Quality of written information used in down syndrome screening

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 138-142

  Chen, Chih Ping ^a   Chern, Schu Rern ^a   Shih, Jin Chung ^a   Wang, Wayseen ^a   Yeh, Li Fan ^b   Chang, Tung Yao ^b   Tzen, Chin Yuan ^c  

^a MACKAY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Down syndrome; Leaflets; Screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOWN SYNDROME; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM; UNITED KINGDOM;

DOWN SYNDROME; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PAMPHLETS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 0035106992     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0223(200102)21:2<138::AID-PD997>3.0.CO;2-C     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Interventions for influencing people's experiences of screening [protocol]
2. Readability of patient information booklets for women with breast cancer
3. Readability of patient information leaflets on over-the-counter (OTC) medicines
4. Risk language and dialects
5. A new readability yardstick
6. Serum screening for Down's syndrome: Experiences of obstetricians in England and Wales
7. The attitudes of midwives to maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome
8. Support during screening: An NCT report
9. Natural history of Down's syndrome: A brief review for those involved in antenatal screening
10. Informed consent to undergo serum screening for Down's syndrome: The gap between policy and practice
11. Readability index: Life-line or weak link?