Marine ecological footprint of Italian Mediterranean fisheries

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 7482-7495

  de Leo, Federica ^a   Miglietta, Pier Paolo ^b   Pavlinović, Sladana ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

^b and Technology   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SPLIT   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Fish; Italy; Marine ecological footprint

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; FISH; FISHERY PRODUCTION; FOOD CONSUMPTION; HUMAN ACTIVITY; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT; SEAFOOD; SUSTAINABILITY;

ITALY;

EID: 84920711918     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su6117482     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i2727e/i2727e.pdf (accessed on 8 August 2014).
2. Safran P. Fisheries and Aquaculture: Towards Sustainable Aquatic Living Resources Management; Eolss Publishers Company Limited: Oxford UK 2009.
3. Mozaffarian D. Fish and n-3 fatty acids for the prevention of fatal coronary heart disease and sudden cardiac death. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008 87 1991S-1996S.
4. Patel P.S.; Sharp S.J.; Luben R.N.; Khaw K.T.; Bingham S.A.; Wareham N.J.; Forouhi N.G. Association between type of dietary fish and seafood intake and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes: The European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk cohort study. Diabetes Care 2009 32 1857-1863.
5. Gonzalez C.A.; Riboli E. Diet and cancer prevention: Where we are where we are going. Nutr. Cancer 2006 56 225-231.
6. Adeniyi S.A.; Orjiekwe C.L.; Ehiagbonare J.E.; Josiah S.J. Nutritional Composition of Three Different Fishes (Clarias gariepinus Malapterurus electricus and Tilapia guineensis). Pak. J. Nutr. 2012 11 793-797.
7. Ali A.; Kiumars P. Chemical and proximate composition properties of different fish species obtained from Iran. World J. Fish Mar. Sci. 2010 2 237-239.
8. Erkman S. Industrial ecology: A new perspective on the future of the industrial system. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2001 131 531-538.
9. Unione Europea. Note Sintetiche sull'Unione Europea-Il Settore Europeo della Pesca in cifre 2014. Available online: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/displayFtu.html?ftuId=FTU_5.3.9.html (accessed on 8 August 2014). (In Italian)
10. Pierannunzio I. Con la crisi crollano i consumi di pesce in Italia. Available online: http://www.ideapesce.it/?s=Con+la+crisi+crollano+i+consumi+di+pesce+in+Italia&s-btn=Search (accessed on 30 May 2014).
11. Report ittico-Analisi dei dati di settore 2011 e 2012. Available online: http://www.ismea.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeAttachment.php/L/IT/D/2%252Fe%252Fe%252FD.a8b3276d6861bddaf50f/P/BLOB%3AID%3D7868 (accessed on 4 August 2014). (In Italian)
12. Il settore ittico in Italia-Check up 2013. Available online: http://www.ismea.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeAttachment.php/L/IT/D/5%252Ff%252F2%252FD.cc060abd05429fb5996b/P/BLOB%3AID%3D8845 (accessed on 4 August 2014).
13. Talberth J.; Wolowicz K.; Venetoulis J.; Gelobter M.; Boyle P.; Mott B. The Ecological Fishprint of Nations Measuring Humanity's Impact on Marine Ecosystems; Redefining Progress: Oakland CA USA 2006.
14. Warren-Rhodes K.; Sadovy Y.; Cesar H. Marine ecological footprint of the live reef fish food trade. SPC Live Reef Fish Inf. Bull. 2004 12 10-16.
15. Rhodes K.; Warren-Rhodes K.; Sweet S.; Helgenberger M.; Joseph E.; Boyle L.; Hopkins K. Marine ecological footprint indicates unsustainability of the Pohnpei (Micronesia) coral reef fishery. Environ. Conserv. 2014 doi:10.1017/S037689291400023X.
16. Larsson J.; Folke C.; Kautsky N. Ecological limitations and appropriation of ecosystem support by shrimp farming in Columbia. Environ. Manag. 1994 18 663-676.
17. Folke C.; Kautsky N.; Berg H.; Jansson Å.; Troell M. The ecological footprint concept for sustainable seafood production-A review. Ecol. Appl. 1998 8 S63-S71.
18. Tyedmers P.H. Salmon and Sustainability: The Biophysical Cost of Producing Salmon through the Commercial Salmon Fishery and the Intensive Salmon Culture Industry. Ph. D. Dissertations University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada 2000.
19. Berg H.; Michelsen P.; Troell M.; Folke C.; Kautsky N. Managing aquaculture for sustainability in tropical Lake Kariba Zimbabwe. Ecol. Econ. 1996 18 141-159.
20. Bunting S.W. Appropriation of environmental goods and services by aquaculture: A reassessment employing the ecological footprint methodology and implications for horizontal integration. Aquac. Res. 2001 32 605-609.
21. Weber M.L. What Price Farmed Fish: A Review of the Environmental and Social Costs of Farming Carnivorous Fish; SeaWeb Aquaculture Clearinghouse: Providence RI USA 2004.
22. Folke C.; Jansson Å.; Larsson J.; Costanza R. Ecosystem appropriation by cities. AMBIO 1997 26 167-172.
23. Talberth J.; Venetoulis J.; Wolowicz K. Recasting Marine Ecological Fishprint Accounts-Technical Report; Redefining Progress: Oakland CA USA 2006.
24. Venetoulis J.; Talberth J. Refining the ecological footprint. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2008 10 441-469.
25. Pauly D.; Christensen V. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 1995 374 255-257.
26. Nixon S.W.; Oviatt C.A.; Frithsen J.; Sullivan B. Nutrients and the productivity of estuarine and coastal marine ecosystems. J. Limnol. Soc. S. Afr. 1986 12 43-71.
27. Sea Around US Project. Fisheries Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Available online: http://www.seaaroundus.org/(accessed on 30 July 2014).
28. Shogren J. Encyclopedia of Energy Natural Resource and Environmental Economics; Newnes: London UK 2013.
29. Kuo D.; Booth S. From local to global: A catch reconstruction of Taiwan's fisheries from 1950-2007. Fish. Cent. Res. Rep. 2011 19 97-104.
30. Swartz W.; Sala E.; Tracey S.; Watson R.; Pauly D. The spatial expansion and ecological footprint of fisheries (1950 to present). PLoS One 2010 5 e15143.
31. Platt T.; Sathyendranath S. Oceanic primary production: Estimation by remote sensing at local and regional scales. Science 1988 241 1613-1620.
32. Tudela S. The pair %PPR and TLfishery: A possible composite indicator of ecosystem impact aligned with a holistic vision of the ecosystem-based fisheries management approach. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Sustainability Indicators in Fisheries Ecofish Dakar Senegal 14-16 April 2003.
33. Pauly D.; Christensen V.; Dalsgaard J.; Froese R.; Torres F. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 1998 279 860-863.
34. Pauly D.; Palomares M.L. Fishing down marine food web: It is far more pervasive than we thought. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2005 76 197-212.
35. Andersen K.H.; Pedersen M. Damped trophic cascades driven by fishing in model marine ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. B 2009 277 795-802.
36. Sherman K.; Hempel G. The UNEP Large Marine Ecosystem Report: A Perspective on Changing Conditions in LMEs of the World's Regional Seas; UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 182; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi Kenya 2008.
37. Duarte C.M.; Cebrian J. The fate of marine autotrophic production. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1996 41 1758-1766.
38. Tudela S.; Coll M.; Palomera I. Developing an operational reference framework for fisheries management on the basis of a two-dimensional index of ecosystem impact. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2005 62 585-591.
39. Pauly D. The Sea around Us Project: Documenting and communicating global fisheries impacts on marine ecosystems. AMBIO 2007 36 290-295.
40. Watson R.; Zeller D.; Pauly D. Primary productivity demands of global fishing fleets. Fish Fish. 2014 15 231-241.
41. Parker R.W.; Tyedmers P.H. Uncertainty and natural variability in the ecological footprint of fisheries: A case study of reduction fisheries for meal and oil. Ecol. Indic. 2012 16 76-83.