Supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 621-648

  Cruz, J M ^a   Matsypura, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Environment; Multicriteria optimization; Networks; Risk management; Supply chain

Indexed keywords

NETWORK MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; SUPPLY CHAINS; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES;

COMPUTATIONAL SCHEMES; CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES; CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONS; EQUILIBRIUM FLOWS; EQUILIBRIUM STATES; MODELING AND ANALYSIS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISIONS; MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; NET RETURNS; NETWORKS; NODAL PRICES; NUMERICAL EXAMPLES; OPTIMALITY CONDITIONS; PRICE PATTERNS; PRODUCT FLOWS; QUALITATIVE PROPERTIES; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES; SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS; TRANSACTION COSTS; VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 56749185762     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540701513901     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Batterman, S.A. and Amann, M., Targeted acid rain strategies including uncertainty. J. Environ. Mgmt, 1991, 32, 57-72.
2. Bazaraa, M.S., Sherali, H.D. and Shetty, C.M., Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms, 1993 (Wiley: New York).
3. Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S. and Jones, T.M., Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad. Mgmt J., 1999, 42, 488-506.
4. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M., Beek, P., Hordijk, L. and Van Wassenhove, L.N., Interactions between operational research and environmental management. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1995, 85, 229-243.
5. Buck de, A.J., Hendrix, E.M.T. and Schoorlemmer, H.B., Analysing production and environmental risks in arable farming systems: a mathematical approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1999, 119, 416-426.
6. Clarkson, M., Good business and the bottom line. Can. Bust. Mag., 1991, 28.
7. Clift, R. and Wright, L., Relationships between environmental impacts and added value along the supply chain. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2000, 65, 281-295.
8. Collins, J.C. and Porras, J.I., Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, 1995 (Random House, Century: London).
9. Delmas, M. and Terlaak, A., A framework for analyzing environmental voluntary| agreements. Calif Mgmt Rev., 2002, 43, 44-63.
10. Dowling, G., Creating Corporate Reputations: Identity, Images, and Performance, 2001 (Oxford University Press: New York).
11. Dyer, J., Effective interfirm collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strateg. Mgmt J., 1997, 18, 535-556.
12. Dyer, J. and Chu, W., The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: empirical evidence from the United States, Japan and Korea. Org. Sci., 2003, 14, 57-68.
13. Emmelhainz, M. and Adams, R., The apparel industry response to "sweatshop" concerns: a review and analysis of codes of conduct. J. Suppl. Chain Mgmt, 1999, 35, 51-57.
14. Fabian, T., Supply chain management in an era of social and environment accountability. Sustain. Dev. Int., 2000, 2, 27-30.
15. Feldman, S., Soyka, P. and Ameer, P., Does improving a firm's environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price? J. Invest., 1997, 6, 87-97.
16. Florida, R., Lean and green: the move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. Calif. Mgmt Rev., 1996, 39, 80-105.
17. Frombrun, C.J., Corporate reputations as economic asset. In The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, edited by E. Freeman and J.S. Harrison, pp. 289-312, 2001 (Blackwell: Oxford).
18. Gabay, D. and Moulin, H., On the uniqueness and stability of Nash equilibria in noncooperative games. In Applied Stochastic Control in Econometrics and Management Science, edited by A. Bensoussan, P. Kleindorfer and C.S. Tapiero, pp. 271-294, 1980 (North-Holland: Amsterdam).
19. Geffen, C. and Rothenberg, S., Suppliers and environmental innovation: the automotive paint process. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Mgmt, 2000, 20, 166-186.
20. Hall, J., Environmental supply chain dynamics. J. Clean. Prod., 2000, 8, 455-471.
21. Handfield, R. and Bechtel, C., The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply Chain responsiveness, Ind. Mkt Mgmt, 2002, 31, 367-382.
22. Hart, S., Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world. Harv. Bus. Rev., 1997, 75, 66-77.
23. Hill, K.E., Supply-chain dynamics, environmental issues, and manufacturing firms. Environ. Plann. A, 1997, 29, 1257-1274.
24. Hitchens, D.M.W.N., Birnie, E. and Thompson, W., Environmental Regulation and Competitive Advantage: A Study of Packaging Waste in the European Supply Chain, 2000 (Edward Elgar: Cheltenham).
25. Johnson, M.E., Learning from toys: lessons in managing supply chain risk from toy industry.| Calif. Mgmt Rev., 2001, 43, 106-130.
26. Juttner, U., Peck, H. and Christopher, M., Supply chain risk management: outlining and agenda for future research. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl., 2003, 6, 197-210.
27. Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, 1993 (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).
28. King, A. and Lenox, M., Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Prod. Oper. Mgmt, 2001, 10, 244-256.
29. Kitazawa, S. and Sarkis, J., The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous source reduction programs. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Mgmt, 2000, 20, 225-248.
30. Klassen, R., Just-in-time manufacturing and pollution prevention generate mutual benefits in the furniture industry. Interfaces, 2000, 30, 95-106.
31. Kolk, A. and Tudder, R.V., The effectiviness of self-regulation: corporate codes of conduct and child labour. Eur. Mgmt J., 2002, 20, 260-271.
32. Korpelevich, G.M., The extragradient method for finding saddle points and other problems. Matekon, 1977, 13, 35-49.
33. Kotter, J. and Heskett, J., Corporate Culture and Performance, 1992 (Free Press: New York).
34. Lamming, R. and Hampson, J., The environment as a supply chain management issue. Br. J. Mgmt, 1996, 7, S45-S62.
35. Marcus, A., Geffen, D. and Sexton, K., Reinventing Environmental Regulation: Lessons from Project XL, RFF (Resources for the Future), 2002 (Resources for the Future: Washington, DC).
36. Mazurkiewicz, P., Corporate self-regulations and multi-stakeholder dialogue. In Handbook of Voluntary Environmental Agreements, edited by E. Croci, 2004 (Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht).
37. Nagurney, A., Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach, 2nd ed., 1999 (Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht).
38. Nagurney, A. and Dong, J., Supernetworks: Decision-making for the Information Age, 2002 (Edward Elgar: Cheltenham).
39. Nagurney, A. and Toyasaki, F., Supply chain supernetworks and environmental criteria. Transport. Res. D, 2003, 8, 185-213.
40. Nash, J.F., Equilibrium points in n-person games, Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci., 1950, 36, 48-49.
41. Nash, J.F., Noncooperative games. Ann. Math., 1951, 54, 286-298.
42. Norrman, A. and Jansson, U., Ericsson's proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. Int. J. phys. Distrib. Logist. Mgmt, 2004, 34, 434-456.
43. Porter, M. and Van der Linde, C., Green and competitive. Harv. Bust. Rev., 1995, September-October, 149 163.
44. Qio, Z., Prato, T. and McCamley, F., Evaluating environmental risks using safety-first constraints. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 2001, 83, 402-413.
45. Quinn, B., E-System manages inventory to reduce risk. Pollut. Engng, 1999, 31, 27-28.
46. Roman, R., Hayibor, S. and Agle, B.B., The relationship between social and financial performance. Busi. Soc., 1999, 38, 109-125.
47. Rothenberg, S., Pil, F. and Maxwell, J., Lean, green and the quest for superior environmental performance. Prod. Oper. Mgmt, 2001, 10, 228-243.
48. Rothenberg, S., Knowledge content and worker participation in environmental management at NUMMI. J. Mgmt Stud., 2003, 40, 1783-1802.
49. Simpson, D., Greening beyond the firm: improving environmental performance through the supply relationship. Available online at: www.nzsses.org.nz/Conference/Session5/54%20Simpson.pdf (2004).
50. Social Investment Forum, Report on socially responsible investing trends in the United States. Ten-Year Review. Available online at: http://www. community-wealth.org/-pdfs/articles-publications/cdfis/report-social-investment. pdf (2005).
51. Svendsen, A., Boutilier, R.G., Abbott, R.M. and Wheeler, D., Measuring the business value of stakeholder relationships (Part 1). CAmagazine, 2001, August, 29-63.
52. UNCTAD, World Investment Report, Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Development, 1999 (UNCTAD: Geneva).
53. UNSRID, Regulating Business via Multi-stakeholder Initiatives: A Preliminary Assessment in Voluntary Approaches to Corporate Responsibility: Readings and Resource Guide, 2002 (NGLS: Geneva).
54. Waddock, S.A. and Graves, S., The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strateg. Mgmt. J., 1997, 19, 303-317.
55. Williamson, O.E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, 1975 (Free Press: New York).
56. Williamson, O.E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, 1985 (Free Press: New York).
57. World Bank, Public Sector Roles in Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility: Baseline Study, 2002 (World Bank: Washington, DC).