Screening networks: Shared agendas in feminist and disability movement challenges to antenatal screening and abortion

Disability and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 297-310

  McLaughlin, Janice ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037660978     PISSN: 09687599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0968759032000052879     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. AKRICH, M. (1992) The de-scription of technical objects, in: W. E. BIJKER & J. LAW (Eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: studies in sociotechnical change (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).
2. ASCH, A. (1999) Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy, American Journal of Public Health, 89, pp. 1649-1657.
3. ASCH, A. (2000) Why I haven't changed my mind about prenatal testing: reflections and refinements, in: E. PARENS & A. ASCH (Eds) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press).
4. BAILY, M.A. (2000) Why I had amniocentesis, in: E. PARENS & A. ASCH (Eds) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press).
5. BERG, A-J. (1994) Technological flexibility: bringing gender into technology or was it the other way around? in: C. COCKBURN & R. FCRST-DILIC (Eds) Bringing Technology Home: gender and technology in a changing Europe (Buckingham, Open University Press).
6. BEWLEY, S. & WARD, R.H. (Eds) (1994) Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (London, RCOG Press).
7. BIJKER, W.E. & LAW, J. (Eds) (1992) Shaping Technology/Building Society: studies in sociotechnical change (Cambridge, MIT Press).
8. BROOKES, A. (2001) Women's voices: prenatal diagnosis and care for the disabled, Health Care Analysis, 9, pp. 133-150.
9. BROWN, W. (1992) Finding the man in the state, Feminist Studies, 18, pp. 7-13.
10. CALLON, M. (1986) The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle, in: M. CALLON, J. LAW & H. RIP (Eds) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: sociology of science in the real world (Basingstoke, Macmillan).
11. FAULKNER, W. (2000) The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for 'making gender stick' to engineers, Science Technology & Human Values, 25, pp 87-119.
12. FAWCETT, B. (2000) Feminist Perspectives on Disability (Harlow, Prentice Hall).
13. GILL, R. & GRINT, K. (1995) The gender-technology relation: contemporary theory and research, in: K. GRINT & R. GILL (Eds) The Gender-Technology Relation (London, Taylor & Francis).
14. GREEN, J. (1995) Obstetricians' views on prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: 1980 compared with 1993, British Medical Journal, 309, pp. 769-772.
15. HARDING, S. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? (Buckingham, Open University Press).
16. HARRIS, R., LANE, B., HARRIS, H.J., WILLIAMSON, P., DODGE, J. & MODELL, B. (1999) National confidential enquiry into counselling for genetic disorders by non-geneticists: general recommendations and specific standards for improving care, British Journal of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 106, pp. 658-663.
17. HUBBARD, R. (1997) Abortion and disability: who should and who should not inhabit the world? in: L. J. DAVIS (Ed.) The Disability Studies Reader (London, Routledge).
18. JENNINGS, B. (2000) Technology and the genetic imaginary, in: E. PARENS & A. ASCH (Eds) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press).
19. KALLIANES, V. & RUBENFELD, P. (1997) Disabled women and reproductive rights, Disability & Society, 12, pp. 203-221.
20. LANE, B., CHALLEN, K., HARRIS, H.J. & HARRIS, R. (2001) Existence, and quality of written antenatal screening policies in the United Kingdom: postal survey, British Medical Journal, 322, pp. 22-23.
21. LATOUR, B. (1996) Aramis, or the Love of Technology (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
22. LAW, J. (1987) Technology and heterogeneous engineering: the case of Portuguese expansion, in: W. E. BIJKER, T. P. HUGHES & T. PINCH (Eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).
23. LAW, J. (Ed.) (1991) Sociology of Monsters (London, Routledge).
24. LOHAN, M. (2000) Constructive tensions in feminist technology studies, Social Studies of Science, 30, pp. 895-916.
25. MARTEAU, T.M., DRAKE, H. & BOBROW, M. (1994) Counselling following diagnosis of a fetal abnormality: the differing approaches of obstetricians, clinical geneticists and genetic nurses, Journal of Medical Genetics, 31, pp. 864-867.
26. McLAUGHLIN, J., ROSEN, P., SKINNER, D. & WEBSTER, A. (1999) Valuing Technology: organisations, culture and change (London, Routledge).
27. MORRIS, J. (1993) Feminism and disability, Feminist Review, 43, pp. 57-70.
28. ORMROD, S. (1995) Feminist sociology and methodology: leaky black boxes in gender/technology relations, in: K. GRINT & R. GILL (Eds) The Gender-Technology Relation (London, Taylor & Francis).
29. PHILLIPS, A. (1993) Democracy and Difference (Cambridge, Polity Press).
30. PRESS, N. (2000) Assessing the expressive character of prenatal testing: the choices made or the choices made available? in: E. PARENS & A. ASCH (Eds) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press).
31. RAPP, R. (1998) Refusing prenatal diagnosis: the meanings of bioscience in a multicultural world, Science, Technology and Human Values, 23, pp. 45-70.
32. RAPP, R. (1999) Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: the social impact of amniocentesis in America (London, Routledge).
33. REYNOLDS, T.M. (2001) Down's Syndrome, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 53, pp. 893-898.
34. RUDY, K. (1999) Liberal theory and feminist politics, Women and Politics, 20, pp. 33-57.
35. SAETNAN, A.R. (1997) Standing one's ground requires finding some ground to stand on, in: B. BERNER (Ed.) Gendered Practices: feminist studies of technology and society (Linkoping, Department of Technology and Social Change, Linkoping University).
36. SAXTON, M. (2000) Messages and meanings of prenatal genetic testing, in: E. PARENS & A. ASCH (Eds) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press).
37. SCHOTT, J. & HENLEY, A. (1996) Antenatal screening and diagnosis in a multiracial society, British Journal of Midwifery, 4, pp. 346-349.
38. SHAKESPEARE, T. (1998) Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality, Disability & Society, 13, pp. 665-681.
39. SHARP, K. & EARLE, S. (2002) Feminism, abortion and disability: irreconcilable differences, Disability & Society, 17, pp. 137-145.
40. SHELDON, A. (1999) Personal and perplexing: feminist disability politics evaluated, Disability & Society, 14, pp. 643-658
41. SHILDRICK, M. (1997) Leaky Bodies and Boundaries (London, Routledge).
42. SILVA, E.B. (2000) The cook, the cooker and the gendering of the kitchen, Sociological Review, 48, pp. 612-628.
43. STAR, S.L. (1991) Power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions, in: J. LAW (Ed.) A Sociology of Monsters (London, Routledge).
44. THOMAS, C. (1999) Female Forms: experiencing & understanding disability (Buckingham, Open University Press).
45. WAJCMAN, J. (2000) Reflections on gender and technology studies: in what state is the art? Social Studies of Science, 30, pp. 447-464.
46. WILLIS, E. (1998) The 'new' genetics and the sociology of medical technology, Journal of Sociology, 34, pp. 170-183.
47. WINNER, L. (1993) Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology and Human Values, 18, pp. 362-378.
48. WOOLGAR, S. (1991) Configuring the user: the case of usability trials, in: J. LAW (Ed.) A Sociology of Monsters (London, Routledge).
49. YOUNG, I.M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).