(1): 41-6.
24. Browner, C. H., Preloran, M. and Cox, S. (1999) ‘Ethnicity, bioethics and prenatal diagnosis: the amniocentesis decisions of Mexican-origin women and their partners’, Public Health Matters, 89(11): 1658-66.
25. Bryman, A. (2001) Social Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Bunting, M. (2004) Willing Slaves: How the Overwork Culture is Ruling Our Lives London: Harper Collins.
27. Cannon, L.W., Higgenbotham, E. and Leung, M.L.A. (1988) ‘Race and class bias in qualitative research on women’, Gender and Society, 2: 449-62.
28. Carroll, J.C., Brown, J.B., Reid, A.J. and Pugh, P. (2000) ‘Women’s experience of maternal serum screening’, Canadian Family Physician, 46: 614-20.
29. Chattopadhyay, S. (2006) ‘Rakter dosh-corrupting blood: the challenges of preventing thalassemia in Bengal, India’, Social Science and Medicine, 63: 2661-73.
30. Chronholm, A. (2004) ‘Dad on Parental Leave. Men’s Experience with Shared Parental Leave’, Göteborg, University of Göteborg, Department of Sociology.
31. Clarke, J. (1983) ‘Sexism, feminism and medicalism: a decade review of literature on gender and illness’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 5(1): 62-82.
32. Clement, S. (ed) (1998) Psychological Perspectives on Pregnancy and Childbirth, New York: Churchill Livingstone.
33. Connell, R. (2000) The Men and the Boys, Berkeley: University of California Press.
34. Conrad, P. and Gabe, J. (1999) ‘Introduction: sociological perspectives on the new genetics: an overview’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 21(5): 505-16.
35. Conrad, P. (1994) Presentation to the Society for the Study of Social Problems, Annual Meeting.
36. Conrad, P. (1997) ‘Public eyes and private genes: historical frames, new constructions and social problems’, Social Problems, 44(2): 139-54.
37. Corea, C. (1985) The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to the Artificial Womb, New York: Harper and Row.
38. Courtenay, W.H. (2000) ‘Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health’, Social Science & Medicine, 50(10): 1385-401.
39. Craig, L. (2006) ‘Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with their children’, Gender & Society, 20: 259-81.
40. Crompton, R. (2006) Employment and the Family. The Reconfiguration of Work and Family Life in Contemporary Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Crompton, R., Brockman, M. and Lyonette, C. (2005) ‘Attitudes, women’s employment and the domestic division of labour’, Work, Employment and Society, 19(2): 213-33.
42. Delphy, C. (1992) ‘Mothers’ union?', Trouble and Strife, 24: 12-19.
43. Delvaux, T., Buekens, P., Godin, I. and Boutsen, M. (2001) ‘Barriers to prenatal care in Europe’, American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 21(1): 52-9.
44. Department of Health (1998) Our Healthier Nation: A Contract for Health, London: The Stationery Office.
45. Department of Health (2000) Second Report of the UK National Screening Committee.
46. Department of Health (2006) The Pregnancy Book, London: Central Office of Information.
47. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (2004) Fathers-to-be and Prenatal Appointments: A Good Practice Guide. First published November 2004, www.dti.gov.uk/ (accessed September 2008).
48. Dex, S. (2003) Families and Work in the Twenty-First Century, Bristol: The Policy Press.
49. Diemer, G.A. (1997) ‘Expectant fathers: influence of perinatal education on stress, coping and spousal relations’, Research in Nursing and Health, 20: 281-93.
50. Directgov (2011) ‘Additional paternity-leave and pay’ www.direct.gov.uk/ (accessed May 2011).
51. Down’s Syndrome Association ‘Stories on T.V’ www.downs-syndrome.org.uk/informat ion/i-have-downs-syndrome/eastenders.html (accessed May 2011).
52. Doyle, J.A. (1995) The Male Experience, Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.
53. Dragonas, T. (2001) ‘Whose fault is it? Shame and guilt for the genetic defect’, in E. Ettorre (ed), Before Birth, London: Ashgate.
54. Draper, J. (2002) ‘It was a real good show’: the ultrasound scan, fathers and the power of visual knowledge’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 24(6): 771-95.
55. Dudgeon, M. and Inhorn, M. (2004) ‘Men’s influences on women’s reproductive health: medical anthropological perspectives’, Social Science and Medicine, 59: 1379-95.
56. Dunn, C.L., Pirie, P.L. and Hellerstedt, W.L. (2003) ‘The advice-giving role of female friends and relatives during pregnancy’, Health Education Research, 18(3): 352-62.
57. Duster, T. (1990) Backdoor to Eugenics, London: Routledge.
58. Dyson, S. (1999) ‘Genetic screening and ethnic minorities’, Critical Social Policy, 19 (2): 195-215.
59. Dyson, S., Fielder, A. and Kirkham, M. (1995) ‘Haemoglobinopathies, antenatal screening and the midwife’, British Journal of Midwifery, 4(6): 319-22.
60. Early, R. (2001) ‘Men as consumers of maternity services: a contradiction in terms’, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 25: 160-7.
61. Earle, S. and Letherby, G. (2007) ‘Conceiving time? Women who do or do not conceive’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(2): 233-50.
62. Edwards, J., Franklin, S., Hirsch, E., Price, F. and Strathern, M. (1993) Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception, 2nd edn, London: Routledge.
63. Ettorre, E. (2000) ‘Reproductive genetics, gender and the body: “Please doctor, may I have a normal baby?"' Sociology, 34(3): 403-20.
64. Ettorre, E. (2002) Reproductive Genetics, Gender and the Body, Routledge: London.
65. Fatherhood Institute (2004) ‘Government backs dads attending prenatal appointments’ www.fatherhoodinstitute.org/index.php?id=10& cID = 31 (accessed September 2008).
66. Finger, A. (1990) Past Due: A Story of Disability, Pregnancy and Childbirth, London: The Women’s Press.
67. Finkler, K., Skrzynia, C. and Evans, J.P. (2003) ‘The new genetics and its consequences for family, kinship, medicine and medical genetics’, Social Science and Medicine, 57: 403-12.
68. Finnbogadottir, H., Svalenius, E.C. and Persson, E.K. (2003) ‘Expectant first-time fathers experiences of pregnancy’, Midwifery, 19: 96-105.
69. Forth, J., Lissenburgh, S., Callendar, C. and Millward, N. (1997) ‘Family friendly working arrangements in Britain, 1996', Policy Studies Institute. Department for Education and Employment. Research Brief, Number 16.
70. Fox-Keller, E. (1992) ‘Nature, nurture and the human genome project’, in D.J. Kelves and L. Hood (eds), The Code of Codes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71. Francis, B. (2008) ‘Engendering debate: how to formulate a political account of the divide between genetic bodies and discursive gender’, Journal of Gender Studies, 17(3): 211-23.
72. Frankenberg, R. (1992) (ed.) Time, Health and Medicine, London: Sage.
73. Genome Screening Service (2007) Screening Information Leaflet www.grnomrltd.co.uk (accessed 2009).
74. Getz, L. and Kirkengen, A. (2003) ‘Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: advanced technology, soft markers for fetal chromosomal aberrations, and unacknowledged ethical dilemmas’, Social Science and Medicine, 56(10): 2045-57.
75. Giddens, A. (1981) ‘Agency, institution and time-space analysis’, in K. Knorr-Cetina and A.V. Cicourel (eds), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro and Macro Sociologies, London: Routledge.
76. Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
77. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
78. Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sex, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
79. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, New York: Aldine.
80. Goldthorpe, J. (2004) The Economic Basis of Social Class, London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
81. Good, B.J. (1994) Medicine, Rationality and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Green, J. (1995) ‘Obstetricians’ views on prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: 1980 compared with 1993', British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 102: 228-32.
83. Green, J.M. (1994) ‘Serum screening for Down’s syndrome: experiences of obstetricians in England and Wales’, BMJ, 309: 769-72.
84. Green, J.M., Hewison, J., Bekker, H.L., Bryant, L.D. and Cuckle, H.S. (2004) ‘Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review’, Health Technology Assessment, 8, 33. www.hta.ac.uk/execsumm/summ833.shtml (accessed May 2011).
85. Grosz, E. (1999) ‘Space, time and bodies’, in J. Wolmark (ed.), Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
86. Hall, R., Saukko, P., Evans, P.H., Qureshi, N. and Humphries, S.E. (2007) ‘Assessing family history of heart disease in primary care consultations: a qualitative study’, Family Practice, 24: 435-42.
87. Hallowell, N. (1999) ‘Doing the right thing: genetic risk and responsibility’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 21(5): 597-621.
88. Halrynjo, S. (2009) ‘Men’s work-life conflict: career, care and self-realization: patterns of privileges and dilemmas’, Gender, Work and Organization, 16(1): 98-125.
89. Hansen, C. (2004) A Cultural History of Pregnancy: Pregnancy Medicine and Culture 1700-2000, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
90. Hardey, M. (1999) ‘Doctor in the house: the internet as a source of lay health knowledge and challenge to expertise’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(6): 820-35.
91. Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge.
92. Harris, R. and Firestone, J.M. (1998) ‘Changes in predictors of gender role ideologies among women: a multivariate analysis’, Sex Roles, 38(3-4): 239-52.
93. Hauari, H. and Hollingworth, K. (2009) ‘Understanding fathering: masculinity, diversity and change’, Joseph Rowntree Foundation www.jrf.org.uk/publications/understanding-fathering (accessed 2010).
94. Hewlett, B. (1991) Intimate Fathers: The Nature and Context of Aka Pygmy Paternal Infant Care, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
95. Hindley, C., Wren Hindliff, S. and Thomson, A.M. (2006) ‘English midwives views and experiences of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring in women at low obstetric risk: conflicts and compromises’, Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 51(5): 354-60.
96. Hirsch, E. (1993) ‘Negotiated limits: interviews in south-east England’, in J. Edwards, S. Franklin., E. Hirsch., F. Price and M. Strathern, Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception, London: Routledge.
97. Hochschild, A.R. (1989) The Second Shift, New York: Penguin Books.
98. Hochschild, A.R. (2001) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work (2nd edn first published 1997), New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
99. Hollyer, T., Boon, H., Georgousis, A., Smith, M. and Finarson, A. (2002) ‘The use of CAM by women suffering from nausea and vomiting during pregnancy’, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2(5) www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6882-2-5.pdf (accessed March 2011).
100. Hubbard, R. (1989) ‘Personal courage is not enough: some hazards of childbearing in the 1980‘s’, in R. Arditti, R. Duelli-Klein and S. Minden (eds), Test-Tube Women. What Future for Motherhood? London: Pandora-Press.
101. Hubbard, R. (1997) ‘Abortion and disability: who should and who should not inhabit the world?' In L. Davis (ed.). The Disability Reader, New York: Routledge.
102. Human Genetics Commission Committee (2002) Inside Information: Balancing Interests in the Use of Personal Genetic Data, London: HGC.
103. Human Genetics Commission Report (2005) www.hgc.gov.uk (accessed November 2005).
104. Innes, M. (2003) Investigating Murder: Detective Work and the Police Response to Criminal Homicide, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105. Irving, Z. (2008) ‘Gender and work’, in D. Richardson and V. Robinson (eds), Introducing Women’s Studies: Feminist Theory and Practice, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
106. Ivry, T. (2007) ‘Embodied responsibilities: pregnancy in the eyes of Japanese ob-gyns’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(2): 251-74.
107. Jackson, A., Ervin, K., Gardner, P.D. and Schmitt, N. (2001) ‘Gender and the Internet: women communicating and men searching’, Sex Roles, 44(5/6): 363-79.
108. Jackson, S. (2008) ‘Families, domesticity and intimacy: changing relationships in changing times’, in D. Richardson and V. Robinson (eds), Introducing Women’s Studies: Feminist Theory and Practice, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
109. Jordan, P.L. (1990) ‘Laboring for relevance: expectant and new fatherhood’, Nursing Research, 39: 11-16.
110. Keller, E.F. and Grontowski, C.R. (1983) ‘The mind’s eye’, in S. Harding and M.B. Hintikka (eds), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
111. Kerr, A. (2004) Genetics and Society: A Sociology of Disease, London: Routledge.
112. Kuppermann, M., Gates, E. and Washington, E. (1996) ‘Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnosis test use and outcomes: preferences, socioeconomics or parent knowledge?' Obstetrics and Gynecology, 87(5): 675-82.
113. Landsman, G.H. (1998) ‘Reconstructing motherhood in the age of “perfect” babies: mothers of infants and toddlers with disabilities’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 24(1): 9-98.
114. LaRossa, R. (1988) ‘Fatherhood and social change’, Family Relations, 37(4): 451-57.
115. LaRossa, R. (1997) The Modernization of Fatherhood: A Social and Political History, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
116. Larsson, M. (2009) ‘A descriptive study of the use of the Internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information’, Midwifery, 25: 14-20.
117. Lazarus, E. (1994) ‘What do women want? Issues of choice, control and class in pregnancy and childbirth’, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 8: 25-46.
118. Learman, L.A., Kupperman, M., Gates, E., Nease, R.F., Gildengorin, V. and Washington, A.E. (2003) ‘Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions: are there racial/ethnic differences?' American Journal of Medical Genetics (Part C), 119C: 190-26.
119. Lee, J. and Schmied, V. (2001) ‘Involving men in antenatal education’, British Journal of Midwifery, (9)9: 559-61.
120. Leshin, L. (2007) Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome www.ds-health.com/prenatal.htm (accessed 2010).
121. Levy, V. (1999) ‘Protective steering: a grounded theory study of the processes by which midwives facilitate informed choices during pregnancy’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(1): 104-12.
122. Lewando-Hundt, G., Shoham-Vardi, I., Beckerleg, S., Belmaker, I., Kassem, F. and Jaafar, A. (2001) ‘Knowledge, Action and Resistance; the Selective Use of Pre-natal Screening among Bedouin Women of the Negev, Israel’, Social Science and Medicine, 52(4): 561-9.
123. Lewis, S. (2001) ‘Restructuring the workplace cultures: the ultimate work-family challenge?' Women in Management Review, 16(1): 21-29.
124. Locock, L. and Alexander, J. (2006) '“Just a bystander?" Men’s place in the process of fetal screening and diagnosis’, Social Science and Medicine, 62(6): 1349-59.
125. Lorber, J. (1989) ‘Choice, gift or patriarchal bargain? Women’s consent to invitro fertilization in male infertility’, Hypatia, 4: 23.
126. Lorber, J. (1994) Paradoxes of Gender, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
127. Lorber, J. and Bandlamudi, L. (1993) ‘The dynamics of marital bargaining in male infertility’, Gender and Society, 7(1): 32-49.
128. Lowe, P., Powell, J., Griffiths, F., Thorogood, M. and Locock, L. (2009) '“Making it all normal”: the role of the Internet in problematic pregnancy’, Qualitative Health Research, 19(10): 1476-84.
129. Lupton, D. and Barclay, L. (1997) Constructing Fatherhood: Discourses and Experiences, London: Sage.
130. Markens, S., Browner, C.H. and Preloran, H.M. (2003) '“I’m not the one they’re sticking the needle into”: Latino couples, fetal diagnosis, and the discourse of reproductive rights’, Gender and Society, 17(3): 462-81.
131. Markens, S., Browner, C.H. and Press, N. (1997) ‘Feeding the fetus: on interrogating the notion of maternal-fetal conflict’, Feminist Studies, 23(2): 351-72.
132. Marshall, K. and Woollett, A. (2000) ‘Fit to reproduce? The regulative role of pregnancy texts’, Feminism and Psychology, 10(3): 351-66.
133. Marteau, T.M. and Dormandy, E. (2001) ‘Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: how well are we doing?' American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106(3): 185-90.
134. Mason, D. (2003) Explaining Ethnic Differences, Bristol: Policy Press.
135. Matisons, M.R. (1997) ‘The new feminist philosophy of the body’ The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 5: 9-34.
136. McCourt, C. (2006) ‘Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit’, Social Science and Medicine, 62: 1307-18.
137. McLaughlin, J. (2003) ‘Screening networks: shared agendas in feminist and disability movement challenges to antenatal screening and abortion’, Disability and Society, 18(3): 297-310.
138. Medhurst, A. (2000) ‘If anywhere: class identification and cultural studies academics’, in S.R. Munt (ed.), Cultural Studies and the Working Class, London: Cassell.
139. Meerabeau, L. (1991) ‘Husbands’ participation in fertility treatment. They also serve who stand and wait’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 13: 396-410.
140. Mele, M.A. (2009) ‘Exploring the gendered web’, Gender and Technology, Berkman Center for Internet and Society, http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/genderandtech/tag/facebook/ (accessed May 2011).
141. Mitchell, L.M. and Georgies, E. (1997) ‘Cross-cultural cyborgs: Greek and Canadian women’s discourses on fetal ultrasound’, Feminist Studies, 23(2): 373-401.
142. Modell, B., Harris, R., Lane, B., Khan, M., Darlison, M., Petrou, M., Old, J., Layton, M. and Varnavides, L. (2000) ‘Informed choice in genetic screening for thalassaemia during pregnancy: audit from a national confidential inquiry’, British Medical Journal, 320: 337-41.
143. Moyer, A., Brown, B., Gates, E., Daniels, M., Brown, H.D. and Kupperman, M. (1999) ‘Decisions about prenatal testing for chromosomal disorders: perceptions of a diverse group of pregnant women’, Journal of Women’s Health and Gender Based Medicine, 8(4): 521-31.
144. Murkoff, H.E. and Mazel, S. (2009) What to Expect When You Are Expecting? London: Simon and Schuster.
145. Murphy, F. and Hunt, S. (1997) ‘Early pregnancy loss: men have feelings too’, British Journal of Midwifery, 5(2): 87-90.
146. Murray, J., Cuckle, H., Sehmi, I., Wilson, C. and Ellis, A. (2001) ‘Quality of written information used in Down syndrome screening’, Prenatal Diagnosis, 21: 138-42.
147. National Childbirth Trust (NCT) www.nct.org.uk/home (accessed February 2011).
148. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NINDS Microcephaly Information Page, www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/microcephaly/microcephaly.htm (accessed 2011).
149. Nazroo, J. (2003) ‘The structuring of ethnic inequalities in health: economic position, racial discrimination, and racism’, American Journal of Public Health, 93(2): 277-84.
150. Net Mums www.netmums.com/ (accessed February 2011).
151. Nettleton, S. (1995) Sociology of Health and Illness, Cambridge: Polity Press.
152. NHS Choices (2008) ‘Antenatal screening’, www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Antenatal-screening (accessed 2008).
153. NHS Choices (2011) ‘Miscarriage’, www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Miscarriage/Pages/Introdu ction.aspx (accessed June 2011).
154. NHS Antenatal and Newborn Screening Programme (2008a) ‘Sickle cell and thalassaemia’ www.sct.screening.nhs.uk/Documents/MidwivesInfo.pdf (accessed 2008).
155. NHS Antenatal and Newborn Screening Programmes (2010) Screening Tests for You and Your Baby, NSC: UK National Screening Committee.
156. NHS Down’s Syndrome Prevention (2008) www.nhsdirect.com (accessed 2008).
157. NHS Evidence (2011a) '(a)-Genetic conditions, Down’s syndrome’, www.library.nhs.uk/geneticconditions/viewresource.aspx?resID=88948 (accessed 2011).
158. NHS Evidence (2011b) '(b)-Genetic conditions, sickle cell anaemia’, www.library.nhs.uk/geneticconditions/viewresource.aspx?resID=143175 (accessed 2011).
159. NHS Executive (2001) ‘Good practice in consent: achieving the NHS plan commitment to patient-centred consent practice’, www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatisti cs/Lettersandcirculars/Healthservicecirculars/DH_4003736 (accessed June 2011).
160. NICE (2003a) Antenatal Care: Routine Care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman: Clinical Guidance, National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health, London: RCOG Press.
161. NICE (2003b) Routine Antenatal Care for Healthy Pregnant Women: Understanding NICE Guidance Information for Pregnant Women, Their Families and the Public, London: NICE.
162. Nolan, J. and Scott, J. (2006) ‘Gender and kinship networks in contemporary Britain’, in M, Richards (ed.), Kinship Relationships and Law in a Changing Society, London: Hart.
163. Oakley, A. (1981) ‘Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms’, in Roberts, H. (ed), Doing Feminist Research, London: Routledge.
164. Oakley, A. (2005) (ed.) The Ann Oakley Reader: Gender Women and Social Science, Bristol: Policy Press.
165. OECD (2005) Employment Outlook 2005, Paris: OECD.
166. Olsson, P. and Jansson, L. (2001) ‘Patterns in midwives and expectant/new parents ways of relating to each other in ante-and postnatal consultations’, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 15(2): 113-22.
167. Overall, C.H. (1987) Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis, London: Allen & Unwin.
168. Pakulski, J. and Waters, M. (1996) The Death of Class, London: Sage.
169. Panter-Brick, C. (1991) ‘Parental responses to consanguinity and genetic disease in Saudi Arabia’, Social Science and Medicine, 33(11): 1295-302.
170. Petchesky, R. (1980) ‘Reproductive freedom: beyond a women’s right to choose’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5: 661-85.
171. Petchesky, R. (1984) Abortion and Woman’s Choice: The State, Sexuality and Reproductive Freedom, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
172. Petchesky, R. (1987) ‘Foetal images: the power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction’, in M. Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies, Gender, Motherhood and Medicine, Cambridge: Polity Press.
173. Pilnick, A. (2002) Genetics and Society: An Introduction, Buckingham: Open University Press.
174. Pilnick, A. (2004) '“It’s just one of the best tests that we’ve got at the moment”: the presentation of nuchal translucency screening for fetal abnormality in pregnancy’, Discourse and Society, 15(4): 451-65.
175. Pizzini, F. (1992) ‘Women’s time, institutional time’, in R. Frankenberg (ed), Time, Health and Medicine, London: Sage.
176. Plantin, L. (2001) Men’s Parenthood: On Men’s Perceptions and Experiences of Fatherhood, (dissertation), Göteborg, University of Göteborg, Department of Social Work.
177. Plantin, L., Månsson, S.-A. and Kearney, J. (2003) ‘Talking and doing fatherhood. On fatherhood and masculinity in Sweden and Britain’, Fathering, 1: 3-26.
178. Pleck, J.H. (1987) ‘American fathering in historical perspective’, in M.S Kimmel (ed.), Changing Men; New Research on Men and Masculinity, London: Sage.
179. Press, N. and Browner, C. (1993) '“Collective fictions”: similarities in reasons for accepting maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening among women of diverse ethnic and social class backgrounds, ' Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 8(1): 97-106.
180. Press, N.A. and Browner, C.H. (1994) ‘Collective silences, collective frictions: how prenatal diagnostic testing became part of routine prenatal care’, in K.H. Rothenburg and E.J. Thompson (eds), Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
181. Press, N. and Browner, C.H. (1997) ‘Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis’, Social Science and Medicine, 45(7): 979-89.
182. Puthussery, S., Twamley, K., Harding, S., Mirsky, J., Baron, M. and Macfarlane, A. (2008) '“They’re more like ordinary stroppy British women”: attitudes and expectations of maternity care professionals to UK-born ethnic minority women’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 13(4): 195-201.
183. Rapp, R. (1994) ‘Woman’s responses to prenatal diagnosis: A sociocultural perspective on diversity’, in K. Rothenberg and E. Thomson (eds), Women and Prenatal Testing, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
184. Rapp, R. (1998) ‘Refusing prenatal diagnosis: the meanings of bioscience in a multicultural world’, Science and Technology Studies, 23(1): 45-70.
185. Rapp, R. (2000) Testing Women, Testing the Fetus, London: Routledge.
186. Reed, K. (2003) Worlds of Health, Connecticut, USA: Praeger.
187. Reed, K. (2006) New Directions in Social Theory: Race, Gender and the Canon, London: Sage.
188. Reed, K. (2007a) ‘Bureaucracy and beyond: the impact of ethical review and research governance on health research in the social sciences’, Sociological Research Online, 12(5). www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/18.html
189. Reed, K. (2007b) ‘Antenatal screening and the gendering of genetic responsibility’, Reproductive Health, 4:8. www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/4/1/8
190. Reed, K. (2009a) '“It’s them faulty genes again”: women, men and the gendered nature of genetic responsibility’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(3): 343-59.
191. Reed, K. (2009b) ‘Fathers’ involvement in antenatal screening: midwives’ views’, British Journal of Midwifery, 17(4): 218-22.
192. Reed, K. (2011a) ‘Making men matter: exploring gender roles in prenatal screening’, Journal of Gender Studies, 20(1): 55-66.
193. Reed, K. (2011b) '“He’s the dad isn’t he?" Gender, race and the politics of prenatal screening’, Ethnicity and Health (Special Issue on Sickle Cell Disorders), 16 (4/5): 327-34.
194. Reitmanova, S. and Gustafson, D. (2008) '“They can’t understand it”: maternity health and care needs of immigrant Muslim women in St. John’s, Newfoundland’, Maternal Child Health Journal, 12(1): 101-11.
195. Richards, M. (1996) ‘Families, kinship and genetics’, in T. Marteau and M. Richards (eds), The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
196. Richardson, D. (2008) ‘Conceptualizing gender’, in D. Richardson and V. Robinson (eds), Introducing Women’s Studies: Feminist Theory and Practice, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
197. Ringrose, J. and Epstein, D. (2008) ‘Gender and schooling: contemporary issues in gender equality and educational achievement’, in D. Richardson and V. Robinson (eds), Introducing Women’s Studies: Feminist Theory and Practice, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
198. Rhodes, P.J. (1994) ‘Race of interviewer effects: a brief comment’, Sociology, 28: 547-58.
199. Robinson, V. (2008) ‘Men, masculinities and feminism’, in D. Richardson and V. Robinson (eds) Introducing Women’s Studies: Feminist Theory and Practice, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
200. Rose, H. (1987) ‘Victorian values in a test-tube: the politics of reproductive science and technology’, in M. Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine, Cambridge: Polity.
201. Rose, N. (2001) ‘The politics of life itself’, Theory, Culture and Society, 18(6): 1-30.
202. Rothman, B.K. (1986) The Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood, New York: Norton.
203. Rothman, B.K. (1995) ‘Of maps and imaginations: sociology confronts the genome’, Social Problems, 42: 1-10.
204. Rowe, R. and Garcia, J. (2005) ‘Ethnic minorities’ access to antenatal screening’, British Journal of Midwifery, 13(2): 101-4.
205. Rowe, R.E. and Garcia, J. (2003) ‘Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review’, Journal of Public Health Medicine, 25(2): 113-19.
206. Rowe, R., Puddicombe, D., Hockley, C. and Redshaw, M. (2008) ‘Offer and uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in women from different social and ethnic backgrounds’, Prenatal Diagnosis, 28(13): 1245-50.
207. Royal College of General Practitioners (2005) Emma’s Diary, London: Lifecycle Marketing. Also www.emmasdiary.co.uk/ (accessed February 2011).
208. Sandelowski, M. (1994) ‘Separate but less unequal: fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood’, Gender and Society, 8: 230-45.
209. Santalahti, P., Hemminki, E., Latikka, A. and Ryynanen, M. (1998) ‘Women’s decisionmaking in prenatal screening’, Social Science and Medicine, 46(8): 1067-76.
210. Scheibal, F. and Dex, S. (1998) ‘Should we have more family-friendly policies?' European Management Journal, 16(5): 586-99.
211. Schott, J. and Henley, A. (1997) Culture, Religion and Childbearing in a Multiracial Society: A Handbook for Health Professionals, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
212. Schuth, W., Karck, U., Wilhelm, C. and Reisch, S. (1994) ‘Parents needs after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal malformation: an empirical deficit analysis’, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 124-9.
213. Scott, J. (2006) ‘Family and gender roles: how attitudes are changing’, GenNet working paper, No. 21, www.genet.ac.uk (accessed March 2009).
214. Scott, J. (2000) ‘If class is dead, why won’t it lie down?' In A. Woodward and G. Lengyel (eds), European Societies: Inclusions and Exclusions, London: Routledge.
215. Segal, L. (1990) Slow Motion: Changing Masculinities, Changing Men, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
216. Simmonds, W. (2002) ‘Watching the clock: keeping time in pregnancy, birth and postpartum experiences’, Social Science and Medicine, 55(4): 559-70.
217. Shakespeare, T. (1995) ‘Back to the future? New genetics and disabled people’, Critical Social Policy, 44(5): 22-35.
218. Shakespeare, T. (1999) '“Losing the plot?" Medical and activist discourses of contemporary genetics and disability’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(5): 669-88.
219. Shakespeare, T. (2008) ‘Are we really more accepting of Down’s syndrome?' guardian.co.uk (24/11/2008), www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/nov/24/disability-children/print (accessed June 2011).
220. Smith, F.W., Adam, A.H. and Philips, W.D.P. (1983) ‘NMR imaging in pregnancy’, Lancet, 321(8314-15): 61-2.
221. Skeggs, B. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable, London: Sage.
222. Skeggs, B. (2001) ‘The toilet paper: femininity, class, and mis-recognition’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(3/4): 295-307.
223. Stanworth, M. (1987) (ed.) Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine, Polity: Cambridge.
224. Steinberg, D.L. (1997) Bodies in Glass: Genetics, Eugenics, Embryo Ethics, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
225. Stenson, K., Sidenvall, B. and Heimer, G. (2005) ‘Midwives’ experiences of routine antenatal questioning relating to men’s violence against women’, Midwifery, 21(4): 311-21.
226. Streetly, A., Latinovic, R. and Henthorn, J. (2010) ‘Positive screening and carrier results for the England-wide universal newborn sickle cell screening programme by ethnicity and area for 2005-7', Journal of Clinical Pathology, 63: 626-9.
227. Sullivan, J.R. (1999) ‘Development of father-infant attachment in fathers of preterm infants’, Neonatal Network, 18: 33-9.
228. Tsianakas, V. and Laimputtong, P. (2002) ‘What women from an Islamic background in Australia say about care in pregnancy and prenatal testing’, Midwifery, 18(1): 25-34.
229. UK National Screening Committee (2003) ‘Antenatal screening-working standards incorporating those for the National Down Syndrome screening programme for England’, January 2003, www.nelh.nhs.uk/screening/dssp/Standards.pdf (accessed 2008).
230. UK National Screening Committee (2007) ‘Antenatal screening-working standards for Down’s syndrome screening’, www.perinatal.nhs.uk/ultrasound/screening/Workin gStandardsforDownsSyndromeScreening%202007.pdf (accessed June 2011).
231. Van Allen, M.I. and Myhre, S. (1991) ‘New multiple congenital anomalies syndrome in a stillborn infant of consanguinous parents and a prediabetic pregnancy’, American Journal of Medical Genetics, 38(4): 523-8.
232. Vosler, A.T. and Burst, H.V. (1993) ‘Nurse-midwifery as it reinforces and transforms the American ideology of gendered roles’, Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 38(5): 293-300.
233. Wailoo, K. (2001) Dying in the City of the Blues: Sickle Cell Anemia and the Politics of Race and Health, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
234. Wailoo, K. and Pemberton, S. (2006) The Troubled Dream of Genetic Medicine, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
235. Walby, S. (1990) Theorizing Patriarchy, Oxford: Blackwell.
236. Wall, G. and Arnold, S. (2007) ‘How involved is involved fathering? An exploration of the contemporary culture of fatherhood’, Gender and Society, 21: 508-27.
237. Webster, A. (2007) Health, Technology and Society: A Sociological Critique, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
238. Whitby, E.H., Paley, M.N., Sprigg, A., Rutter, S., Davies, N.P., Wilkinson, I.D. and Griffiths, P.D. (2004) ‘Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities’, BJOG, 111: 784-92.
239. Williams, C., Alderson, P. and Farisides, B. (2002) '“Too many choices?" Hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal screening’, Social Science and Medicine, 55: 743-53.
240. Williams, K. and Umberson, D. (1999) ‘Medical technology and childbirth: experiences of expectant mothers and fathers’, Sex Roles, 41(314): 147-68.
241. Witz, A. (2000) ‘Whose body matters? Feminist sociology and the corporeal turn in sociology and feminism’, Body and Society, 6(2): 1-24.
242. World Health Organization (2007) Fatherhood and Health Outcomes in Europe: A Summary Report, Denmark: WHO, regional office, www.euro.who.int/-data/assets/pdf_file/0019/69013/E91129sum.pdf (accessed June 2011).
243. Yoon, P.W., Scheuner, M.T., Peterson-Oehlke, K.L., Gwinn, M., Faucett, A. and Khoury, M.J. (2002) ‘Can family history be used as a tool for public health and preventative medicine?' Genetics in Medicine, 4(4): 304-10.
244. Zechmeister, I. (2001) ‘Foetal images: the power of visual technology in antenatal care and the implications for women’s reproductive freedom’, Health Care Analysis, 9(4): 387-400.