Group-based trust in strangers: The role of stereotypes and expectations: Research Report

Psychological Science

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 419-422

  Foddy, Margaret ^b   Platow, Michael J ^c   Yamagishi, Toshio ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TRUST;

ALTRUISM; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; STEREOTYPING; TRUST;

EID: 64249124180     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02312.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boldizar, J.P. Messick, D.M. (1988). Intergroup fairness biases: Is ours the fairer sex? Social Justice Research, 2, 95 111.
2. Brewer, M.B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M.G. Brewer B. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry in the social sciences (pp. 214 231). San Francisco : Jossey Bass.
3. Brewer, M.B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: In-group love or out-group hate. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429 444.
4. Brewer, M.B. Silver, M. (1978). In-group bias as a function of task characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 393 400.
5. Cook, K.S. (Ed.) 2001). Trust in society. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
6. Gambetta, D. (Ed.) 1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford, England : Basil Blackwell.
7. Hardin, R. (2001). Conceptions and explanations of trust. In K.S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 3 39). New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
8. Kiyonari, T. (2002). Expectations of the generalized exchange system and ingroup favoritism: An experimental study of bounded reciprocity. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 73, 1 9.
9. Kramer, R.M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569 598.
10. Kramer, R.M. Tyler, T.R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
11. Maddux, W.W. Brewer, M.B. (2005). Gender differences in the relational and collective bases for trust. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 159 171.
12. McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24 59.
13. McKenna, K.Y.A. Bargh, J.A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57 75.
14. Platow, M.J., McClintock, C.G. Liebrand, W.B.G. (1990). Predicting intergroup fairness and ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 221 239.
15. Smith, M.A. Kollock, P. (Eds.) 1999). Communities in cyberspace. London : Routledge.
16. Stangor, C. Lange, J.E. (1994). Mental representations of social groups: Advances in understanding stereotypes and stereotyping. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 357 416). San Francisco : Academic Press.
17. Tyler, T.R. Huo, Y.J. (2002). Trust in the law: Building public cooperation with the police and courts. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
18. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N. Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: In-group boasting and in-group favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161 197.
19. Yamagishi, T. Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116 132.