A bilevel programming model for corporate social responsibility collaboration in sustainable supply chain management

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 73, Issue , 2015, Pages 84-95

  Hsueh, Che Fu ^a  

^a CHING YUN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bilevel programming; Corporate social responsibility; Sustainable supply chain management; Variational inequality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; LINEAR PROGRAMING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

EID: 84919936003     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brandenburg M., Govindan K., Sarkis J., Seuring S. Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: developments and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2014, 233(2):299-312.
2. Chiou S.-W. Bilevel programming for the continuous transport network design problem. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2005, 39(4):361-383.
3. Cruz J.M. Dynamics of supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 184(3):1005-1031.
4. Cruz J.M. The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: multicriteria decision-making approach. Decis. Support Syst. 2009, 48(1):224-236.
5. Cruz J.M. Modeling the relationship of globalized supply chains and corporate social responsibility. J. Cleaner Prod. 2013, 56:73-85.
6. Cruz J.M., Liu Z. Modeling and analysis of the multiperiod effects of social relationship on supply chain networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011, 214(1):39-52.
7. Cruz J.M., Matsypura D. Supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2009, 47(3):621-648.
8. Elkington J. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business 1997, Capstone, Oxford, UK.
9. Goering G.E. Corporate social responsibility and marketing channel coordination. Res. Econ. 2012, 66(2):142-148.
10. Guide V.D.R., Van Wassenhove L.N. The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper. Res. 2009, 57(1):10-18.
11. Hsueh C.-F. Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, 151:214-222.
12. Hsueh C.-F., Chang M.-S. Equilibrium analysis and corporate social responsibility for supply chain integration. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 190(1):116-129.
13. Josefsson M., Patriksson M. Sensitivity analysis of separable traffic equilibrium equilibria with application to bilevel optimization in network design. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2007, 41(1):4-31.
14. Liu Z.G., Anderson T.D., Cruz J.M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 218(3):602-613.
15. Nagurney A. Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
16. Nagurney A., Toyasaki F. Supply chain supernetworks and environmental criteria. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2003, 8(3):185-213.
17. Ni D., Li K.W. A game-theoretic analysis of social responsibility conduct in two-echelon supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 138(2):303-313.
18. Ni D., Li K.W., Tang X. Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: insights from wholesale price contracts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 207(3):1269-1279.
19. Noor M.A., Noor K.I., Bnouhachem A. On a unified implicit method for variational inequalities. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2013, 249:69-73.
20. Panda S. Coordination of a socially responsible supply chain using revenue sharing contract. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2014, 67:92-104.
21. Seuring S. A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support Syst. 2013, 54(4):1513-1520.
22. Seuring S., Müller M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Cleaner Prod. 2008, 16(15):1699-1710.
23. Swami S., Shah J. Channel coordination in green supply chain management. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2012, 64(3):336-351.
24. Tang C.S., Zhou S. Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 223(3):585-594.
25. Tobin R.L., Friesz T.L. Sensitivity analysis for equilibrium network flow. Transp. Sci. 1988, 22(4):242-250.
26. Xie G. Modeling decision processes of a green supply chain with regulation on energy saving level. Comput. Oper. Res. 2014.