Antenatal screening and the gendering of genetic responsibility

Reproductive Health

Volumn 4, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Reed, Kate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; ETHICS; FEMALE; GENDER; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PERCEPTION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELECTIVE ABORTION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT;

EID: 36349014799     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17424755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-4-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. NHS Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Screening Programme. http://www.kcl-phs.org.uk/haemscreening/Policy.htm
2. NHS Downs Syndrome Prevention. http://www.nhsdirect.com/articles/article. aspx?articleId=136§ionId=9
3. NHS Choices: Antenatal Screening. http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Antenatal- screening/Pages/When-should-it-be-done.aspx?url=Pages/What-is-it.aspx
4. Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis. N Press CH Browner, Soc Sci Med 1997 45 7 979 989 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00011-7 9257391
5. Separate but less unequal: Fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood. M Sandelowski, Gender and Society 1994 8 230 245 10.1177/089124394008002006
6. 'Mothers' Union? C Delphy, Trouble and Strife 1992 24 12 19
7. R Rapp, Testing Women, Testing the Fetus London: Routledge 2000
8. Laboring for relevance: Expectant and new fatherhood. PL Jordan, Nursing Research 1990 39 11 16 10.1097/00006199-199001000-00003 2294508
9. K Reed, New Directions in Social Theory: Race, Gender and the Canon London: Sage 2006
10. Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms. A Oakley, Doing Feminist Research London: Routledge, Roberts H, 1981 30 61
11. A Bryman, Social Research Methods Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001
12. Close encounters if the 'CA' kind: a review of literature analysing talk in research interviews. K Roulston, Qualitative Research 2006 6 515 534 10.1177/1468794106068021
13. Dealing with difference: researching health beliefs and behaviours of British Asian mothers. K Reed, Sociological Research Online 4 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/4/reed.html
14. K Reed, Worlds of Health Praeger: Connecticut 2003
15. Community, mobility and racism in a semi-rural area: Comparing minority experience in East Kent. L Ray K Reed, Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 212 234 10.1080/01419870420000315825
16. Bias in qualitative research designs. J Daly J Lumley, Aust N Z J Public Health 2002 26 4 299 300 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00174.x 12233947
17. What do women want? Issues of choice, control and class in pregnancy and childbirth. E Lazarus, Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1994 8 25 46 10.1525/maq.1994.8.1.02a00030
18. Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. RE Rowe J Garcia, Journal of Public Health Medicine 2003 25 113 119 10.1093/pubmed/fdg025 12848399
19. D Mason, Explaining Ethnic Differences Bristol: Policy Press 2003
20. The National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/methods_quality/ns_sec/
21. Race and class bias in qualitative research on women. LW Cannon E Higgenbotham MLA Leung, Gender and Society 1988 2 449 462 10.1177/ 089124388002004003
22. On the retrieval of sociological descriptions: respondent validation and the critical case of ethnomethodology. NP McKeganey MJ Bloor, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 1981 1 58 69
23. BG Glaser AL Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research New York: Aldine 1967
24. The grounded theory method: an explication and interpretation. K Charmaz, Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings Boston: Little, Brown, Emerson RM, 1983
25. T Duster, Backdoor to Eugenics London: Routledge 1990
26. The Human Genetics Commission Report. http://www.hgc.gov.uk