Intragroup relationships and intergroup comparisons as two sources of group-based collectivism

Social Cognition Social Identity and Intergroup Relations

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 247-266

  Yuki, Masaki ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920614228     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203816790     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. Adams, G., Anderson, S. L., & Adonu, J. K. (2004). The cultural grounding of closeness and intimacy. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 321-339). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
3. Bond, M. H., & Cheung, T. (1983). College students’ spontaneous self-concept: The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 186-200.
4. Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. B. Brewer & B. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 345-360). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
6. Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y. -R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133-151.
7. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
8. Brewer, M. B., & Harasty, A. S. (1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, vol. 3: The interpersonal context (pp. 347-370). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. D. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
10. Brewer, M. B., & Yuki, M. (2007). Culture and social identity. In S. Kitayama & D.Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 307-322). New York: Guilford Press.
11. Buchan, N. R., Croson, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2002). Swift neighbors and persistent strangers: A cross-cultural investigation of trust and reciprocity in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 168-206.
12. Buchan, N. R., Johnson, E., & Croson, R. (2006). Let’s get personal: An international examination of the influence of communication, culture and social distance on other regarding preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 373-398.
13. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
14. Chen, C., Lee, S. -y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and crosscultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170-175.
15. The Chinese Culture Connection (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143-164.
16. Choi, S. C., Kim, U., & Choi, S. H. (1993). Indigenous analysis of collective representations: A Korean perspective. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 193-210). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Cross, S. E., & Madison, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
19. Falk, C., Heine, S., Yuki, M., & Takemura, K. (2009). Why do Westerners self- enhance more than East Asians? European Journal of Personality, 23, 183-203.
20. Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 915-981). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Foddy, M., Platow, M., & Yamagishi, T. (2009). Group-based trust in strangers: The role of stereotypes and expectations. Psychological Science, 20, 419-422.
22. Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642-655.
23. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Gudykunst, W. B. (1988). Culture and intergroup processes. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology (pp. 165-181). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Hamaguchi, E. (1977). “Nihon rashisa” no saihakken [The rediscovery of “Japaneseness”]. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha.
27. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference- group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903-918.
29. Ho, D. F. Y. (1993). Relational orientation in Asian social psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 240-259). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
30. Ho, D. Y. F., & Chiu, C. Y. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 137-156). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work- related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32. Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
33. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
34. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340.
35. Hwang, K. K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 163-183.
36. Jin, N., Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (1996). Bilateral dependency and the minimal group paradigm (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Psychology, 67, 77-85.
37. Karp, D. R., Jin, N., Yamagishi, T., & Shinotsuka, H. (1993). Raising the minimum in the minimal group paradigm. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 231-240.
38. Kashima, E., & Hardie, E. A. (2000). The development and validation of the relational, individual, and collective self-aspects (RIC) scale. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 19-48.
39. Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S. C., & Yoon, G. (Eds.). (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. King, A. Y. C., & Bond, M. H. (1985). The Confucian paradigm of man: A sociological view. In W. T. Tseng & D. Wu (Eds.), Chinese culture and mental health (pp. 29-46). New York: Academic Press.
41. Kitayama, S. (2002). Culture and basic psychological processes-Toward a system view of culture: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 89-96.
42. Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245-1267.
43. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
44. Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051.
45. Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
46. Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 793-804.
47. Macy, M. W., & Skvoretz, J. (1998). The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. American Sociological Review, 63, 638-660.
48. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
49. Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama’s theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289-310.
50. Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
51. Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). The culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Denver, CO: Westview Press.
52. Oishi, S., & Graham, J. (2010). Social ecology: Lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 356-377.
53. Oishi, S., Ishii, K., & Lun, J. (2009). Residential mobility and conditionality of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 913-919.
54. Oishi, S., Lun, J., & Sherman, G. D. (2007). Residential mobility, self-concept, and positive affect in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 131-141.
55. Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92, 1-22.
56. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and metaanalyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
57. Perreault, S., & Bourhis, R. (1998). Social identification, interdependence and discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 49-66.
58. Platow, M., McClintock, C., & Liebrand, W. (1990). Predicting intergroup fairness and in-group bias in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 221-239.
59. Prentice, D., Miller, D., & Lightdale, J. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493.
60. Rhee, E., Uleman, J., Lee, H. K., & Roman, R. J. (1995). Spontaneous selfdescriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 142-152.
61. Ross, M., Xun, W., & Wilson, A. (2002). Language and the bicultural self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1040-1050.
62. Sato, K., Yuki, M., Takemura, K., Schug, J., & Oishi, S. (2008). The “openness” of society determines the relationship between self-esteem and subjective well-being (1): A cross-societal comparison. A poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Albuquerque, NM.
63. Schug, J., Yuki, M., Horikawa, H., & Takemura, K. (2009). Similarity attraction and actually selecting similar others: How cross-societal differences in relational mobility affect interpersonal similarity in Japan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 95-103.
64. Schug, J., Yuki, M., & Maddux, W. W. (2010). Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends. Psychological Science, 21, 1471-1478.
65. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1998). Social psychology across cultures (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
67. Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. Boston: Ginn.
68. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
69. Takano, Y., & Osaka, E. (1999). An unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the U.S. on individualism/collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 311-341.
70. Takemura, K., Yuki, M., & Ohtsubo, Y. (2010). Attending inside or outside: A Japan-U.S. comparison of spontaneous memory of group information. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 303-307.
71. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
72. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
73. Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism-collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-in-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323.
74. Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.
75. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
76. Watkins, D., Adair, J., Akande, A., Gerong, A., McLnerney, D., Sunar, D. et al. (1998). Individualism-collectivism, gender and the self-concept: A nine culture investigation. Psychologia, 41, 259-271.
77. Wetherell, M. (1982). Cross-cultural studies of minimal groups: Implications for the social identity theory of intergroup relations. Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 207-240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
78. Wit, A. P, & Kerr, N. L. (2002). Me versus just us versus us all: Categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 616-637.
79. Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H., & Schug, J. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19, 579-584.
80. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: In-group boasting and in-group favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161-197.
81. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Miller, A. (1998). Collectivism and in-group bias. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 315-328.
82. Yamagishi, T., Makimura, Y., Foddy, M., Matsuda, M., Kiyonari, T., & Platow, M. J. (2005). Comparisons of Australians and Japanese on group-based cooperation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 173-190.
83. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129-166.
84. Yamaguchi, S. (1994). Collectivism among the Japanese: A perspective from the self. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 175-188). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
85. Yuki, M. (2003). Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 166-183.
86. Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship- and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 48-62.
87. Yuki, M., Schug, J., Horikawa, H., Takemura, K., Sato, K., Yokota, K. et al. (2007). Development of a scale to measure perceptions of relational mobility in society (CERSS Working Paper 75). Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaido University, Center for Experimental Research in Social Sciences.