Population-based evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, Retinal ganglion cell layer, And inner plexiform layer as a diagnostic tool for glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 55, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 8428-8438

  Springelkamp, Henriët ^a   Lee, Kyungmoo ^b   Wolfs, Roger C W ^a   Buitendijk, Gabriëlle H S ^a   Ramdas, Wishal D ^a   Hofman, Albert ^a,c   Vingerling, Johannes R ^a   Klaver, Caroline C W ^a   Abràmoff, Michael D ^b,d,e   Jansonius, Nomdo M ^a,f  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b University of Iowa   (United States)

^c Netherlands Genomics Initiative   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^e DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Iowa Reference Algorithms; OCT; Population based evaluation; Retinal thickness measurement

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PERIMETRY; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINA INNER PLEXIFORM LAYER; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; NERVE FIBER; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STANDARD; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; REFERENCE STANDARDS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELD TESTS;

EID: 84920103906     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15506     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Airaksinen PJ, Alanko HI. Effect of retinal nerve fibre loss on the optic nerve head configuration in early glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1983;220:193-196.
2. Nickells RW. Ganglion cell death in glaucoma: From mice to men. Vet Ophthalmol. 2007;1(suppl 10):88-94.
3. Schuman JS, Hee MR, Puliafito CA, et al. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113:586-596.
4. Rohrschneider K, Burk RO, Kruse FE, Volcke, HE. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology. 1994;101: 1044-1049.
5. Dreher AW. Retinal laser ellipsometry: a new method for measuring the retinal nerve fibre layer thickness distribution? Clin Vis Sci. 1992;7:481-488.
6. Weinreb RN, Dreher AW, Coleman A, Quigley H, Shaw B, Reiter K. Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:557-560.
7. Choplin NT, Lundy DC. The sensitivity and specificity of scanning laser polarimetry in the detection of glaucoma in a clinical setting. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:899-904.
8. Oddone F, Centofanti M, Iester M, et al. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:1106-1111.
9. Healey PR, Lee AJ, Aung T, Wong TY, Mitchell P. Diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph for glaucoma a population-based assessment. Ophthalmology. 2010;117: 1667-1673.
10. Ramdas WD, Wolfs RC, Hofman A, de Jong PT, Vingerling JR, Jansonius NM. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT3) in population-based epidemiology: normative values and criteria for glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011;18:198-210.
11. Saito H, Tsutsumi T, Araie M, Tomidokoro A, Iwase A. Sensitivity and specificity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II Version 3.0 in a population-based study: The Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1854-1861.
12. Toth M, Kothy P, Vargha P, Hollo G. Accuracy of combined GDx-VCC and matrix FDT in a glaucoma screening trial. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:462-470.
13. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178-1181.
14. Bengtsson B, Andersson S, Heijl A. Performance of timedomain and spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography for glaucoma screening. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:310-315.
15. Li G, Fansi AK, Boivin JF, Joseph L, Harasymowycz P. Screening for glaucoma in high-risk populations using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:453-461.
16. Garvin MK, Abramoff MD, Lee K, Niemeijer M, Sonka M, Kwon YH. 2-D pattern of nerve fiber bundles in glaucoma emerging from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:483-489.
17. Hood DC, Raza AS, de Moraes CG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Glaucomatous damage of the macula. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;32:1-21.
18. Jansonius NM, Nevalainen J, Selig B, et al. A mathematical description of nerve fiber bundle trajectories and their variability in the human retina. Vision Res. 2009;49:2157-2163.
19. Jansonius NM, Schiefer J, Nevalainen J, Paetzold J, Schiefer U. A mathematical model for describing the retinal nerve fiber bundle trajectories in the human eye: average course, variability, and influence of refraction, optic disc size and optic disc position. Exp Eye Res. 2012;105:70-78.
20. Lee K, Kwon YH, Garvin MK, Niemeijer M, Sonka M, Abramoff MD. Distribution of damage to the entire retinal ganglion cell pathway: Quantified using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography analysis in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:1118-1126.
21. Hofman A, Darwish Murad S, van Duijn CM, et al. The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28:889-926.
22. Wolfs RC, Borger PH, Ramrattan RS, et al. Changing views on open-angle glaucoma: definitions and prevalences-The Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3309-3321.
23. Czudowska MA, Ramdas WD, Wolfs RS, et al. Incidence of glaucomatous visual field loss: a ten-year follow-up from the Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1705-1712.
24. Garvin, MK et al. Intraretinal layer segmentation of macular optical coherence tomography images using optimal 3-D graph search. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008;27:1495-1505.
25. Garvin MK, Abramoff MD, Kardon R, Russell SR, Wu X, Sonka M. Automated 3-D intraretinal layer segmentation of macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28:1436-1447.
26. Lee K, Neimeijer M, Garvin MK, Kwon YH, Sonka M, Abramoff MD. Segmentation of the optic disc in 3-D OCT scans of the optic nerve head. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:159-168.
27. Springelkamp H, Lee K, Ramdas WD, et al. Optimizing the information yield of 3-D OCT in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:8162-8171.
28. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845.
29. Ramdas WD, Rizopoulos D, Wolfs RC, et al. Defining glaucomatous optic neuropathy from a continuous measure of optic nerve damage - the optimal cut-off point for risk-factor analysis in population-based epidemiology. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011;18:211-216.
30. Inuzuka H, Kawase K, Sawada A, Aoyama Y, Yamamoto T. Macular ganglion cell complex thickness in glaucoma with superior or inferior visual hemifield defects. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:60-64.
31. Kimura Y, Hangai M, Matsumoto A, et al. Macular structure parameters as an automated indicator of paracentral scotoma in early glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:907-917.
32. Na JH, Lee K, Lee JR, Baek S, Yoo SJ, Kook MS. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in preperimetric glaucoma patients with localized retinal nerve fibre defects by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2013;41:870-880.
33. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Nowroozizadeh S, Nassiri N, et al. Macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography for detection of early glaucoma and comparison to retinal nerve fiber layer measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:1297-1307.
34. Rao HL, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, Alencar LM, Medeiros FA. Comparison of different spectral domain optical coherence tomography scanning areas for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1692-1699.
35. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2305-2314.
36. Tan O, Li G, Lu AT, et al. Mapping of macular substructures with optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:949-956.
37. Wang M, Lu AT, Varma R, et al. Combining information from 3 anatomic regions in the diagnosis of glaucoma with timedomain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2014;23: 129-135.
38. Hood DC, Raza AS, de Moraes CG, et al. Initial arcuate defects within the central 10 degrees in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:940-946.
39. Schiefer U, Papagiorgiou E, Sample PA, et al. Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:5685-5689.
40. Wang L, Cioffi GA, Cull G, Dong J, Fortune B. Immunohistologic evidence for retinal glial cell changes in human glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1088-1094.
41. Grieshaber MC, Moramarco F, Schoetzau A, Flammer J, Orguel S. Detection of retinal glial cell activation in glaucoma by time domain optical coherence tomography. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2012;229:314-318.
42. Garas A, Vargha P, Hollo G. Diagnostic accuracy of nerve fibre layer, macular thickness and optic disc measurements made with the RTVue-100 optical coherence tomograph to detect glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2011;25:57-65.
43. Huang JY, Pekmezci M, Mesiwala N, Kao A, Lin S. Diagnostic power of optic disc morphology, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and macular inner retinal layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis with fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2011;20:87-94.
44. Jeoung JW, Choi YJ, Park KH, Kim DM. Macular ganglion cell imaging study: glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of spectraldomain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:4422-4429.
45. Seo JH, Kim TW, Weinreb RN, Park KH, Kim SH, Kim DM. Detection of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects with posterior pole asymmetry analysis of spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53: 4347-4353.
46. Baskaran M, Ong EL, Li JL, et al. Classification algorithms enhance the discrimination of glaucoma from normal eyes using high-definition optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:2314-2320.
47. Marcus MW, de Vries MM, Junoy Montolio FG, Jansonius NM. Myopia as a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1989-1994.
48. Bowd C, Hao J, Tavares IM, et al. Bayesian machine learning classifiers for combining structural and functional measurements to classify healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:945-953.
49. Leung CK, Lam S, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: Analysis of the retinal nerve fiber layer map for glaucoma detection. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1684-1691.
50. Moreno-Montanes J, Olmo N, Alvarez A, Garcia N, Zarranz-Ventura J. Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography compared with Stratus optical coherence tomography in glaucoma diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:335-343.
51. Mwanza JC, Oakley JD, Budenz DL, Anderson DR, Cirrus Optical Coherence Tomography Normative Database Study Group. Ability of cirrus HD-OCT optic nerve head parameters to discriminate normal from glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:241-248.
52. Park HY, Park CK. Structure-function relationship and diagnostic value of RNFL Area Index compared with circumpapillary RNFL thickness by spectral-domain OCT. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:88-97.
53. Park HY, Park CK. Diagnostic capability of lamina cribrosa thickness by enhanced depth imaging and factors affecting thickness in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:745-752.
54. Sihota R, Sony P, Gupta V, Dada T, Singh R. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2006-2010.