Combining information from 3 anatomic regions in the diagnosis of glaucoma with time-domain optical coherence tomography

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 129-135

  Wang, Mingwu ^a   Lu, Ake Tzu Hui ^b   Varma, Rohit ^b   Schuman, Joel S ^c   Greenfield, David S ^d   Huang, David ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Image processing; Imaging; Optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMICAL CONCEPTS; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BODY REGIONS; CIRCUMPAPILLARY RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER; CLASSIFIER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CUP DISC VERTICAL RATIO; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HORIZONTAL INTEGRATED RIM WIDTH; HUMAN; LINEAR DISCRIMINATION FUNCTION CLASSIFIER; MACULAR RETINAL THICKNESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPTIC DISK; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY DEVICE; OR LOGIC CLASSIFIER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELEVANCE VECTOR MACHINE; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; RETINAL THICKNESS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; TIME DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; VERTICAL INTEGRATED RIM AREA; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINA; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 84896388346     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318264b941     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982; 100: 135-146. (Pubitemid 12203071)
2. Mikelberg FS, Yidegiligne HM, Schulzer M. Optic nerve axon count and axon diameter in patients with ocular hypertension and normal visual fields. Ophthalmology. 1995; 102: 342-348.
3. Altangerel U, Bayer A, Henderer JD, et al. Knowledge of chronology of optic disc stereophotographs influences the determination of glaucomatous change. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112: 40-43. (Pubitemid 40075316)
4. Vessani RM, Moritz R, Batis L, et al. Comparison of quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment by general ophthalmologists to differentiate normal from glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma. 2009;18: 253-261.
5. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254: 1178-1181. (Pubitemid 21917444)
6. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Alencar LM, et al. Detection of glaucoma progression with stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50: 5741-5748.
7. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using Stratus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45: 1716-1724. (Pubitemid 38868963)
8. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112: 3-9. (Pubitemid 40075311)
9. Naithani P, Sihota R, Sony P, et al. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retinal tomography parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48: 3138-3145. (Pubitemid 351261158)
10. Schulze A, Lamparter J, Pfeiffer N, et al. Diagnostic ability of retinal ganglion cell complex, retinal nerve fiber layer, and optic nerve head measurements by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249: 1039-1045.
11. Bowd C, Hao J, Tavares IM, et al. Bayesian machine learning classifiers for combining structural and functional measurements to classify healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49: 945-953.
12. Mwanza JC, Oakley JD, Budenz DL, et al. Ability of cirrus HD-OCT optic nerve head parameters to discriminate normal from glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2011;118: 241-248.
13. Kaushik S, Singh Pandav S, Ichhpujani P, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer measurement and diagnostic capability of spectraldomain versus time-domain optical coherence tomography. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21: 566-572.
14. Bizios D, Heijl A, Hougaard JL, et al. Machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis based on classification of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness parameters measured by Stratus OCT. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88: 44-52.
15. Huang JY, Pekmezci M, Mesiwala N, et al. Diagnostic power of optic disc morphology, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and macular inner retinal layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2011;20: 87-94.
16. Lu AT, Wang M, Varma R, et al. Combining nerve fiber layer parameters to optimize glaucoma diagnosis with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2008;115: 1352-1357.
17. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139: 44-55. (Pubitemid 40094839)
18. Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN. A Training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory; ACM Press, Pittsburgh, PA: 144-152.
19. Vapnik V. Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Wiley; 1998.
20. Tipping M. Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res. 2001;1: 211-244. (Pubitemid 33687203)
21. Tipping M. The relevance vector machine. In: Solla SA, Leen TK, Müller K-R, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: Vol 12; 2000: 652-658.
22. Tan O, Li G, Lu AT, et al. Mapping of macular substructures with optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology. 2008;115: 949-956. (Pubitemid 351749686)
23. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73: 13-22.
24. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48: 817-830.
25. Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for clustercorrelated data. Biometrics. 2000;56: 645-646. (Pubitemid 30422662)
26. Obuchowski NA. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics. 1997;53: 567-578. (Pubitemid 27262219)
27. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44: 837-845.
28. Obuchowski NA. On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data. Stat Med. 1998;17: 1495-1507. (Pubitemid 28330346)
29. Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Zhang Z, et al. Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46: 1322-1329. (Pubitemid 41685872)
30. Zangwill LM, Chan K, Bowd C, et al. Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45: 3144-3151. (Pubitemid 39121848)
31. Townsend KA, Wollstein G, Danks D, et al. Heidelberg retina tomograph 3 machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92: 814-818. (Pubitemid 351839575)
32. Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, et al. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41: 1730-1742. (Pubitemid 30354344)
33. Coops A, Henson DB, Kwartz AJ, et al. Automated analysis of Heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47: 5348-5355. (Pubitemid 46723784)
34. Savini G, Carbonelli M, Barboni P. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011;22: 115-123.
35. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116: 1257-1263, 1263e1-e2.
36. Gabriele ML, Ishikawa H, Wollstein G, et al. Optical coherence tomography scan circle location and mean retinal nerve fiber layer measurement variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49: 2315-2321.
37. Mwanza JC, Chang RT, Budenz DL, et al. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic nerve head parameters measured with cirrus HD-OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51: 5724-5730.
38. Vizzeri G, Weinreb RN, Gonzalez-Garcia AO, et al. Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93: 775-781.
39. Gonzalez-Garcia AO, Vizzeri G, Bowd C, et al. Reproducibility of RTVue retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc measurements and agreement with Stratus optical coherence tomography measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147: 1067-1074.
40. Sung KR, Kim DY, Park SB, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116: 1264-1270.
41. Cho JW, Sung KR, Hong JT, et al. Detection of glaucoma by spectral domain-scanning laser ophthalmoscopy/optical coherence tomography (SD-SLO/OCT) and time domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2011;20: 15-20.
42. Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 1271-1277.
43. Budenz DL, Fredette MJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115: 661-666.
44. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a comparison between the fast and the regular retinal nerve fiber layer scans. Ophthalmology. 2011;118: 763-767.
45. Bengtsson B, Andersson S, Heijl A. Performance of timedomain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma screening. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90: 301-305.
46. Lee EJ, Kim TW, Weinreb RN, et al. Trend-based analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in eyes with localized nerve fiber layer defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52: 1138-1144.
47. Kim NR, Kim JH, Kim CY, et al. Comparison of the optic nerve imaging by time-domain optical coherence tomography and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in distinguishing normal eyes from those with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2011. [Epub ahead of print].
48. Moreno-Montanes J, Olmo N, Alvarez A, et al. Cirrus highdefinition optical coherence tomography compared with Stratus optical coherence tomography in glaucoma diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51: 335-343.
49. Sehi M, Grewal DS, Sheets CW, et al. Diagnostic ability of Fourier-domain vs time-domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma detection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148: 597-605.
50. Jeoung JW, Park KH. Comparison of cirrus OCT and Stratus OCT on the ability to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in preperimetric glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51: 938-945.
51. Hastie T, Buja A, Tibshirani R. Penalized discriminant analysis. Ann Stat. 1995;23: 73-102.
52. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116: 2305-2314.